- Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite
source
as World Affairs Brief
- http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com
-
- ANALYSIS OF THE BUSH VICTORY
-
- Never before has an election polarized the American
people
as this one - and the bitterness and distrust of the Bush administration
by the 49% that voted for Kerry is not going away. It will continue to
fester as President Bush accelerates his "new mandate from the
people."
-
- Despite the fact that there is very little difference
between the positions of both major political parties (both are socialist
and globalist in orientation), and also little difference in the controlled
background of both candidates (Skull and Bones members, surrounded by CFR
advisors and handlers), the perception of voters from the two sides is
dramatically separate. Democrats and many independent voters hold to the
view that George Bush is an inveterate warmonger and that John Kerry is
a peace loving liberal. Conservatives, on the other hand, were downright
fearful of being led by a Jane Fonda peacenik who falsified his allegiance
to the Constitution, gun rights, and moral values.
-
- Despite Kerry's call for unity and Bush's appeal to Kerry
supporters to help him lead a united America, there will never be a truce
between these two groups.
-
- As long as conservatives give unthinking support to a
president who betrays every constitutional and religious principle he
pretends
to espouse, and as long as liberals think John Kerry would have done
anything
different as president, we haven't got a chance of turning things around
in this country. When it appeared that Kerry might just pull off a victory,
I thought it might be an interesting exercise to see how the liberals react
once they realize that Kerry would continue the policies of Bush, albeit
with a different spin. But, as one of my friends pointed out,
"Liberals
wouldn,t see the light any more than conservatives. Both are wedded to
the carefully skewed establishment news" which never really attacks
the globalist agenda of either party.
-
- HILLARY
-
- A victory for Kerry would have derailed a presidential
run for Hillary Clinton until she was too old and ugly to win. Now, with
the Bush reelection, Hillary will begin her run for the Democratic
nomination
immediately, though informally. She already is getting a boost from the
NY Times: In a story in Thursday's editions, the paper begins: "The
defeat of John Kerry has left Hillary Rodham Clinton as one of the most
powerful elected officials in the national Democratic Party - as well as
the top prospect for the presidential nomination in 2008, according to
party officials and strategists."
-
- She has powerful ambitions and will not be denied, though
I doubt the PTB will let her win the presidency. They don,t ever intend
to allow the victory of a candidate who has her kind of independent will.
That is why they never allowed Lee Ioccoca to run for president. He was
too independent and strong-minded. He wasn't controllable.
-
- I think Hillary will face Rudolph Giuliani as the
Republican
nominee, a candidate who is, frankly, unbeatable - if he can stay healthy.
Some have speculated also about the ambitions of Arnold Schwarzenegger,
who just recently admitted on 60 Minutes that he, indeed, harbors
presidential
ambitions, notwithstanding the US constitutional prohibition against
persons
of foreign birth ascending to this high office. Not to worry! Republican
lackey Sen. Orrin Hatch is bent on sponsoring a constitutional remedy for
this problem. One wonders why he would go to all this trouble (amidst all
the more important things Hatch has to do) when there is neither a pressing
need nor a public outcry for such a change. It is obvious someone from
the RNC put a bug in his ear - which indicates that in mind for the
presidency.
However, I think he is just a back-up, in case Giuliani slips from
popularity.
-
- MANIPULATION OF THE VOTE
-
- There are a number of Democratic candidates who could
have presented a greater threat to George W. than John Kerry - but they
were not allowed to run. The PTB wanted Bush reelected and they needed
a flawed Democratic candidate who could be beaten. Kerry appeared to be
a good choice, on the surface, but the liabilities of George Bush
(one-track,
blustering, error-prone personality; falsifying the reasons for going to
war in Iraq; etc.) still made it unlikely that he could defeat Kerry
single-handedly.
Bush's liabilities make him the perfect president for antagonizing the
rest of the world, but increase the difficulties of getting him reelected.
That is why Ralph Nader was trotted out to pull off additional votes from
Kerry, as happened with Al Gore's run for the presidency. If the PTB really
wanted Kerry to win, they would have given significant airtime to the
Libertarian
and Constitution Party candidates, which would have drawn votes away from
Bush. But, nary a word was uttered about these two principled third
parties.
Even the Christian Coalition refused to list the Conservative Party
candidate,
Michael Peroutka, for president. Peroutka is a devout Christian who ran
on a pro-constitution, pro-Christian platform.
-
- In the end, Not even the Nader sabotage campaign was
enough to ensure a Bush win. As some had feared would happen, there appears
to be ample evidence of the misuse electronic voting skew the results
toward
Bush. This is easy to do when the PTB control the people behind the two
major companies that provide voting machines to states. Walden O'Dell,
CEO of Diebold Corporation, the largest of the two, is a Republican fund
raiser. That doesn,t make him dishonest per se but Diebold,s history of
secretive software changes and lack of openness in state investigations
about those changes make the company very suspect.
-
- Some of this manipulation was blatant, such as when
voters
in some precincts complained that the touch screens sometimes registered
their vote for Kerry as a vote for Bush. There were virtually no reports
of the opposite mistake happening. One county,s vote computer already had
votes for Bush in memory before the voting began. Another county in Ohio
had all its votes disappear from memory.
-
- But the more common methods were more subtle - tweaking
the Bush percentages upward only in close races where it wouldn't be
noticeable
or provable.
-
- Here is an analysis by voter fraud expert Faun
Otter:
-
- So, what do we actually see when comparing exit polls
with actual results? There is skew - but ONLY in states which the
Republicans
had previously stated to be target states in play. The skew is in the same
direction every time; that is to say in favor of Bush. The exit poll
results
are not scattered about the mean as the alternative theory predicts. They
are all on the Kerry side of the vote counts as issued by the states except
for a hand full of states which hit amazingly close to the exit poll
figures.
-
- Here are the figures. They list the four contemporaneous
and uncorrected exit polls. Kerry is listed first and Bush second in each
pair of figures.
-
- 'Published' is the figure presented as the official vote
count as of 10.00 am EST on 11/3/04, the morning after...
-
- ARIZONA
- Poll one 45-55
- Final poll 45-55
- ...Published 44-55
-
- COLORADO
- Poll one 48-51
- 2nd poll 48-50
- 3rd poll 46-53
- ...Published 46-53
-
- LOUISIANA
- Poll one 42-57
- Final poll 43-56
- ...Published 42-57
-
- MICHIGAN
- Poll one 51-48
- ...Published 51-48
-
- IOWA
- Poll one 49-49
- 3rd poll 50-48
- Final poll 49-49
- ...Published 49-50
-
- NEW MEXICO
- Poll one 50-48
- 2nd poll 50-48
- 3rd poll 50-48
- Final poll 50-49
- ...Published 49-50
-
- MAINE
- 3rd poll 55-44
- ...Published 53-45
-
- NEVADA
- 3rd poll 48-49
- ...Published 48-51
-
- ARKANSAS
- 3rd poll 45-54
- ...Published 45-54
-
- MISSOURI
- Final poll 46-54
- ...Published 46-53
-
- These tracking polls were right where you would expect
them to be and within the margin of error. However, if we look at some
other states, the figures are beyond curious. Either the exit polls were
wrong or the vote count is wrong:
-
- WISCONSIN
- Poll one 52-48
- 3rd poll 51-46
- Final poll 52-47
- ...Published 50-49
-
- PENNSYLVANIA
- Poll one 60-40
- 3rd poll 54-45
- Final poll 53-46
- ...Published 51-49
-
- OHIO
- Poll one 52-48
- 2nd poll 50-49
- 3rd poll 50-49
- Final poll 51-49
- ...Published 49-51
-
- FLORIDA
- Poll one 51-48
- 2nd poll 50-49
- 3rd poll 50-49
- Final poll 51-49
- ...Published 47-52
-
- MINNESOTA
- Poll one 58-40
- 3rd poll 58-40
- Final poll 54-44
- ...Published 51-48
-
- NEW HAMPSHIRE
- Poll one 57-41
- 3rd poll 58-41
- ...Published 50-49
-
- NORTH CAROLINA
- Poll one
- 3rd poll 49-51
- Final poll 48-52
- ...Published 43-56
-
- "Taking the figures and measuring the size and
direction
of the poll to supposed vote count discrepancy, we find the variance
between
the exit poll and the final result:
-
- Wisconsin: Bush plus 4%
- Pennsylvania: Bush plus 5%
- Ohio: Bush plus 4%
- Florida: Bush plus 7%
- Minnesota: Bush plus 7%
- New Hampshire: Bush plus 15%
- North Carolina: Bush plus 9%.
|
