- What happens when you cross a human and a mouse? Sounds
like the beginning of a bad joke but, in fact, it's a serious experiment
recently carried out by a team headed by a distinguished molecular biologist,
Irving Weissman, at Stanford University.
-
- Scientists injected human brain cells into mouse foetuses,
creating a strain of mice that were approximately 1% human. Weissman is
considering a follow-up that would produce mice whose brains are 100% human.
-
- What if the mice escaped the lab and began to proliferate?
What might be the ecological consequences of mice who think like human
beings, let loose in nature? Weissman says that he would keep a tight rein
on the mice, and if they showed any signs of humanness he would kill them.
Hardly reassuring.
-
- Experiments like the one that produced a partially humanised
mouse stretch the limits of human tinkering with nature to the realm of
the pathological.
-
- The new research field at the cutting edge of the biotech
revolution is called chimeric experimentation. Researchers around the world
are combining human and animal cells and creating chimeric creatures that
are part-human, part-animal.
-
- The first chimeric experiment occurred many years ago
when scientists in Edinburgh fused a sheep and goat embryo - two unrelated
animal species that are incapable of mating and producing a hybrid offspring.
The resulting creature, called a geep, was born with the head of a goat
and the body of a sheep.
-
- Now, scientists have their sights trained on breaking
the final taboo in the natural world - crossing humans and animals to create
new human-animal hybrids. Already, aside from the humanised mouse, scientists
have created pigs with human blood and sheep with livers and hearts that
are mostly human.
-
- The experiments are designed to advance medical research.
Indeed, a growing number of genetic engineers argue that human-animal hybrids
will usher in a golden era of medicine. Researchers say that the more humanised
they can make research animals, the better able they will be to model the
progression of human diseases, test new drugs, and harvest tissues and
organs for transplantation. What they fail to mention is that there are
equally promising and less invasive alternatives to these bizarre experiments,
including computer modeling, in vitro tissue culture, nanotechnology, and
prostheses to substitute for human tissue and organs.
-
- Some researchers are speculating about human-chimpanzee
chimeras - creating a humanzee. This would be the ideal laboratory research
animal because chimpanzees are so closely related to us. Chimps share 98%
of the human genome, and a fully mature chimp has the equivalent mental
abilities and consciousness of a four-year-old human.
-
- Fusing a human and chimpanzee embryo - which researchers
say is feasible - could produce a creature so human that questions regarding
its moral and legal status would throw 4,000 years of ethics into chaos.
Would such a creature enjoy human rights? Would it have to pass some kind
of "humanness" test to win its freedom? Would it be forced into
doing menial labour or be used to perform dangerous activities?
-
- The possibilities are mind-boggling. For example, what
if human stem cells - the primordial cells that turn into the body's 200
or so cell types - were to be injected into an animal embryo and spread
throughout the animal's body into every organ? Some human cells could migrate
to the testes and ovaries where they could grow into human sperm and eggs.
If two of the chimeric mice were to mate, they could potentially conceive
a human embryo. If the human embryo were to be removed and implanted in
a human womb, the resulting human baby's biological parents would have
been mice.
-
- Please understand that none of this is science fiction.
The National Academy of Sciences, America's most august scientific body,
is expected to issue guidelines for chimeric research some time next month,
anticipating a flurry of new experiments in the burgeoning field of human-animal
chimeric experimentation.
-
- Bioethicists are already clearing the moral path for
human-animal chimeric experiments, arguing that once society gets past
the revulsion factor, the prospect of new, partially human creatures has
much to offer the human race. And, of course, this is exactly the kind
of reasoning that has been put forth to justify what is fast becoming a
journey into a brave new world in which all of nature can be ruthlessly
manipulated. But now, with human-animal chimeric experiments, we risk even
undermining our own species' biological integrity in the name of human
progress.
-
- With chimeric technology, scientists have the power to
rewrite the evolutionary saga - to sprinkle parts of our species into the
rest of the animal kingdom as well as fuse parts of other species with
our own genome and even to create new human sub-species and super-species.
Are we on the cusp of a biological renaissance, or sowing the seeds of
our destruction?
-
- - Jeremy Rifkin is the author of The Biotech Century
-
- Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited
2005
-
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/science/story/0,12996,1438030,00.html
|
