- "It's appalling that this story got out there,"
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on her way back from Iraq.
-
- What's NOT appalling to Condi is that the US is holding
prisoners at Guantanamo under conditions termed "torture" by
the Red Cross. What's not appalling to Condi is that prisoners of the
Afghan war are held in violation of international law after that conflict
has supposedly ended. What is NOT appalling to Condi is that prisoner
witnesses have reported several instances of the Koran's desecration. What
is appalling to her is that these things were REPORTED. So to Condi goes
to the Joseph Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda Iron Cross.
-
- But I don't want to leave out our President. His aides
report that George Bush is "angry" about the report -- not the
desecration of the Koran, but the REPORTING of it.
-
- And so long as George is angry and Condi appalled, Newsweek
knows what to do: swiftly grab its corporate ankles and ask the White
House for mercy.
-
- But there was no mercy. Donald Rumsfeld pointed the
finger at Newsweek and said, "People lost their lives. People are
dead." Maybe Rumsfeld was upset that Newsweek was taking away his
job. After all, it's hard to beat Rummy when it comes to making people
dead.
-
- And just for the record: Newsweek, unlike Rumsfeld,
did not kill anyone -- nor did its report cause killings. Afghans protested
when they heard the Koran desecration story (as Christians have protested
crucifix desecrations). The Muslim demonstrators were gunned down by the
Afghan military police -- who operate under Rumsfeld's command.
-
- Our Secretary of Defense, in his darkest Big Brother
voice, added a warning for journalists and citizens alike, "People
need to be very careful about what they say." And Newsweek has now
promised to be very, very good, and very, very careful not to offend Rumsfeld,
appall Condi or anger George.
-
- For their good behavior, I'm giving Newsweek and its
owner, the Washington Post, this week's Yellow Streak Award for Craven
Cowardice in Journalism. As always, the competition is fierce, but Newsweek
takes the honors by backing down on Mike Isakoff's expose of cruelity,
racism and just plain bone-headed incompetence by the US military at the
Guantanamo prison camp.
-
- Isakoff cited a reliable source that among the neat little
"interrogation" techniques used to break down Muslim prisoners
was putting a copy of the Koran into a toilet. In the old days, Isakoff's
discovery would have led to Congressional investigations of the perpetrators
of such official offence. The Koran-flushers would have been flushed from
the military, panels would have been impaneled and Isakoff would have collected
his Pulitzer.
-
- No more. Instead of nailing the wrong-doers, the Bush
Administration went after the guy who REPORTED the crime, Isakoff. Was
there a problem with the story? Certainly. If you want to split hairs,
the inside-government source of the Koran desecration story now says he
can't confirm which military report it appeared in. But he saw it in one
report and a witnesses has confirmed that the Koran was defiled.
-
- Of course, there's an easy way to get at the truth. RELEASE
THE REPORTS NOW. Hand them over, Mr. Rumsfeld, and let's see for ourselves
what's in them.
-
- But Newsweek and the Post are too polite to ask Rumsfeld
to make the investigative reports public. Rather, the corporate babysitter
for Newsweek, editor Mark Whitaker, said, "Top administration officials
have promised to continue looking into the charges and so will we."
In other words, we'll take the Bush Administration's word that there is
no evidence of Koran-dunking in the draft reports on Guantanamo.
-
- It used to be that the Washington Post permitted journalism
in its newsrooms. No more. But, frankly, that's an old story.
-
- Every time I say investigative reporting is dead or barely
breathing in the USA, some little smartass will challenge me, "What
about Watergate? Huh?" Hey, buddy, the Watergate investigation was
32 years ago -- that means it's been nearly a third of a century since
the Washington Post has printed a big investigative scoop. The Post today
would never run the Watergate story: a hidden source versus official denial.
Let's face it, Bob Woodward, now managing editor at the Post, has gone
from "All the President's Men" to becoming the President's Man
-- "Bush at War." Ugh!
-
- And now the Post company is considering further restrictions
on the use of confidential sources -- no more "Deep Throats."
Despite its supposed new concern for hidden sources, let's note that Newsweek
and the Post have no trouble providing, even in the midst of this story,
cover for secret Administration sources that are FAVORABLE to Bush. Editor
Whitaker's retraction relies on "Administration officials" whose
names he kindly withholds.
-
- In other words, unnamed sources are OK if they defend
Bush, unacceptable if they expose the Administration's mendacity or evil.
-
- A lot of my readers don't like the Koran-story reporter
Mike Isakoff because of his goofy fixation with Monica Lewinsky and Mr.
Clinton's cigar. Have some sympathy for Isakoff: Mike's one darn good
reporter, but as an inmate at the Post/Newsweek facilities, his ability
to send out serious communications to the rest of the world are limited.
-
- A few years ago, while I was tracking the influence of
the power industry on Washington, Isakoff gave me some hard, hot stuff
on Bill Clinton -- not the cheap intern-under-the-desk gossip -- but an
FBI report for me to publish in The Guardian of Britain. I asked Isakoff
why he didn't put it in Newsweek or in the Post.
-
- He said, when it comes to issues of substance, "No
one gives a sh--," not the readers, and especially not the editors
who assume that their US target audience is small-minded, ignorant and
wants to stay that way.
-
- That doesn't leave a lot of time, money or courage for
real reporting. And woe to those who practice investigative journalism.
As with CBS's retraction of Dan Rather's report on Bush's draft-dodging,
Newsweek's diving to the mat on Guantanamo acts as a warning to all journalists
who step out of line.
-
- Newsweek has now publicly committed to having its reports
vetted by Rumsfeld's Defense Department before publication. Why not just
print Rumsfeld's press releases and eliminate the middleman, the reporter?
-
- However, not all of us poor scribblers will adhere to
this New News Order. In the meantime, however, for my future security and
comfort, I'm having myself measured for a custom-made orange suit.
-
-
- ********
- Greg Palast was awarded the 2005 George Orwell Prize
for Courage in Journalism at the Sundance Film Festival for his investigative
reports produced by the British Broadcasting Corporation. See those reports
for BBC, Harper's, The Nation and others at www.GregPalast.com
|
