- "It was the Jews themselves who convinced me of
the direct relationship between the international Jew and war. In fact,
they went out of their way to convince me. On the peace ship were two
very prominent Jews. We had not been at sea 200 miles before they began
telling me of the power of the Jewish race, of how they controlled the
world through their control of gold, and that the Jew and no one but the
Jew could end the war. I was reluctant to believe it but they went into
detail to convince me of the means by which the Jews controlled the war,
how they had the money, how they had cornered all the basic materials needed
to fight the war and all that, and they talked so long and so well that
they convinced me. They said, and they believed, that the Jews started
the war, that they would continue it as long as they wished, and that until
the Jew stopped the war it could not be stopped. I was so disgusted I
would have liked to turn the ship back."
-
- -- Henry Ford to The New York Times in 1921
-
- Something's got to give soon. The various "Lone
Rangers" of the Internet and some maverick government officials are
beginning to challenge G. Bush and his Zionist spooks, handlers and manipulators.
And as regards virtually the entire Congress, their mantra will never
return to those "thrilling days of yesteryear," when "Remember
the Alamo," or "Remember the Maine," or "Damn the torpedoes
and full speed ahead!" typified the military heroics that founded
this nation. No, their mantra now is "Israel has a right to exist!"
as recently articulated by Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi humbling herself
and the entire Congress before almighty AIPAC, the controllers and destroyers
of American government and our American way of life.
-
- Congressman John Conyers' heroic effort to get to the
bottom of things launched by the Downing Street Memos, note the plural,
has, it appears, been torpedoed by the very same Zionist propaganda rags
and hags that refused to report the news in the first place - but now they're
reactively on board and screaming a blood-curdling "ANTI-SEMITISM!"
What a hoot!
-
- The latest "Typhoid Mary" journalistic shill
for Zionism is Dana Milbank in his June 17th attack
against Conyers and any and all Democrats that don't sell America down
the river for Israel: "Democrats Play House To Rally Against the War."
Should the question be posed to the Bilderberg-supporting Washington Post
with its untiring devotion to the New World Order of The
International Jew, as well as to Milbank himself, inquiring as to the
progress being made in the investigation of AIPAC spying? Or perhaps Milbank
and his boss Abramowitz
can fill US in on the Israeli weapons sales to Communist China! No?
-
- Well then, why has it taken the Bilderberg-supporting
Washington Post over six weeks to comment in any way on the original Downing
Street Memo, exposed by the Sunday London Times back on May 1, 2005? Why
has it taken The New York Times just as long to comment on this vital information
necessary to truly inform the American public?
-
- When will the Post and Milbank inform US on the progress
of the USS Liberty complaint
recently launched by some of its "survivors" against Israel for
murdering 34 of our Navy personnel and wounding 173 others? Isn't Milbank
proud of "Democrats" Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara for covering
up Israel's "false flag" attempt to blame Egypt for that attack,
which is dwarfed by Mossad's 9-11 participation to falsify claims against
Saddam and Iraq? When will the true facts concerning that Israeli false
flag act of terrorism be revealed by Milbank and his fellow "journalists"
at the Post? Will they follow up on the "Weehawken Five?"
-
- Milbank starts his false flag assault on Conyers offering:
"The session took an awkward turn when witness Ray McGovern, a former
intelligence analyst, declared that the United States went to war in Iraq
for oil, Israel and military bases craved by administration 'neocons' so
'the United States and Israel could dominate that part of the world.'
He said that Israel should not be considered an ally and that Bush was
doing the bidding of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon." Wow!
McGovern stated the whole Bush administration plan of operations in just
two sentences - pretty darn good!
-
- Milbank denigrated the Conyers meeting offering it as
being held in a "Capital basement" and that it engaged in "make
believe." What part of 1740 dead American service personnel is "make
believe" in Milbank's judgment? Has the Post elaborated on the additional
memos found to blunt Milbank's critical sarcasm? How does he know they
"pretended at playing" Judiciary Committee? He also failed to
mention Conyers' complaint that Republicans originally wouldn't allow the
Conyers panel to convene anywhere on Congressional property, and that they
only relented when Republican domination of our government was so outrageously
exhibited by Congressman James Sensenbrenner's senseless insensitivity
in walking out of a bi-partisan committee discussing the horrors of the
USA PATRIOT Act.
-
- So, where's the sarcasm in Milbank's
latest collaborative effort with fellow "writer" Peter Baker
"reporting" on the latest Bush lies and newspeak in his June
28th TV propaganda show? Milbank and Baker write in their June 29th article
entitled, "Bush Says War Worth the Effort," offering: "Bush
invoked Sept. 11 five times in his speech and referred to it by implication
several more times." They continue: "Although he has previously
agreed with investigators that there is 'no evidence' of a link between
Saddam Hussein's government and the attacks masterminded by Osama bin Laden's
al Qaeda, he used much of his speech to depict the militants in Iraq as
the same breed of Islamic terrorist who struck the United States. The
White House titled his remarks a discussion on the 'War on Terror,' not
Iraq." Astonishing, no? Now we're not only not after a specific
nation, nor even a specific group of terrorists, but a "breed"
of evil-doers! Isn't word engineering a wonderful thing?!
-
- Now Bush freely admits no connection to either Saddam
or Iraq as regards 9-11, and Milbank doesn't see anything amiss here?
Why was there a connection before the Downing Street Memo and none whatsoever
at the present time? He doesn't see how heavily Bush touted this farce
to mislead America, lie to Congress, and cause the deaths of 1,740 of our
own military? He still cannot connect the Downing Street Memos, the substantiation
and proof of manufactured false intelligence, and the actual statements
of other Bush accusers along with those of McGovern and Conyers? What
about Clark, O'Neill, Reynolds, Shayler, Edmonds and Kwiatkowski? Do Milbank,
Baker and the Washington Post even know who these people are?
-
- Milbank is the "hit man" for the Zionist media!
His assignment? Take out Conyers and whatever Democrats support him, help
Bush and the GOP to continue to dominate and run interference for Ariel
Sharon and Israel. Dan
Balz comes a lot closer to exposing the Bush fraud when commenting
on Bush's June 28th TV show: "One year after the transfer of power
in Iraq, President Bush found himself in a familiar, if unsettling, position
last night, as he sought to reinvigorate public support for his policies
in the face of almost daily suicide bombings and continued U.S. casualties
that have called into question whether the administration has a workable
strategy for success and exit there." But if the Post had only paid
more attention to some of the words in Downing, they would have learned,
"There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after
military action."
-
- In his "'Lessons of Sept.11' Take Center Stage Again"
of June 29th, Balz continues, "Sept. 11 remains Bush's most reliable
argument with the public when he faces political headwinds; it gave him
the highest-rated moments of his presidency and helped sustain him through
a difficult reelection campaign. Surprisingly, given how effectively he
has used the collective emotion of that day in the past, Sept. 11 has been
largely missing in the administration's discussions of Iraq this year."
Nothing surprising here - once Bush and the GOP got US into this war for
Israel, oil and bases in the Mid East, we were all supposed to quickly
dwell on the evil of Islam that needed eradicating.
-
- But Bush is now backpedaling once again, hoping to hide
in the comfy zone of a heroic wartime president launching anew the Crusades
of the 21st century. And while the Zionist MSM has been covering for him
and his international criminal activities, the Internet and an increasing
number of Democrats, and now even some Republicans, are causing worry and
uncertainty that yet another "Gitmo eruption" or other uncovered
outrage/lie will blow wide open Bush's scheme regime of lying Zionist Nazis.
And with this uncertainty, Bush and his war are dropping rapidly in public
opinion polls.
-
- So here's Balz's very key observation: "The stakes
for Bush could hardly be higher, given the reality that unpopular wars
can lead to the unraveling of a presidency. Bush's lofty ambitions for
a free, stable and democratic Iraq may stir Americans' sense of idealism,
but if events on the ground call those goals into question, the potential
for erosion in support remains significant."
-
- And then, Balz follows with an ominous observation: "No
single speech can cement public opinion, particularly in a conflict in
which the administration has been guilty of misjudgments about the strength
of the opposition and the timetable for stabilizing and rebuilding Iraq.
To a surprising degree, given the strength of the insurgency in Iraq, Bush
has maintained support for the broad goals of his Iraq policy and for a
continued military presence there. But nothing guarantees continued support
if there is little sign of progress on the ground."
-
- The danger exposed is that Bush and his regime had always
counted on the Zionist MSM to cover up for the Bush imperial criminal agenda,
but the Internet has indeed shaken some of their former resolve. Scott Ritter has alluded
to hostilities on the part of our over-extended forces as already being
deployed in Iran; please remember that Downing also mentioned "spikes
of activity" before the invasion of Iraq to provoke Saddam. The Bush
regime's popularity at the time carried them back then; it will not carry
them now. Veterans have returned to tell of the horrors of Iraq, as have
continuing lines and rows of flag-draped caskets. Bush has built his regime
on lies, deception and falsehoods, which are unmentioned in Balz's admonition
- these have become a staggering risk factor to Bush's rapidly decreasing
popularity.
-
- The situation is similar to the American political environment
immediately preceding September 11, 2001. Americans could not see any
need to do Israel's bidding. The Zionist PNAC cabal that controls the
White House, the Pentagon and the Congress, will now require yet another
"Pearl Harbor for the 21st century." This will be needed to blunt
increasing exposure and focus on the Bush regime's war crimes and torture,
its PATRIOT Act, the coming gulags, the failing economy, the ever-decreasing
job market, the ever-increasing employment instability, and the planned
invasions of Iran and Syria.
-
- Will the Bush crime regime become desperate and arrange
yet another terrorist attack? Where will the Mossad strike this time?
Will that be the most expedient political solution again for these gangsters
increasingly recognized as such by more and more ordinary people? Sadly,
I feel something's going to happen soon!
-
- Theodore E. Lang
-
- 6/30/05
- © THEODORE E. LANG 6/30/05 All rights reserved
-
- Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.
|
