Rense.com



US Bonds Face Gloomier
Future - Selling Increases

By Jenny Wiggins
Financial Times - UK
9-8-3

The US bond markets have had a rough few months, with an intense bout of heavy selling that started in mid-June knocking government debt prices sharply lower.
 
But the markets are already considering the prospect of an even gloomier future.
 
Many market participants say more selling is on the cards, this time led by foreign investors.
 
Over the past decade, foreign investors have been gathering up increasing amounts of US debt securities.
 
Foreigners now own one-third of the US Treasury market, up from one-fifth eight years ago, according to Merrill Lynch.
 
In recent years, Asia has become the most noticeable buyer of Treasury debt. Japan is the largest holder of Treasury securities, owning some $442bn at the end of June, followed by the UK with $123bn and mainland China with $122bn.
 
Lehman Brothers says the Asian region now accounts for some 39 per cent of international purchases of US bonds, nearing the 43 per cent owned by Europe.
 
In an environment where bond prices are falling and the US government's financing needs are increasing - the Treasury will issue a record amount of debt this quarter to help fund its large budget deficit - these large foreign holdings are starting to raise some concerns.
 
Economists say that the US relies on foreign purchases to help finance its current account deficit, which runs at some 5 per cent of GDP.
 
For some time, a happy equilibrium has existed between the US and Asia. The US buys Asian exports, and Asian countries use income from the sale of their exports to buy US assets to help prevent their currencies from rising against the dollar.
 
However, investment managers have begun to realise that this equilibrium is unlikely to last forever, particularly if bond yields remain low and the US continues to put pressure on Asian countries to revalue their currencies.
 
Last week, Bill Gross, the chief investment officer at bond fund Pimco, the largest bond fund in the US, expressed fears that China could start a bond market rout.
 
"Since [China's] monthly trade surplus of $10bn plus with the US implies a $120bn annual addition to its dollar reserves, there will come a time when their hundreds of billions, if not half a trillion or so, in holdings of US notes and bonds look a tad too risky," he told investors in his September investment outlook.
 
"In turn, the hundreds of billions that the Japanese and other Asian countries have been buying in order to keep their currencies competitive with the Chinese yuan (renminbi) and the US dollar will be subject to a sanity check as well."
 
Fixed-income strategists do not expect Asian central banks to start selling immediately.
 
But they are considering the pressure any foreign selling could put on the bond markets if it comes amid a big increase in debt supply.
 
"It could weigh on an already heavy market," said Amy Falls, head of global fixed-income strategy at Morgan Stanley.
 
The government may also be hard-pressed to find replacement buyers for its debt if Asian investors do sell.
 
"It's very important to maintain central bank demand," said Ethan Harris, chief economist at Lehman Brothers.
 
"There's nothing close to that kind of demand from private borrowers."
 
There are already signs that overseas investors have become less enamoured of US debt.
 
Foreign investors have been selling the so-called "agency" debt issued by mortgage financiers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae following an accounting scandal at Freddie Mac.
 
There is currently some $186.6bn in agency debt securities held in custody for foreign accounts at the Federal Reserve, down from $189.8bn on June 4, before the scandal broke.
 
This debt is a popular alternative to Treasury securities because investors believe agency securities hold an implicit guarantee from the US government due to Freddie and Fannie's special status as "government-sponsored enterprises".
 
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/Story
FT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059479617516&p=1012571727088
 
_____
 
Asian debt withdrawal threat to US deficit By Jenny Wiggins in New York Published: September 7 2003 19:01 | Last Updated: September 7 2003 19:01
 
Economists fear that Asian investors, who are the largest foreign owners of US Treasuries, may cut their holdings of US government debt, withdrawing a key source of financing for America's large current account deficit.
 
The worries have been fuelled by recent sharp falls in the price of US government debt.
 
Weakness in the US Treasury market could make Asian investors "less willing" buyers of debt securities, said Marcel Kasumovich, head of G10 foreign exchange strategy at Merrill Lynch.
 
He said there had already been a "noticeable shift" downwards in the amount of debt issued by mortgage financiers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae being bought by foreign investors.
 
Asian investors have piled into the US Treasury markets in recent years, helping to push Treasury prices high and interest rates low. China, Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong owned a combined total of about $696bn in Treasuries at the end of June, up from $512bn in December 2001, according to data from the US Treasury.
 
Asian countries use the income they receive from exporting goods to the US to buy American assets, which helps keep their currencies weak compared with the dollar. This helps keep the price of Asian goods down in the US.
 
But in recent months, as investors have become more optimistic about an economic recovery, they have begun to sell Treasury debt, sending government bond prices down.
 
Political pressure on Asian governments to alter their exchange rates could also prompt selling. The US Treasury would like Beijing to abandon its fixed currency regime because it is concerned that China is keeping its currency low to support exports.
 
However, if China and other Asian countries were to allow their currencies to strengthen against the US dollar, they would have less need to own US assets.
 
"It could mean Asia pulls out of US markets," said Ethan Harris, chief US economist at Lehman Brothers.
 
If Asian countries were to reduce their holdings of American assets heavily, they would remove a key source of finance for US investment spending, potentially requiring the government to rely more on sparse domestic savings.
 
 
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/Story
FT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059479617509&p=1012571727088
 
_____
 
Russia and Saudi Arabia signed 5 year Oil Agreement
 
posted by ewing2001 on Tuesday September 02, @10:36AM from the AP dept.
 
Russia, Saudi Arabia Sign Oil Agreements
 
Guardian -Tuesday September 2, 2003
 
MOSCOW (AP) - Russia and Saudi Arabia - the world's largest oil exporters - signed oil industry cooperation agreements Tuesday during a landmark visit to Moscow by the Arab kingdom's ruler.
 
The two sides also were expected to take up the sensitive question of whether rebels in the secessionist republic of Chechnya receive funding from Saudi charities.
 
Crown Prince Abdullah, who met with President Vladimir Putin, is the first Saudi head of state to visit post-Soviet Russia. A Saudi crown prince last visited in 1932.
 
 
After talks, Russian and Saudi energy ministers signed a five-year agreement on cooperation in the oil and gas industry. The deal also calls for joint ventures in oil and gas exploration and scientific research, according to the text released by the Russian Cabinet.
 
Russia is the world's second-largest oil exporter behind Saudi Arabia.
 
The two countries were also expected to address the situation in Iraq and the Middle East peace process. Riyadh hopes the visit will strengthen Russia's support for Arab causes, particularly the Palestinian issue.
 
http://new.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/09/02/2145230
 
_____
 
TIME magazine on US/Saudi relations:
 
For many in the U.S., including in the halls of government, patience with the Saudis is running thin. "More and more people are saying, 'It's time to sit on the Saudis; it's time to hit them hard,'" says a State Department official. Frank Gaffney, a conservative foreign-policy analyst, has some ideas on how to do that: "You put them on notice that this kind of behavior is completely unacceptable. You can break off diplomatic relations, you can impose economic sanctions, and you have, ultimately, the option of seizing the oil fields militarily if you have to."
 
 
That's easy to advocate when you're not in office. The hard-liners in the Bush Administration, most of them neoconservatives, would like to put greater pressure on the Saudis to reform, but they don't go so far as to propose regime change. The fall of the House of Saud is too scary to contemplate, because any alternative regime would probably be more regressive. It's one measure of the essential conservatism of the Saudi people that their country, despite the lack of freedom, produces very few political refugees. By Saudi standards, the Saud regime is liberal. "If you want to marginalize the Saudis, cut them off and turn your back on them, you are simply inviting another Taliban type of regime," says Ambassador Jordan.
 
For that reason, it seems unlikely that the Bush Administration will adopt a tougher policy toward Riyadh. While the neocons have won most of the internal debates so far in this Administration, this time they are fighting without their powerful godfather, Vice President Dick Cheney, on board. Cheney's pragmatism on Saudi Arabia is informed by his experience as an official in the Nixon Administration in 1973, when the Saudis protested U.S. support for Israel by embargoing oil sales to the U.S. for five months, causing the worst gasoline shortages in U.S. history. From Cheney, Secretary of State Colin Powell, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and, significantly, his father, President Bush is hearing a singular line from his most important foreign policy advisers: that he must engage with the Saudis, work with them to bring about change and not alienate them. Indeed, when President Bush spoke to Abdullah for 20 minutes by phone last week, say U.S. and Saudi sources, he went out of his way to compliment the Prince on Saudi Arabia's efforts to combat terrorism.
 
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030915-483269,00.html

 

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros