- "We knew well in advance that the Japanese were
going to attack. It was a lie that we didn't have direct radio communication
with Washington DC." --Lt. Col. Clifford M. Andrew
-
- The opening line to a rare 1975 document entitled The
Skeleton in Uncle Sam's Closet reads, "I am Hartford Van Dyke, a
Non Union lawyer. I have become sensitive to political situations because
my family was involuntarily involved in the treasonous murder of 4000
men1 at Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941. My relatives knew it was going
to happen beforehand."
-
- In a letter to Paranoia dated December 17, 2003, Hartford
Van Dyke provided a history of the publication of this important document,
writing, "In about October 1967, I asked my father about a vague
memory of something I had heard him say about an aircraft being shot
down in our neighborhood in Honolulu. As he told me about the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, he broke down in grief. I
don't recall ever seeing my father cry before that incident."
-
- Hartford's father, Lyle Hartford Van Dyke, Sr., had promised
his uncle, Gerald Mason Van Dyke, that he would not publish anything
about the Pearl Harbor incident until after Mason's death. Hartford obeyed
his father's wishes for two years, he writes, but the Mi Lai massacre
in Vietnam and government lies about it pressed him to publish the truth
about Pearl Harbor. In 1970, Hartford mailed a copy of his first work
on the Pearl Harbor story to every U.S. senator and congressman - 535
copies in all.
-
- As Hartford tells the story, he included his father in
that mailing and phoned him for a criticism of the text. He connected
a tape recorder to the telephone line and "got a tape recording for
posterity about the real history of the Pearl Harbor attack." He
sent out a second print run to Congress, House and Senate, another 535
copies. He also recorded conversations with people his father had mentioned,
and sent the cassettes through the mail. He was on a mission to tell the
world what really happened at Pearl Harbor. Would the world listen?
-
- In October 1972, Hartford received a copy of the book
None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen. This book, he states, inspired
him to write his own book about Pearl Harbor. Completed in August 1973,
he again sent a copy of his final book, The Skeleton in Uncle Sam's Closet
(hereafter, Skeleton), to every US senator and congressman. In 1975, he
printed a newspaper edition, which is the edition being quoted here.
-
- Van Dyke's Pearl Harbor Story
-
- The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, writes Van Dyke,
was instigated by the U.S., Britain and Holland, when they cut off all
shipping into and out of Japan, threatening its people with starvation.
Hartford's great uncle, Gerald Mason Van Dyke, was an Army Intelligence
officer in Hawaii at the time of the attack.
-
- According to Skeleton, Mason Van Dyke had foreknowledge
of the Pearl Harbor attack and sent his warning to Washington DC at 2:00
p.m. on December 4, 1941. His message was received in Washington at about
7:00 p.m. (due to the time difference) by Rear Admiral, Paulus Prince
Powell. As Van Dyke tells the story, Powell notified Secretary of the
Navy, Frank Knox, who then contacted Secretary of War, Henry Stimson.
Stimson contacted President Roosevelt, and Roosevelt reported to Naval
Intelligence in Washington.
-
- As Skeleton claims, Secretary of the Navy, Frank Knox,
wanted to move the Navy out and set up a defense perimeter around the
islands. James Vincent Forrestal, Undersecretary of the Navy, also wanted
to act defensively. According to Skeleton, what happened next is a claim
that has never been made before (to my knowledge). President Roosevelt
put Powell, Knox and Forrestal under armed Marine guard until after the
Pearl Harbor attack. He sent a message to Lt. Col. Clifford M. Andrew,
Intelligence officer at Army Intelligence in Hawaii, which read: "The
Japanese will attack, do not prepare defenses, we need the full support
of the American Nation in a war time effort by an unprovoked attack upon
the Nation."
-
- A Distinguished Gentleman
-
- Van Dyke Sr. testifies in Skeleton that at a political
conference about twenty years after the event (date not written), he sat
beside "a distinguished gentleman" with whom he began a discussion
of his experience in Honolulu during the Pearl Harbor attack. He testifies:
"This gentleman acted very interested in what I had to say and started
to question me about the details." Finally, he said, "Mr. Van
Dyke, do you know who I am?" He pulled out his personal card and
said, "I am Admiral Paulus P. Powell, United States Army Retired.
Do you know what I did during World War II?"
-
- Powell then divulged that he was the one who had received
Mason Van Dyke's message at the Naval Intelligence office in Washington.
He asked, "Would you like to know what happened in Washington DC
when your uncle's message was received by my office?" Van Dyke Sr.
replied that he had not "heard a logical explanation in the last
nineteen years."
-
- Van Dyke Sr. claims, "I was utterly amazed at the
remarks he made about President Roosevelt being responsible for the Pearl
Harbor attack; about Roosevelt making Admiral Kimmel and General Short
scapegoats so that he [Roosevelt] would come out looking like a hero."
Admiral Powell said, "Mr. Van Dyke, when I die it will be the most
pleasant thing that has happened to me because I have died thousands of
times, especially when I think of all the officers and enlisted men, many
of them my personal friends, being killed, and I could not do a thing
to save their lives."
-
- According to Skeleton, Admiral Powell stated, "Here
I was on Saturday morning, Washington time. I grieved; you don't know
how I grieved. And yet I couldn't do anything because I was under guard."
He revealed, "If I had ever sent a message to Pearl Harbor, I would
have been shot on the spot." Powell declared it was one of the most
treacherous acts committed by any president. Indeed, he added, "It
was one of the most dastardly things any president or king has ever done
in the history of the world. And there's no way to keep it from happening
again."
-
- On Friday evening at about 5:00 p.m., December 5, Mason
Van Dyke warned his nephew that the Japanese would attack, most probably
on Sunday. He told him the Intelligence Department in Washington had
been warned, but America would stand down. Hartford's father prepared
his family for the attack as best he could.
-
- Forty Top Secret File Cabinets
-
- As Hartford writes in Skeleton, in 1949 James Vincent
Forrestal's knowledge became a threat to those in power, and he was thrown
out of a seventh floor window of a Bethesda hospital. Less well known,
on May 15, 1966, Lt. Col. Clifford M. Andrew, who had received FDR's
stand down order at Military Intelligence in Hawaii, was murdered in his
home in Tigard, Oregon, by a bullet in the back of the head.
-
- Roger A. Stolley worked in a civilian capacity for Clifford
Andrew. Stolley testifies in Skeleton that, "A limited number of
personnel were directly involved with the events behind the Pearl Harbor
incident. Information directly concerned with the attack was labeled
TOP SECRET, held in approximately forty file cabinets of the Army Intelligence
Office." The file cabinets, which were situated in Honolulu, he writes,
was taken out and burned - another claim not made elsewhere (to my knowledge).
All personnel with knowledge of them were subject to military court martial
if they revealed their contents.
-
- Stolley further testifies that Lt. Col. Clifford Andrew
confided in him, on several occasions, part of the contents of those files.
Stolley paraphrases Andrew's words, "We knew well in advance that
the Japanese were going to attack. It was a lie that we didn't have direct
radio communication with Washington DC. Not only did my office have direct
radio communications, but so did the territorial government and the FBI."
Stolley concludes, "The responsibility for Pearl Harbor rests upon
five men: Franklin D. Roosevelt; Gen. George C. Marshall; Harold R. Stark
(Chief of Naval Operations); Lt. Col. Kindall J. Fielder, G-2, under General
Short; and Clifford M. Andrew." The extract is signed and witnessed
by Roger A. Stolley, dated May 25, 1975.
-
- In a 1992 article in the Journal for Historical Review
("Pearl Harbor Attack No Surprise"), Stolley reiterated the
information given to him by Clifford Andrew: "We knew well in advance
that the Japanese were going to attack. At least nine months before the
Japanese attack upon Pearl Harbor, I was assigned to prepare for it."
Andrew claimed he was under direct orders of President Roosevelt. He also
claimed he was ordered to withhold from commanders in Hawaii vital intelligence
relating to the location of the Japanese fleet. Stolley concludes: "Pearl
Harbor is an example of how a small group of men in control of government
has the power to destroy the life, property and freedom of its citizens."
-
- The Infamous Seaman Z
-
- Many of the first- and second-hand witness statements
contained in Skeleton can be supported by sources published decades later,
which rely on many more witness testimonies. In fact, while most books
on Pearl Harbor purposely avoid the above conclusions, at least two crucial
books buttress its assertions.
-
- In his 1986 book, Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath,
Pulitzer Prize-winning historian, John Toland, reveals a letter from Col.
Carlton Ketchum, who informed Toland that warnings from various sources
began in early fall of 1941. The sources of these warnings included the
Dutch Embassy, Dutch Secret Service and British Secret Service. Indeed,
Roosevelt had received a warning from "some government agency in
Japan, I cannot recall who that was." Ketchum claimed the warnings
were passed on to "Secretary Knox, and I think Secretary Stimson,"
but was sure they were not passed on to commanders in the Pacific. He
added, Hoover was told by Roosevelt not to pass on the information to
the FBI or to their men stationed in the Pacific. (Toland, 343)
-
- At an October 1990 Institute for Historical Review conference
(ihr.org), Toland stated that Stolley's testimony (in "Pearl Harbor
Attack No Surprise") rings true. Toland relayed a personal story
at this conference. He stated that after writing, The Rising Sun, he
received many letters from naval officers who informed him that Roosevelt
did know the Japanese were moving in to attack Pearl Harbor. In fact,
Toland received so many letters that he began work on Infamy in order
to correct the record.
-
- After a two-year search for witnesses, Toland located
a Dutch admiral named Ranneft, who in 1941 had been a captain serving
as the Dutch naval attaché. Ranneft wrote that he was frequently
allowed into the Naval Intelligence Office in San Francisco. On December
3, he went into the office and was informed that they had tracked the
locations of two Japanese carriers from their radio emissions. When he
returned on the 6th and asked where the carriers were, a man went up to
the chart and "pointed to an area two hundred miles from Pearl Harbor."
-
- As the story goes, Toland discovered the identity of
the man who had located the Japanese fleet in the Pacific. This man did
not want to disclose his name because he was marrying a fabulously wealthy
California woman, so Toland referred to him as "Seaman Z." When
Infamy was published in 1986, the Washington Post, true to form, claimed
Toland had invented Seaman Z. About a year later, this witness went public
and confirmed the information, but the media did not respond. The man's
name is revealed as Robert Ogg in a crucial 2001 book, Day of Deceit.
While on assignment in San Francisco, Ogg confirms, he began to plot the
location of the Japanese fleet on a chart of the North Pacific on or about
November 30, 1941.
-
- This claim contradicts the sanctioned version of history,
which declares that, "Nagumo's task force sailed from the Kuriles
on 26 November and arrived, undetected by the Americans, at a point about
200 miles north of Oahu at 0600 hours (Hawaiian time) on December 7,
1941." (www.worldwar2history.info/Pearl-Harbor/)
-
- The Purple Machine
-
- Hartford Van Dyke has been trying to tell the world about
Pearl Harbor for more than 35 years. He was undeniably vindicated in 2001
with Robert Stinnett's bombshell book, Day Of Deceit: The Truth About
FDR and Pearl Harbor, which is based on documents from the National Archives
as well as Naval Intelligence files acquired through persistent FOIA requests
beginning in 1983. The Navy finally declassified these records in 1994.
Day of Deceit provides overwhelming evidence that FDR and about thirty
members of his administration knew well in advance that Japanese warships
were heading toward Hawaii. In fact, Stinnett uncovered a Naval Intelligence
memo, dated October 1940, which outlined eight steps to provoke such an
attack.
-
- For the past sixty years, a majority of historians have
put forth the deception that the Japanese maintained strict radio silence
on their war path to Pearl Harbor. Even as late as 1999, historian Stephen
Ambrose echoed the official line in a Wall Street Journal editorial saying,
"American intelligence was terrible." Stinnett exposes the transparency
of this fabrication, writing, "After sixty years it is clear that
the US Navy, the Army, and the press were all wrong. Overwhelming evidence
[from the National Archives] proves that Yamamoto, as well as commanders
of the Task Force warships, broke radio silence and that their ships were
located by American communication intelligence units." (Stinnett,
162)
-
- The radio stealth exhibited by the Japanese is consistently
overstated in official accounts. The truth is, "[t]here was no escaping
the electronic surveillance." Beginning on April 22, 1941, Stinnett
reveals, "Six US Navy monitor stations from Dutch Harbor, Alaska,
Samoa, Hawaii, Corregidor and two from San Francisco followed every move
of Nagumo and theAkagi." (Stinnett, 262)
-
- In a deep underground Army/Navy base known as Corregidor,
situated west of Manila, Japanese kata kana message codes were intercepted
by 63 operators working round the clock in eight-hour shifts. Navy analysts
unscrambled the complex codes. "We had the Purple machine and the
means to intercept, decode and translate messages," stated one radio
operator. "Since we were so near to Japan and its naval operation
area we were in an excellent position to intercept radio broadcasts."
(Stinnett, 186)
-
- These dispatches should have been sent to Admiral Kimmel,
the commander in Hawaii who would have been able to avert, or at least
minimize, the tragedy. However, the unscrambled messages never made it
to their proper destination in order to save American lives at Pearl Harbor,
simply because saving the lives of American servicemen was not the name
of the game. The name of the game was more succinctly stated by Lt. Com.
Joseph Rochefort when he proclaimed, "It was a pretty cheap price
to pay for unifying the country." (Stinnett, 203)
-
- This was likely the mad logic bestowed upon distinguished
representatives of the American press when they were invited to a "secret
press briefing" at 10:15 a.m. on November 15, 1941, where Gen. George
C. Marshall revealed one of America's most vital secrets: the U.S. could
read Japan's coded radio messages. Inconceivably, Marshall did not request
the presence of General Short or Admiral Kimmel, the two officers in charge
of naval operations in Hawaii, nor did he give them a separate briefing.
-
- Instead, according to Marshall's own papers, the General
called seven news correspondents to his office in the Munitions Building
in Washington, and forthwith provided an exit opportunity to anyone unwilling
to button his lips over the information he was about to reveal. Stinnett,
who remains flummoxed as to the reason for the meeting, writes: "Though
the function of the press is to publicize, none left. They kept Marshall's
secret from their readers, who included many of the officers and sailors
manning the warships on Pearl Harbor's Battleship Row." (Stinnett,
158)
-
- Now we find out why the major media has obstructed the
truth about Pearl Harbor for the past sixty years. As Stinnett discloses,
four news media and three major wire services were "let in on secrets
denied to General Short and Admiral Kimmel." No radio news reporters
were invited to the secret conference, where the print news media learned
that the Japanese would attack some time in the first ten days of December.
The select members of the media who were present and who complied with
the secrecy rule were: Robert Sherrod, Time; Ernest Lindley, Newsweek;
Charles Hurd, New York Times; Bert Andrews, New York Herald Tribune; Lyle
Wilson, United Press; Edward Bomar, Associated Press; and Harold Slater,
International News Service. (Stinnett, 361) (Note, Simon & Schuster
hides this bombshell in the back of the book among copious endnotes in
tiny font.)
-
- Stinnett suspects the messages containing this time-sensitive
information were intercepted between November 5 and November 13, 1941,
in time for the General's unfathomable leak to the media. In 1979, President
Jimmy Carter released to the National Archives a small portion of the
messages sent between September 3 and December 8, 1941. However, as of
2001 an estimated 143,000 Japanese messages remained "cloaked in
American censorship" in spite of many FOIA requests.
-
- In fact, Stinnett reveals that Naval Intelligence had
cracked the Japanese codes as early as fall of 1940, fifteen months before
the attack. He also reveals that Admiral Nagumo's first radio broadcast
was intercepted on April 22, 1941, eight months before the attack. (Stinnett,
362) He concludes, "A systematic plan had been in place long before
Pearl Harbor to arouse the United States from its isolationist position."
(Stinnett, 259) This corroborates Clifford Andrew's claim in Skeleton
that he had been assigned to "prepare for the attack" at least
nine months prior.
-
- Inexplicably, it was not until November 25, according
to the diary of Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, that FDR announced to
his War Cabinet that "an attack was expected perhaps as soon as next
Monday (December 1)." With great American ingenuity, radio interceptors
and analysts deciphered an obscure secret language, and assumed their
dire warnings would travel up the proper command route; however, Washington
war mongers chose to keep it from the one person with an unequivocal need
to know: Admiral Kimmel. Indeed, writes Stinnett, "None of the nine
Pearl Harbor investigations examined the TESTM dispatches or questioned
why their crucial data were cut from Kimmel's intelligence loop."
He traces Kimmel's severance from the intelligence loop to "numerous
directives issued from Washington." (Stinnett, 186)
-
- On November 25, 1941, a full ten days after the press
was secretly briefed, Admiral Kimmel finally received a briefing to the
effect that a massive Japanese force of fleet subs and long-range patrol
aircraft would reach Hawaii in the beginning of December. Kimmel received
explicit orders on November 28 from Admiral Stark stating, "Undertake
no offensive action until Japan has committed an overt act." Because
he followed these orders he would later take most of the blame.
-
- Stinnett proves that both Pacific Fleet commanders, Admiral
Kimmel and Lt. Gen. Walter Short, were purposely kept in the dark and
were later blamed for "failing to anticipate" the attack. In
1999, the Senate finally exonerated Kimmel and Short of charges of "dereliction
of duty." However, throughout nine official investigations of Pearl
Harbor over a span of nearly sixty years, no radio broadcasts were ever
brought forward. Even Congressional hearings had not the luxury of these
documents.
-
- Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, Stinnett shows, the Navy
classified all documents TOP SECRET. All radio operators and cryptographers
were gagged on threat of imprisonment and loss of all benefits. Navy
Director of Communications, Rear Admiral Leigh Noyes, sent a memo ordering
all commanders to "destroy all notes or anything in writing."
(Stinnett, 256) This backs up Skeleton's assertion that Army Intelligence
in Honolulu burned forty file cabinets full of documents.
-
- In addition, Stinnett tells of a crucial 15-hour time
delay where no action was taken. In a 1944 Army investigation, he notes,
"Three Army generals determined that the delay began Saturday night,
December 6, and ended at 11:00 the next morning." (Stinnett, 235)
Coincidentally, John Toland asks in Infamy, "Was it to be believed
that the heads of the Army and Navy could not be located on the night
before Pearl Harbor? Or that they would later testify over and over that
they couldn't remember where they were?" (Toland, 335) According
to Toland, the cover-up began the very morning after, when General Marshall
said, "Gentlemen, this goes to the grave with us."
-
- Could this curious lapse of time and memory cloak a still
tightly fortified secret, described in Skeleton, that any military commanders
in Washington who had the presence of mind to alert Hawaii were put under
military house arrest from Saturday morning "until after the blitz"?
I have been unable to verify this extraordinary claim, but under the circumstances
of this vast sixty-year conspiracy and cover-up, it isn't as preposterous
as it might seem. Indeed, it might explain the astonishingly persistent
suppression of Pearl Harbor documents, which continued up to Janet Reno's
administration in 1994 - an invisible wall that Robert Stinnett ran into
again and again while researching his book.
-
- When all the (available) facts are studied, the conclusion
is palpable: Pearl Harbor was a planned event that opened wide the path
leading to the deaths of millions of people. The United States taunted
Japan into a World War that led to the first and only nuclear bombing
of a sovereign country and its people.
-
- Pearl Harbor is a case study of an archetypal conspiracy
and cover-up for those naïve enough to think it can't happen because
there are too many people involved. This is how it's done. Here is the
model.
-
- The Ghost of Pearl Harbor
-
- Hartford Van Dyke warns prophetically in Skeleton: "Every
phase of deception and maneuvering which was used by the US government
in order to engineer and guarantee the Japanese 'surprise' attack on
Pearl Harbor is still being used in full force by the government today.
Present national and international events make this crystal clear. Observe
the actions of the president, and the content and control of the United
Nations Charter."
-
- As Hartford writes, the Roosevelt administration used
the "back door" of Japan to enter a world war. The attack, and
Roosevelt's "Day of Infamy" address, "jolted the American
people to the proper frame of mind to accept war, commit to it, and make
the long sacrifice to pursue its successful conclusion." This scenario
should be familiar to us today as George Bush and the government-controlled
media refer to the terror attacks of September 11 as the "New Pearl
Harbor." Now that we know Pearl Harbor was an experiment in government/military
censorship, does this not illuminate the dark shadows surrounding the
events of 9/11? Did the Bush administration have clear foreknowledge
of the attacks? Was it Bush's "back door" to US occupation of
the Middle East? Was the intent of 9/11 to lead us into World War III?
-
- As Hartford writes in Skeleton, "Every year like
a ghost, Pearl Harbor intrudes upon us again and haunts us. The story
is repeated because everybody knows the whole story was never told."
The truth about Pearl Harbor is a public possession, he declares. Yet,
over sixty years later the public still does not have adequate possession
of the truth. Thus, the association of 9/11 with the annual phantom of
Pearl Harbor puts the 'wink' in hoodwink. Not only are we being controlled,
but we're being taunted with that control.
-
- Addendum
-
- After working tirelessly to collect and disseminate the
testimony in Skeleton in Uncle Sam's Closet, Hartford began work on another
prescient document, completed in May 1979, entitled 'Silent Weapons for
Quiet Wars.'
-
- This infamous tract begins: "This publication marks
the 25th anniversary of the Third World War, called the 'Quiet War,' being
conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with 'silent weapons.'
This book contains an introductory description of this war, its strategies,
and its weaponry." In his anonymously written document, Hartford
Van Dyke explained:
-
- Social engineering (the analysis and automation of a
society) requires the correlation of great amounts of constantly changing
economic information (data), so a high-speed computerized data-processing
system was necessary which could race ahead of the society and predict
when society would arrive for capitulation.
-
- In the interest of future world order, peace and tranquility,
it was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public
with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social
energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands
of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few. In order to implement
this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons,
which were a class of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle
of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name
'silent weapons.'
-
- Hartford Van Dyke is now in federal prison in Waseca,
Minnesota. Many readers of his letters (at www.paranoiamagazine.com) want
to know why. Hartford's situation is not easy to comprehend, but I will
try to explain as succinctly as possible. (See detailed explanation "The
Commercial Principles Governing the Engineering of Public Wealth Rebate
Banks, a.k.a. Robin Hood Banks," posted at website.)
-
- Hartford got into trouble by circulating something called
Public Wealth Rebate Notes (PWRN's). Hartford insists his issuance of
PWRNs was lawful. As he explains, "Public Wealth Rebate Banks engage
in the lawful altruistic/charitable disbursement of public malpractice
default judgments to the Public, by generating a Commercial Lien Assignment
Currency known as Public Wealth Rebate Notes, establishing thereby a lawful
method for the Public to lay claim to the real and moveable property of
the Lien Debtor party(ies). A Public Wealth Rebate Note is a Reversed
Party Promissory Note, a Demand Note made by a creditor or claimant against
a debtor based on the Debtor's promise to pay or to perform."
-
- Hartford further claims that his case was filed in the
U.S. District Court - an administrative, not criminal, court. The case
was set as "United States of America vs. Hartford Van Dyke."
He explains that the term "United States of America" is a legal
fiction. Since it's not a flesh and blood person, it can neither accuse
nor bring a criminal case. It has to be brought ex rel.(ex relation),
he explains, which is the relation of a person telling the story to the
prosecuting attorney. The accuser's name must appear under the United
States of America, he explains, otherwise the case is a fraud.
-
- It is safe to presume that Hartford Van Dyke is a political
prisoner. He's in federal prison in Minnesota for an attitude adjustment.
His insistence on abiding by commercial law infuriates insider lawyers
and judges. His political knowledge threatens the shadow government.
In the winter of 2004, he was placed in solitary confinement in a cold
stone cell with a ration of two blankets. He shivered uncontrollably.
His weight dropped to 127 pounds. He padded his blankets with a layer
of toilet paper. His letters tell of being covered with rashes and boils,
which he attributes to toxins placed in his food. His treatment can only
be described as torture.
-
- Why is a non-violent individual treated in this manner
in the American prison system? How many political prisoners is the United
States holding in its torture chambers? Please keep Hartford in your
prayers and call attention to his plight in whatever way you can.
-
-
- Footnotes
-
- 1. Stinnett lists the Pearl Harbor death toll at 2,476;
wounded: 1,119; POWs: 1,951 (many of whom died in Japanese custody).
-
- References
-
- Hartford Van Dyke. The Skeleton in Uncle Sam's Closet.
Newspaper reprint edition, 1975.
-
- John Toland. Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath.
Berkeley. 1986.
-
- John Toland, "Living History," Tenth International
Revisionist Conference, October 1990. (www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/11/1/Toland5-24.html)
-
- Robert Stinnett. Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and
Pearl Harbor. Simon & Schuster. 2001.
-
- Stinnett speech "Pearl Harbor: Official Lies in
an American War Tragedy?" May 24, 2000 (www.independent.org/events/transcript.asp?eventID=28)
-
- Roger A. Stolley. "Pearl Harbor Attack No Surprise."
Journal of Historical Review, 1992. (www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/12/1/Stolley119-121.html)
-
- Hartford Van Dyke's 'Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars' may
be read at: www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml. There are several
versions online, but this appears to be the only one that contains the
original schematic diagrams.
-
- See www.paranoiamagazine.com, for Hartford's "Letters
from the Federal Pen."
-
- http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/federalpen.html
-
- http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/skeleton.html
-
- Also these articles;
-
- The Bones Of "Station H"
- http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SH.html
-
- The Smoking Gun Of Pearl Harbor
- http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/McCollum/index.html
-
- Pearl Harbor - The Mother Of All Conspiracies
- http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/
6315/pearl.html
-
-
- FREE HARTFORD VAN DYKE!
-
- The Skeleton in Uncle Sam's Closet.
- Newspaper reprint edition, 1975 is available from Paranoia,
PO Box 1041, Providence, RI 02901. $12, postage included. (limited supply,
available by check, money order or via paypal at www.paranoiamagazine.com.)
This money goes directly to Hartford Van Dyke, through his family, for
his care in federal prison. For three copies or more, you may reduce the
price to $10 each.
|
