- Bush UN Speech
-
- "Delegates to the General Assembly: We have been
more than patient. We have tried sanctions. We have tried the carrot of
"oil for food" and the stick of coalition military strikes. But
Saddam Hussein has defied all these efforts and continues to develop weapons
of mass destruction. The first time we may be completely certain he has
nuclear weapons is when, God forbid, he uses one. We owe it to all our
citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming."
- George Bush, September 12, 2002
-
- "I have only a few statements still to make: I am
grateful to Mr. Chamberlain for all his efforts. I have assured him that
the German people desires nothing else than peace, but I have also told
him that I cannot go back behind the limits set to our patience."
- Adolph Hitler, September 26, 1938
-
- "The United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi
people, who have suffered for too long in silent captivity. Liberty for
the Iraqi people is a great moral cause and a great strategic goal. The
people of Iraq deserve it and the security of all nations requires it.
Free societies do not intimidate through cruelty and conquest and open
societies do not threaten the world with mass murder. The United States
supports political and economic liberty in a unified Iraq." - George
Bush, September 12, 2002
-
- "I have further assured him, and I repeat it here,
that when this problem is solved there is for Germany no further territorial
problem here in Europe. And I have further assured him that at the moment
when Czechoslovakia solves her problems, that means when the Czechs have
come to terms with their minorities, and that peaceably and not through
oppression, then I have no further interest in the Czech state. And that
is guaranteed to him!" - Adolph Hitler, September 26, 1938
-
- "My nation will work with the U.N. Security Council
on a new resolution to meet our common challenge. If Iraq's regime defies
us again, the world must move deliberately and decisively to hold Iraq
to account. The purposes of the United States should not be doubted. The
Security Council resolutions will be enforced - the just demands of peace
and security will be met - or action will be unavoidable. And a regime
that has lost its legitimacy will also lose its power.
-
- Events can turn in one of two ways.
-
- If we fail to act in the face of danger, the people of
Iraq will continue to live in brutal submission. The regime will have new
power to bully, dominate and conquer its neighbors, condemning the Middle
East to more years of bloodshed and fear. The region will remain unstable,
with little hope of freedom and isolated from the progress of our times.
With every step the Iraqi regime takes toward gaining and deploying the
most terrible weapons, our own options to confront that regime will narrow.
And if an emboldened regime were to supply these weapons to terrorist allies,
then the attacks of September 11th would be a prelude to far greater horrors."
- George Bush, September 12, 2002
-
- "But in the same way I desire to state before the
German people that with regard to the problem of the Sudeten Germans my
patience is now at an end! I have made Mr. Benes an offer which is nothing
but the carrying into effect of what he himself has promised. The decision
now lies in his hands: Peace or War! He will either accept this offer and
now at last give to the Germans their freedom or we will go and fetch this
freedom for ourselves."
-
- "In this hour the whole German people will unite
with me! It will feel my will to be its will. Just as in my eyes is it
its future and fate which give me commission for my action." - Adolph
Hitler, September 26, 1938
-
- "Neither of these outcomes is certain. Both have
been set before us. We must choose between a world of fear and a world
of progress. We cannot stand by and do nothing while dangers gather. We
must stand up for our security, and for the permanent rights and hopes
of mankind. By heritage and by choice, the United States of America will
make that stand. Delegates to the United Nations, you have the power to
make that stand as well." - George Bush, September 12, 2002
-
- "In this hour we all wish to form a common will
and that will must be stronger than every hardship and every danger. And
if this will is stronger than hardship and danger than one day it will
break down hardship and danger. We are determined! Now let Mr Benes make
his choice." - Adolph Hitler, September 26, 1938
-
-
- Like I keep saying, it's getting harder and harder to
tell where the head ends and the asshole begins. Just like Hitler, every
time an American president says "we have no quarrel" with a group
of people, it means they're about to bomb the snot out of them and kill
them by the tens of thousands, or more.
-
- www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=332803
-
- It's like the guy swinging a lead pipe at a cop while
screaming, "I am not resisting arrest!"
-
- Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon had no quarrel with the Vietnamese,
so they killed three million of them. Reagan had no quarrel with the Libyans,
so he bombed them and killed Qadaffi's child. Bush 41 had no quarrel with
the Panamanians either. Both Bush 41 and Clinton had no quarrel with the
Iraqi people, so between them they killed close to two million Iraqis.
And now Bush Jr. has "no quarrel" with the Iraqi people...
I can hear the, 'uh-oh' from the Muslim world from my living room.
Time to play twenty questions -
-
- "In 1991, Security Council Resolution 688 demanded
that the Iraqi regime cease at once the repression of its own people, including
the systematic repression of minorities, which the council said threatened
international peace and security in the region. This demand goes ignored."
-
- "In 1991, the U.N. Security Council, through Resolutions
686 and 687, demanded that Iraq return all prisoners from Kuwait and other
lands. Iraq's regime agreed. It broke this promise." - George Bush,
September 12, 2002
1. If Saddam is evil and the UN must take action because Saddam has ignored
three UN Sanctions 686, 687, and 688 for 11 years, doesn't this mean Israel
is at least twelve times as evil as Iraq? Six times as evil for ignoring
UN Resolution 181 for sixty-four years since 1948, three times as evil
for ignoring UN Resolution 242 for thirty-five years, and three times as
evil for ignoring UN Resolution 338 for thirty-five years? So, in the words
of the popular GOP writer and pollster Ann Coulter, do we get to invade
Israel next, "kill their leaders, and convert them all to Christianity?",
for non-compliance with UN Resolutions?
2. If the destruction of Afghanistan and the murder and incarceration of
the Taliban in concentration camps was not pre-planned before 9/11, why
have the Bush administration's choice of allies, their strategy in Afghanistan,
and their appointments of Khalilzad and Karzai been a game plan that copies
word-for-word John Maresca's speech to Congress in February of 1998?
3. If the invasion of Afghanistan was not planned prior to 9/11, why then,
according to BBC and many other foreign news services, did people from
the Bush administration tell people in the Pakistani and Indian governments
in July, 2001 that the US would be in Afghanistan, 'before the snow falls'?
www.rense.com/general17/spp.htm
4. If the invasion of Afghanistan was not planned prior to 9/11, why was
the CIA working with 'tribes and warlords in southern Afghanistan' for
eighteen months prior to November 2001? www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=
- &contentId=A47201-2001Nov17¬Found=true
5. If the Office of Homeland Security was created as a reaction to the
events of 9/11, why then was there mention on the Carlyle Group's former
subsidiary EG&G of Homeland Defense on a webpage last edited in February
2001? (the page was altered the last time I checked, but it was present
with a Homeland Defense section in February 2001) www.egginc.com/html/science___engineering.htm
6. If the Office of Homeland Security was created as a reaction to the
events of 9/11, why then did the Brookings Institute publish Defense Policy
Choices: For the Bush Administration 2001-05 (2001) by Michael E. O'Hanlon
in February of 2001? http://brookings.nap.edu/books/0815700792/html/index.html
7. If the upcoming attack on Iraq is a reaction to Iraq's support of terrorism
and a pre-emptive action designed to prevent future terrorism, why then
was this 'regime change' planned by the Project for the New American Century
who published Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources
For a New Century in September 2000, two months BEFORE Election 2000? www.newamericancentury.org/publicationsreports.htm
8. If the massive increases in military spending are a reaction to 9/11
and not a pre-planned exercise in grabbing taxpayer's dollars, why has
the Bush administration done nearly everything in the aforementioned report
by the PNAC, which was written in September 2000?
9. If America is NOT an Empire and has no ambitions of Empire, why do American
think tanks like the Hudson institute keep referring to a 'Unipolar Pax
Americana' - a term coined from the ancient Roman term used to refer to
the Roman Empire, Pax Romana? www.newamericancentury.org/def_natl_sec_pdf_01.pdf
10. If the massive increases in military spending are a reaction to 9/11
and not a pre-planned exercise in grabbing taxpayers dollars, why did the
the Weekly Standard publish on September 10, 2001 the following article
in its September 17 edition, in the same week when the Bush administration
announced its massive spending increases? www.newamericancentury.org/Schmitt-Donnolley-Sept17.pdf
11. If the events of 9/11 were not known to any of the above people, or
to the Bushes, why did Jeb Bush pass into law in Florida a new Emergency
Powers Act ONE DAY before 9/11, on the same day that the Weekly Standard
published their article?
12. If Weapons of Mass Destruction are a weapon of last resort, and Saddam
has WMD as Dickhead Cheney claims, why would we push Saddam into a position
of last resort?
-
- Since we obviously have no concerns about a weapon of
last resort because unlike China or Russia we're willing to invade Iraq,
what then are we really talking about - Weapons of Mass Destruction, or
112 billion barrels of proven reserves worth about US $3,242,400,000,000
at current market prices?
13. If the Nazis had to pay at Nuremberg for the genocide of Jews (which
was in part financed by Americans), and Milosevic has to pay for the genocide
of Croats (which was done in part by American puppets), and Saddam
has to pay for genocide against Kurds (which was partly done by Iranians)
during the Iraqi Civil War, how come America doesn't have to apologize
or pay for genocide and enslavement of Africans, or genocide against Indians,
Vietnamese, Koreans, Jews, or Croats?
14. Since Saddam is evil for being responsible for the deaths of as many
as 200,000 people involved in an Iraqi Civil War (sponsored by the American-backed
Kurds), out of a population of around 26 million, does that mean that the
Confederates and Union armies in 1861-1865 were twice as evil as Saddam,
seeing as how they killed 500,000 people out of a population of 29 million
and 4 million slaves?
15. If the Secessionist South had won, and the Yankees lost (which has
now happened), would Yankee Americans still consider America 'good'? And
if the answer is no, then why is Saddam evil for ending a Civil War led
by Secessionists backed by Islamic fundamentalists and foreign powers (Iranian
and American Kurdish puppets, trained by Osama Bin Laden's Makhtab Al Khidimat)?
16. If Saddam has to pay for the killing of Kurds, why then don't we have
a sanctions regime against Turkey? We trade with Turkey and we continue
to arm Turkey, even though they've destroyed more than 3000 Kurdish villages
using American weapons.
17. Iran, Iraq, Libya and North Korea are all under US Sanctions. It's
illegal for American companies to engage in business with them. Why then
is Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton, enjoying an open ended
contract at Guantanamo Bay, even though Brown and Root did business with
the Axis Of Evil when Dickhead Cheney was CEO?
18. If Iran and Iraq are part of an Axis of Evil, and Dickhead Cheney did
business with them (which he did), doesn't that mean that he's evil?
19. If Iran and Iraq are part of an Axis of Evil and support terrorism
as Bush claims, and if the Patriot Act retroactively covers crimes that
haven't been prosecuted (which it does), doesn't that mean Dickhead Cheney,
who was never prosecuted or fined for trading with Iraq (he WAS fined for
trading with Iran and Libya) should be prosecuted under the Patriot Act
for giving material support to terrorists?
20. Doesn't it mean that Dickhead Cheney 'doesn't deserve' Constitutional
rights and should be sent to Camp X-Ray for providing the Iraqis with tens
of millions of dollars in infrastructure (US $21million) thatÕs
been used, according to the Bush administration, to create Weapons of Mass
Destruction and to finance terrorism?
Dick Cheney belongs in a maximum-security prison. He should be joined by
all the Bush brothers and their dad, Ken Lay, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald
Rumsfeld.
To rephrase a popular American response to anti-war/anti-genocide protests
against American wars of aggression, we need your help before the Nazis
conquer the planet and the entire world ends up speaking AmericanÉ
the world needs a Regime Change in Washington DC.
Until then, no one is safe from terror.
IMPEACH BUSH AND CHENEY!
Peace
|
