- During the afternoon of 9/11, the Mayor of New York city
and the Governor of New York state held a press conference.
-
- Reporters asked 2 interesting questions:
-
- "Is there anything to indicate that there could
be MORE BOMBS, more planes out there?"
-
- "So, the only National Guard we'll see will be in
lower Manhattan, in the BOMB site area?"
-
- Neither the Mayor nor the Governor corrected the reporters
by stating that there weren't any bombs, and that -- instead -- the twin
towers had collapsed due solely to airplane and fire damage.
-
- If you were a high-level official trying to calm down
the public in a major crisis (which is part of the job description) and
there weren't in fact bombs in t he world trade centers, wouldn't you have
corrected the reporters in order to kill unfounded rumors and minimize
panic? Doesn't this lack of a statement amount to an acknowledgment that
the Mayor and Governor believed there were bombs in the twin towers?
-
- By way of analogy, imagine that 10 witnesses say they
saw Mike shoot Joe. In a press conference, a reporter asks the police chief
if police know why Mike shot Joe, and the chief answers without correcting
the reporter. In other words, the police chief does not answer by saying
something like "No no, Fred shot Joe" or
-
- "we don't know who shot Joe yet, we've just started
investigating". Isn't that further circumstantial evidence that tends
to show that Mike shot Joe? Doesn't the silence in the face of bomb-related
questions help corroborate the numerous eyewitness statements of bombs
in the trade centers, such as the following:
-
- A reporter for USA Today stated that the FBI believed
that bombs i n the buildings brought the buildings down;
-
- The NY Fire Department Chief of Safety stated there were
"bombs" and "secondary devices", which caused the explosions
in the buildings;
-
- A NYC firefighters who witnessed attacks stated that
it looked like there were bombs in the buildings;
-
- A NYC firefighter stated "On the last trip up a
bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building";
-
- An MSNBC reporter stated that police had found a suspicious
device "and they fear it could be something that might lead to another
explosion" and the police officials believe "that one of the
explosions at the world trade center . . . may have been caused by a van
that was parked in the building that may have had some kind of explosive
device in it, so their fear is that there may have been explosive devices
planted either in the building or in the adjacent area";
-
- A NYC firefighter stated "the south tower . . .
exploded . . . At that point a debate began to rag e because the perception
was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges .
. . many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World
Trade";
-
- Assistant Fire Commissioner stated "I thought .
. . before . . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I
. . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building
[not up where the fire was]. You know like when they . . . blow up a building
... ?" -- and a lieutenant firefighter the Commisioner spoke with
independently verified the flashes;
-
- A firefighter said "[T]here was just an explosion.
It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed
like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions";
Another firefigther stated "it almost sounded like bombs going off,
like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight";
-
- A paramedic said "at first I thought it was -- do
you ever see professional demolition where they se t the charges on certain
floors and then you hear pop pop pop pop pop -- thats exactly what because
thought it was";
-
- A police officer noted "People were saying, 'There's
another one and another one.' I heard reports of secondary bomb explosions
...";
-
- A firefighter stated "there was an explosion in
the south tower, which . . . just blew out in flames . . . One floor under
another after another and when it hit about the fifth floor, I figured
it was a bomb, because it looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of
thing. I was there in '93" (referring to 1993 bombing of world trade
center;
-
- A firefighter stated "it looked like sparkling around
one specific layer of the building . . . Then the building started to come
down. My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when
they show you those implosions on TV";
-
- Dan Rather said that collapse was "reminiscent of
those pictures we've all seen [when] a building was deliberately destroyed
by well-placed dynamite to knock it down" (CNN's Aaron Brown and a
Fox News reporter also made similar comments);
-
- A British newspaper stated "some eyewitnesses reported
hearing another explosion just before the structure crumbled. Police said
that it looked almost like a 'planned implosion'";
-
- One ABC reporter stated it looked like a controlled demolition;
another ABC reporter stated "anyone who has ever watched a building
being demolished on purpose knows that if you're going to do this you have
to get at the under-infrastructure of the building to bring it down";
-
- A reporter for WNYC radio said "The reporters were
trying to figure out what had happened. We were thinking bombs had brought
the buildings down";
-
- A Wall Street Journal reporter said "I heard this
metallic roar, looked up and saw what I thought was just a peculiar site
of individual floors, one after the other exploding outward. I thought
to myself, "My God, they're going to bring the build ing down."
And they, whoever they are, HAD SET CHARGES . . . . I saw the explosions";
and
-
- A facilities manager in the north tower "was convinced
that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting
at a control panel pushing detonator buttons". You can view links
to the source materials for all eyewitness quotes at www.911Proof.com .
-
- The 9/11 Commission Report did not even once mention
the word "explosion" or "bomb". The mainstream media
hasn't touched the evidence of bombs in the trade center. Democratic and
republican politicans smear anyone who even raises the issue as a conspiracy
nut. Isn't it time that we faced the elephant in the living room? Can our
democracy survive if we don't?
-
- http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
|
