- Know how to tell the difference between the truth and
lies of 9/11? If they're talking about hijackers having done the dastardly
deed, you know they're part of the sinister coverup extravaganza, wittingly
or not.
-
- In order for the people of the world to be convinced
that Islamic hijackers were responsible for terrible tragedy of 9/11, we
need to see some evidence. Not hearsay, innuendo, aspersion or promises
of evidence, but real evidence.
-
- Otherwise, the whole subject is rightly regarded as a
ruse, a setup to conceal the identities of the real culprits, the ones
who sit smugly in front of the TV cameras and plot their cynical war on
terror - otherwise known as the war on the peoples of the world.
-
- As President Bush continues to insist that his word be
accepted as truth on numerous questions, time after time his statements
have been revealed as blatant falsehoods. Yet he continues to repeat them,
and the whorish corporate media continues to accept them.
-
- Why hasn't either the Bush administration or some element
of law enforcement in the United States issued a single solid piece of
evidence connecting the hijackers to the hijacked airplanes? Why don't
the alleged hijackers appear on the airport security videos? Why aren't
there credit card records of their ticket purchases?
-
- Why did FBI director Robert Mueller say very publicly
to the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco that nothing on paper connected
Arab terrorists to 9/11? I mean, two and half years have passed. And the
feds produced 19 names within 72 hours of the disaster. Notice a mathematical
inconsistency here? All that has happened since is mere vigilante hysteria,
hypothetical scenarios trumpeted ad nauseum by America's notoriously brainwashed
Zionist press.
-
- Seven or eight of the names on that original list have
been found living comfortably in other countries. Why hasn't the FBI made
any attempt to correct the errors made on that original list? See for yourself.
http://members.fortunecity.com/911/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm
and http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
-
- And why, after much hullabaloo about Colin Powell using
phony information in his remarks to the United Nations about the reasons
for war, hasn't the U.S. government produced a single conclusive piece
of evidence to back up its claim that 9/11 was the work Osama bin Laden
and other Islamic terrorists? Not a single piece!
-
- If you disagree, tell me what it is!
-
- There's a simple answer to this, you know. It's because
there isn't any evidence. And why is that? Because those pseudo-Muslims
revealed to be so publicly incompetent at piloting jerkwater training planes
had absolutely zero chance of flying sophisticated jetliners into anything
narrower than the Grand Canyon, never mind executing tricky maneuvers with
extraordinarily complicated machinery.
-
- The unknown men who played the roles of the so-called
Arab terrorist hijackers were really recruited by either American and/or
Israeli intelligence services in a scheme set up as a diversion to inflame
dumb Westerners against the Islamic world. The purpose was to divert the
world's attention from the Israeli genocide and dispossession of the Palestinians
by blaming the attacks on Muslims.
-
- But that was only half the objective. The other half
was to enable our despicable cabal of neocon gangbangers to fleece the
American public with an endless array of no-bid contracts to enrich the
conscienceless billionaires who are really driving the war machine.
-
- You know how the Bushista American government uses anything
for PR to supposedly authenticate its own evil agenda. If they had any
concrete evidence against the hijackers - if they even possessed all their
correct names - we would have heard about it by now. There would be an
avalanche of TV shows about them, unlike that Jewish claptrap hate crime
against Muslims that appeared on NBC the other night.
-
- After two and half years, with the whole world knowing
that eight of the 19 names on the hijacker list are fraudulent, the FBI
has made no attempt to substitute new names. And why is that? Because the
identities of the hijackers were constructed with mostly stolen papers,
for some of the patsies designed to take the heat. In any case, and whoever
they were, there is no evidence they ever got on the planes.
-
- But nothing. Instead we have one minor player convicted
in Germany, then the conviction was overturned, partly because Americans
refused to help with the prosecution.
-
- We have the so-called 20th hijacker and assorted other
preposterous character actors languishing in jails on trumped up charges.
We have security camera film at the Pentagon, which surely reveal that
no jetliner hit that building, locked away in Ashcroft's vault under the
phony aegis of national security. We have all the rubble of the World Trade
Center, which surely would have revealed the use of nuclear explosives
creating shattered beams in odd places, instantly carted away with no forensic
investigation. We have transcripts - but no recordings - of these phony
cellphone calls, some from people who may not have even existed.
-
- And we have the famous standdown, in which America's
air defenses suddenly evaporated - the only time in our history this has
happened.
-
- We have Marvin Bush sitting suspiciously on the board
of directors of the security company that had the contract for the Twin
Towers.
-
- We have Larry Silverstein, who conveniently leased and
insured the towers shortly before the big hits, telling officials to "pull"
a relatively intact tower, which then fell identically to the two structures
that were struck by airplanes, creating the impression that that's the
way all three came down.
-
- We have billions of dollars of windfall profits made
by savvy investors in the days before 9/11, and an FBI investigation that
insists nothing was amiss with these spectacular deals. Of course, we don't
get the details. Only "assurances" that the trades were not suspicious,
despite patterns and results that were unprecedented in the entire history
of financial trading.
-
- We have reports from firemen of explosions at the base
of the Twin Towers BEFORE they fell, and the seismographic evidence to
back up these assertions.
-
- We have leader after leader saying they didn't know such
a thing could happen when the government had been studying the problem
for ten years. It had held at least two major drills simulating such a
possibility.
-
- And we have a president sitting in a ghetto classroom
in Florida, at possibily the most pivotal moment in American history, pretending
to read a book that he was holding upside down.
-
- Perhaps most tellingly of all, we have the tragic tale
of John O'Neill, rabidly honest FBI investigator, prevented from following
his leads about Osama bin Laden because of the danger he would have discovered
the links from Afghanistan back to CIA headquarters. Just review the way
he was prevented from conducting his probe of the Cole bombing, and prevented
by digging into other leads by the same guys - namely insiders Louis Freeh
and Thomas Picard - who prevented significant reports from other FBI agents
from seeing the light of day.
-
- So, how does all that make you regard the supposedly
impartial government panel investigating these matters? When they talk
about Presidential Daily Briefings months before the event, or chitchat
with presidential flunkies who leak out these pseudorevelations about this
and that tidbit of essentially trivial information. And especially when
they talk about the dastardly hijackers (without being able to name them)
as if there is no question of their guilt. Talk about your misleading urban
legends! This one is the champ.
-
- Well, no sense feigning surprise. We knew this commission
was a set-up from the get-go. Recycled Watergate investigators, even. Part
of the same bunch that has run the country and covered up everything for
the past 30 years or more.
-
- Surely you didn't expect a real investigation. Thomas
Kean declared at the outset of his hearings that Osama bin Laden was guilty.
End of discussion. As soon as he made that statement, there was no way
the hearings could be legitimate.
-
- Asserting that genuine Arab hijackers did not carry out
the attacks of 9/11 requires analysis of two concomitant categories: the
history of American (and Israeli) involvement (and subterfuge) with Arab
terrorists, and methods of remote control of aircraft, or other means of
piloting the aircraft.
-
- The remote control aspect continues to be a bone of contention
among legitimate pilots, with some asserting only real pilots could have
made such extemporaneous maneuvers and others insisting only remote control
could have accomplished such a feat. An interesting new perspective on
this debate can be found here: http://joevialls.altermedia.info/wtc/radiocontrol.html
-
- A third natural area of study in this regard would be
the intimate histories of those whom officials claim to be the hijackers,
including putting the microscope on their behavior in the days and weeks
before the tragedy.
-
- Many researchers claim the name al-Qaeda was made up
in middle '90s by a variety of American functionaries (one of them being
none other than Richard Clarke) as an all-purpose villain the U.S. could
blame as a convenient reason for its military adventurism. And a group
of Israeli provocateurs was recently discovered trying to create their
own faux version of al-Qaeda.
-
- How many more hints do you need? The absence of any relevant
arrests or discovery of any clues to the hierarchy of this supposedly worldwide
terror group should tell you a lot.
-
- Al-Qaeda doesn't exist except for when they want it to,
to blame for any sort of strategic terror they have created themselves
for some political reason, like influencing the elections in Spain. Hah,
that one really backfired.
-
- Why haven't American intelligence operatives gone to
these foreign countries to interview these named hijackers who turned out
to be alive? Simple. Because they knew the list was fiction in the first
place, and the Arab-types who have been named as terror gurus are mostly
their own employees, or people who have been set up by them.
-
- It is a celebrated fact that Mohammed Atta and some of
his friends were seen in nightclubs in the hours before 9/11, certainly
a fact that argues against them being able to carry out their supposed
missions because they were motivated by Islamic religious zeal. So their
appearance in strip clubs blows the whole story that they were devout Muslims
giving their lives to Allah. Devout Muslims don't drink, never mind cavort
with strippers.
-
- If we knew who the hijackers were, we'd know their names,
wouldn't we? Or is it now worth bombing other nations and murdering thousands
of innocent people because we say we know who the hijackers were, even
though we don't know their names? It is the great shame of the American
people that they have approved of the murders of thousands of people because
of that blatant lie.
-
- Many of the men who were fingered as 9/11 hijackers received
preferential treatment from American immigration officials when it came
to entering and leaving the U.S. on numerous occasions. Many of these same
names reportedly trained at various U.S. military installations.
-
- What has resulted after two and a half years of work
by America's crack intelligence agencies, besides the persecution of Muslims
throughout the world?
-
- Well, hundreds of innocent people have been unjustly
imprisoned and tortured at Guantanamo. All of them innocent, hapless dupes
rounded up in a Rumsfeld-ordered dragnet in Pakistan after U.S. planes
had (inadvertently or otherwise) allowed the Taliban fighters to escape
with the Pakistani army from Afghanistan.
-
- Two pathetic flunkies have been arrested and held without
due process. One of them, the notoriously pathetic shoe bomber who was
obviously a deranged personality and not a member of any terror network,
was ceremoniously sentenced to life in prison.
-
- Other than that, no al-Qaeda kingpins have been even
named, never mind apprehended. No clue about how the 9/11 attacks were
engineered has ever emerged. This is simply not consistent with being able
to name all 19 hijackers the day after the attacks. It is a case of pretending
you have all of the information instantly, and then pretending you no information
for the next two years. What a smell!
-
- This means two things: that the list of 19 names was
a total fabrication, and that the worldwide terror network called al-Qaeda
is also a total fabrication, the wet dream brainchild of the CIA and the
Mossad to be trotted out as an excuse for a whole string of terror attacks
- Madrid, Bali, Riyadh, Istanbul, etc. - that were really carried out by
the CIA and the Mossad themselves, cleverly involving designated patsies
to give the operations a suitably foreign flavor.
-
- Al-Qaeda does not exist except as a bogeyman invented
by Western powers to justify their evil agenda. There were no hijackers
flying those planes on 9/11. And honest FBI agents have been prevented
from publicizing that fact.
-
- If you disagree, prove it! The world knows you can't,
though the high-tech mass murder by the United States and Israel spreads
around the world because of this falsified version of events.
-
- History will show - and the public will soon realize
- that those who are telling these lies not only allowed 9/11 to happen,
but planned it for their own personal advantage.
-
- The only question that remains is will the American public
awaken to this murderous, treasonous scam before the perpetrators achieve
their objective and bury the whole planet in the flames of their insane
perfidy.
-
- Just remember. If they're talking about the hijackers,
they're part of the coverup, whether they know it or not.
-
- Much more productive would be analyzing the tiny hole
in the Pentagon, how the ejected material in the WTC photos prove there
were unexplained explosions, or how those emotional cellphone calls could
not possibly have been made as government flunkies have presented them.
-
- But you won't hear the official 9/11 commissioners talking
about any of that, because they are definitely part of the coverup. You
can obviously tell, because they keep talking about the hijackers.
-
- * * *
-
-
- Other than a general alert to citizens of the world about
the basic lies that continue to underlie all political debate in the United
States at this time, there is another, more pressing reason to discuss
and contemplate all these matters at this time.
-
- On Tuesday, April 20, and Wednesday, April 28, the U.S.
Supreme Court will hear arguments on the power claimed by the President
to designate people as "enemy combatants" and have them incarcerated
by the military - indefinitely, without charges, and without access to
the court system--solely on his say-so.
-
- As my friend Alvin notes, "This is a critical moment
in United States history."
-
- "How the court rules on these cases will determine
the type of country we will be living in. We urge those of you who can
to be present outside the Supreme Court on these dates," said Alvin.
For more information please see http://www.nlg.org/eccases/
-
- It is one thing to realize all law enforcement and defense
strategies in America in 2004 have become lies.
-
- It is quite another to incorporate those lies into the
law itself, and that is about to happen next week.
-
- The decision expected will make a time of darkness grow
even darker, and practically guarantee that freedom and justice for all
is now an outmoded phrase that has been conveniently discarded by the evil
robots who now control the lives of every person on earth.
-
-
- John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy
Report," a collection of his Internet essays seen on hundreds of websites
around the world, and also "The Day America Died: Why You Shouldn't
Believe the Official Story of What Happened on September 11, 2001,"
a 48-page booklet written for those who insist on believing the government's
version of events. For more information about both, go to http://www.johnkaminski.com/
-
-
- Comment
- From Leslie Bell
- 4-17-4
- Those planes pulled "G" forces in those turns
that were impossible. The planes have built-in safeguards that make such
maneuvers impossible (for the protection of the passenger and crew), EVEN
WHEN AUTOPILOT IS DISABLED. The only way those planes could have done those
maneuvers is if their internal safety restraints were overruled from outside
remote control. This bit of information COMES FROM COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE
PILOTS, and was widely available days after 9-11 when commercial pilots
said what they saw was impossible.
|
