Rense.com




Democrats, Dump Kerry Now
By Bev Conover
Online Journal
Editor & Publisher
4-14-4


If there are any people in the Democratic Party leadership who haven't been bought by the corporate globalists, they would insist the party dump John Kerry now and choose instead, as the party's presidential candidate, Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean.
 
We predicted during the Democratic primaries that if Kerry emerged as the party's contender, it was a signal that the corporate masters have had it with George W. Bush. Either that message hasn't gotten through to the corporate media, which is still giving Bush a free pass while playing up Kerry's shortcomings, or perhaps we should have said the corporate masters may have had it with Bush.
 
Whether Kerry is their boy or their fallback candidate, either way, whether it's Kerry or Bush, very little will change. Bonesman Kerry will just put a seemingly kinder and gentler face on the madness and throw a few crumbs to Americans, while continuing the quest for empire.
 
Kerry surely knew he wanted to run for president when he voted for the resolution Bush used to illegally invade Iraq. He unequivocally parroted all Bush's lies about Iraq having chemical and biological weapons and that it was attempting to develop nuclear weapons, despite briefings, prior to his vote, by former chief UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Did he also buy into the insanity that the whole exercise was going to be a cakewalk and the Iraqi people were going to greet their liberators with hugs and flowers or was his fearful of being on the wrong side of history if the Bushies were correct? Now Kerry wants us to believe that it wasn't a blank check he voted to give Bush on October 11, 2002, but that it was his understanding that if Saddam Hussein refused to turn over the WMD, which Ritter had told him Saddam didn't have, Bush would obtain a UN resolution before sending in the troops. Either Kerry is a liar or he is stupid, which makes him no better than Bush.
 
With Iraq in ruins, deaths and casualties mounting on all sides as the Iraqi intifada gains steam, what does Kerry, who served in Vietnam and then turned on that illegal war, propose? Send in more troops, get the UN involved and seek help from our allies (if we have any left), instead of saying enough and proposing a way to end the occupation, bring the troops home and turn the country over to the Iraqis.
 
Keeping the above in mind, where does Kerry stand on Bush's "axis of evil?" He said on the Senate floor, "Every nation has the right to act preemptively if it faces an imminent and grave threat." How many more "imminent and grave" threats does he see?
 
The militarization of space doesn't seem to bother Kerry, either. In a May 2, 2001, statement on the Senate floor, he supported Bush's missile defense initiative and called for amending the 1997 ABM Treaty Demarcation agreements that prohibit the development and testing of systems that could shoot down ICBMs. Are space wars what we would have to look forward to with Kerry, too? Former astronaut Ed Mitchell points out in the documentary, "Arsenal of Hypocrisy," that if a weapon the size of the Apollo rocket that carried him to the moon were exploded in space, it would create such a band of debris circling the earth that it would end space exploration for all time.
 
Kerry voted for the dastardly USA PATRIOT Act, which he now says Attorney General John Ashcroft has abused, but he's big on "homeland security" and he buys into the bogus "war on terror."
 
Palestinians will get no better treatment from a Kerry White House than they have from the Bush. The senator from Massachussetts has already pledged his fealty to the murderous and certifiably insane Zionists in control of Israel. In a February 17 article that appeared in CounterPunch, Kerry wrote that "the cause of Israel must be the cause of America." On his campaign website, it is stated, "John Kerry believes that history and our own best interests demand that the United States maintain a steady policy of friendship and support for Israel. As the only true democracy in the Middle East, Israel is our most important ally, and a critical partner in the quest for peace and security in this troubled region. America's longstanding commitment to Israel's independence and survival must never waver."
 
Kerry is no friend of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, either. In his March 19 Statement on Venezuela, Kerry said, "Throughout his time in office, President Chavez has repeatedly undermined democratic institutions by using extra-legal means, including politically motivated incarcerations, to consolidate power. In fact, his close relationship with Fidel Castro has raised serious questions about his commitment to leading a truly democratic government.
 
"Moreover, President Chavez's policies have been detrimental to our interests and those of his neighbors. He has compromised efforts to eradicate drug cultivation by allowing Venezuela to become a haven for narco-terrorists, and sowed instability in the region by supporting anti-government insurgents in Colombia."
 
Nor does Kerry propose taking back the store from the corporations. He just wants to tax them a little more, as if most of them were paying anything now.
 
And these are just a few of Kerry's negatives.
 
Yes, Kerry will throw a few crumbs to the rabble to keep them at bay, such as calling for the rollback of the Bush tax cuts for the rich, not seeking to privatize Social Security, attempting to provide heath care for the uninsured, trying to restore the 3 million jobs lost by Bush to date. Note: that's all in the conditional tense.
 
The corporate globalists and their puppets in the European Union, the African Union, and the coming American (Free Trade Association of the Americas) and Asian unions might sleep a little better at night with loose cannon Bush retired to his Crawford, Texas, funny farm and Kerry in the White House. But beneath the less nasty looking surface, it will be business as usual. That is if they are truly out to replace Bush and get that message across to their media hacks and the folks who control the computerized voting equipment.
 
Ironically, Kerry, the third Catholic to seek the presidency, is now facing the wrath of his own church. While John F. Kennedy had to overcome the "he'll be run by the pope" notion, US Catholic bishops are insisting the pro-choice Kerry be run by the pope when it comes to matters of abortion, gay marriage (Kerry opposes, but supports civil unions) and stem cell research. The bishops also are upset with Kerry's vote against a bill that makes it a crime to harm a fetus during an assault on a woman. In February, Archbishop Raymond Burke of St. Louis told Kerry not to take communion if he attended mass there. If Kerry is the choice of the corporate globalists, can they get the church to back off? In what could be another irony, the globalists could remind the bishops that the constitution forbids religious tests for public office and that they would be jeopardizing the church's tax exempt status should they instruct their parishioners to vote against Kerry.
 
But if the Anybody-But-Bush (ABB) crowd isn't so eager to see George W. gone that they are willing to replace one Bonesman and globalist with another, there is still time before the confirmation partyóa.k.a., the Democratic Nation Conventionógets under way in Boston to demand that the party dump Kerry in favor of someone who will stand up for the people and the constitution.
 
The best choices to replace Kerry would be Kucinich or Dean, despite the number the corporate media did on both. Don't put your hopes on Kucinich, though. The former boy mayor of Cleveland is anathema to the corporate globalists. Kucinich had to be painted as a failure and some fringe lefty for having temporarily sacrificed his political career when he stood up to Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI)ówhich has since been merged into FirstEnergy Corp, now accused of causing last year's massive power outageówhen it tried to take over Cleveland's municipal electric system.
 
So that leaves Howard Dean, who doesn't exactly make the globalists happy, either. When Dean was riding high in the polls, he had to be cut down. Thusly, the false issue of "electability" was raised. After all, how could a well-educated achiever and the former governor of a small state who, despite no requirement to do so, balanced the budget 11 times be equipped to step on the world stage? Only an uneducated non-achiever, hard-drinking party animal, who deserted his military obligation, and the former governor of a large state, who got his jollies signing death warrants and handing the treasury away to his buddies could do that.
 
Surely, even the ABB crowd has to see that either man is superior to Kerry, the darling of the globalist Democratic Leadership Council who would have him move further to the right than he has.
 
Copyright © 1998-2004 Online Journalô. All rights reserved. http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/041404Conover/041404conover.html


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros