Last week heterosexuals came under attack in many places. In Ontario, courts granted gays permission to marry creating a contentious national rift. In Vancouver, parents narrowly blocked homosexual activists from placing their books on kindergarten curriculum. 

 

The American Psychiatric Association came under heavy pressure to remove pedophilia from its list of mental disorders.  (http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200306\CUL20030611c.html)  Newsweek featured (same-sex couples attending their high school proms.)  "Instead of sparking controversy, schools are saying, whatís the big deal?" http://www.msnbc.com/news/924401.asp?0bl=-0

 

The campaign to change society's sexual norm is intensifying. Straights need to realize that they are under siege from big government and big business.

 

The vast majority of homosexuals are good people who want to be left alone.  Homosexual organizations, however, are created and funded by elite foundations and corporations to destroy the heterosexual fabric of society. http://dianedew.com/gayles.htm (I will expand on the reasons next week.) 

 

Gay activists pretend they are seeking "tolerance" and "equality." But privately they admit that their hidden agenda is to reshape society in their own image. They don't care how much harm they do.

 

"The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex distinction itself," says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11)

 

 "Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded," writes Gary kinsman. "The forms of sexuality considered natural have been socially created and can be socially transformed." (The Regulation of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219)

 

 "In a free society, everyone will be gay," writes Allen Young, a pioneer of the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D'Emilio, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, p.322)

 

"In one sense the right is right." says gay historian Jonathan Katz: if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically transformative promise (or threat, depending on your values). (The Invention of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.) Emphasis mine.

 

THE GAY FEMINIST ONSLAUGHT

 

Gay and feminist activists have found common cause because they both insist male-female distinctions are artificial (ignoring all scientific evidence to the contrary.) While many heterosexuals consider themselves "feminists", feminism is a homosexual movement. It believes that men and women are not only equal but also the same; and only social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is love of the same.

 

Today, gay and feminist activists want "people" to make love to "people" regardless of their sex. They depict normal heterosexual behavior as pathological. Men are abusers and the heterosexual family is oppressive. They think the way to social justice is to abolish heterosexuality altogether. Isn't this "hatred?"

 

Illuminati-Marxism spawned both the Gay and Woman's liberation movements by transferring Marxist class conflict to gender. The "patriarchy" (male-dominated heterosexual family) is the root of all evil and must be destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed "oppressed" (gays, certain favoured minorities) must be handed position and power on a silver platter.

 

The Illuminati's "revolutionary" goal is the "new world order" or authoritarian socialism run by monopoly capital. It is big government in the service of big business, left in the service of right.

 

 

It always was. In the words of US Communist leader Bella Dodd the rich sponsored the Communist Party. They sponsor homosexuality and feminism to "destroy the bourgeois family" and create "new types of human beings who would conform."

 

Why have straights passively endured this attack?

 

1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity by asserting their victim status. Straights can't even defend their own sexuality for fear of accusations of "homophobia" and "sexism." These days anyone who does not want to be gay is homophobic.

 

 2) Typical Marxists, they practiced deceit successfully. They attracted widespread support by pretending to champion women when in fact they always had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians and media are in massive denial because they have empowered these radicals and even put them in charge of education. The situation is comparable to the liberal refusal in the 1940's and 1950's to admit the government was riddled with Soviet Spies. This was part of the same phenomenon of Rockefeller Communism.

 

TEACHING CHILDREN TO BE GAY

 

Many public schools virtually "break the ice" for gays. For example, the Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces 12-year-old children to oral and anal sex.

 

Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary Teacher's Federation said the union is "trying to promote a more positive [homosexual] environment in schools." (National Post, Aug.16, 2001)

 

This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by reading books like "Aasha's Moms" and "Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads."

On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo. Our children's textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that men and women might be different, live in traditional families, or behave in "stereotypical" ways.

 

As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists like D.H. Lawrence who portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I was accused of "sexual harassment" by feminist activists and lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now defined as anything that makes a radical feminist uncomfortable.)

 

As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because homosexuals may be "uncomfortable." This has led to the demoralization of society. We cannot celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine. We do not celebrate heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers us.

 

This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution. It used to be 'live and let live.' Now gay and feminist activists will not let us live.

 

In an episode of the TV show Friends, Rachel avoids paying a speeding fine by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the steering wheel and is stopped for driving too slowly. Ross tries to flirt with the male cop. The message is that we can all go both ways, even the cop. This is the reality behind the gay activist demand for "equality". It is no longer enough to tolerate them; we must become them. It doesn't matter if we are comfortable as long as they are. See also Pat Buchanan's "Mainstreaming Deviancy" http://www.theamericancause.org/patmainstreamingdeviancyprint.htm

 

SOVIET-STYLE THOUGHT CRIME

 

In Rochester, N.Y., Rolf Szabo,  a 23-year employee of Eastman Kodak Co. was fired because he objected to a pro-homosexual office memo. He did not adhere to the company's so-called "Winning & Inclusive Culture" designed to promote "diversity." This example of Soviet-style thought crime is not isolated. http://www.cnsnews.com/Culture/Archive/200208/CUL20020802b.html

 

Homosexual behaviour makes straights uncomfortable. Most men viscerally find the sight of two men kissing repulsive.

 

Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of straight children by gays denies the children's natural instincts and distorts their psychological development. In 20 years they will be suing the government for millions of dollars.

 

Gay marriages are different from heterosexual marriages, and should have a separate status. Gay marriage deliberately distorts our perceptions of ourselves. As Katz says, the "secret" purpose is to "do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division

 

 

In conclusion, it's time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality are in fierce competition. The gay model does not fit heterosexuals and vice-versa. There can only be one model. Will ours be a heterosexual society that tolerates a 4% gay minority?

 

Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a 96% straight majority? History has many examples of minorities that have persecuted majorities. Take Communism for example.

 

If straights don't establish the norms, gay activists will. When gay/feminist activists demand "equality," they are demanding that one model fit all. They are saying that we are the same. We are not.

 

Rejecting the homosexual model is not "intolerance" or "hatred." It is defending our natural birthright, and our families.

 

 

Heterosexual society is the victim of an insidious form of persecution called psychological warfare. The real "haters" are gay-feminist activists, and the elite politicians, media, corporations and foundations that sustain them.

 

--------------------

Henry Makow is the inventor of the board game "Scruples" and author of "A Long Way to go for a Date."  His articles on feminism and

 

 

 

Comment

From Ken

6-23-3

Henry Makow's article on Heterosexual Society Under Siege is a distortion of truth. Heterosexuals are not being attacked and injured and killed for being heterosexual as are homosexuals and bisexuals. They do not lose jobs and housing by marrying a woman. Also its not true that the lesbians among the more extreme feminists speak for most gay men, there often has been division between radical feminists and gay men in homosexual organizations. The implication is that homosexuality and bisexuality are unnatural, yet Zoologists know that virtually all social mammals and social birds demonstrate homosexual behavior fairly frequently. (See the book Biological Exuberance by biologist Bruce Bagemihl).

To equate gay rights with the right wing fascist billionaire elite taking over the world with monopolistic economic globalism is absurd. Places like San Francisco are a hot bed of opposition to economic globalism. You generally have very useful info that the Big Business media outlets block and I praise you for that. But apparently you have a bias against homosexuals and bisexuals.

Fundamentalist Judaism began the bigotry against gays probably because of some ancient sexual disease going through the Middle East at the time. A health issue was turned into religious superstition.

Fundamentalist monotheists often say that all religion opposes homosexuality. Yet the oldest school of Buddhism, the Southern Buddhist Theravada religion which is considered to have one of the most strict moral codes and called too conservative by some for that reason has no prohibition against homosexual behavior among non-monastic unmarried adults. Polygamy was acceptable also as long as you had permission from your wife to get another wife.

Peace, Ken