Rense.com



US Soldiers Fight Iraq
Enlistment Extensions

By Sue Pleming
12-6-4
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Eight U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq and Kuwait filed a lawsuit on Monday challenging the U.S. military's "stop loss" policy, which forces them to serve beyond their enlistment contracts.
 
Lawyers for the active duty soldiers sued Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other senior military officials and asked to be immediately released from military service, saying they had served out their contracts.
 
The U.S. Army has implemented a "stop loss" policy that prevents tens of thousands of soldiers designated to serve in Iraq and Afghanistan from leaving the military even when their volunteer service commitment is over.
 
Spec. David Qualls said he enlisted with the Arkansas National Guard on July 7, 2003, under a program that allows a veteran to serve for one year before committing to full enlistment, but when he wanted to quit a year later, he was told he could not return home from Iraq to his wife and daughter in Arkansas.
 
"What it boils down to in my opinion is a question of fairness," Qualls, 35, told a news conference to announce the suit filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington. "I feel it's time to let me go back to my wife."
 
A recent pay stub for Qualls, who is on home leave from Iraq, indicated his last day of service would now be Dec. 24, 2031.
 
Qualls, who said he supported the war in Iraq, took an 80 percent wage cut to serve his country and said he was falling behind on his car and house mortgage payments.
 
"I spent the last nine months in that combat zone (in Iraq). I don't think I am being unpatriotic. I believe I have fulfilled my duties," he said of his wish to quit.
 
Lawyers representing Qualls and the others said the military's decision to force people to stay longer than they had signed up for amounted to a back-door draft, a claim the military has strongly rejected.
 
ANONYMOUS
 
Qualls is the lead plaintiff and the only one named in the suit. The others have asked to remain anonymous, described as John Doe 1 through John Doe 7, because they fear a backlash from the Army.
 
"I wanted people to understand we are not John Does out there. We are real people," said Qualls of his decision to be named.
 
Six of the eight are stationed in Iraq and two soldiers in Kuwait are on their way to Iraq. Their hometowns are in New Jersey, New York, Arizona, Arkansas and elsewhere and they joined the lawsuit by contacting lawyers either via the Internet or with the help of relatives back home.
 
Qualls is due to leave for Iraq on Friday and lawyer Staughton Lynd said he hoped to win a temporary restraining order to allow his client to stay in America while his case was heard.
 
"When we ask a young person to risk his or her life in harms way, we owe it to that young person to fully explain the circumstances they may confront so far as the length of service," said Lynd. "That was not done here."
 
Lawyer Jules Lobel, vice president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, said he would try to prove the soldiers were fraudulently induced to join the military in what he said was a classic "bait and switch" operation.
 
The Pentagon, which did not return phone calls about the suit, has said without a "stop loss" policy in place, the already stretched Army would be forced to continuously replace thousands of soldiers in deployed units as their service commitments expired.
 
Copyright © 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
 
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=4&u=/nm/20041
206/ts_nm/iraq_military_lawsuit_dc
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros