 The West was not
amused by burning embassies in Beirut and elsewhere. "Them there Muslims
do not understand our sense of humour; they do not understand our idea
of liberty". - droned the newspapers. Others condemned the tactless
escapade of the Danes but thought the reaction was quite out of proportion.
However the flare up was anything but incidental. [The picture on the left:
a burned embassy in Beirut].
-
- A resourceful American journalist Christopher
Bollyn investigated the Danish Satanic Pictures and their procurer, one
Flemming Rose, and found out that Rose was not an innocent lover of freedom
of speech, neither was he some quaint Scandinavian collector of smut pictures
with religious connotations who kept his presentations of the Muslim prophet
next to that of a Nun-with-the-Great Dane. Rose was a devotee of the Zionist
Neo-Con cult, and made a pilgrimage to the pope of this persuasion -- Daniel
Pipes, wrote Bollyn.
-
- So far, so good. But the execrable Rose
peddled his stuff four months ago, and that's a long time, as the media
counts. The Muslims did not even notice his effort, as possibly not many
of them read the Jylland Pest. Like a naughty child who multiplies his
effort when his well-prepared jibe fails to annoy, eleven newspapers in
seven countries republished the pictures simultaneously. It was a show
of hands: behind various newspapers in various countries, beyond companies
and corporations, we were allowed to see the Enemy, the Not-So-Hidden Hand,
the player on the international scene across all borders. It was a convincing
show, and now we know: one will, one design rules the world media empire.
- Who organised it?
-
- Who is the Enemy? Who can control media
on such a scale? Sandhya Jain, an important Indian journalist of nationalist
persuasion wrote: "The cartoons were an intentional act of religious
disrespect by political Christianity, comprising the socio-economic-political
elites of Europe and America." Christendom was called the culprit
by many other observers. But to be sure, the same people who offended Muslims
do not think twice before offending believing Christians it is enough
to recall the Cross changing into a Swastika on the posters of Amen, the
movie, or the crucifix in a glass of piss (an illustration to the Talmud?)
in a Brooklyn [a heavily Jewish suburb of New York] Museum. There is no
religious enmity between the Muslims and the Christians. Ahmad Amr was
right:
-
 "The defamatory
portrayals of Islam and Mohammed by European 'free speech advocates' puts
Muslims at a distinct disadvantage. They can't very well retaliate by defaming
Jesus Christ because they revere him as much as they revere Mohammed and
consider him a prophet of God. Insulting Jesus or the Virgin Mary is considered
as blasphemous as insulting Mohammed. No true Muslim would ever consider
lampooning the Mother of Christ because they also believe in the Immaculate
Conception. In Islamic tradition, Mary will be the first woman to enter
heaven. And like the Koran, Muslims consider both the Bible and the Torah
holy texts." [The picture on the left: Islamic depiction of the Holy
Virgin with the Child from Istanbul]
- Thus we have to exonerate Christians
and look elsewhere.
-
- The Western media is the exclusive domain
of Judeophiles: you may have noticed it by their extensive and morbid coverage
of Sharon's demise, of Jewish fatalities while disregarding Palestinian
deaths, of the Holocaust issue, of real or imagined attacks on Jews. (Read
more about it) The Jews have a vested interest in promoting anti-Muslim
sentiment, for it fits into their plans of subduing Palestinians and dealing
with Iran. (The Iranians immediately recognised it, and turned to anti-Jewish
holocaust jokes. Equally tasteless, it was a reasonable tit-for-tat.) Indeed,
just now the non-Zionist World Jewish Congress officially kicked off his
campaign against Iran , Haaretz informed its readers. AIPAC plans a Washington
conference titled "Now is the time to stop Iran". Kurt Nimmo
correctly called the pictures "a deliberate provocation designed to
outrage and incite Muslims and thus engender support in Europe and America
for the manufactured "clash of civilizations" engineered by the
Straussian neocons". The Clash of Civilisations, as well as the Satanic
Pictures affair fit well into the Middle Eastern strategy of organised
Jewry.
-
- A clear sign of Jewish involvement in
the Satanic Pictures affair was given by many headlines: though all the
Muslim nations were upset, the Jewish-controlled newspapers stressed "Palestinian
attacks on Europeans", as in 2001 they stressed "Palestinians
rejoice at the collapse of the Towers", though many people all over
the world were happy at the strike that smote this symbol of arrogance
and money power. The Israeli daily Haaretz wrote: the Muslim press shows
Sharon and rabbis in a disrespectful light, let them try their own medicine.
This amounts to an admission that the Judeophiles were behind the publication.
-
- But our colleagues did not notice a grand
plan behind this action. Much as the Pictures fit into the plan of fighting
Muslims, they fit even better into the great offensive on freedom carried
out now world-wide. From the US to Russia, from England to Italy, our masters
promulgate the web of laws to strengthen their control and to eliminate
the vestiges of freedom. In 1968, we proclaimed "Defence de Defence",
"It is forbidden to forbid"; but now we are entangled by many
new prohibitions. We mayn't choose to smoke or not, to fasten sit-belt
or ride carefree. These small annoying prohibitions are a sign of our submission
to Big Brother. And do not tell me it is done for my benefit. I can list
a hundred things more urgent for my well-being. Let them ban indebtedness
first. If I am free to take a dangerous loan, I should be free to choose
or miss the sitting belt.
-
- Our freedoms are severely curtailed.
They exist on paper, but we may not use them. We may not say what we wish
less our livelihood will be jeopardised. So many teachers and professors
found themselves out of job for saying a word out of turn: in "democratic"
Germany, a Communist could not work as a teacher. We may not elect whom
we want: when the Austrians chose Heiger, they were beaten until they agreed
to give up. Now the Palestinians chose Hamas, and they are told they will
not get their own tax money until they repent. (In a similar vein, the
Bible provides for debt cancellation every seven years, but the Talmud
allows the creditor to tie up and beat the debtor until he insists to pay
the voided debt). Every time, be it guns for the folks in remote Montana,
a cigarette in a Dublin pub, a sitting belt for you, or a free vote for
all of us, the great opinion-making machine of mass media enforced the
prohibition. Sometimes, as in the case of the Satanic Pictures, it does
not balk at deliberate provocation to make its point clear: we are not
allowed to say what we want.
-
- The media machine's devotion to the Jewish
cause allows us to guess that it is not run by oil sheiks. But let us presume
(and deal with this presumption later) that the Jews and their Judaeophile
supporters built up their media empire for another purpose. If you feel
(as so many good people do) an urgent need to exonerate the Jews, you may
believe that the Jews organised their media holding just in order to fight
antisemitism, while the evil Mammonites utilised this machine for their
own need of establishing the world dictatorship. You may consider the Jews
as the Dwarves who wrought the Ring of Power, and it was taken by the Mammonites.
They promoted the narrative of antisemitism and holocaust in order to keep
the Jews fighting on their side against the people. They indoctrinate the
Jews in belief that the normal humans want to devour them and only the
ruling Mammonites prevent it. Indeed, as I wrote in The Third Dove, there
is no antisemitism, as there are no witches, and, alas, no Santa Claus.
-
- The media machine is good at enlisting
allies, by the same means the ordinary Jews are enlisted, i.e. by propagating
fear. They invented "homophobia", so a homosexual will fear normal
folks and apply for the protection of Big Brother. They invented "male
chauvinism" and "battered wives", so women will be afraid
of their menfolk and seek the rulers' shelter. They invented "racism",
so every ethnic minority would hide under the guardianship of Big Brother.
They created the myth of "abused children", so the wives will
distrust their husbands. These are myths. There is no "homophobia"
we really do not give a damn what you do at your bedrooms, as long
as you do not frighten horses. Men are naturally protective of children
and chivalrous towards women. White folks like blacks being jolly and playing
their banjo, as long as it is not all night long. I tell you: we all are
minorities, and together, we are the people. We can do very well together
without guardianship of Big Brother.
-
- There is nothing to fear abroad, either.
In the days of my youth, Americans were frightened by the Domino theory.
After the Communist takeover of Vietnam and Cambodia, they would proceed
to California, run the writ. It came to naught. The fear of Communism destroyed
trillions of dollars of national product across the globe and eventually
ruined the great social experiment. The victorious mice judge the slain
lion: at the initiative of Poland and the Baltic states, The Council of
Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) condemned "horrors and crimes
of Communism." Now the machine plays up the fear of Islam. Islam was
provoked and its response was presented as the proof of its depravity.
-
- The great fear-producing machine won't
stop at the Middle East, or at the narrow Jewish causes, and for a good
reason. A tank can be used as a nut-cracker, but it has more functions
than that. The unified and perfected Jewish media machine can be utilised
for much more important tasks than fighting off holocaust jokes. Its main
goal is to bring us to the Brave New World, to the new spiritless totalitarianism,
while smaller tasks are incidental to the great one.
-
- Last month there were a few important
but apparently unconnected developments. The British PM, Tony Blair, made
a step towards total control over his population. England introduced a
new computer system that collects and stores data of car traffic. Connected
to ubiquitous video cameras, it allows the Big Brother to trace your movements
from your work to your girlfriend and to your home. It passed without a
hitch. Then it tried to pass the Internet Terror Bill, that would have
given police the power to shut down websites which "promote terrorism".
The House of Lords blocked it. Last month the Lords threw out plans for
a new offence of "glorifying" acts of terrorism. The Government
was also defeated when peers voted to redraft ministers' version of the
offence of "intentionally" or "recklessly" disseminating
a "terrorist publication". And the best of all, the indomitable
Lords blocked the bill against "religious hatred" which was supposed
to close the only loophole for criticising Jews.
-
- After that, the Adversary splashed the
Satanic Pictures. The predictable and predicted reaction of the offended
Muslims will force the parliaments to accept the new set of 'anti-hate'
laws. Surely these laws will not protect the feelings of Muslims and Christians,
who, after all, encompass only a few billion humans. The Jews, the preferred
mascot of the Mammonites, will feel better protected (and more vulnerable),
but more important, freedom of speech will receive another blow.
-
- This great freedom was the advantage
of the West over the Soviet East, for one of the less savoury features
of the Soviet regime was its infamous Article 58 of the Criminal Code "Anti-Soviet
propaganda". In the early Stalin's days, one has to express sympathy
with the enemies of the Republic to be sentenced; in his heyday, a joke
would suffice; in Brezhnev's era it was used to ensure conformity in the
society. Even in the very end of the Soviet days, the Damocles' sword of
Article 58 influenced all discussion and eventually allowed Gorbachev to
carry out his transformation of Russia without a debate. He eliminated
the social achievements of the Soviet era, surrendered Russian industry
and oil to a few Jewish crooks, gave the keys of the Russian might to the
CIA and broke up the country into feuding successor states. The only positive
feature of Gorbachev-Yeltsin transformation was the removal of Article
58. Now it is creeping back.
-
- Some time ago booby-trapped anti-Jewish
billboards appeared in Moscow. When a passer-by tried to remove it, the
explosive device went off. The government rushed an 'anti-hate' bill through
the parliament, and lo! No more anti-Jewish billboards came to be. A month
ago, there was an extremely fishy incident in a Moscow synagogue, and a
new reinforced 'anti-extremism' bill was introduced into the Russian parliament.
-
- Thus, under the cover of fighting extremism,
terrorism and hatred, the remainder of freedom on our planet shrinks from
day to day. Eugene Rostow, "a Kennedy's Huntington", predicted
in 1960s that the two systems, Communism and Capitalism would eventually
converge, and bring forth the best features of both systems. Now the Convergence
has actually taken place. Once, the Red East was socially secure, but at
the expense of personal freedom, while the West was free at the expense
of equality and social guarantees. Now they have converged: the Russians
have lost their free schools and health and have received the freedom to
sleep under the bridge, while the West now has its own Gulag and its own
political dissidents. East and West reinstalled Article 58 under the guise
of anti-hate, anti-terrorism, anti-extremism laws.
-
- The grand plan of world domination is
unveiling. On its first stage, the power of old elites and of the church
was broken. The Mammonite enemy used democracy and liberty as his weapons
against the old order, and we, the Left and the Liberals, enjoyed his support.
The adverse vote in the House of Lords (albeit reshuffled and remoulded)
proves that the old system with all its faults had some positive qualities.
But that stage is over. Now the enemy is fighting against democracy and
liberty, employing fear and (anti-)racism.
-
- The enemy has the advantage of infiltrating
both left and right, of mainstream and alternative media, of interaction
on the global scale. Following a defeat in England they can attack in France
and provoke in Gaza. They can cause grief and feign horror at your response.
As long as this machine is intact, war and fear are unavoidable for they
are its products. Moreover, this is the reason why the powerful Mammonites
not Jews at all use and support this machine. The machine produces
fear, and allows them to usher in their dictatorship. But we have to win
unless we want our children to live in the world of slaves and masters.
You do not have to care about Muslim sensibilities or Jewish prejudices
it is your freedom at stake. We have to think globally because our
enemy acts globally. We must defeat fear and discord, the main tools of
the enemy.
|
