- It was the year 2004. The U.S. Presidential Election
was set for November 2. The bosses of the newly-minted Homeland Security
were worried. Their primary purpose was to root out dissidents, soon as
possble, that could disturb the agenda of the Anglo-American Aristocracy
that owns and operates the occupant and resident of the White House, George
W. Bush. who is a stooge and scapegoat for their program of ruling WITHOUT
THE CONSENT OF THOSE GOVERNED, a horrendous violation of the organic law,
the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
-
- Not for small reasons did critics call them the American
Gestapo. After all, their title, Homeland Security, was the English-language
equivalent of the Nazi-era secret political police. And the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, sort of aides to them, has an awful historical background.
A dirty little secret is that NO CHARTER PROVIDES FOR THE EXISTENCE OF
FBI. Nowadays, who dares mention such things?
-
- By 2004, some savvy folks persisted in grumbling that
in a five-to-four decision, in December, 2000, the Supreme Court of the
United States installed George W. Bush as the occupant and resident of
the White House. Some refuse to call him "Mr. President". The
duly elected President, NOT inaugurated, Albert Gore, Jr., never actually
conceded defeat. Some people forgot that.
-
- The ruling of the Five-Judge majority in Bush versus
Gore was arbitrary. Even worse, some knew the five-judge Military-Style
Junta had been corrupted. Judges on the High Court wear two hats. One,
as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Secondly and little
known, each is also a Circuit Justice, supervising one or more U.S. Courts
of Appeal, one step below the Supreme Court of the United States.
-
- As Associate Justice, John Paul Stevens, as part of the
Dissenting Four Judges, in Bush versus Gore, wrote the most blistering
dissenting opinion probably in the history of the high tribunal.
-
- [In 1969, I directly accused the Judges on the Illinois
Supreme Court, that state's highest tribunal. of bribery. It became the
biggest judicial bribery scandal in the nation's history up to that time.
A Special Commission was put together to consider my accusations. Since
I was self-educated in law but not a member of the Bar, they demanded,
despite my outspoken objections at that time, that a lawyer be appointed
to represent me and present my accusations, namely John Paul Stevens. The
state high court was just about swept away by the judicial earthquake that
occurred; the Chief Justice and an Associate Justice resigned and a third
Justice, while under fire from me, simply croaked. Issued in the name of
that third judge, dated and signed by him---now get this---supposedly a
month after he was dead and buried was an important steel company decision.
Ten days AFTER the effective resignation date of the two other judges was
issued in their name, and dated, a supposedly valid decision upholding
the state Income Tax as Constitutional. Corruption does not go away that
easy. Before that, while yet on the bench, the judges jailed me, wheelchair
and all, for the judge-made offense of "contempt of court" as
the head of our court-reform group because I refused to divulge to the
bribe-tainted judges the methods we use to finger judges and lawyers for
bribery. Later, I was released and vindicated.
-
- Stevens and I became famous. A few years later, he was
appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States. More than thirty years
later, a law professor wrote a book about the 1969 scandal. "Illinois
Justice" by Kenneth Manaster. Pictured with me on the cover of the
book, Stevens, about the only Judge ever to have a public good word to
say about me, a loudmouth Judge-buster, wrote the forward to the book.
See the Home Page, www.skolnicksreport.com ]
-
- As I have written, John F. Kerry's "wife of convenience",
billionaire heiress to the Heinz Ketchup fortune, Teresa Heinz Kerry, a
long-time rabid ultra-right Republican, long prior to the year 2004 Election,
made an unholy deal with the GOP. In return for a promise of a horde of
gold, she would see to it that John, a purported "Democrat" with
a litle-known British intelligence agency background, "lay down and
play dead", sort of like a typical crooked wrestler in a heavily gambled
upon match. [ See my story, "Overthrow of the American Republic",
part 64, "Buying & Selling the U.S. Presidency".]
-
- BUT, two groups were at work, months before the 2004
Election, with details that could have wrecked the rotten tricks set to
re-install George W. Bush as the resident and occupant of the White House.
-
- (1) Operating in the Chicago-area is a court-reform group,
of which since 1963, I am the Founder/Chairman. One member of that group
was putting together some four hundred pages of documents relating to Coca-Cola's
role in corrupting all the judges in active service, sitting in what is
known in law lingo as en banc, all together, some fourteen judges in a
case against Coke in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit,
headquartered in Chicago. Seventh Circuit Justice Stevens supervises that
Court.
-
- Because the corruption involved all the judges of that
federal appeals court and in related situations, some of the five-judge
majority in Bush versus Gore, on the Supreme Court of the United States;
the one sueing Coca-Cola, Robert E. Kolody, made an Application to Seventh
Circuit Justice John Paul Stevens that he arrange a special panel of judges,
from outside the Seventh Circuit, to hear and determine the judicial corruption
matter, of Judges on the Chicago federal appeals court as well as those
on the high court in Washington, D.C., committing a fraud upon their own
Court and obstructing the same.
-
- Unknown to most, Homeland Security and the FBI have a
virtual wall around the Supreme Court of the United States.This all started
with the "anthrax terror" first publicized shortly after 9-11.
The apparent real culprit is a super-duper Russian biochemist who is a
defector. He heads up a company, under contract to the American CIA, to
develop, perfect, and test the usage of weaponized anthrax. To sidestep
the geopolitical problems in investigating this situation, the FBI, instead,
saw fit to try to blame the anthrax mess on someone else, apparently not
really involved.
-
- Apparently contaminated, or possibly so, with weaponized
anthrax or similar, powder leaking from envelopes were in the offices of
media bigshots; Congress; the Supreme Court of the United States; as well
as one or more major U.S. Post Office facilities.
-
- It was the perfect excuse to violate the U.S. Constitution's
mandate of "Separation of Powers". Already illegally in existence,
with no Charter, the FBI, together with the newly setup Homeland Security,
both supposedly of the Executive branch of the U.S. central Government,
took command of the Supreme Court of the United States, plainly part of
the Judicial branch of the Government.
-
- They decided who, if anyone, would be permitted in person,
by U.S. Mail, or other transportation ways, to communicate with those in
the headquarters building of the Supreme Court of the United States. For
that purpose, a remote warehouse was used. All mail, packages, and such,
would have to go there, under the absolute examination and supervision
of Homeland Security and FBI, secretly or otherwise.
-
- With the connivance of Court clerks and employes inside
the headquarters building of the Supreme Court of the United States, as
well as those in the remote warehouse and enroute to the headquarters building;
it was a perfect obstruction of justice scheme.
-
- (2) Running on a parallel track, with apparent knowledge
of the first group, was a group of investigative reporters of Vanity Fair
Magazine. Without mentioning the first group by name or detail, the Magazine
group starting many months before the 2004 Presidential Election, was to
start to divulge some of their work for the October 2004 monthly issue
of Vanity Fair, set to be distributed and circulated about September 27th,
just a few weeks before the Election.
-
- Both the first and second group were in a position to
know that some of the "Gang of Five" judges in Bush versus Gore,
had complained to the FBI and Homeland Security, some of the following:
-
- (a) each of the judges of the Supreme Court of the United
States typically has five law clerks who look up prior decisions, write
or assist to write decisions on pending matters, and prepare the decisions
to be printed in the printing plant historically contained within the headquarters
building.
-
- The law clerks are pledged to absolute secrecy. After
serving several years as a high court law clerk, they can usually expect
to be hired by a big bucks lawfirm at a salary of some two hundred thousand
dollars a year. Not something to be lightly thrown away with little consideration
of the consequences.
-
- For the first time in the history of the high court,
some of the law clerks of some of the four dissenting judges in Bush versus
Gore, at great danger to themelves and their later careers, went public.
They spoke to the reporters of Vanity Fair and others. They told how Justice
Antonin Scalia, a Fascist-inclined Judge of the "Gang of Five",
was "Hell bent" on stopping the crucial Florida recount of the
ballots, with Florida being the necessary vote to put the winner over the
top for the necessary Electoral College vote. Scalia was Hell bent on stopping
Gore from becoming President-Elect; so was Chief Justice Rehnquist and
O'Connor, both telling friends they cannot, as they planned, retire if
Gore gets elected.
-
- The law clerks often work late, long after the Justices
have left for the day; such as the night before release of a decision.
So the law clerks have all the keys to the place. According to Antonin
Scalia and others of the Five, some of the law clerks of the Four swiped
private papers from various locked drawers of the Five; some of these papers
related to handwritten type notes of the Five to some of the Four making
threats by some of the Five that could or would constitute federal criminal
offenses, threatening a federal government official. According to some
law clerks of the Four, Scalia tried every dirty trick to stop John Paul
Stevens from having time enough to write a Dissenting Opinion in Bush versus
Gore.
-
- Some of these details got into the October 2004 issue
of Vanity Fair Magazine. Other details were revealed on a forty-minute
segment on National Public Radio on the Terry Gross Show interviewing one
of the magazine's reporters. Such as that Antonin Scalia strong-armed one
of the Four dissenting Judges in Bush versus Gore to remove a revealing
footnote from their separate Dissenting Opinion.
-
- Right after the Vanity Fair publishing their report,
one or more law review articles condemned the law clerks who broke the
pledge of silence. Various Judges and law clerks of other courts howled
against the law clerks of the Four dissenting Judges in Bush versus Gore.
The law clerks for the dissenters, defending themselves against being condemned
by others of the Bench and the Bar, stated that the serious offenses committed
by the Five Judge Majority in Bush versus Gore, released the law clerks
from their pledge of secrecy.
-
- FBI and Homeland Security sped up their persistent spying
on the Four Dissenting Judges and their law clerks, harassing them in various
devilish ways. FBI and Homeland Security claim that the ring leader of
the Four is Justice John Paul Stevens and that somehow, through intermediaries
he communicates with those outside the headquarters building of the high
court. Stevens has reportedly been accused of being a part of a plot to
Overthrow the U.S. central government by discrediting the Supreme Court
of the United States by profound scandal because Five, of the Nine, on
the Court are accused of corrupt acts and doings in Bush versus Gore.
-
- Some at FBI and Homeland Security have raised the question
that Sherman H. Skolnick is part of this plot.
-
- To understand more about this, refer to the entire series,
"Coca-Cola, the CIA, and the Courts", parts 1 through 13 inclusive.
In particular study the court documents attached to Part 9 and the document
about the Secret Court in Part 10.
-
- Set out below is, verbatim, a related document. The letter
dated "5/7/2004", mentioned therein, .. once thought to be an
erroneous date pre-dating the sending of the packages is actually revealing
and apparently not erroneous. That date was supposed to have been a secret
and apparently refers to the date on or about which the law clerks for
some of the dissenting judges in Bush versus Gore somehow latched onto
certain records of Justice Antonin Scalia proving his corruption and criminality
in the litigation where he was the so-called team leader of the five-judge
majority. Does that qualify as a magnificient blunder by the cover up specialists?
-
- More coming. Stay tuned.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Via Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested, Registered
Number
- RA 528943745 US (for Suter); and
- RA 528943754 US (for Johnson)
- and Via EXPRESS MAIL
- Number ED 112007088 US(for Suter); and 112007138 US (for
Johnson).
- To check: www.usps.com or 1-800-222-1811.
-
- NOTICE OF CLAIMS PRIOR TO SUIT
-
- December 20, 2004
-
- To: William K. Suter, individually and as purported Clerk
of the Supreme Court of the United States
- One First Avenue, N.E.
- Washington, D.C. 20543
- (202) 479-3014;
-
- Gail Johnson, individually and as purported Deputy Clerk
and/or purported employee of the Supreme Court of the United States.
- Clerk's Office
- One First Avenue, N.E.,
- Washington, D.C. 20543
- (202) 479-3038;
-
- 1. You and each of you are and have been, together with
persons directly associated with you and with whom you are and have been
directly acting in respect to Robert E. Kolody and the matters herein mentioned,
in a position to know, as follows:
-
- 2. That the persons and entities actually involved with
the purported "anthrax scare" or "anthrax terror" starting
in the United States, on or about later in September, 2001, are known to
the highest authorities within the Federal Executive Department bureaucracy.
-
- 3. That because of conflicting interests within the Executive
Department of the U.S. Government, that said true perpetrators are not
publicly accused or identified, because, among other reasons, they are
interwoven with the operations of certain U.S. intelligence operatives
and agencies.
-
- 4. As a consequence of a purported "anthrax scare"
purportedly targeting the Supreme Court of the United States, and its headquarters,
you, and each of you, and persons directly associated with you and in combination
with whom you are directly acting, and have been acting, allowing, permiting,
condoning and acquiescing in.the following:
-
- (a) That the Federal Bureau of Investigation, for which
there is no Charter authorizing their existence, and later, the Federal
agency known as Homeland Security; both; purporting to be of the Executive
branch of the U.S. central government ; tthat said purported agencies set
up and/or began using, a warehouse, not within the headquarters building
of the Supreme Court of the United States.
-
- (b) That said remotely located purported warehouse is
and has been, part of an unlawful plan or scheme, to obstruct, evade, and
nullify, efforts of those who rightfully and lawfully seek to communicate
with persons having offices within the headquarters building of the Supreme
Court of the United States, whether via United States Postal Service, Federal
Express, or other transportation means. For example, in respect to Kolody,
that said obstructed communications related to corruption of certain Judges
on the Supreme Court of the United States, in litigation commonly known
as Bush versus Gore, and related corruption of Judges on the United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois,
in litigation Robert E. Kolody versus Simon Marketing and Coca-Cola Company.
-
- 5. On October 14, 2004, the undersigned, Robert E.Kolody,
sent a package properly and lawfully addressed to John Paul Stevens, not
in his capacity as Associate Justice of the United States, but to Stevens
in his capacity as Seventh Circuit Justice, supervising, among others,
the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, headquartered
in Chicago, Illinois.
-
- 6. Said package was sent by Kolody via Registered Mail,
Return Receipt Requested, Registered Mail Number RA 785544000 US
-
- 7. On 10/22/2004, a package arrived at Kolody's
- home address from Clerk's Office, Supreme Court of the
United States. On it was a printed, office-supply-store-type label, "RECEIVED
IN DAMAGED CONDITION". Said package had a postage meter purportedly
indicating it was sent on 10/19/2004. The package contained just two of
Kolody's Applications for Certificate of Necessity and just two copies
of supporting Exhibits, which Kolody had properly and lawfully addressed
to Seventh Circuit Justice John Paul Stevens, in his capacity supervising
the Seventh Circuit. No letter of explanation was contained in said package
received by Kolody.
-
- 8. On 10/25/2004, on the phone, Kolody spoke to John
Kouros, the person identifying himself as the "Manager" or similar
title, of the purported remotely located "warehouse". Said person
led Kolody to know, believe, and understand, that said person was aware
of the package from Kolody; that said package did not arrive damaged; that
said package was forwarded to certain other persons and entities.
-
- 9. On 10/25/2004, by phone, Kolody spoke to Gail Johnson
in the headquarters building. Kolody in substance, complained that part
of the contents of his package, arrived back to him with the cryptic printed
label as mentioned, with only part of the contents of the package he sent.
-
- 10. On 10/27/2004, there arrived at Kolody's home address,
a package containing the additional nine copies, being the balance of the
contents of the original package that Kolody had rightfully and lawfully
addressed to Seventh Circuit Justice John Paul Stevens. This package contained
a purported letter, dated 5/7/2004, from William K. Suter and Gail Johnson.
Said letter, in substance, made the false and perjurious statement that
Kolody had sent his package to the wrong place. On November 1, 2004, Kolody
received a letter, marked "COPY", dated 10/18/2004, the same
words as in the letter falsely dated "5/7/2004".
-
- 11. Said package originally sent by Kolody contained
copies directed to Seventh Circuit Justice John Paul Stevens, in his supervisory
capacity as mentioned. Kolody made Application, supported by some four
hundred pages of documentation, to Stevens for a Certificate of Necessity.
-
- 12. Kolody asked Seventh Circuit Justice John Paul Stevens
to arrange to have designated a panel of Judges, not from the Seventh Circuit,
to especially sit in Chicago, to hear and determine Kolody's Motion to
Purge The Judgments, Rulings, and Decrees in Kolody's Seventh Circuit litigation,
said rulings having been obtained by frauds upon the United States Court
of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and obstructions of justice, perpetrated
by the Judges themselves of said Court upon their own Court.
-
- 13. Kolody pointed out that the fraud upon the court
also was related to the fraud upon the Supreme Court of the United States,
in the litigation commonly known as Bush versus Gore, perpetrated by some
of the five judges that issued a purported majority ruling installing George
W. Bush corruptly and arbitrarily as the occupant and resident of the Oval
Office.
-
- 14. Kolody pointed out that the fraud upon the United
States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit was done by all the judges
on that court in active service, sitting in what is known as en banc, that
is, all sitting at one time. perpetrating a fraud upon their own Court
and obstructions of justice upon their own Court, as shown in the some
four hundred pages of supporting documentation sent to Stevens with the
Application for Certificate of Necessity.
-
- 15. Kolody pointed out that his documentation in support
of this included that the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit, unlawfully delegated to himself, the Judicial authority
to make Judicial rulings on said Motion to Purge, disregarding the case
law precedents mentioned in said Motion. Such as Root Refining Co. versus
Universal Oil Products, Co., 169 F.2d 514 ( 3rd Circuit, 1948); namely
that a U.S. Court of Appeals has original jurisdiction to inquire at any
time, without regard to statutes of limitations, as to whether its Judgments,
Rulings, and Decrees are tainted, and subject to being purged, having been
obtained by a malign if not corrupt influence on such U.S. Court of Appeals.
In the Root case, since the corruption involved Judges on the United States
Court of Appeals, judges from outside that Circuit, were especially designated
to sit and determine the extra-ordinary matter, within that Circuit, to
inquire into said matter. Such special out-of-Circuit panel, the Root case
states, has to call before it all the persons involved by way of unearthing
the fraud upon the United States Court of Appeals, and thereafter, to purge
the records favoring certain malefactors and corrupters in said litigation.
-
- 16. Kolody's said documentation shows that. prior to
his Application for Certificate of Necessity to Stevens, that Kolody's
Motion to Purge was sent to an apparent secret court, that purports to
consider apparent misdeeds, corruption, and bribery of Federal Judges.
That said secret court has no public record location where it sits, no
public records, no public available title of the proceeding, no public
record of the cause number or other reference, and no public issued determination
as to what, if anything, is done about the documentation of corrupt acts
and doings of certain Federal Judges.
-
- On the other hand, the Root case, cited by Kolody in
his Motion to Purge, requires public hearings, public record identification
of the corrupt federal appeals Judges implicated, public record identification
of the lawyers and public officials implicated, and public record announcement
of the remedy of the corruption as determined by the out-of-Circuit special
panel of Judges.
-
- 17. That on 11/22/2004, Kolody properly and lawfully
addressed and sent to Seventh Circuit Justice John Paul Stevens, a further
package, again making Application for Certificate of Necessity; via Registered
Mail, Return Receipt Requested, Registered Mail Number RB 361395565 US,
that Stevens, in his capacity as supervising Justice of the Seventh Circuit,
arrange to have out-of-Seventh Circuit panel of Judges to hear and determine
the matter of Kolody's Motion to Purge, and as it relates to the corruption
of some of the five Supreme Court of the United States Justices in the
litigation known as Bush versus Gore.
-
- 18. In a letter to Kolody, dated November 30, 2004, William
K. Suter and Gail Johnson, made, in substance, the selfsame false and perjurious
statement identical to the previous one in letter marked "COPY"
and dated 10/18/2004, that Kolody's Application For Certificate of Necessity
to have been received by Seventh Circuit Justice in his capacity as supervising
the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, was sent to
the wrong place.
-
- 19. A very small piece of what this is all about, without
referring at all to Kolody, is contained in the October, 2004 issue of
Vanity Fair Magazine.
-
- 20. Plainly, the headquarters building of the Supreme
Court of the United States, is obviously that of the Judicial branch of
the U.S. central government, according to Article Three of the U.S. Constitution.
Purported units of the Executive branch of the central government of the
United States, namely the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Homeland
Security, have by unlawful acts and doings, built a virtual wall around
the headquarters building housing the Supreme Court of the United States,
by "anthrax terror" tricks supposedly justifying blockading,
obstructing, and nullifying any attempts to have properly delivered papers
supported by extensive documentation as to the corrupt acts and doings
of federal appeals judges, one step below the high court, and to corrupt
acts and doings of some of the five judges in the high court in their unlawful,
corrupt, and arbitrary installation of George W. Bush as the occupant and
resident of the White House, in 2000.
-
- 21. As a matter of record, John Paul Stevens, in the
litigation known as Bush versus Gore, issued a blistering dissent condemning
what the five Judge majority had done. Some of those investigating how
some of the law clerks, of the four Dissenting high court justices, went
public with the corrupt doings of the five judge majority; that found out
was that the team leader for the five of the Majority, was Justice Antonin
Scalia who was "Hell bent" to stop Gore from properly winning
the Electoral College vote revolving around Florida in 2000. And, further,
that Scalia attempted to blockade Stevens from having time to prepare and
present his Dissenting opinion in Bush versus Gore. And that some of the
five Majority judges sent private notes to some of the Dissenting four
judges, notes which seem to constitute federal criminal offenses for threats
against such Dissenting Judges for not remaining silent and not joining
with the five Majority to unlawfully and corruptly install Bush as the
occupant and resident of the White House.
-
- 22. Under the U.S. Constitution's provisions for "Separation
of Powers", the purported units of the Executive branch of the U.S.
central Government, namely FBI and Homeland Security, have no lawful authority
to be controlling what someone, like Kolody, properly and lawfully sends,
regarding high judicial corruption, to a supervising Circuit Justice, such
as Stevens, or to hound and torment Stevens and his law clerks, and other
Dissenting Justices and their law clerks, as these two purported Executive
branch agencies have done, regarding the five judge Majority's corrupt
acts and doings in Bush versus Gore related to Coca-Cola's corruption of
said Judges.
-
- 23. William K. Suter,individually and as purported Clerk
of the Supreme Court of the United States, and Gail Johnson individually
and as purported Deputy Clerk and/or Employee of said Court, have by their
acts and doings, aided and abetted the unlawful acts and doings of the
FBI and Homeland Security. That Robert E. Kolody has, as a consequence,
been damaged in his copyright and contract rights, and in his Constitutionally
guaranteed and protected rights to Due and orderly Processes of Law and
the Equal Protection of the Laws.
-
- 24. That Kolody's opponent, Coca-Cola Company, is implicated
in the corruption of the Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit as well as the related corruption of some of the five
Majority Judges of the Supreme Court of the United States, in Bush versus
Gore.
-
- 25. Kolody because of the foregoing corruption and wrongdoing,
has been damaged to a total well over a Billion Dollars and so herein and
hereby claims.
-
- 26. THAT ROBERT E. KOLODY HEREBY INFORMS WILLIAM K. SUTER
and GAIL JOHNSON that ROBERT E. KOLODY in due course intends in a court
of competent jurisdiction to bring a damage suit against them, individually
and in their capacity as supposed public officials, as named defendants
having joined in combination with others to greatly damage Kolody.
-
-
- _____/s/ Robert E. Kolody_________________
- Robert E. Kolody, complainant in this Notice of Claims
Prior to Suit
- 223 Saint Andrews Drive
- Schererville, Indiana 46375
- (219) 865-9880.
|
