WTC 7 Smoke And Mirrors On 9/11


WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11 By Jon Carlson carlson.jon@att.net 5-23-5

Three days after 9/11, The Albuquerque Journal interviewed Demolition Scientist Van Romero. Explosives Planted In Towers New Mexico Tech Expert Says By Olivier Uyttebrouck Journal Staff Writer Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday. The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said. Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures. Romero said he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts. Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures. "It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that." http://www.world-action.co.uk/explosives.html Apparently not wanting to be a lightning rod in the 9/11 controvery, later Romero added two quotes, "Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail." and "I'm not trying to say anything did or didn't happen." Attorney Phil Berg comments: "Although he would eventually recant his statements that explosives were used, perhaps there was some prodding by government officials," said Berg in the federal lawsuit, eventually hoping deposition testimony will clear up the confusion behind Dr. Romero's conflicting statements. "He is still on the record saying that 'the collapse of the towers was too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures.'" http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/17338.htm The RENSE article, WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible shows screen captures from the videos that Romero probably studied. http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm The Albuquerque Journal article doesn't mention what happened to WTC7, a 47-story steel-framed, brick masonry building that was located 355 feet from the North Tower. This photo shows WTC7 viewed from the North Tower. This photo WTC7 viewed from the South Tower, a distance of about 600 feet. Since WTC7 was 'only' 355 feet away, some damage occurred when the North Tower 'went down' BUT no fires. The WTC7 side opposite the NT also showed NO areas of fire. In these photos areas of fire have miraculously appeared. Arson? NIST reports fires not seen in photos all over the place . (The smoke is primarily from the Towers burning.) SHOWTIME: ENGINEER JERRY RUSSELL: Controlled demolitions have a striking and characteristic appearance of smooth, flowing collapse.As your eyes will tell you, the World Trade Center collapses looked like controlled demolitions. Building 7 was destroyed later in the afternoon. It was never hit by any airplane, so there is no known reason (besides explosives) for it to have collapsed into rubble. http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm FEMA: "The specifics of the fires in WTC-7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY (An agency of the US Commerce Dept):: NISA has seen no evidence that the collapse of WTC7 was caused by bombs, missiles, or controlled demolition. April 5, 2005 . http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_latest_findings_1004.htm 911 COMMISSION: Their report...looks only at the 102 minutes between the first plane attack and the collapses of WTC 1 and 2. They thus ignored a crucial case where the available evidence militates against the official explanation. http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Fight-Terrorism-Scott1sep04.htm LARRY SILVERSTEIN (The World Trade Center was leased by Westfield America and Larry Silverstein, on April 26th, 2001): "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it (WTC7)." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html Remarkably in only 10 days Controlled Demolition, Inc. submitted a plan to remove the remains of Ground Zero. http://sept11.wasteage.com/ar/waste_construction_company_proposes/ HOWEVER, the company makes no claims for the demolition records that would have been established on 9/11. Their website claims the Detroit Hudson Department Store at 439 feet dropped in October, 1998 is the tallest structural steel buidling ever imploded. IN ADDITION, CDI, Inc. is MUCH SLOWER than the NYFD that Silverstein claimed 'pulled' WTC7. Under CDI direction, Homrich/NASDI's 21 man crew needed three months to investigate the (Hudson Store) complex and four months to complete preparations for CDI's implosion design. CDI's 12 person loading crew took twenty four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition. http://www.controlled-demolition.com/default.asp?reqLocId= 7&reqItemId=20030225133807 BIG SURPRISE at http://www.cdi-uk.com/implosion.htm especially considering the Hollywood-style smoke and mirrors of 9/11. Most important of all here is the Karl Schwarz group's plan to reverse the decline of America. http://www.iconoclast-texas.com/default.htm Of course Karl Schwarz has more hard-hitting 9/11 journalism at www.karlschwarz.com. DON'T MISS: CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm 911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC http://www.rense.com/general65/911h.htm Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo? http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm

Disclaimer

MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros