- There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen
Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in
a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other
Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English
Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed
by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from
the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London,
or simply 'The City.'
- The City is not a part of England, just as Washington
is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square
mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by
the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to
enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking
several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything
other than service uniforms.
- In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was
carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships
had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the
world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection
of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth,
but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth. As of 1850, author Frederick
Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion.
Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.
The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds
an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association
franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court. They are;
the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn. The entry
point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is
called to their Bar.
The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge
their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are
signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located
at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.
The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds
Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to
steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized
internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of
Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United
States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States
spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown.
At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed
the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties
were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs
as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal
memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most Americans believe
that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate
by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred
by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a 'color of title.' Color of
Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in
law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.
The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England.
Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration
of Independence was created to pacify the populace.
Another method used to hoodwink natural persons is enfranchisement. Those
cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital letters means
that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a corporation. A
'juristic personality' has been created, and you have entered into multi-variant
agreements that place you in an equity relationship with the Crown.
These invisible contracts include: birth certificates, citizenship records,
employment agreements, driver's licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps
helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had
to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American judges.
If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract.
Tax protestors and (the coming) draft resistors trying to renounce the
parts of these contracts that they now disagree with will not profit by
resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges will
reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract law jurisprudence.
Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in effect.
These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule the
broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the Constitution
being essentially a renamed enactment of English common law). The Bill
of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a 'bill of benefits,' conferred on
us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes). Protestors and resistors
will also lose their cases by boasting of citizenship status. Citizenship
is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the
very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them.
In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, "Equity
is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements." The balance of
Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states, ".citizens
shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses,
and exactions of every kind"
What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality.
It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial
use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the
payment of the Crown's debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable
income. And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment
includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all
enfranchised persons (that's you) can be held personally liable for the
Crown's debt.
The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity
as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn't
have been possible were it not for the Crown. They view the system of interstate
banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with
a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it - as
an operation of law - the identical same full force and effect as if the
Crown had created the gain.
Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection
because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot
be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The Crown
also views bank account records as their own private property, pursuant
to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us ever read.
The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find that
they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not to
disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the Crown
also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of commerce.
When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality was
created. It is this personality (income and assets) that IRS agents are
excising back to the Crown through taxation.
A lot of ink is being spilled currently over Social Security. Possession
of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown's lex as 'conclusive
evidence' of our having accepted federal commercial benefits. This is another
example of an equity relationship with the Crown. Presenting one's Social
Security Number to an employer seals our status as taxpayers, and gives
rise to liability for a reciprocal quid pro quo payment of taxes to the
Crown.
Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement endowment
benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die, your spouse
gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is divided (forfeited)
among other premium payers who haven't died yet.
But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity attachments
as an act of defilement and will proceed against us with all due prejudice.
For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thoroughgoing
study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be deemed
a 'stranger to the public trust,' forfeit all enfranchisement benefits
and close all bank accounts, among other things. Citizenship would have
to be made null and forfeit and the status of 'denizen' enacted. If there
are any such natural persons extant who have passed through this fire,
I would certainly appreciate hearing from them
-
-
- Comment
From GazorgFarkelman@aol.com
2-18-5
-
-
- Mark Owen is INCORRECT. A spouse of a deceased gets Social
Security payments of 1/2 of the deceased monthly payment, or their own
entitlement, whichever is higher.
-
- A spouse need not have worked at all to receive the 1/2
payment.
-
- There is also a "death benefit" of approximately
$250. paid to the survivor.
-
- Those who do not fact check should not submit false articles
to Rense.
-
-
- Reply
Mark Owen
2-21-5
-
- Your reader is somewhat correct in his Social Security
surmise. The act is constantly in a state of flux and was ammended last
year. I possessed copies of the act of 2003. Thus ammended,
and according to their own words today:
-
- "...The number of years you need to work for your
family to be eligible for Social Security survivors benefits depends on
your age when you die..."
-
- There are other restrictions on spousal death benefits
too numerous to cite.
-
- A case is made in civil law according to a preponderance
of evidence. Under contract law, the complainant (your reader) would be
the victor. Under tort law, my arguments would still suffice and be actionable.
-
- My article emphasizes overarching themes of the Crown
matrix that have heretofore not been broached.
-
-
- From Devvy Kidd
- devvyk@earthlink.net
- 2-22-5
-
- Good evening, Jeff -
-
- The Mark Owen post on your site tonight about taxes and
the crown - this guy is a complete idiot who has bought into the crap out
there in the tax movement. http://www.rense.com/general63/tcs.htm
-
- His e-mail address isn't in his bilge or I would have
sent this to him directly. It is exactly this flavor of idiot that is getting
people thrown in jail. Boy, I wish his e-mail address was made public.
I'd give him a very public piece of my mind.
-
- Larry Becraft has debunked both the crown, names in caps
and the ABA destroyed arguments long ago:
-
- Names in caps:
- http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/NamesInCaps.htm
-
- The Crown and ABA:
- http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/BAR.html
-
- Larry can tell you how many suckers he knows that bought
into this junk that are now serving hard prison time, the latest being
poor Al Thompson. He bought into the name in caps and other "legal"
theories from charlatans. He will be sentenced soon and faces a minimum
of about eight years in a federal pen.
-
- Cordially,
-
- Devvy Kidd
|
