RENSE.COM


Shock & Awe - Is Baghdad
the Next Hiroshima?

By Ira Chernus
CommonDreams.org
1-28-3

Have your heard of Harlan Ullman? Everyone in the White House and the Pentagon has. They may very well follow his plan for war in Iraq. He wants to do to Baghdad what we did to Hiroshima.
 
Ullman is what they call a ãdefense intellectual.ä He was the Navy's ãhead of extended planningä and taught at the National War College. One of his students was Secretary of State Colin Powell, who says he ãraised my vision several levels.ä
 
What Powell and everyone in the Bush administration sees now is Ullmanâs vision for high-tech war. He calls it ãrapid dominance,ä or ãshock and awe.ä The idea is to scare the enemy to death. To win, you donât need to inflict physical pain and destruction. Just the fear of pain, and the massive confusion it creates, is enough.
 
Ullman wants the U.S. to (in his words) ãdeter and overpower an adversary through the adversaryâs perception and fear of his vulnerability and our own invincibility.ä ãThis ability to impose massive shock and awe, in essence to be able to 'turn the lights on and off' of an adversary as we choose, will so overload the perception, knowledge and understanding of that adversary that there will be no choice except to cease and desist or risk complete and total destruction."
 
Ullman is ready to use every kind of weapon to create shock and awe. He once said it might be a good idea to use electromagnetic waves that attack peoplesâ neurological systems, ãto control the will and perception of adversaries, by applying a regime of shock and awe. It is about effecting behavior."
 
When it comes to Iraq, Ullman likes the idea of cruise missiles -- lots of them, right away. CBS News reports that Ullmanâs ideas are the basis for the Pentagonâs war plan. The U.S. will smash Baghdad with up to 800 cruise missiles in the first two days of the war. Thatâs about one every four minutes, day and night, for 48 hours.
 
The missiles will hit far more than just military targets. They will destroy everything that makes life in Baghdad livable. "We want them to quit. We want them not to fight," Ullman told CBS reporter David Martin. So ãyou take the city down. You get rid of their power, water. In 2,3,4,5 days they are physically, emotionally and psychologically exhausted."
 
Ullman is sure it will work as well in 2003 as it did in 1945: ãYou have this simultaneous effect, rather like the nuclear weapons at Hiroshima, not taking days or weeks but in minutes." "Super tools and weapons -- information-age equivalents of the atomic bomb -- have to be invented," he wrote in the Economic Times. "As the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki finally convinced the Japanese Emperor and High Command that even suicidal resistance was futile, these tools must be directed towards a similar outcome.ä
 
When he first invented ãrapid dominance,ä Ullman talked about an ãeight-level hierarchy of shock and awe,ä with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the top. Now, it seems, thatâs where he wants to start.
 
Is the Hiroshima model just a metaphor? Ullman recently wrote that one way to ãshock and aweä Saddam is to remind him that the U.S. has ãcertain weaponsä that can destroy deeply buried facilities. Thatâs a not-even-thinly-veiled reference to the newest kind of nuclear weapons, the B-61 ãbunker-busters.ä L.A. Times columnist William Arkin <http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0126-01.htm>has confirmed that the U.S. is preparing to use ãbunker-bustersä against Iraq. That would ãbreak down the firewall separating nuclear weapons from everything else,ä Arkin warns, and ãforever pit the Arab and Islamic world against us.ä
 
Suppose we drop the nuke in the wrong place? Even Harlan Ullman admits it could easily happen: ãOf course, there will always be intelligence gaps, and no solution is perfect.ä But thatâs just the point. ãThe threat would be a Damoclean sword that might or might not descend.ä In other words, the fear of nukes falling who-knows-where would scare them into surrendering without a fight. Let other Islamic nations get as angry as they like. Weâll just shock and awe them too.
 
And why not North Korea, while weâre at it? Ullman wants a nuclear threat there, if North Korean leaders donât heel to U.S. commands: ãTo remind the North of its vulnerability, one or more Trident ballistic submarines could be permanently assigned to target North Korea.ä Tridents carry 240 nuclear warheads each. One Trident might not be enough, it seems. When you use shock and awe, you use it big-time.
 
So here we are, preparing to destroy a huge modern city, kill tens of thousands, and threaten nuclear attack -- all against people who have not fired a single bullet at us. Yes, itâs about oil. But itâs also about shock and awe, putting on a terrifying show for the whole world to see.
 
If all this leaves you in shock and awe, you have had your vision raised several levels too. You see what Ullman, Powell, and all the Bushies see: the U.S. frightening the whole world so badly that no one will dare fire a single bullet at us. Let them be as angry as they like, just so they know who is the meanest, toughest son of a bitch on the global block.
 
That is now becoming the essence of U.S. foreign policy. And they seriously believe it will put an end to war. I suppose the Romans believed it too.
 
Ira Chernus is Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder.
<mailto:chernus@spot.colorado.edu>chernus@spot.colorado.edu
 
###
 
 FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Common Dreams <http://www.commondreams.org/>NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
© Copyrighted 1997-2003
<http://www.commondreams.org/>www.commondreams.org


Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros