- Dear Jeff -
-
- Thank you for your great website. I like the way you
post essays by just common folk like me.
- I know what a "limited hangout" is, and I also
know that when you bury one or two big whoppen lies in the middle of a
one-hour video documentary that is 90 percent facts and truth, that those
lies will be most efficacious in the war against the minds of the citizens.
-
- The History Channel televised a one hour documentary
called "Modern Marvels: Metal". about one week ago. I only saw
the last half hour of it, but that is where I encountered the two whopper
lies.
-
- First I heard them talking about the glories of aluminum.
In that segment, they made the statement that "aluminum is inert in
the human body. There is aluminum in tooth paste but it caused no harm
to the body." Dr. Russel Blaylock, neurosurgeon, nutrition researcher
and author of "Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life"
says, on the contrary, with complete citation of probably over 100 scientific/medical
studies on just this one subject within this big book, that aluminum is
a neurotoxin and causes many many neurological and endocrine assaults on
the human body and that it is not inert and that it is very deleterious.
That was Whopper # 1.
-
- Then the video documentary went on to a segment about
the strength of the metal beams used to build huge skycrapers. Keep in
mind the entire video had metal scientists and researchers and professors
each speaking and telling their part of the story on metals. The video
said that the rubble and beams from the 9-11 World Trade Centers had been
studied carefully so that a stronger metal could be made for beams for
tall skyscrapers. They said they wanted metal beams that would not melt
quickly at high temperatures as did the beams in the fallen towers. They
said if they could invent a metal alloy that melted at higher temperatures
and melted more slowly, then the people would have much more time to get
out of the buildings and many more lives would be saved. That Wopper #
2 Lie was to reiterate in a subtle sly way the government's official story
of why the towers fell.
-
- History Channel seems to be very sophisticated in its
government disinformation plants. I consider them to be very very evil.
I really would like to read and essay or a book that explains the terms
used for the different kinds of propaganda techniques being used on the
American populace these days, and explaining which have proven to be most
effective.
-
- God bless you and thank you again for your website.
-
- Archie
- Austin, TX
-
-
- Comment
- From Daniel Natal
- 2-14-5
-
- Jeff,
-
- I just read one email you posted from a reader about
the History Channel. It spurred me to write too because--about two years
ago--the History Channel had a documentary on the history of counterfeiting.
In the course of narrating the story of one 19th century counterfeiter
who happened to be deaf, they illustrated the point with a photo they claimed
was the counterfeiter.
-
- Imagine my shock when, instead, they put up the photo
of 19th Century French symbolist poet Charles Baudelaire! --I guess, the
director of the documentary assumed that no one would know that the photo
he produced was a fake. Sadly, I--as a fan of Baudelaire--recognized the
famous picture. My wife, who sat beside me was astonished when I turned
to the internet and produced the exact photo from a Baudelaire webiste.
-
- My response was to email the channel and tell them of
the shoddy documentary-maker. I mean, if they were inaccurate about THAT
what else were they inaccurate about?
-
- Ever since then I can't watch the network--which routinely
rants about Hitler. How can I trust anything they say about "Hitler"
when I myself have caught them in a fabrication?
|
