- Abduction cases are rapidly becoming standard fare in
UFOlogy. The abduction of an individual, or individuals, and the subsequent
"medical examination" which have been related countless times
are famliar to most researchers. However, we may have a new twist to add
to the old story.
- In 1984, a Lincoln, Nebraska woman we will call simply
"Joan," mentioned that she had experienced a recurring dream
since childhood. In this dream, someone appears outside her bedroom window,
and attempts to coax her to come with them. This subject arose during a
casual conversation, and over the next few days, I made a decision to explore
this dream with Joan, if she were willing to pursue it.
- Joan (whose full name is on file and available to qualified
reseachers with her permission) holds a position of some authority with
a state governmental agency. An extremely intelligent and engaging woman,
Joan had almost no prior knowledge of the UFO subject, and, in fact, was
uninterested in it. She did, however, agree to explore this rcurring dream
through the use of regressive hypnosis.
- On April 11, 1984, Joan was hypnotically regressed to
the point in time when the dream fist occurred. This, we discovered, was
October 7, 1955, when Joan was 12 years old. The hypnosis was performed
by Stacey Vornbrock, a psychological social worker, and a skilled hypnotist.
- The story which unforlded was for the most part very
similar to that of other abductees. She was awakened in her bedroom by
a figure standing outside her window, who asked her to come with him. This
entity was described as about four feet in height, dressed in a hite tight-fitting
- This entity conducts Joan on a "craft" which
is resting on the ground in a large vacant lot next to her home. After
entering, she is given the well-known medical exam described by others
(sampling of skin tissue, blood, hair, etc.) and is returned to her home,
and subsequently her bedroom.
- The entity who escorted her from the bedroom, and subsequently
performed the examination, was assisted by 5 other similar beings, who
were described as identical, but slightly smaller, than the "leader."
The leader, who Joan had originally met, was the only one who communicated
with her. However, she indicated that she was able to discern what he was
telling his apparent subordinates. This is where the totally new dimension
- According to Joan's testimony under hypnosis, the subordinates
were quite worried about being caught, that it was too obvious a location
with too many people nearby, and that they shouldn't take chances and endanger
themselves. The leader told them apparently quite sternly that plans had
changed, they had to make up time, and that's why Joan was chosen.
- The leader then indicated to Joan that they had intended
to examine someone else, a man who was out driving in his automobile, but
he had returned home, (apparently an unexpected turn of events to the entities)
and they were unable to pick him up then. The leader then indicated to
the others not to be concerned, that he had done this many times before.
- He then indicated to Joan that she was, quoting now,
"very far back in the files, and they hadn't intended to choose her,
but the change in plans necessitated it. This being then begins the examination,
Joan having been instructed to lie on a smooth, metallic table. Clamps
emerge from the table, holding her ankles, wrists, and head immobile. Again,
without going into great detail, the examination which follows is quite
similar to that related by many others.
- However, throughout this examination, the leader apparently
had to reassure the others that it was quite alright for this to be going
on, and made mention several times again of Joan being "back in the
files." This presents a novel idea, which could conceivably tie in
with Budd Hopkin's work on abductions.
- Hopkins had found that (as chronicled in his book Missing
Time) many of the abductees he has worked with have had multiple experiences
- first as a child, and then again later as an adult. Making the great
assumption that what all of these people have experienced is exactly what
they have described, is it not conceivable that the individuals abducted
may indeed be "on file" - genetically, by random chance, or by
some deliberative process which we could not begin to fathom? This appears
to add an entirely new dimension to the entire abduction question.
- One other startling fact emerged at the end of the abduction
experience. The following information is so coincidentally strange, that
I was quite literally shocked when it came out during the session. Joan
was describing being back in her room, and the leader was reassuring her
that she was alright, and she wouldn't remember the event in the morning.
We asked Joan to recall this conversation exactly, word for word, much
as if she were watching herself and this entity carry on a conversation.
Here is the transcription of that conversation.
- JOAN: I want to talk.
- ENTITY: About what?
- J: What went on?
- E: Nothing.
- J: Who are you?
- E: An explorer.
- J: An explorer of what?
- E: An explorer of all.
- J: Like who?
- E: Like your christopher Columbus.
- J: Should I be afraid?
- E: Not of us.
- J: Who should I be afraid of?
- E: The men in black.
- J: You mean the priests?
- E: No, no, the men in black.
- J: What men in black?
- E: You don't have to be afraid.
- J: What do they look like?
- E: They're your people (Joan then described a mental
picture of men dressed completely in black clothing - suits, overcoats,
hats, sunglasses, gloves, which she said was the way the entity communicated
this description to her).
- J: What do they do?
- E: They scare people.
- J: Like ghosts?
- E: No, like bad people scare others.
- J: Like J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI?
- E: No.
- J: What will they do?
- E: They don't want people to know we explorers won't
- J: Are you going to help us?
- E: No, we're just explorers, but we watch.
- J: What will they do?
- E: You like animals.
- J: Yes.
- E: What if I tell you that they killed someone's dog
because he saw some explorers.
- J: Joan then goes on to describe a "mental motion
picture," in which she is shown a man walking in the woods with his
dog, when he stumbles on a landed UFO. Later that same night, she witnesses
the men in black clothing come to his home, kill his dog, and question
the man about what he had seen.
- She is then made aware of these men in black calling
the man's work place, discrediting him, causing the loss of his job. After
suffering further harassment from friends and family, Joan is shown the
man back in his home, placing a gun in his mouth, and pulling the trigger.
- J: What else?
- E: You're afraid - I don't want to tell you any more
because I don't want you to be afraid. I've only told you this much because
you are a child, and curious. Just know they are bad. You are safe.
- J: Can you keep me safe?
- E: No, when we are gone, we can do nothing more. The
men in black won't know, you are too far back in our files.
- J: Who should I tell?
- E: You won't remember.
- J: Who will know?
- E: No one - they aren't watching you, not like the man
in Maine. Don't be afraid, goodbye.
- As I mentioned earlier, I was shocked to hear this portion
of the session. Also, the first question which Joan asked upon awakening
from the hypnotic state was "Have you ever heard of these men in black?"
She literally had no concept that a term such as this even existed.
- I am well aware of the doubts expressed by many researchers
as to the validity of abduction cases as a whole. I feel, however, that
the whole abduction question is one for serious consideration, and I doubt
highly that they are all the products of the imagination, or the oft-touted
"birth-trauma" memories. In short, I believe a great many of
these people experienced something exceedingly strange, and which took
place substantially as they claim it did.
- I am also aware of the highly skeptical attitude taken
by many researchers toward the question of the notorious men in black,
or MIB reports. I have a great interest in this aspect of UFOlogy, and
for approximately the last 3 years, I have been collecting as much substantiated
information as possible for a serious book-length work on this subject.
I am also certain that the question of the MIB phenomenon is not one to
be taken lightly.
- Let me make some comments relative to this, since these
two controversial topics are woven together in this instance. People in
great numbers are having these experiences, both abductions, and MIB events.
Of that there can be no doubt. Before criticizing this attitude, however,
you must realize that we still have no firm, concrete proof of what the
causal factor in these events might be.
- At this point in time, we can see only the effect the
descriptions of these events as given to us by the percipients. We don't
know the cause. Is it a psychological phenomenon? If so, then what is triggering
it? Budd Hopkins and Dr. Aphrodite Clamar have shown that the psychological
profiles of many abduction victims show no abnormalities, but suggest that
they have suffered a psychological trauma-like an abduction. So, if the
cause is psychological, what is the intrusive factor which "tickles"
the psyche into constructing this event. I cannot accept at this time,
with the available facts, that it is either an overactive imagination,
or a memory of the birth trauma.
- The same can be said of MIB experiences. What is the
causal factor? I quite honestly don't know. And before anyone attempts
to dismiss these events as being hoaxes, delusions, or plays for publicity,
they had better be able to explain the many legitimate cases of MIB activity;
the cases which have lain silent until, with much effort I have been able
to ferret them out. No plays for publicity, no hoaxes, just a good many
genuinely frightened people who have no idea why they experienced what
- At any rate, here is an abduction case which raises a
good many questions -- many of which are rather uncomfortable to face.
As a matter of fact, it was quite uncomfortable to make the decision to
publish this report. However, unless we can look at all of the evidence
with unbiased eyes, we will never be able to make any headway toward understanding
- Bill Hamilton
- AstroScience Research Network
- "I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because
they seem incredible." Fred Hoyle
- From Bill Hamilton
- It just so happens that this story which came from Leneesa's
blog website for UFOCCI (UFO Contact Center International) and was written
by researcher Ray Boeche was forwarded to an individual we call an insider.
Insiders were "read in" to the secret UFO government program
and have had some direct experience while in government service of witnessing
alien spacecraft or our pilots flying alien spacecraft or reverse engineering
of alien spacecraft or alien biology and believe they know the truth about
alien spacecraft, alien origins, alien technology and other aspects of
the alien presence, but NOT ONE of them was ever briefed on alien abductions
and do not believe it is even happening. I have heard this now from multiple
- Without disclosing anything but one typical sentence,
here is an example:
- "Another science fiction story. Never heard of
any abductions in my 32 years of government service."
- If we believe abductions are real events, and I do, at
least in some percentage of cases, then this means even insiders are kept
in the dark concerning the alien agenda. The CONTROLLERS do not even fully
brief those in government service about the WHOLE truth. This is indeed
an eye-opener and I think we definitely have something to worry about here,
because we have to ask ourselves who these controllers are and who knows
the whole picture and why are they holding back?
- I have reason to believe that the reason for the cover
up is not the alien presence alone, but WHY they are here, and that reason
may involve future events that have drawn them here to conduct a program
of survival. When I take pieces of this puzzle from both the insiders
and the abductees together, the picture comes into better focus and involves
more than just intra-galactic space. It involves the TIME dimension.
We seemed to be headed for disaster on a fast track and it would behoove
us to start looking at the signs of the time.
- Bill Hamilton
- AstroScience Research Network