- Lately I have involved myself in topics about which I
seem to offend partisans on both sides of the same question.
- As a journalist, this gives me great satisfaction, because
true objectivity demands constructive criticism of both sides of any given
issue, and in this I often succeed. But as a human being, it frustrates
me that everybody from all points of the political spectrum can be so blindly
biased; so unwilling to admit their own faults; so profoundly dense not
to see that other people's arguments are often the same as their own though
couched in different terms; so lacking in understanding, empathy, and fairness;
so selfishly parochial as a new unprecedented worldwide disaster closes
in on us.
- Like, why should the United States have the right to
declare other nations not suited to possess weapons of mass destruction?
Or, why should one country have them (Israel) and another country not (Iraq)?
Does it all hinge on Condoleezza Rice's statement that we are a nation
of truth and goodness and can determine what is right for everyone? And
what of those who disagree? Are they wrong? Are they evil? Isn't the United
States the country most likely to use weapons of mass destruction?
- No wonder there are so many wars. Everybody says they're
listening, but nobody's hearing anything, because everyone's consciousness
is set up in such a way that they believe they are right, and anybody who
says anything else is automatically an evil enemy. Objectivity seems to
be an impossibility, determined entirely by those who control the methods
- This process of getting caught in the middle of these
kinds of arguments and being blasted from both sides regularly happens
to me because I consort with people from all angles of the political spectrum,
from pistol packing Patriots to grandmoms eager to lay in the street in
front of tanks. Both groups, the nobility of whose motives are not really
to be questioned, routinely fall into the careless use of stereotypes to
characterize the nefarious forces they believe oppress them.
- The Patriots call the Clintons Communists when they are
actually cynical stooges for corporate totalitarians, and the lefties tag
those on the way-right as selfish gun-toting racists when they are actually
arguing for principles that would enrich all our lives. But seen from a
slightly different angle, those same Patriots (and libertarians, too) become
shills for those very processes that now threaten to plunge the world into
the darkness of war, and liberal lefties " who preach that if we all
don't make it to freedom and security, none of us are going to make it
" are all too often oblivious to the destruction of individual rights
that they themselves espouse in their political campaigns. Never the twain
seems to meet.
- Anyway, the latest tar baby that has attached itself
to my butt involves really kind of a toss-off line I used in my last essay
about "The Dead Zone," when I waxed poetic that I was sitting
on the shore of Vichy France waiting for the American bombers to arrive
and change the nature of the world. To those certain few of my e-penpals
who have identified with my previous critiques of Israel's fascist behavior
throughout recent decades, it was as if I'd blasphemed the messiah.
- How could I denigrate Hitler, when he was clearly a victim
of the Western chapter of the worldwide Jewish conspiracy which set him
up to take the big fall?
- Whoa, Nellie! Just because I happen to believe in that
worldwide Jewish conspiracy doesn't mean I have to believe that the little
fruitcake with the funny mustache was a good guy. I mean, nobody made him
invade France, Poland, Czechoslovakia and all those other countries. Nobody
made him preach a gospel of racial superiority (that now, very oddly, seems
to have been adopted by the Jews) and herd his little coterie of black-uniformed
twits into venom-spewing, hate-mongering robots out to obliterate the rest
of the world.
- No conspiracy made him do that. He took the ball and
ran with it.
- Just because I believe that Western business interests
have manipulated worldwide markets and armies into numerous wars doesn't
make me a fan of someone who wanted to take over the world.
- But the real reason I can't identify with Hitler is that
I can see from his philosophical descendants that he was pure, insane evil.
And who are those philosophical descendants? Well, they are the Bush family,
tied into the Hitler legacy through the second Bush president's forebears,
Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, who both made millions off their backing
of German businesses during World War II. This is no fiction. Do a Google
search. It's easy to find. These are Hitler's real philosophical descendants:
the pro-war, Zionist Christian Republican establishment.
- The Nazi legacy was passed to the conquering Americans
through the CIA and the Dulles brothers, and the American space program,
which wouldn't have succeeded without the help of German scientists. Nazi
principles live on in the American corporate establishment, which condones
absolutely anything in the name of profit and now has been given its favorite
Nazi gift: the indefinite imprisonment (or even murder) of mere suspects
without trial or appeal.
- Yes, I can believe there was funny stuff going on prior
to WW II involving Jewish control of the media and the financial markets
that uncannily reflects what is going on now. I know about the implications
of the Balfour declaration: Germany would have won World War I, except
that Jewish interests got the U.S. to enter the war after Britain made
a secret promise to Zionists that they could have Palestine. But no, despite
what was major provocative Jewish propaganda against him, I still believe
Hitler was a white racist bent on destroying anybody who didn't have the
kind of genetic heritage he preferred (and didn't even possess himself).
- But just because I revile Hitler doesn't mean I believe
the fictions the Jewish dominated media have spun about the Holocaust.
I have been driven irrevocably into the category of Holocaust denier (a
1947 AP story said 875,000 Jews were killed in Germany during WW II) simply
because of the way the Jewish community has trumpeted its martyrdom for
financial gain, how the Jewish community has destroyed freedom of speech
in a dozen European countries by making it a crime to talk about the events
that led up to World War II.
- I mean, if what the Jews were saying were actually true,
they wouldn't need to pass laws to prevent their opponents from talking
about it. They'd simply defeat them in an empirical argument, or in a court
- But to pass laws about talking about the events of World
War II ... I mean, that's almost as bad as George W. Bush preventing a
thorough investigation into the events of 9/11/2001. It's a certain admission
of guilt, an undeniable indication of a falsehood being perpetrated.
- I submit the degree to which a reader of this may be
horrified by this pronouncement is exactly the degree to which this same
reader has been indoctrinated by media myths that severely alter the truth.
- And when you realize that the Jewish community has stamped
out freedom of speech throughout much of Europe, you naturally have to
ask what that same group has done to legitimate political debate in the
United States of America.
- Back in World War II, there never was much coverage about
how Eisenhower let two million Germans starve to death in French prison
camps that didn't even ahve buildings or latrines, an event surely as shameful
as German concentration camps.
- It's more of the same today. Nothing on TV or the big
newspapers about the investigations into 9/11 or the anthrax murders, no
coverage of the Palestinians being caged up in prison camps and murdered
indiscriminately by bulldozers and helicopters on a daily basis, and not
an audible peep about how it is Israel that has violated U.N. mandates
about weapons of mass destruction and inhuman treatment of political prisoners.
Yet the U.S. gives Israel so much money ($14 billion per year) that it
has begun to tip over the entire American economy, and still not a peep
in the American mass media ... because it is totally controlled by Jewish
interests. This is not an exaggeration, no matter what trendy, left-leaning
mass media observers like FAIR have to say about it.
- But that still doesn't mean I have to like Hitler, or
think he was right about anything, least of all Aryan superiority.
- Same deal with Saddam. I can rail against how unjust
and immoral the continuing target practice against Iraq is without saying
anything nice about the Iraqi leader. Hell, the worst thing I can say about
him was that he was a partner of the Bush family in acquiring weapons of
mass destruction for his war against the truly legitimate democracy of
- So, the Nazis say I'm soft on Israel because I don't
like Hitler, and Jews call me an anti-Semite because I don't like Israeli
soldiers putting bullets through the heads of old ladies and little babies.
Everywhere I look I'm busted.
- Anti-Semite. Hah. That's a laugh.
- As many observers have written recently, an anti-Semite
used to mean someone who hated Jews because they were Jews. Now, the term
anti-Semite is used by Jews to tar and feather anyone who disagrees with
Jewish policies, influences, and effects. Complain about Israelis burying
alive Palestinian residents of Jenin and Jews say you're an anti-Semite.
Wonder about the preponderance of Jewish influence on the American government
and you're an anti-Semite. Worst of all were the recent remarks by Harvard
president Lawrence Summers and his henchman Alan Dershowitz, who decried
the recent rise of anti-Semitism. All this means to me is that Harvard
is no longer a great university, but just another influential vehicle for
Jewish propaganda. Check out the school's Enron investments sometime.
- It's not a rise of anti-Semitism; it's a rise of disgust
by thoughtful people who are appalled by the Jewish failure to admit the
appalling crimes against humanity their Israeli cousins are perpetrating
against the dark-skinned peoples of the region, and their political double
agents are doing to the integrity of the American government.
- This is a smokescreen kind of lie in which Jews exploited
the so-called Holocaust for a kind of political immunity. Let's be nice
to them because they've had a hard time, everyone was encouraged to think.
And now we have more of the same: a worldwide wave of anti-Semitism used
to camouflage obvious genocide in the Middle East.
- I'm not an anti-Semite. I'm anti-Israel, an illegal nation
which has inherited all the worst traits of Hitler's regime and passed
them onto the United States. And I'm anti-Jew because there are so few
Jews with the honesty to admit their beloved sanctuary of Israel is a lethal
menace to every decent nation and ethnic group on earth, including itself.
This too is a Jewish legacy that has been successfully passed to the United
- Anti-Semite. That's a good one.
- Jews aren't Semites at all; they're Turkic Mongols, who
stormed their way across Asia with Genghis Khan 1500 years ago, became
Khazars in the Ukraine a thousand years ago, adopted Judaism as a political
strategy, then infiltrated eastern Europe, always ashamed of their Oriental
lineage, which they have done their best to conceal.
- But it's no secret; they're still behaving like Genghis
Khan, taking what they want and lying about it. They picked up a lot of
good pointers from Hitler, that's all. They have become like Hitler, but
they always were like Hitler, because they're a lot like Genghis Khan,
the greatest butcher of all time (although the Bushes are in the running),
because they're descended from him.
- It's a terrible hoax, just like the Holocaust. Zionists
had an office at Hitler's headquarters to funnel a "chosen" few
to Palestine. And because Zionists controlled the American media, we fell
for the myth of the Holocaust, although it wasn't really introduced into
the public until 20 years after the war ended. Just like we're falling
for it now " Israel freedom fighters against Palestinian terrorists.
Hah. Israelis are stealing Palestinian land. They, and we, are the real
- America, controlled by Israel, is the genuine terrorist
threat, just like the Christian crusaders of long ago were the real terrorists
butchering the indigenous inhabitants of Arabia and India. Just look at
any of the current polls. The whole world knows the real axis of evil:
America, Britain and Israel, trying to bribe the whole world into seeing
things in their ugly way. Everybody knows this except the American people,
who are kept in the dark by Jewish media.
- We are the real terrorists, people. Time to wake up.
- Having said all this, I can't fault the Jews for being
to any great degree worse than anyone else. Consider the Europeans, from
whom most of you reading this are descended. Consider the European heritage
from an American Indian perspective.
- Who are the real killers now? Who are the true manipulators
now? Pass out the smallpox blankets, people. Just plead guilty and take
the deal. It's too late to argue. The verdict has been in for more than
a century. It's just that you don't hear it because the media are all controlled
by Europeans and Jews, trying hard to tell us what great folks we are,
and how we have the right to destroy the world in order to rule. Just like
Genghis Khan. We are all descended from Genghis Khan. Or Charlemagne. Same
- I don't have to prove any of this to anyone, because
I don't want to kill anyone to defend a deep dark secret, and they do.
They want to kill to take what they want so they can keep their deep dark
- Nothing gets fixed until the secret gets exposed. The
secret is this: there are no colors and no nationalities. We are all members
of the same tribe. Those who establish differences are just trying to make
money off conflict. It's no more complex than that.
- But in this game of political roulette happening right
now on the eve of World War III, it's just a case of heads they win, tails
we lose. It's a coin flip we can't win. The minute you turn on the TV or
open a well-known newspaper, the game is fixed. Reasons to kill are plentiful
and continually repeated: "They hate our freedom."
- I'm going to lose the argument no matter what I say,
because everyone has been conditioned to believe that there has to be good
and there has to be evil. No one " or damn few, anyway " have
even considered the possibility that the striving for this "good"
is the very thing that creates the "evil."
- Consider this conversation I had with two schoolteachers
the other night. Of course, I managed to offend both of them. One asked
me what to do about children he could not reach, because they were only
interested in computer-game retribution and seeing things in black and
- I told him he wouldn't gain their confidence until he
convinced them he believed there was a conspiracy against them. Silence
followed. All teenagers know there's a conspiracy against them. They feel
like adults but they're treated like kids. It's only the adults who pretend
there isn't a conspiracy. And there is a conspiracy: kids are honest, adults
are not. These same adults are the ones who wave the flag and support war.
- I can argue til I'm blue in the face that the human race
has been conditioned to look to war and conflict as a way to solve its
problems, but until each one of us in an actualized way realizes that we
die and are not going to some holy place in the sky because we've exterminated
those we've decided are infidels or enemies, nothing is going to get fixed,
no message of peace " no matter how articulate and compassionate "
is ever going to get through to us, because we're always going to have
that enemy to be vanquished " even though the true enemy is always
- My response was greeted with uncomfortable silence. I
had given them the right answer, but they couldn't even hear it. It made
me wonder what myths they would actually teach.
- So this is how I manage to offend people on both sides
of the same issue. I like to think it's good journalism, which is more
important to me than whether you like me, or agree with me.
- And damn! I think I've just done it again.
- John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the coast of Florida
and belongs to no political party, no religion, and " would that he
could " no particular nationality or ethnic group.