- WASHINGTON, DC -- Last week's
London explosions carry the characteristic features of a state-sponsored,
false flag, synthetic terror provocation by networks within the British
intelligence services MI-5, MI-6, the Home Office, and the Metropolitan
Police Special Branch who are favorable to a wider Anglo-American aggressive
war in the Middle East, featuring especially an early pre-emptive attack
on Iran, with a separate option on North Korea also included. With the
London attacks, the Anglo-American invisible government adds another horrendous
crime to its own dossier. But this time, their operations appear imperfect,
especially in regard to the lack (so far) of a credible patsy group which,
by virtue of its ethnicity, could direct popular anger against one of the
invisible government's targets. So far, the entire attribution of the London
crimes depends on what amounts to an anonymous posting in an obscure, hitherto
unknown, secular Arabic-language chatrooms in the state of Maryland, USA.
But, based on this wretched shred of pseudo-evidence, British Prime Minister
Tony Blair who has surely heard of a group called the Irish Republican
Army, which bombed London for more than a decade has not hesitated to ascribe
the murders to "Islam," and seems to be flirting with total martial
law under the Civil Contingencies Act. We are reminded once again of how
he earned his nickname of Tony Bliar.
- SCOTLAND YARD KNEW IN ADVANCE
- That the British Government knew in advance that blasts
would occur is not open to rational doubt. Within hours of the explosions,
Israeli Army Radio was reporting that "Scotland Yard [London police
headquarters] had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before
they occurred." This report, repeated by IsraelNN.com, added that
"the Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting
in Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather
than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion,
a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address an economic summit."
This report is attributed to "unconfirmed reliable sources."
At around the same time, the Associated Press issued a wire asserting that
"British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before
Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror
attacks in the city," according to "a senior Israeli official."
This wire specifies that "just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called
the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say that they had received
warnings of possible attacks."
- According to eyewitness reports from London, BBC claimed
between 8:45 and some minutes after 10 AM that the incidents in the Underground
were the result of an electrical power surge, or alternatively of a collision.
Foreign bigwigs, presumably not just Netanyahu, were warned, while London
working people continued to stream into the subway. These reports have
been denied, repudiated, sanitized, and expunged from news media websites
by the modern Orwellian Thought Police, but they have been archived by
analysts who learned on 9/11 and other occasions that key evidence in state-sponsored
terror crimes tends to filter out during the first minutes and hours, during
the critical interval when the controlled media are assimilating the cover
story peddled by complicit moles within the ministries. These reports are
not at all damaging to Israel, but are devastating for British domestic
security organs. An alternative version peddled by Stratfor.com, namely
that the Israelis warned Scotland Yard, is most probably spurious but still
leaves the British authorities on the hook. Which Scotland Yard official
made the calls? Identify that official, and you have bagged a real live
rogue network mole.
- Another more general element of foreknowledge can be
seen in the fact reported by Isikoff and Hosenball of Newsweek that, since
about November 2004, the US FBI, but not other US agencies, has been refusing
to use the London Underground.
- Operations like these are generally conduited through
the government bureaucracies under the cover of a drill or exercise which
closely resembles the terror operation itself. So it was with Amalgam Virgo
and the multiple exercises held on 9/11, as I show in my 9/11 Synthetic
Terror Made in USA (Joshua Tree CA: Progressive Press, 2005). So it was
with the Hinckley attempt to assassinate Ronald Reagan, when a presidential
succession exercise was scheduled for the next day, as I showed in my George
Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992; reprint by Progressive Press, 2004).
An uncannily similar maneuver allows the necessary work to be done on official
computers and on company time, while warding off the inquisitive glances
and questions of curious co-workers at adjoining computer consoles.
- THE COVER STORY TERROR DRILL
- Such a parallel drill was not lacking in the London case.
On the evening of July 7, BBC Five, a news and sports radio program, carried
an interview with a certain former Scotland Yard official named Peter Power
who related that his firm, Visor Consulting, had been doing an anti-terror-bombing
drill in precisely the Underground stations and at the precise times when
the real explosions went off. Peter Power and Visor had been subcontractors
for the drill; Power declined to name the prime contractors. Small wonder
that Blair, in his first official report to the Commons on July 11, went
out of his way to rule out a board of inquiry to probe these tragic events.
- Tony Blair may be eyeing the advantages of emergency
rule for a discredited lame duck like himself, but the British people may
have a different view. The alternative is clear: on the one hand is the
American response after 9/11, marked by submissive and credulous gullibility
in regard to the fantastic official story of what had happened. On the
other hand is the militant and intelligent Spanish response after March
11, 2004, marked by powerful mass mobilization and righteous anger against
politicians who sought to manipulate the people and sell a distorted account
of events. Which way will the British people go? Straws in the wind suggest
that the British response may be closer to the Spanish, although it may
develop more slowly because of the lack of mass organization and related
factors. If this is the case, Tony Blair, Jack Straw, and the rest of the
malodorous "New Labor" crypto-Thatcherites will be out the window.
- My thesis is that the London explosions represent a form
of communication on the past of the transatlantic Anglo-American financier
faction with Bush, Blair, and the heads of state and government assembled
at Gleneagles, Scotland for the G-8 meeting on the day of the blast. The
London deaths were designed to deliver an ultimatum in favor of early war
with Iran. Here a word of clarification may be necessary. The demonization
of Bush by his many enemies, while understandable, risks blurring the basic
realities of power in the US and UK. Since the Bay of Pigs and the Kennedy
assassination (to go back no further than that), we have been aware of
a secret team. During the Iran-contra era, the same phenomenon was referred
to as an invisible, secret or parallel government. This is still the matrix
of most large-scale terrorism. The questions arises for some: do Bush and
Cheney tell the invisible government what to do, or does the invisible
government treat the visible office holders as puppets and expendable assets?
To ask the question is to answer it: Bush, Cheney & Co. are the expendable
puppets. The explanation of terror is not Bush MIHOP, as some seem to argue,
but rather invisible government MIHOP, an altogether more dire proposition.
- How then does the invisible faction communicate with
the public mouthpieces? Given the violence of the power relations involved,
we can be sure that it is not a matter of sending out engraved invitations
announcing that the honor of Bush's presence is requested at the launching
of an attack on Iran. Rather, the invisible and violent rogue network communicates
with Bush, Blair, and others by means coherent with their aggressive nature
as they did on 9/11. Bush, of course, is a weak and passive tenant of the
White House whose instinct is to do virtually nothing beyond the day-to-day
- We therefore need to note that the London blasts come
after two months of vigorous and impatient prodding of Bush by the invisible
government. On May 11, a small plane almost reached the White House before
it was turned away, while the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White
House (but not the Pentagon, the Treasury, etc.) were evacuated amid scenes
of panic. The White House went to red alert, but Bush was not informed
until it was all over, and was riding his bicycle in the woods near Greenbelt,
Maryland. Flares were dropped over the Brookland district and Takoma Park,
MD. The resemblance of all this to a classic coup scenario was evident.
On May 18, a live hand grenade, which turned out to be a dud, landed near
Bush as he spoke at a rally in Tbilisi, Georgia.
- On June 29, the approach of another small plane led to
an evacuation of the Congress and the Capitol, again with scenes of panic.
On the afternoon of July 2, no fewer than three small planes came close
to Bush's Camp David retreat in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland; this
story was suspiciously relegated to the local news page of the Washington
Post. The details of these incidents are of little interest; what counts
is the objective reality of a pattern. These incidents also provide background
for Bush's unbalanced behavior on July 5 at Gleneagles, when he crashed
into a policeman while riding on his bicycle. Then came the London blasts
on July 7.
- What is it that the invisible government wants Bush and
Blair to do? Scott Ritter announced last January that Bush had issued an
order to prepare an attack on Iran for the month of June. According to
a well-informed retired CIA analyst I spoke with on July 3, this order
actually told US commanders to be ready to attack Iran by the end of June.
This project of war with Iran is coherent with most of what we know about
the intentions of the US-UK rogue faction, and thus provides the immediate
background for the London explosions. The Bush administration and the Blair
cabinet have failed to deliver decisive military action, and the invisible
government is exceedingly impatient.
- One way to increase the pressure on Iran would be to
implicate a group of Iranian fanatic patsies in the London bombings. This
would not be difficult; in fact, as I show in 9/11 Synthetic Terror, the
British capital, referred to during the 1990s as Londonistan, is home to
the largest concentration of Arab and Islamic patsy groups in the entire
world in such infamous locations as Finsbury mosque and Brixton mosque;
these groups are known to have enjoyed de facto recruiting privileges in
Her Majesty's Prisons. But perhaps an Iranian patsy group would be too
obvious at this time. More likely may be the sinking of a US warship in
the Gulf by a third country, duly attributed to Iran.
- In a recent speech, Dr. Ephraim Asculai of Tel Aviv University
made two main points: first, that there is no military solution to the
Iranian nuclear issue, and second, that there is no such thing as a point
of no return in nuclear weapons development. Dr. Asculai showed that South
Africa, Sweden, and other nations had turned away from deploying A-bombs
well after having acquired the ability to produce them. Dr. Asculai is
evidently arguing against widespread tendencies in the US-UK-Israeli strategic
community who are whipping up hysteria around the notion that Iran is now
indeed approaching exactly such a point of no return.
- For her part, Miss Rice of the State Department has now
declared that it will no longer be sufficient for Iran to turn away from
nuclear weapons production; the entire Iranian program for nuclear energy
production will also have to be dismantled, in her view. Such maximalism
makes a negotiated solution impossible as long as the current Washington
group holds power.
- SCO: US GET OUT OF CENTRAL ASIA
- The US, UK and Israel have been on the brink of war with
Iran for at least a year, and the rogue network is generally aware that
time is not on its side. There is also an important new development which
threatens the ability of the Anglo-Americans to wage war. On July 5, the
summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which brings together
China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Krygyzia, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan plus new
members India, Pakistan, and Iran, issued a call for the United States
to vacate the bases seized in the autumn of 2001 under the cover of the
9/11 emergency and the looming invasion of Afghanistan. The parties to
this call represent about half of the world's population. This demand was
immediately rejected by the State Department, but veteran Russian Eurasian
expert Yevgeny Primakov crowed that for the first time a formula had been
agreed to by which the US would be ejected from this region. The US presence
goes back to the Bush-Putin emergency hotwire talks of September 11, 2001,
when Putin, seeing that the madmen had seized control in Washington, dropped
Russian objections to a US intrusion into the former Soviet republics of
central Asia. The US-UK can attack Iran from Iraq in the west, from Afghanistan
in the east, and from Qatar in the south, but without the Uzbek and Kyrgyz
bases, the Anglo-American ability to attack from the north as well will
be severely limited. The SCO states are also concerned about US-backed
"color revolutions" on the recent Georgian and Ukrainian models,
traditionally known as CIA "people power" revolutions, being
used to destabilize their governments. To make matters worse for Washington
and London, Kazakhstan is a few months away from opening an oil pipeline
to China, which will diminish the US-UK ability to use their Gulf presence
to blackmail Beijing. Washington and London are also dismayed by the pro-Iranian
overtures in various fields being made by their Shiite puppets in Baghdad.
- And what of the report in the Washington Post of July
11, which claims that US and UK planners are now contemplating a sharp
reduction in the US forces in Iraq? The most plausible explanation is that
this is pure disinformation, similar to news blips issued by both Hitler
and Stalin in May and June of 1941. It should also be noted that the British
plan explicitly provides for most of the forces now at Basra to go to Afghanistan,
where they would be positioned for operations against Iran, or into central
- Generally, the invisible government appears dismayed
by its loss of momentum and the constant erosion of the political position
of its asset, Bush. 110,000 US factory workers lost their jobs in June,
the worst total in a year and a half: auto and textiles are collapsing.
The housing bubble may also be nearing its end, with the bankruptcy of
Fannie Mae on the near-term agenda. World derivatives have officially reached
$300 trillion, with JP Morgan Chase holding the largest single portfolio.
The one virtuoso performance of July 7 was that of the Federal Reserve,
Bank of England, and European Central Bank, which flooded equity and capital
markets with liquidity through such vehicles as the Plunge Protection Team
(PPT), turning a big Wall Street loss into a small gain.
- During the recent Reopen 9/11 tour of 8 European cities,
Jimmy Walter repeatedly forecast that the general predicament of the Bush
regime and the US financier faction would lead to another large-scale terror
attack before the end of 2005; this has now occurred, and there is no end
in sight. The tide of US public opinion has now definitively turned against
the Iraq war and to some degree against Bush, as all major polls demonstrate.
Notable is the 42% affirmative response to the Zogby International question
as to whether, if it could be proved that Bush lied to launch the Iraq
war, he should be impeached. Larry Franklin of the Wolfowitz-Feith neocon
apparatus has been indicted for divulging US secrets, and the American-Israeli
Public Affairs Council has been raided twice; further indictments are expected.
Karl Rove has now been revealed as the source of the Valerie Plame leak,
making Rove and perhaps other White House officials fair game for federal
indictment. The Niger yellowcake forgeries and the Chalabi state secrets
cases are still pending to say nothing of two stolen elections and the
9/11 Septembergate itself. All these factors incline the rogue network
to seek an improvement in their situation through a flight forward to a
wider war in Iran. Those who stand to lose most by such an Iranian adventure
must now mobilize to make Mr. Bush's second term as eventful as Nixon's
second term turned out to be in 1974.