RENSE.COM


Etiologic Agent Of
SARS Identified
A Brand New Coronavirus May Be Cause
From Patricia Doyle, PhD
dr_p_doyle@hotmail.com
3-25-3

Hello, Jeff -- The CDC believes that a NEW Coronavirus may cause SARS. Of course, more testing is ongoing and a definite diagnosis forthcoming.
 
Patricia
 
 
From ProMED-mail promed@promedmail.org
 
CDC Lab Analysis Suggests New Coronavirus May Cause SARS
 
A CDC Press Release
 
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced today that a previously unrecognized virus from the coronavirus family is the leading hypothesis for the cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Two coronaviruses that are known to infect humans cause one third of common colds and are also a common cause of health care-associated upper respiratory infections in premature infants.
 
"This is encouraging news from our laboratories at CDC," said Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary of Health and Humans Services. "These and other excellent scientists all over the world have been working around the clock for days and their hard work is paying off. They continue to look at other possible causes of SARS, but this is a key finding in our efforts to identify the cause of this global outbreak."
 
Additional steps needed to confirm this hypothesis include further culturing of the virus from appropriate specimens, sequencing the viral genome, and examining specimens from patients at different stages of their illness.
 
"This collaboration among scientists led by the World Health Organization (WHO) is unprecedented," said CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding. "We certainly have more work to do, but we think we are on the right track. And our systems to identify cases and investigate them are working too, thanks to all the frontline clinicians and state and local health departments around the country."
 
As of Mon, 24 Mar 2003, CDC is reporting 39 suspected SARS cases in 18 states. WHO is reporting 456 cases and 17 deaths.
 
Since the outbreak of SARS was first reported two weeks ago, CDC has responded in these ways:
 
Activated the agency's Emergency Operations Center.
 
Alerted public health partners in cities and states by issuing electronic messages.
 
Prepared and distributed more than 60,000 health alert cards to travelers returning from Southeast Asia.
 
Provided guidance to public health departments, health care facilities, and clinicians in monitoring and identifying potential cases.
 
Provided safe specimen-handling guidelines to laboratories.
 
Deployed more than a dozen CDC staff members, including medical officers, epidemiologists, infection control specialists, and pathologists to support the World Health Organization in the global investigation.
 
Provided regular media briefings to report on progress of the investigation.
 
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r030324.htm
 
Pro Med Comment -
 
(This report does not provide much clarity but rather adds to the confusion regarding the nature of the infectious agent responsible for SARS. The candidates so far include, an unspecified paramyxovirus, the recently discovered human metapneumovirus (representing the two subfamilies of the family _Paramyxoviridae_, and now an unspecified coronavirus (representing the family _Coronaviridae_). A common feature of the families _Paramyxoviridae_ and Coronaviridae_ is that they contain viruses that are ubiquitous respiratory tract pathogens. Consequently it would not be unexpected to detect such viruses in clinical samples entirely fortuitously, particularly where a diagnostic technique of limited discriminatory potential such as electron microscopy is employed.
 
The paramyxoviruses and coronaviruses are quite distinct viruses with different biological potential. The paramyxoviruses are negative-sense RNA viruses, which do not recombine, whereas the coronaviruses are positive-sense RNA viruses, which undergo recombination at high frequency.
 
In the UK, at least, coronaviruses are second only to rhinoviruses as causes of the common cold. In the case of the four types of human parainfluenza viruses (sub-family _Paramyxovirinae_), human respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus (sub-family _Pneumovirinae_) infection occurs in infancy and early childhood, but does not confer prolonged immunity. In the case of human respiratory syncytial virus it has been estimated that reinfection occurs on average every 36 months.
 
The outcome of infection can be serious in infancy (bronchiolitis) and in the elderly (pneumonia), At other ages infection is usually asymptomatic or mild URTI. The recently discovered human metapneumovirus appears to behave similarly, but is less prevalent than respiratory syncytial virus (see: Human metapneumovirus infections in young and elderly adults by Falsey et al., in Journal of Infectious Diseases, 187, (5), 785-790, 2003). These authors conclude that: "Human metapneumovirus infection occurs in adults of all ages and may account for a significant portion of persons hospitalized with respiratory infections during some years."
 
Continued caution is required in evaluation of the competing claims of identification of the etiologic agent of SARS. - Mod.CP)
 
ProMED-mail promed@promedmail.org
 
 
Patricia A. Doyle, PhD Please visit my "Emerging Diseases" message board at: http://www.clickitnews.com/emergingdiseases/index.shtml Zhan le Devlesa tai sastimasa Go with God and in Good Health


Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros