- In doing a periodic check on the Mars Rover progress,
I came upon some interesting data. Its also interesting to note the text
below in the NASA analysis that states: "The rock's composition is,
however, similar to that of meteorites thought to have come from Mars."
Who would entertain such a DUMB THOUGHT ? Surely not any scientist...cough-cough.
But before we get to the savory part about rock analysis, lets look at
some other facts. You probably may already know much of this, but its still
worth a look.
-
- Evolutionists will hate me, but they cannot deny the
facts I'll present here. From writing for Jeff Rense in the past, the old
axiom is indeed true from war pilots- you do start getting flack
when you are right over the target.
-
- HOW COULD A ROCK FROM MARS FIND ITS WAY TO EARTH ? It
has never been proven that ANY rock could reach earth from Mars. The odds
are beyond belief, considering the red planet is more than 34 million
miles from earth. To reach Mars from earth, it requires every system to work
perfectly. This requires propulsion systems, sophisticated computers
and software. Could a rock from the red planet without any of this
technology reach earth, just because a theoretical meteor slams
into Mars ? This is like stating that two grains of sand - one
from NY city, the other found in LA, came from the same beach.
-
- The odds that any rock on earth came from Mars staggers
the imagination. However, this does not rule out that two rocks, one from
Earth and one from Mars, could have the same composition.
-
- WHERE DID OUR MOON COME FROM ? Instead of NASA re-hashing
stupid-talk, they should just admit that Mars, Earth, the Moon and the
other planets were PUT HERE. Computer simulations of every possible scenario
with the moon for its appearance have been done. These were done to
determine HOW the moon could have become a satellite of earth
using every possible natural process and event. It has an almost
circular orbit and rotates so we see the same side all the time at night-
and all attempts to explain it have failed. As one scientist admitted
on television, "it shouldn't be there, but it is." In fact, it
has one of the more circular orbits in the solar system. Even more circular
than many of the outer planets.
-
- Scientists even tested what I call "The
Idiot Theory" - that "the earth's gravity captured the moon-to-be as
it was passing by and it went into orbit." This too failed, because the
moon-to-be would have slammed into the earth, or it would have just kept
on passing by the earth. In space everything is weightless- but everything
still has MASS. And any body in motion tends to stay in motion. You
found that out if you ever pushed a car, and didn't have someone inside
to step on the brakes when you wanted to stop it. Yet Earth life needs
the Moon to function, and likewise the Moon "needs" the Earth
to orbit. Therefore, these two bodies are essentially in a symbiotic
state. To my its quite difficult to grasp the entire celestial engineering
that was required for our solar system's stability.
-
- WHAT DOES THE MOON REALLY DO ? Based on the earth's
mass and wobble, science has shown from computer simulations of the
earth that the moon is a stabilizer for earth's rotation, and is essential
for tides. It functions something like a flywheel, smoothing out the earth's
rotation. Without tides from the moon's orbit our oceans would
become like stagnant water. And at the very least, the oceans would
not have the variety of life they have. Think about how may creatures come
and go from the beach, just based on tides. Even sea turtles go by
the tide when they lay their eggs on shore. All of this shows the beauty
of Creation. (There- I said it. The "C" word, like
it or not.)
-
- And we won't get into details about how science is quietly
admitting that the so-called "evolution theory" isn't proving
out. Species that scientists have been monitoring for 100 years now have
shown no change at all. Over that time some change was expected, albeit even
a very small one. Not to mention earth's missing fossils we won't
talk about here.
-
- MARS ROCK COMPOSITION Many of us suspected previously...
that Mars is proving to be very much like earth in many respects.
But the curve analysis plot below the photo is such a close match to an
earth rock its unreal.
-
- The rock NASA drilled with the rover:
-
-
-
-
-
- Recipe for 'Bounce' Rock Compared Against an Earth Rock
- April 14, 2004
-
-
-
- The mineralogy of "Bounce" rock was determined
by fitting spectra from a library of laboratory minerals to spectra of
Bounce taken by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity's miniature thermal
emission spectrometer. Bounce is made-up of 69 percent pyroxene, 20 percent
plagioclase, and 11 percent olivine. The pyroxene minerals are primarily
calcium-rich varieties, with smaller amounts of a class of minerals called
orthopyroxenes. The composition of Bounce is significantly different from
that of typical martian basalts seen over much of the surface from orbit
by the Mars Global Surveyor thermal emission spectrometer. The rock's composition
is, however, similar to that of meteorites thought to have come from Mars.
No detectable hematite was found in Bounce.
-
- Perhaps life on Mars was not all that different from
ours in many respects. Below are intriguing photos.
- The dome structure? NASA isn't talking about at
all.
-
- FOSSILS ON MARS
- Here's an excellent article, that describes how NASA
ground to dust a fossil on Mars right in front of a camera: http://www.enterprisemission.com/articles/03-08-2004/crinoid_cover-up.htm
-
- DOME ON MARS
- Just for old times' sake- lets not forget one last
great picture taken from Mars orbit. There are a multitude of explanations
for the face on Mars, some for the pyramids. But everyone is silent on
this one. Who built this structure ? Remember the size of this object
is comparable to a large building, as this was taken from orbit.
-
-
-
- From http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/fullres/divided/m15012/m1501228a.jpg :
-
-
-
-
|
