- Hello Jeff, here's a letter I just sent off to Dan Burisch
which is a response to a letter he sent me where he replied to my article
posted on your website. Feel free to post it if you feel it appropriate.
-
- In peace
- Michael
-
- Letter From Dan Burisch -
-
- Dr Salla reports:
-
- "So we have echoes of the Epic of Gilgamesh where
the hero Gilgamesh set out on a quest for the secret of immortality, and
got tantalizingly close to success before being robbed by a wily serpent."
-
- Gilgamesh? Perhaps it is fitting for it was Gilgamesh
that has been said laid the first stone for the temple of Ishtar, a name
from which the word "Easter" may be derived. This man is truly
thinking, or at least writing from inspiration! Whilst I am not the offspring
of a goddess (lol!), being 3/3 humbled-human, it is said that he may have
seen the abyss. Indeed, poor Gilgamesh. This abyss resides in the statement
above, involving a quest for the secrets, as the Fruit of the Tree of Life
is such that would bestow immortality. Thus, the fruit is guarded from
all human beings, by the Cherubim, to be bestowed only by Christ as a gift.
In this case, t hough, the wily serpent is not conjured as the robber,
but again (as was in Eden) as the tempter. It sets, within the darkest
of human infatuations, as a swirling helix awaiting its two mates, through
our empathy toward it. There it sets, being lost and awaiting itsí
mating with the dualism of our present circumstance, begging for completion
as the three columns of the Divine Sephiroth. Indeed, poor Gilgamesh, the
wily serpent comes!
-
- As to the next statement:
-
- "No mention of Pleiadians, Sirians, Andromedans,
Arcturians, the Galactic Federation, etc., mentioned by numerous other
researchers exploring the extraterrestrial presence (http://exopolitics.org/Study-Paper1.htm%3Ehttp://exopolitics.org/Study-Paper1.htm
). It's as though we are being conditioned to accept that the only extraterrestrials
that are relevant to the human condition are the J-Rods/Grays."
-
- Surely, I cannot account for the agendas others. Again,
all I can say is what I have seen, read, and heard. I have to admit that
I found it a bit disconcerting that Dr. Salla, with his litany of impressive
origins and destinations, may have left from the list (not having been
briefed on any "membership statistics" for any Galactic Federation),
those from Orion. Those, as I have been told, (may) continue the spiritual
side of humanity. But to speak of such things, may engender further accusations:
such as being "spiritual" in the time of "great aspirations"
of those that would place themselves above the stars of heaven. Indeed
I know that it would have been important for me to justify everyoneís
agenda, but to do so would require that I lie to them. For as much as it
would have made people feel better (as much as self satisfaction carries
us through our lives), I have opted not to do that.
-
- "Disclosure that is made with the Dan Burisch scenario
at its core, is something that is so highly contrived, that it would amount
to little more than two small steps forward followed quickly by one large
step back. At the end, we wouldn't know if we were better off or not. After
five decades of secrecy over the extraterrestrial presence, humanity deserves
a more honest reckoning of what has been happening behind the scenes with
the extraterrestrial presence, and an unambiguous step forward into a post-disclosure
world."
-
- Do I sense something? The term "contrived"
gives this away. The block above would necessarily posit knowing the truth
(if linked to the first and second sentences of it), for without that,
the statement "more honest" should not have been uttered. But,
I do agree, in part. One group is, in fact, attempting to mold the future
of humanity, for evil purposes. I fear that is not what he meant though.
Rather, I hear, "Disclosure that is made with everyoneís (including
Dr. Michael Sallaís) scenario at its core, is something so important
that it would amount to a giant step forward." Be careful though,
as someone in that group may just be a Jedi and offer the Galactic Rights
of the Wookie to the fore! Unfortunately, not everyone is right, as others
may well argue of me. The democracy of the human does not instill the truth.
I am not saying that there are no aliens, and positing just the extraterrestrials
of an uncertain future. The size and complexity of our beautiful universe
would strongly argue for their existence, only that my work has not involved
them. The "Tau-9 Conference for the Preservation of Humanity"
is an event, for humans (not aliens), where our own dirty laundry, created
by our unwashed hands, will be sorted out. Itís okay, Bill. If you
have to placate them, do it. You will see them relax and enjoy themselves
and their philosophy. I have been working as hard as my body and spirit
will allow, for them too, even so that they may enjoy themselves with their
musings. Itís not just for the people that would agree with what
has been said.
-
- Can you really imagine the governments that are "in
the know" telling the world the truth? What does that mean, telling
the world? Everyone? Hand it to the United Nations? Does it mean getting
everyoneís input or acquiescence, or just those that have struggled
within the community of UFO researchers, or those members of the Cult of
Great Men? Further, could one speculate as to how, given the time line
we have, humanity (as a whole) could come to a decision? What rubric would
one set to meet, how would one mediate to equanimity, what process would
give way to total equality? Look at our world. Bear witness to our own
history, present conditions, and to the structures and strictures we have
built around ourselves, ostensibly for self protection, on both personal
and global scales. Ought we to have eve ryone suspend their (let's say)
religious convictions, in order that they may deal with the issues? If
not, how? We have 8 years for a solution to be found. This solution, in
toto, will not cure the ills of humanity, but it will, with the help of
God, put a band-aid over some of its errors. Sadly, as much as I believe
in the involvement of everyone in the destiny of humanity (and I really
do) by the time the debating would end, it would be too late. Sometimes
reality dictates that some must simply stand up and act. They (as I) are
available for judgment afterwards. Weíll see, on the morning of
December 22, 2012. I hope to watch the Sun rise and know that all the work,
of those now toiling, is being greeted with laughter by those that have
always "known better." That is enough for me and all I ask in
return for my small part: to know.
-
- Do I believe that people should be told? However possible,
sure. I think they should be told everyoneís perspective, even those
of poor insid ers, that struggle daily, while trying to help. It is not
truth that I hear and read most of the time, but fear. With truth, we always
step forward, sometimes painfully, but yet ever forward. We should listen
to everyone, and debate credence from their statements. While we should
act with caution, we should not be afraid to step forward, for fear of
the boogeyman waiting in dark places. Such fear of the boogeyman does not
serve humanity, but is simply another excuse not to act, to keep ourselves
where we are, comfortable in our positions of self-grandeur. We know who
that serves. We should not lose sight of the truth and the struggle for
it, not even by means of the hatred for government, no matter how much
it has lied to us ñ and it has.
-
- I have appreciated reading Dr. Sallaís words,
wish him all the blessings from God, and ever look toward to having the
opportunity to chat with you in person again. You may communicate this
letter to whomever you wish. I do wish for freedo m, and even as my bus
pulls toward its destination, I hope for it. I feel a little work left
in me. May God grant this world peace and love.
-
- Truly,
-
- Dan
-
-
-
- From Dr. Michael Salla, PhD
- Tuesday, April 13, 2004
-
- Dear Dr Burisch,
-
- Thank you for kind response to my short article [attached
below] and Iím glad that you enjoyed the Gilgamesh metaphor for
the unique situation in which Providence has placed you. As you know, what
sparked the quest for immortality by Gilgamesh was the death of his good
friend Enkiddu. Enkiddu was the only individual of King Gilgameshís
contemporaries that matched the King in strength and manly virtue, and
in their mutual friendship Gilgamesh had found something that went beyond
the superficial loyalty and fealty of his subjects, and had found a ëtrue
friendí in the sense of what the Greeks called ëphiliaí
or brotherly love. With the death of Enkiddu, Gilgamesh set off on his
quest for immortality so that he and others would never again have to experience
the loss of a ëtrue friendí. So what we have in the Gilgamesh
myth is a story of deep friendship, of overcoming the frailties of human
life, and even the mitigation of human suffering. So we have here echoes
of Prince Siddartha who set off on his own noble quest to mitigate human
suffering.
-
- Dan (I hope you don't mind me being informal here since
I hope we can continue to correspond) I wish to inquire about your ëfriendshipí
and experience with J-Rod where he performed a kind of mind-meld with you
where your mind was flooded with information on the origins of life. No
doubt this information has played an important role in your subsequent
research into the Ganesh particle, and appears to be something that you
highly value. Perhaps, more significantly this information appears to be
very highly prized by the controllers within the institutions of the Committee
of the Majority/MJ 12 which puts you in this unique position of perhaps
being the catalyst for disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence on our
planet. My question about your mind-meld encounter simply is did J-Rod
ask your permission? Did he enquire as to whether you would accept the
information he wished to share with you? In that sense, was he being a
ëtrue friendí in passing on that information to you? I ask
because I have observed a distinct pattern in the way the J-Rods or ëGraysí
as more commonly known, interact with humans. The reports on the human
and J-Rod interactions are quite varied ranging from the most sublime of
spiritual experiences, to what many would consider to be exploitative.
Nevertheless, the one common thread in these interactions is that the J-Rods
simply donít ask permission when they initially interact with humanity.
Permission or consent, typically comes after the first interaction which
is forced or a result of compulsion upon an unwilling human subject.
-
- Now you might inquire whatís the relevance of
asking permission if what is gained is mutually beneficial and uplifting,
and isnít the result an important criterion for friendship rather
than the process of asking force? My response is asking permission is demonstrating
a respect for human free will, a recognition that the choices we make are
the ingredients of human maturity as a species, rather than the end results
of our human labors. By simply interacting with humans where the J-Rods
took unwilling human subjects into their ships, downloaded their advanced
information into humans, performed their ëbiological improvementsí,
and a variety of other ëmutually beneficialí projects, all
typically done without first asking permission, the J-Rods were demonstrating
a remarkable absence of a characteristic that is an important criterion
for true friendship.
-
- You may ask whether Iím setting a rather high
standard for how extraterrestrials might interact with humanity, and whether
we should just accept that mode of interaction chosen on by the J-Rods
for passing on their information which in the end is ëmutually beneficialí.
I raise this issue since I do question whether the J-Rods can be ëtrue
friendsí for humanity, and also wish to propose that there are another
extraterrestrial races that have demonstrably shown a greater capacity
of being the true friends of humanity.
-
- You may not be aware that on February 20-21, 1954, President
Eisenhower met with a delegation of humanoid extraterrestrials commonly
described as ëNordicsí which I will hence use as a ëgeneral
descriptioní for those extraterrestrial races that physically appear
sufficiently like modern humans as to blend in without being recognized.
The evidence for the Eisenhower-Nordic meeting has been quite sparse as
might be imagined given the secrecy over all things extraterrestrial, but
when all this disparate information put together it makes for a compelling
case that such a meeting took place. I have subsequently learned that the
meeting was even filmed. Iíve compiled the evidence that I could
find into an article on my website: http://exopolitics.org/Study-Paper-8.htm
-
- A significant fact is that the meeting occurred eleven
days before the testing of the largest Hydrogen bomb ever by the US. The
Bravo Test took place on March 1, 1954 at Bikini Atoll, and had a 15 megaton
yield. The meeting with the ëNordicsí did not go well since
they apparently asked that the U.S. end the testing of the hydrogen bomb,
yet offered no technological assistance in return, but only ëspiritual
adviseí, and believed that humanity had still not reached sufficient
moral maturity for the advanced technologies the ëNordicsí
possessed. It appears that the Nordics were not interested in reaching
an agreement with the Eisenhower administration based on ëmutual assistanceí
agreement, since they presumably were not motivated by what the national
security agencies had to offer. The Bravo Nuclear Test indicated that national
security officials, in particular those within the Committee of the Majority,
thought that they could get better terms from another extraterrestrial
race that would be more open to participating in an agreement based on
ëmutual assistanceí. The treaty you refer to you in your reply
ñ"Tau-9 Conference for the Preservation of Humanity" was
I believe one aspect of this process. Now in exchange for their technological
assistance, the J-Rod/Grays were given the right to conduct a limited biological
program based on a variety of conditions that have subsequently been disputed
by both sides in terms of compliance and led to military conflicts according
to a number of whistleblowers such as Bob Lazar, Phillip Corso, Phil Schneider,
Bill Cooper, Michael Wolf, et al. You are in a better position than I to
comment on the accuracy of what has occurred and the contents of the treaty,
but I would like to offer some comments about what I have observed from
the nature of the interactions between the ëNordicsí who first
met with President Eisenhower and the human contactees who have subsequently
reported on the Nordics.
-
- The contactee reports between the ëNordicsí
and humans typically follow a pattern that can be found in such classic
cases as George Adamski, Billy Meiers, Enrique Rincon and more recent cases
such as Jay Solomon. I have subsequently heard from others who choose to
remain anonymous about their contact experiences. Based on my research
I believe that there is an active military-intelligence campaign to suppress
information on these ëcontactí cases, as opposed to ëabductionsí
involving J-Rods which by and large are allowed to be disseminated in UFO
circles. This suppression of contactee reports makes it difficult to gain
a sufficiently large sample of cases on which to draw firm conclusions.
Nevertheless there is enough information that points to the ëNordic
extraterrestrialí contact experience having the following characteristics
for the contactee: 1. heightened interest in extraterrestrials; 2. establishing
telepathic communication with ëNordicsí; 3. physical meeting
with Nordics; 4. subsequent physical sightings of Nordic ships; 5. voluntarily
going on board of a extraterrestrial ship; and 6. Nordics give assistance
to the contactee to disseminate his/her experiences to a wider audience.
-
- Now this appears to be a classic contact pattern and
the thing which strikes me as most significant in this process is that
the ëcontacteeí is asked for permission by the ëNordicsí
when moving through these various stages which is indicative of a high
degree of respect for human free will. I believe this is very significant
and indicates that the ëNordicsí display a key characteristic
that indicates that they are capable of being humanityís ëtrue
friendsí in the sense of philia or brotherly love. This of course
contrasts with my earlier comments about humanity and the compulsory nature
of the initial interaction with J-Rods, and leads me to your own rather
unique situation.
-
- You are not doubt aware of the way in which information
about your experiences has been allowed to leak out to the general public,
and in the way in which you have been allowed to be interviewed by phone
and in person by individuals outside of the compartmentalized network of
black projects. This is quite unique and I have never heard of any other
case where this has occurred, and suggests that you are indeed the subject
of an ëinsiderí supported initiative to disclose the extraterrestrial
presence on terms that might be considered to be favorable to the Committee
of the Majority. One can read many motivations into this but what I see
is that this as an effort by the Committee to legitimate the historic decisions
they have taken to work with the J-Rods, and establish agreements based
on mutually beneficial projects.
-
- I am very concerned that the result of a disclosure
done in this way will be to legitimate the ëspiní on human
- extraterrestrial interactions that puts the Committee of the Majority
in a favorable light. I suspect that the Committee does not intend to release
information on the failed diplomatic negotiations with the ëNordicsí
involved in the 1954 Eisenhower meeting, or at the very least cast this
in the light of an obscure group of extraterrestrials not willing to participate
in mutually beneficial projects. This would be most unfortunate since in
my view, it is these extraterrestrials that have shown they are most capable
of being humanityís true friends, since they recognized that the
fruit of any technology agreements would not be beneficial to the human
condition simply because we were not yet morally mature enough to deal
with this technology. Subsequent history has show the truth of this since
all the technology achieved through interaction with the J-Rods/Grays has
been kept secret, and we still for instance consume fossil fuels when there
are alternative technologies that are secretly available.
-
- Public disclosure is more than just revealing information
on the secret extraterrestrial presence on our planet, and of the ëmutually
beneficialí projects that have been embarked upon. Disclosure is
a rite of passage which marks an important milestone in human maturation
where we enter into the greater galactic community. If the general public
is given information about extraterrestrials that is sanitized of any mention
of the earlier meetings that occurred with the Nordic extraterrestrials,
or casts a negative light on them for their refusal to participate in ëmutually
beneficialí technology programs, then that would be most unfortunate.
What we would have instead is a sanitized disclosure process based on a
utilitarian principle of ëmutually beneficialí projects, that
resulted in much abuse by the Committee of the Majority in terms of how
the fruits of these projects were dispersed. The J-Rods are complicit in
this by virtue of their participation in these agreements, even though
it was the decision of the Committee of the Majority not to distribute
these technologies. This might be simply viewed as the J-Rods respecting
the will of the leaders of the secret political committees set up to interface
with the public, yet the behavior of the J-Rods in the abduction process
suggests they are not champions of human free will.
-
- I hope that by sharing these ethical and exopolitical
insights with you, you may incorporate some of these into your efforts
to promote a more transparent disclosure process. It appears that you have
been chosen by the Committee of the Majority to play a significant role
in disclosure of the most important event in recent human history. I hope
that the fair mindedness and great integrity you have shown in your responses
both to me and to others, influences you in giving some of the issues I
have raised a fair hearing in what lies ahead. I feel that Providence has
placed you in a unique position and that you have the necessary gifts to
promote an outcome for the highest good of all. I wish you well in your
efforts.
-
- In peace and friendship
-
- Michael E. Salla, PhD
- www.exopolitics.org
|
