rense.com



Shake And Bake -
Who Would Jesus Burn?

By Dave Lindorff
11-17-5
 
What kind of country is this?
 
Not only does America use grotesque chemical weapons in its "War of Liberation"--in this case white phosphorus bombs that are as nasty as anything Saddam Hussein could have dreamt up, with the ability to eat their way into a body and liquefy flesh--but our shameless leaders, when caught in the act, try to lie their way out of their own atrocious behavior.
 
When an Italian documentary producer released a film exposing this war crime committed in the course of the destruction of Fallujah, the honchos at the Pentagon and the White House lied through their teeth, claiming that the scenes of cascading phosphorus bombs blanketing the city, incinerating fighters and civilians alike, which were depicted clearly in the film, were just flares being used for night lighting.
 
But the Italian journalists, who had done their homework, rebutted those lies with Pentagon after-action reports that detailed the deliberate use of the phosphorus weapons--both bombs and mortars, all clearly manufactured for the purpose of incineration, not illumination.
 
Now the fall-back limited hang-out excuse from the Pentagon is that okay, the military did use phosphorus bombs, but only on military targets, not civilians. Check out the photos of raining phosphorus when you read the word "target".
 
This latest war crime dwarfs the earlier reports of officially sanctioned torture.
 
Countless civilians--including women and children--were cruelly burned to death (whether incidentally or in a deliberate attempt to terrorize scarcely matters) in the most agonizing of ways. Enemy fighters were killed through the use of weapons that have been outlawed by the civilized world--a world that America can not claim to be a part of.
 
American troops even have a term for the barbaric technique -- "Shake and Bake"--clear evidence that this was no one-off affair.
 
No wonder journalists have been barred from Fallujah, except when safely embedded and under the control of U.S. military units. No wonder there were reports of whole blocks being bulldozed clear of soil and hosed down after the fighting ended. No wonder the U.S. took control of hospitals in the area and barred the media. No wonder the U.S. military avoided doing body counts.
 
The U.S. now stands unequivocally condemned as an outlaw terror nation.
 
The only bright spot in this horror show is that President Bush, our strutting, god-communing commander-in-chief, will now end his career (hopefully sooner than anticipated) confined to the U.S., lest he be arrested and tried in a cage like Saddam for the crime of using chemical weapons against civilians in Iraq.
 
What a grand irony that would be.
 
Breaking Update: More Pathetic Excuses
 
Still squirming at the exposure of its WMD war crime in Fallujah, the Pentagon late Wednesday came up with two more rationales for its use of phosphorus bombs. The first: it's just another part of the "conventional" arsenal. The second: armies have all used this weapon for a century.
 
Let's examine these excuses. First of all, phosphorus is no conventional weapon. It is a chemical weapon that kills slowly and painfully by burning its way into the body, making it as insidious as any poison gas weapon (precisely why the Pentagon initially denied its use in Fallujah). Second, there are lots of horrible weapons that have been used routinely by armies over the past century. Phosphorus is one. Others are mustard gas, chlorine gas, and various germ weapons. Common usage in the past is no justification for continued use of such barbaric weaponry. Heck, killing POWs was accepted practice long ago, too, as well as rape and pillage following conquest. Now those are war crimes.
 
Let's just face it. If a terrorist were to unleash a phosphorus bomb in a U.S. city, our president and defense secretary would be calling it a WMD, and that is exactly what phosphorus is.
 
One other point: When phosphorus was used in the 20th century, it was for the most part used on battlefields agaiinst soldiers. This is a case where phosphorus was used in an urban setting full of civilians. The gruesome and criminal results were predictable.
 
Incidentally, the Pentagon and State Department should get their stories straight. Rumsfeld's guys are saying phosphorus bombs are just part of the standard arsenal of "conventional" weapons, but only a day before, on Nov. 15, US Ambassador to Britain Robert H Tuttle told the UK paper The Independent, "US forces participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom continue to use appropriate lawful, conventional weapons against legitimate targets. US forces do not use napalm or white phosphorus as weapons."
 
Uh-huh. Let's tell it to the judge...
 
DON'T BE DEPRESSED ABOUT 2005--FIGHT BACK! Get yourself and friends a copy of "This Can't Be Happening!" Order online (see store links below), or go direct to the publisher (at a discount) by clicking on the cover image directly following.
 
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros