- Advised in for Whirlwind 9/11 Ride, after Claiming WTC
Was a Controlled Demolition
- Prim, proper and Republican-looking BYU professor crosses
into uncharted 9/11 truth waters. Bush attack dogs lurking around every
corner. Watch your back, professor!
- The story of the day in the 9/11 truth world is the prim,
proper and conservative-looking BYU physics professor, coming out of the
closet with a 19 page report about how the WTC buildings, defying laws
of gravity, most likely collapsed due to "pre-positioned explosives."
- Professor Steven A. Jones' highly-provocative and scientifically
researched report, concluded the government's jet fuel theory was inconceivable
due the nature of the freefall of the buildings, the towers falling in
a matter of seconds within their own footprints exactly like a controlled
- Jones' story first appeared Friday in the Salt Lake City
Deseret Morning News and was quickly circulated throughout the country
on the internet. And, apparently expecting a barrage of callers, emails
and faxes, Jones seems to have cut-off communications with the rest of
the outside world, instead letting his 19 page report do the talking for
- Numerous calls to the number listed on his resume were
met Friday by a strange sounding busy signal and emails requesting an interview
sent to email@example.com were returned undeliverable.
- Perhaps the good professor wants his privacy or perhaps
he has been overwhelmed with calls and emails. But let's just say good
luck since now he's nothing but "media meat" to slice up every
which way by those on both sides of the hotly contested 9/11 truth issue.
- However, on Saturday Professor Jones telephoned the Arctic
Beacon, saying he is more than willing to tell everyone why he believes
the WTC came down from a controlled demolition and why he is urging the
American people to insist authorities open up a fresh investigation.
- "I came to the conclusion after several months of
serious investigation and after conferring with people like David Ray Griffin
and others," said Jones today from his home in Utah, sounding like
a very sincere, honest and forthright person, wanting to get to the e truth
- "My paper has been accepted for publication and
surprisingly I have been met with a lot of encouragement and support from
my colleagues at BYU. There have been, of course, emails calling me nuts
and crazy but that's to be expected."
- However, for practical purposes and to help Professor
Jones adjust, let's just say his quiet Utah world has ended forever with
his decision to essentially tell the world the government is lying about
9/11. Of course, that's not what he said specifically, but that's how
it will be interpreted, especially by the administration's hyper-sensitive
attitude towards those in academia who have questioned the official 9/11
- "I just believe we should get at the truth and open
up another investigation. What finally tipped the scales for me was the
way in which Building 7 collapsed," said Jones, who admitted coming
from a conservative background.
- Although he stops short of saying exactly who pulled
the demolition plug on the towers, the insinuation is there that it was
an inside government job, his statements being enough to ignite a fury
of retaliation from the Bush administration attacks dogs if reaction to
past statement made by others like Jones is any indication.
- And if history proves right, Jones is now in for a world-wind
9/11 ride, a ride like he's never experienced before. So professor be prepared
to strap yourself very tight to your office chair since those on both sides
of the 9/11 issue are going to be pulling and tugging at you, pulling hard
in very different and opposite directions.
- Professor, be prepared to first be hounded by the 9/11
truth seekers, who are going to try top use your every word to bolster
their position that Bush and his cronies killed 3,000 on the morning of
9/11. Interviews from radio stations, news outlets and underground television
stations will come by the thousands as you have now, for the time being,
become the 9/11 truth movement's new poster child, replacing the likes
of former Bush administration official, Morgan Reynolds, and other conservatives
who came out of the closet attacking Bush for bringing about 9/11.
- The Arctic Beacon was one of the first to interview Reynolds
and his statements about the 9/11 being a government inside job, the story
being literally picked up round the world. Then came former Reagan Treasury
Secretary, Paul Craig Roberts, making similar statements while bashing
Bush on the Iraqi War as well, causing equally as big of stir as Reynolds.
- And all bets are off as to how hard the Bush attack dogs
will come down Jones, who will be viewed as hitting Bush below the belt
from a strongly conservative stronghold like BYU and Utah.
- So, it's really only a matter of time before he is somehow
discredited for his views and only a matter of time before the Bushies
pull out of their hats five, ten or fifteen other physic's professors who
totally disagree with him, as endless scientific debates will automatically
take center stage for awhile like the many debates on the same issue have
transpired in the past.
- And what will be accomplished? Well, in reality Jones
will probably get frustrated of the constant harassment and soon slip back
into academia. The Bush administration will try to hasten that move and
uncover whatever dirt on him available to discredit his character while,
at the same time, checking to see what type of government contracts can
be withheld from BYU in order to get Jones to shut up.
- And, in the end the great scientific debate over 9/11
will continue as the real culprits in Washington like Daddy and Baby Bush,
Clinton, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice. Wolfowitz, Pearle, Rove and the other
crooks continue to walk hand in hand by the banks of the Potomac, smoking
cigars and laughing all the way to the bank.
- But for the sake of discourse, it's rather interesting
to note the innocence, almost schoolboy attitude exhibited by Professor
Jones, as to why he finally decided to go public about 9/11. First he said
he was inspired by a clairvoyant who had a near death experience, warning
others "if you think the WTC came down just due to fire, you have
a lot of surprises ahead of you."
- He then was quoted as saying "at which point everyone
around me (at the speech) started applauding." Even though this is
a rather amusing tale, Jones should be prepared for some near death experiences
of his own, since crossing the line with Daddy Bush is sometimes hazardous
to one's health.
- Also, Jones should be prepared to be forever classified
by the Bushies as "a crazy clairvoyant nut" as he made his first
mistake by giving the administration this type of ammunition to use against
him, being too honest and too naïve -- two big mistakes he will come
to regret when looking back on the whole story
- Next Jones makes a second statement about his 9/11 reawakening
in the Deseret Morning News, again indicating he has no idea what kind
of corrupt government world he is entering. Although a good idea, he said
he would like the government to turn over 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments
of video footage for "independent scrutiny" now being conveniently
held out of sight and out of mind by the government.
- Fat chance! All that can be said is good luck since most
serious investigators and truth seekers to date can't even get their hands
on one video, let alone 12,000, an example being from the gas station across
the street from the Pentagon, a video which is being held by the FBI that
most likely could show an airliner never struck the Pentagon.
- Besides the 12,000 pictures and tapes, Jones is also
asking the government to turn over a piece of molten steel from the core
of the towers for his independent investigation, again perhaps not understanding
FEMA shipped the steel right after 9/11 out of the country to China in
an obvious obstruction of justice criminal violation.
- Good luck again to Jones if he can get a piece of WTC
steel, but it should be remembered for four long years thousands before
him have tried and failed, obviously proving we have a cover-up of massive
- Even though Jones means well and his heart is in the
right place, he is going to have a rude awakening when he tries to get
anything, even a cup of coffee and a roll, from anyone close to the government
after what he has said. It's basically the gloves off, professor, so get
used to the controversy as perhaps the old saying "be careful what
you ask for as you just might get it" may aptly apply here.
- But regarding his 9/11 conclusions, it's important to
note they are bolstered by what he says are many eye-witnesses who have
come forward, saying they heard, felt and experienced explosions in the
sublevels of the towers just prior to the airliners striking at the top
- Jones is correct in his conclusions since the Arctic
Beacon has been one of the first to conduct interviews with many of those
eye-witnesses, including a North Tower survivor named Felipe Sanchez, who
experienced third degree burns from the powerful basement explosions, resulting
in a six month hospital stay before he finally recovered.
- Jones should be told that 9/11 Commission as well as
everybody else in high places, including the major television and newspaper
outlets, have all categorically censored all the eye-witnesses, shutting
up anyone who can finger the government liars and verify a controlled demolition
took place, thus revealing the true nature of the corrupt media owners
protecting the equally corrupt government officials.
- However, in all fairness, Jones' thoughts should be heard
and added to the words of many other 9/11 truth seekers who have come spoken
before him. In the article written by Elaine Jarvik of the Deseret Morning
News, the following points are highlighted from his 9,000 word article
claiming the towers and Building 7 were most likely brought down by a controlled
- * The three buildings collapsed nearly symmetrically,
falling down into their footprints, a phenomenon associated with "controlled
demolition" - and even then it's very difficult, he says. "Why
would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7 and the Towers
when 'toppling over' falls would require much less work and would do much
more damage in downtown Manhattan?" Jones asks. "And where would
they obtain the necessary skills and access to the buildings for a symmetrical
implosion anyway? The 'symmetry data' emphasized here, along with other
data, provide strong evidence for an 'inside' job."
- * No steel-frame building, before or after the
WTC buildings, has ever collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively
sever steel columns, he says.
- * WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes,
collapsed in 6.6 seconds, just .6 of a second longer than it would take
an object dropped from the roof to hit the ground. "Where is the delay
that must be expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational
laws of physics?" he asks. "That is, as upper-falling floors
strike lower floors - and intact steel support columns - the fall must
be significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . How do the upper floors
fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the collapsing buildings?"
The paradox, he says, "is easily resolved by the explosive demolition
hypothesis, whereby explosives quickly removed lower-floor material, including
steel support columns, and allow near free-fall-speed collapses."
These observations were not analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission,
- * With non-explosive-caused collapse there would
typically be a piling up of shattering concrete. But most of the material
in the towers was converted to flour-like powder while the buildings were
falling, he says. "How can we understand this strange behavior, without
explosives? Remarkable, amazing - and demanding scrutiny since the U.S.
government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon."
- * Horizontal puffs of smoke, known as squibs, were
observed proceeding up the side the building, a phenomenon common when
pre-positioned explosives are used to demolish buildings, he says.
- * Steel supports were "partly evaporated,"
but it would require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate
steel - and neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate temperatures
that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked planes lasted at most
a few minutes, and office material fires would burn out within about 20
minutes in any given location, he says.
- * Molten metal found in the debris of the World
Trade Center may have been the result of a high-temperature reaction of
a commonly used explosive such as thermite, he says. Buildings not felled
by explosives "have insufficient directed energy to result in melting
of large quantities of metal," Jones says.
- * Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were
reported by numerous observers in and near the towers, and these explosions
occurred far below the region where the planes struck, he says.
- Greg Szymanski is an independent investigative journalist
and his articles can been seen at www.LewisNews.com. He also writes for
American Free Press www.AmericanFreePress.net and has his own site www.arcticbeacon.com