- On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the
representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopted - or let be
adopted - an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th "International
Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust". Moreover,
the resolution "Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical
event, either in full or part". Historical revisionism thus sees its
existence acknowledged by the whole world, a fact proving that it has some
life in it, but, at the same time, this decision means that the revisionists
find themselves struck with the reprobation of all the countries of the
world. As for the "State" of the Vatican, which has no seat at
the UN, it had, as early as in 1992, declared: "There is no historical
revisionism that can call into question the inhuman abyss of the Holocaust"
(&laqno; Non c'è revisionismo storico che possa rimettere in discussione
l'abisso disumano dell'Olocausto ») ( L'Osservatore Romano, 7 November1992).
-
- The history of human societies and religions is rich
in prohibitions, bannings, excommunications but, whereas, up to a recent
past, the victims could, at least in principle, hope to find a refuge outside
of their land or group of origin, here the condemnation is, for the first
time ever, of universal character. It is thus confirmed that historical
revisionism is a phenomenon of exceptional nature and also that the Jews,
yet once more, have been able to obtain exorbitant privileges.
-
- A Sleight Of Hand
-
- It was through a sleight of hand that the Israeli delegation
succeeded in getting this resolution passed. It proceeded in a manner like
that of certain associations which, in France, under cover of a campaign
against paedophilia, have obtained a law prohibiting, on the Internet,
communication relating to paedophilia and to revisionism! To begin, they
asked: "Is paedophilia not a horror in itself?" The response
was "yes". Their second step was to add: "Is paedophilia
on the Internet not to be banned by a specific law?" The response,
there again, was "yes". As a third step the associations concluded:
"Let's fight, accordingly, to obtain a law against paedophilia and
revisionism [which they called 'negationism']".
-
- For his part, the President of the General Assembly,
the Swede Jan Ellasion, had the deftness on November 1st to ask orally
whether anyone was opposed to the resolution aimed at commemorating the
"Holocaust". No hands being raised, he declared, without prior
recourse to a vote of any kind, that the resolution was thereby adopted,
the text of which contained in one of its provisions the condemnation of
any form of "Holocaust" revisionism. The draft was approved by
the United States in utter disregard of the guarantees of freedom of opinion
provided by the first amendment to its constitution. And, most remarkably,
this Israeli text was accepted by the Arabo-Moslem countries, including
Iran. All those present approved, or let pass with soft verbal restrictions,
a resolution originating from the Jews that goes so far as to condemn the
right of free research on a historical subject.
-
- The UN act assumes only a political and not a juridical
character. Still, since it provides that the Secretary General will have
to report on the measures subsequently taken within the framework of the
resolution, the revisionists will have reason to fear consequences for
themselves of a judicial or administrative nature, for instance, as regards
border and airport police, authorisation to enter and stay in certain countries
or the issuing of visas.
-
- The resolution will serve morally to justify and facilitate
extradition measures taken against revisionists. Precedents are not lacking,
what with 1) the European arrest warrant; 2) the virtual handing over of
revisionist René-Louis Berclaz by Serbia to Switzerland; 3) the
handing over of revisionist Ernst Zündel by the United States to Canada,
then by Canada to Germany; 4) the handing over of Belgian revisionist Siegfried
Verbeke by the Netherlands to Germany; 5) the handing over of revisionist
Germar Rudolf to Germany by the United States. In Austria, on November
11, the semi-revisionist David Irving, a British citizen, was arrested
by traffic police on a motorway and is now in detention in Vienna.
-
- For any noted revisionist, it is already risky to leave
the confines of his home country. In doing so, he exposes himself to a
request for extradition made to the country of transit by either Israel
or Germany. There is at present a bill in committee at the Knesset that
will authorise Israel to demand the handing over of any revisionist in
order to bring him before a court, sitting in Jerusalem, that will apply
the 1986 Jewish antirevisionist law against him.
-
- The Jewish State's Offensive
-
- A fortnight ago, Philippe Bolopion, United Nations correspondent
for Le Monde, wrote a particularly informative article on the successes
achieved at the UN by the Jewish State since June 2004 ("L'offensive
de charme d'Israël à l'ONU rencontre un certain succès",
Le Monde, 4 November 2005, p. 3). He listed six recent accomplishments
of that State: 1) in June 2004, Kofi Annan called for an acknowledgement
"that the United Nations' record on anti-Semitism has at times fallen
short of our ideals"; 2) in October of the same year, a resolution
including a condemnation of antisemitism was adopted; 3) in January 2005,
a special session of the General Assembly marked the 60th anniversary of
"the liberation of the death camps"; 4) in June, an Israeli ambassador
was elected vice-president of the General Assembly - the first Israeli
in fifty-three years; 5) in September, on a visit to the UN for a gathering
of heads of state and government, Ariel Sharon shook hands with Pakistani
president Pervez Musharraf, while the Israeli delegation made numerous
new contacts; 6) in October, the Security Council was quick to condemn
the Iranian calls, which were nothing new, for the Jewish State to be erased
from the map.
-
- The Jewish State's Incomparable Gall
-
- These successes are all the more striking as no nation
in the world has made fun of the UN like "Israel", a state that,
however, owes its creation to the UN. The Jewish State, with an incomparable
gall (in Jewish parlance: chutzpah), has thrown a record number of United
Nations "resolutions" straight into the bin. In violation of
international law, this State, founded on the colossal lie of the "Holocaust",
practises colonialism, racism, apartheid, military occupation and torture.
We may add that it possesses an arsenal of atomic weapons and on this score
has, for example, in the last few years been supplied by Germany, free
of charge, in the name of the said "Holocaust", with three ultra-modern
submarines fitted out for nuclear armament. The collusion between, on the
one hand, the Jewish State and armed forces and, on the other hand, the
German State and armed forces has become such that the German mail service
has just released a stamp, for the most regular rate of postage, depicting,
on the left, the Israeli flag, then, on the right, the German flag and,
finally, linking the two, a strand of barbed wire, symbol of the perpetual
"Holocaust". Germany is becoming the Jewish State's "Guantanamo".
-
- On October 5, 2003, Israeli ambassador to the UN Dan
Gillerman had warned the Security Council members that the God of the Jews
was "watching" them and, on July 16 2004, annoyed at the behaviour
of some Arab states, flung the remark at his colleagues in the General
Assembly that things had "reached a point where the inmates are running
the asylum". On the other hand, on October 31 of this year, he said
that he was "moved" when presenting the "Holocaust Day"
text, his country's first successful draft resolution ever. He declared:
"I feel moved and privileged to present this historic resolution today,
as an Israeli, a Jew, a human being and a child of a family of Holocaust
victims". That is understandable. The next day, the "adoption"
of his resolution marked the triumph of the "Holocaust" sham.
For the occasion, one may say that as far as gall, dishonest procedure,
spirit of domination and intolerance are concerned, the Jewish State has
outdone itself.
-
- This extraordinary UN resolution also constitutes proof
that historical revisionism is a reality that can no longer be bypassed,
denied or played down. Its notoriety has become global. Still, let us take
care to recognise that the revisionist researchers who remain active are
now but a handful and, with each passing year, their future grows darker.
|
