- A number of recent articles on China's growing military
capability voice surprise and shock at the quick pace of the Peoples
Republic
of China "PRC" development in the area of tactical and ballistic
submarine warfare. The discourse is a justified criticism of US
intelligence
assessments in general and specifically a diatribe against the Defense
Intelligence Agency's "DIA", ability to quantify and produce
accurate threat assessments. Yet no recent media reports have touched on
the reasons DIA assessments, in hindsight, appear to be amateur.
-
- Centrally, many of DIA's findings were based upon both
faulty and incomplete data, including but not limited to, a problematic
PRC test-firing of a missile during the Summer of 2004. Actually the first
submerged test-firing of the prototype "JL-2" submarine launched
ballistic "SLBM" missile took place in the Indian Ocean in 2001,
launched from an Israeli submarine built by Germany. The Israelis stole
W88 nuclear secrets from US labs and provided that technology to China
in an arrangement whereas China for its part assembled both the delivery
system and the W88 payload. There is no longer any doubt that US missile
technology was also transferred illegally to China by agents of Israel
and by Israel directly. The Israeli effort was designed to develop a
submarine
launched nuclear ballistic missile to augment an aging nuclear deterrent,
and in an attempt to circumvent US hegemony over Israeli political and
military ambitions beyond the Middle East.
-
- In addition to the obvious national security implications
for the United States, and balance of power issues as they relate to the
defense of Taiwan and beyond, there is a more ominous implication for DIA,
in particular, and to a lesser extent the Central Intelligence Agency
"CIA".
Did Israeli agents working within the Office of Secretary of Defense
"OSD"
influence policy at DIA, directly or indirectly, to weaken or deflect
investigations
away from Israeli espionage? And perhaps more importantly have personnel
changes at DIA, made by Israeli agents working within OSD to reflect their
own fanatical views regarding Israel, greatly impair DIA's ability to make
accurate assessments of strategic importance to the United States by
factoring-out
references to illegal transfers of US technology by Israel or its agents?
The answer to both questions is obviously -- yes!
-
- The saga of DIA's inability to accurately assess China's
capabilities reflects more upon their direction to avoid complications
borne of running counter to the civilians leadership's political views,
than it does upon the dedicated men and women working in the analytical
service of our Nation. Some of the first known reports of the illegal
transfer
of W88 technology to China by Israel surfaced in early 2001 and were sent
to CIA as well as the intelligence committee Chairman at that time. While
the reports were mostly discarded for a variety of reasons -- not the least
of which likely directly implicates organized Zionist espionage -- during
the Summer of 2001 after the Israeli launch of an SLBM in the Indian Ocean
was detected, renewed interest in those reports should have resumed with
a furor, especially after our reconnaissance aircraft was downed on Hainan
Island. Instead the Federal Bureau of Investigation "FBI" was
directed away from the Zionist espionage ring operating at US nuclear
weapons
labs and towards other possible targets. Sources have identified that from
1999 thru 2001 several US based Zionist organizations sponsored travel
to Hong Kong and mainland China in an effort to promote trade between China
and Israel. Some of the people who participated in these rather strange
discussions were alleged former Clinton appointees who in their Zionist
zeal, discarded US security interests in favor of their desire to benefit
Israel -- and who remain no less vile than the republican brand currently
at the Pentagon. As in the past the only apple of interest a superpower
like China would have with Israel would be in acquiring advanced US
technology,
heightened by the so-called arms embargo -- which apparently had little
effect in precluding China from obtaining advanced classified US
technologies.
Israel's history as a source of classified US technology, weaponry and
information during periods of embargo and the cold-war are well documented.
The former Soviet Union, South Africa, and Red-China were all recipients
of illegal technology transfers from Israel.
-
- Certainly there is no lack of information available to
US intelligence agencies regarding Israeli espionage activities targeting
American secrets. Just from public sources alone the amount of information
available is staggering. It should not have been a surprise to anyone that
Israeli spies working for a moving company in New Jersey were apprehended
after leaving a US military base with samples of specialized submarine
fuel. Just as there should be no doubt that the fuel was on its way to
China, say for the fact that a local police officer happened to stop the
truck the Israelis were driving -- assuming it was not a decoy. The then
question becomes why this type of information was not factored-into
assessments
within the intelligence and defense communities?
-
- At some point the US advantage in technology and
information
systems will become irrelevant, if that point has not already been reached.
It may be that the current FBI investigations of alleged improper activity
at the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee "AIPAC" needs
to go well beyond issues of briefing papers and focus upon illegal
transfers
of secrets to China and others, as well as other organized espionage
activities
against the United States and its people. Questions of equal value are
whether the purge at CIA involves persons associated with AIPAC, and
specifically
if Jay Jakub met with AIPAC officials prior to assuming his role at the
operations directorate of CIA, and if so, what was discussed?
-
- As in any intelligence drama there is a history, usually
one in public and another in private. In recent history, however, the
public
discourse is used generally as a political tool, while the private is used
to enforce political motives in secret. Such is the drama currently
unfolding
at CIA under the guise of reform, when in reality CIA has become the
whipping
boy for the policy failures of the Bush Administration. So adept have our
civil servants become at conforming to irrational whim, that independent
thought a cornerstone of intelligence is vanishing under the
"new"
leadership. The group-think contagion apparently hit the general staff
at Pentagon as well, with recent attributions in major media asserting
the untold recent "gains" of the US occupation in Iraq -- as
if the obvious success story is being under-reported.
-
- The fact that DIA assessments regarding China's
capabilities
were so far off the mark, is reminiscent of another recent
"intelligence
failure" and reflects a growing problem within the entire US
intelligence
community. The first chapters appeared in public view when the now defunct
Office of Special Plans at Pentagon inserted knowingly false
"intelligence"
into the Iraq policy debate as pretext for invasion. The last chapters
of US intelligence hegemony are now being written ad hoc and acted out
in haste from one end of Pennsylvania Avenue to the other only confirming
a creeping infiltration of political views, on the one hand, and political
goals on the other, as somehow legitimate intelligence product. With the
only possible result being the weakening US defense capabilities in the
face of a growing world threat. The intelligence reform legislation is
the worst piece of legislation in the history of the United States. It
will allow our enemies almost unfettered access to our Nations secrets
-- the espionage equivalent of one-stop-shopping -- and actually decrease
our readiness and analytical capabilities by exacerbating a dangerous level
of political control over the entire US intelligence community. The
compartmentalization
of our intelligence community, and built-in system of competing views were
the best way to safeguard this Nation -- "a little here and little
there."
-
- The only beneficiaries of the intelligence reform act
will be bureaucracy itself and our enemies like Israel, which maintains
one of the most aggressive and elaborate espionage campaigns and
infrastructure
targeted against the United States. It is centered within Zionist
organizations,
(including organizations located on college campuses), Israeli owned
businesses
operating in America and infiltration of agents from remote border
crossings
in Mexico and Canada. Some of the direct responsibilities of Zionist
organizations
operating in America are to (i) act as conduits for the transfer of
American
secrets to Israel, (ii) to collect data on Americans and American
communication,
(iii) to offer refuge and logistical assistance to Israeli agents, (iv)
to provide identities, transportation and safe houses to Israeli spies,
(v) to offer foreign and domestic political support for Israeli initiatives
or those sought to benefit Israeli, (vi) to promote and expand Israeli
influence through business arrangements, (vii) to help finance Israeli
initiatives and espionage activities, et cetera, through the sale of
Israeli
bonds (such as in New Jersey, where the former governor was seduced by
an Israeli spy). In addition some of the indirect responsibilities of
Zionist
organizations are (viii) to circumvent investigations into Israeli spying,
(ix) to control the flow of information to the American public, and (x)
to buy political influence within the US Congress -- such as the financial
support garnered to the sponsors of the new intelligence
legislation.
-
- In the face of the growing Zionist espionage threat a
patriotic American within the defense department issued a warning
specifically
targeting Zionists, only to have the warning withdrawn by persons within
OSD, despite the mountain of evidence linking Israelis and Zionist
organizations
to a massive organized espionage ring. In its rather short history Israel
has a habit of providing American defense secrets to foreign governments,
which when taken at sum reveal that the pariah of the Middle East is in
deed a foreign and hostile nation to the United States. The fact that
Zionists
in America have become merely a subterfuge for the defense of Israel at
the expense of the American taxpayer and to the detriment of our own
security,
calls for direct and indirect action against this clear and present danger.
No country on earth seeks to emulate Israel, its racist ideals for ethnic
purity, constant state of war, or its policy of ethnic cleansing. So
perverse
have they become as a nation that they are attempting to build a wall
around
G-d, as if He belongs to them. The US association with Israel has brought
little benefit to the American people, and has only served to prop up a
foreign and corrupt regime hostile to the interests of the United States.
Our own society is beginning to resemble that of a draconian state, where
security measures are required to support a pariah racist state like
Israel.
-
- America needs its own "clean-break" strategy
in the Middle East, and away from the cold-war dominated themes created
in many ways by Israel based upon the inane notion that treason against
America is somehow excusable where Israel is concerned. It is the same
psychotic reasoning which prevails upon Israelis to murder Palestinian
woman and children in a blood lust of frustration to drive the indigenous
people from Palestine. As if the world is expected to realize the
establishment
of a religiously racist foreign Zionist state void of any diversity through
murder, treachery, and ethnic cleansing is somehow noble? The mayhem,
suffering
and toll on American society is just not worth it, it's time for a
different
way.
|
