Rense.com




Lies Are Hallmark
Of Team Bush

By Bev Conover
Online Journal
Editor & Publisher
3-28-4


Even the word chutzpah isn't strong enough to account for the lies that flow daily from the mouths of the Bush team. Are these people so deranged that they actually believe they can get away with telling whopper after whopper after whopper or do they think the American people are so stupid that they will buy all the lies as long as the lies are humongous ones?
 
How many of you fell off your chairs when National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice and Supreme Court appointed Vice President Dick Cheney declared that Richard Clarke, who says the administration was soft on terrorism before 9/11, was out of the loop? That Clarke, the administration's top counterterrorism official, was not included in meetings where possible acts of terrorism were discussed?
 
The only thing Clarke may have been out of the loop on was the Bushies using the intelligence he provided them about impending al Qaeda attacks on US soil to either give CIA asset Osama bin Laden the green light or just sitting back and waiting for the attacks to happen. Either way, Bush and his neocons would get their "new Pearl Harbor" to pave the way for their long-planned illegal preemptive strike on Iraq, which was to be the first step in imposing US rule on the Arab states of the Middle East, in addition to neutralizing Team Sharon's enemies - real or perceived.
 
For those of you who still think that "our government wouldn't do that to us," the picture becomes clearer by the day that it is exactly what it did do. The only question remaining is whether the Bushies were complicit in 9/11 or did they just let it happen? Either way, it is not only an impeachable offense - one among a mountain of othersóbut a criminal, possibly even a treasonous, act.
 
How else to explain the waffling, the stonewalling, the hiding behind executive privilege and the fact that George W. Bush got to investigate himself and his underlings by appointing the members of the so-called independent 9/11 commission to do the investigating? That is the equivalent to a citizen accused of a crime appointing his own judge, prosecutor and jury.
 
Richard Clarke is no dove. He is an unabashed hawk. Clarke spent 30 years in government service. Beginning in 1973, he spent 19 years in the Pentagon, the intelligence community and the State Department. He served three presidents - Reagan, Bush I and Clinton - and the current White House resident. Under Reagan, he was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence. Under Bush I, he was Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs and coordinated diplomatic efforts for Poppy's Gulf War and was in charge of security. Under Clinton, he was National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counterterrorism. Under Bush II, he first was the chief counterterrorism official and later demoted to cyberterrorism czar.
 
Now Clarke, a true believer who votes Republican, must be destroyed. Then the Bushies are good at eating their own, especially those who dare to publicly disagree with them or those who no longer serve their purpose. Just ask Saddam Hussein or Manuel Noriega about that.
 
A savvy insider and wily tactician, Clarke is being savaged for being smart enough to respond only to questions he was asked in prior testimony to the 9/11 commission. That, according to Rice, waving an email he sent her regarding an issue the commission never asked him about, shows he lied.
 
It was Rice who ignored a letter from Clarke sent to her one week before 9/11, asking how the Bushies would feel if hundreds of Americans were killed in a terrorist attack.
 
When high administration officials aren't engaged in attempting to assassinate Clarke's character by charging that he was "disengaged," "disgruntled" over being demoted, and that he might even have a partisan agenda in the hopes of a getting a job in a Kerry administration - something he has flat out denied, saying he doesn't wish to serve in anyone's administration - they are whining and shedding crocodile tears over the timing of Clarke's book, "Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror." What the Bushies are failing to own up to is that Clarke's book was given to them last fall, which Clarke, as a former government official, was required by law to do. But they didn't scream and howl and shed false tears then, did they? Or did they fail to read the galleys, too? Is the whole Bush administration reading-challenged?
 
Clarke is only the latest target of the Bushies' fury, but he has shown himself well equipped to handle it, as did former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill before him. In going after former Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV when he called the Bush lie about Saddam trying to buy uranium yellowcake from Niger, two administration officials, as yet unknown, committed a criminal act by outing his wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA operative to a number of reporters, including Robert Novak who published it. When Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki, in testimony before Congress, disputed the Bushies over how many troops would be needed for the illegal war on Iraq, his military career came to an end.
 
Randy Beers, who succeeded Clarke, served only one month before resigning for the same reason Clarke quit. Beers told the Washington Post last June, "The administration wasn't matching its deeds to its words in the war on terror. They're making us less secure, not more." He further told the Post, "The difficult, long-term issues both at home and abroad have been avoided, neglected or shortchanged, and generally underfunded." The Bushies have used the fact that Beers and Clarke are friends and that Beers is currently a volunteer security adviser to John Kerry's presidential campaign more, at this point, to smear Clarke than Beers. But there is still time to punish Beers.
 
Richard Foster, Medicare's chief actuary, says he was threatened with being fired if he told Congress the truth about the cost of Bush's Medicare prescription drug program, which far exceeded what the administration had told Congress. Foster's revelations have sparked a congressional inquiry. Time will tell what fate Foster will suffer. The Bushies let no good deed go unpunished.
 
Lesser lights also have felt Team Bush's wrath. Tom Flocco yesterday reported that FBI translator Sibel Edmonds charged before some "50 reporters and 12 television cameras," following yesterday's Tuesday's to the 9/11 commission, that she was offered a "substantial raise and a full time job to encourage her not to go public that she had been asked by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to retranslate and adjust the translations of [terrorist] subject intercepts that had been received before September 11, 2001, by the FBI and CIA."
 
Edmonds is quoted as saying, "Attorney General John Ashcroft told me 'he was invoking State Secret Privilege and National Security' when I told the FBI I wanted to go public with what I had translated from the pre 9-11 intercepts."
 
And what was in her original translations that Ashcroft wanted suppressed? "My translations of the pre 9-11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date specific information enough to alert the American people, and other issues dating back to 1999 which I won't go into right now."
 
The term "State Secret Privilege," she told Flocco came to her in an October 18, 2002, memo from Department of Justice spokesperson Barbara Comstock.
 
Ms. Edmonds told Flocco that since her appearance on 60 Minutes she has been silenced by Ashcroft, followed by the FBI and, in 2002, threatened in 2002 with jail if she went public.
 
It is doubtful that all these people are liars or nutcases. Those honors belong to the Bushies whose nefarious schemes are coming unraveled. Truth is powerful stuff, so powerful that when it starts coming out, even a Karl Rove can't hold it back.
 
The biggest question is if and when the Democrats are going to pick up on all the Bush lies being handed to them on the proverbial silver platter. Must Bush and his evil twin, Ariel Sharon, set the world aflame before the Democrats wake up? Might there be some unwritten rule that a Bonesman (John Kerry) cannot speak the truth about another Bonesman (George W. Bush)? If so, all is lost.
 
On the lighter side (maybe not), a Condi Rice fan has set up an unofficial Condoleezza Rice for President in 2008 website.
 
Copyright © 1998-2004 Online Journalô. All rights reserved.
 
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/032604Conover/032604conover.html


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros