Rense.com


YETI - The Giant Cousin
Of Ramapithecus
NepalNews.com
8-12-2

Do the giant 'Ape like Men' or 'Men like Apes' supposed to have been extinct, some 10-15 million years ago still exist in Hindukush-Himalayas? The fossilized remains of such creatures like Ramapithecus who were only about 4 ft tall and as old as 8 to 15 million years, have been found in Turkey, Kenya, Butaul of Nepal and Sivalik hills of India and Pakistan. But sufficient scientific proof of the existence of their contemporary giant cousins (scientifically termed as Gigentopithecus) have not yet been found in Nepal. The famous scientist and veteran of high mountain expeditions Prof. Igor Kozlov of Geographical Society of former Soviet Union, firmly believes (Statesman, Delhi, 12 Dec. 1984) that the snowman reported from the Caucasus Mountains between Baltic and Caspian sea and Tyan Shan Mountains on Russian-Chinese Border does exist.
 
It moves at about 12 km. p.h. and its foot are structured for rapid movement over snowy grounds. To protect itself against rains it lives in shelters. An unsocial type; apparently, this creature is a loner, sleeping by day and leaving its shelter at dusk in search of food, possibly it is a distant cousin of the (very early and more primitive) 'Neanderthal Man'. Prof. Kozlov and team of scientists have recorded hundreds of encounters in European and Asian parts of former Soviet Union. Prof. William Grant, one of the world's noted Yeti expert and a scientist firmly believes that Yeti could be either descendent of a 'Gigantic Anthropoid' (common term to denote men like apes or monkeys) sighted in Pamirs or it could be a 'Giant Hominidae' (Ape like men and their dissidents like Home-Erectus, etc.) known to anthropologists as 'Gigantopithecus' who used to roam in the Himalayas some 10-15 million years ago. (It is generally accepted that giant sized Gigantopithecus, medium sized Shivapithecus and small sized Ramapithecus have evolved from Dryopithecus who were in existence some 25 million years Before Present (B.P.) and who are supposed to be the common ancestors of both monkeys and apes as well as of human beings.) According to former leader of Snowman Expedition on Pamir and Caucasus Regions, in 1978, Prof. Jeanne Koffman confirmed about the indisputable proofs of existence of the 'Relict Humanoid' (surviving trace of more humanlike being).
 
In her words, the snowmen 'Kaptar' or 'Almos' (like Yetis of high Himalayas) are of about ordinary human height, some times a little taller; has a stooping posture and a squat head resting squarely on his shoulder, a sloping forehead, long arms and entire figure covered with a long red fur. (The Himalayan Yetis are also described to have greyesh-blackish-redish fur.) This description of 'Kaptars' and 'Almos' also fits with the description of Yetis. Yetis are known to have extremely well developed instinctive or 'Sixth' sense and can predict avalanches and can easily sense snow-covered water-streams and ice crevasses. It is nocturnal and therefore, can see at night. Their hearing power is extremely well developed, which can save them from intruders. According to Prof. Koffman, these snowmen have very heavy and wide foot. (25.5cm = 10" long, which is not abnormal, but the width of foot mark which was found to be 13cm = 5.5" is abnormally wide.) The 2cm imprints found by her on hard soil, denotes the abnormally heavy body structure, notes Prof. Koffman.
 
Probably the Chinese have the longest tradition of historical record keeping of the activities of 'Almos' or 'Yetis'. A poet (of Chang Dynasty Period), Qu Yuan (340-270 B.C.) has recorded the sighting of a very hairy 'Man-like' creature in the mountains. The painting of a 'Wild Man' created during Han Dynastic Rule, is yet another evidence. In the modern times, the Chinese Academy of Sciences has taken the Almos and Yetis very seriously. The sightings of the snowman by the members of the Biological Research and Investigation Team in 1977 in Shaanxi-Zhouzhi, is seriously taken by the scientific community. The Chinese scientists, on the basis of some 200 reported sightings and other indirect evidences (such as hair and foot prints etc.,) found in Shaanxi, Hubie and Sichuan (near Eastern Tibet) have concluded that the Almos-Yetis are creatures who can be termed as 'in-between Apes and Men'.
 
It is important to note that the remains of Gigantopithecus was found in Kwangsi Province of South-Eastern China (adjoining Yunnan Province, which in turn borders Eastern Tibet and Myanmar). It was in Yunnan, where the fossilized remains of Ramapithecus (of some 7 million years B.P.) and 'Australopithecus in Transition' (to be evolved into early Homo-Erectus) of some 1.7 million years B.P. were found. In Nepal, a British Zoological Team also confirmed that a 'Life Form' of big-bodied pre-homonid (man like ape) termed as Gigantopithecus was roaming in Himalayas. Prof. John R. Lukas of Harvard University Research Team, after the extensive study of Western Siwalik (foothills of Western Himalaya) has concluded (1984:2. Also see Dr. Prem Kumar Khatri, 'Utpatti Manaba Savyataka ...', CNAS, T.U. 2053 B.S., pp. 55-56) that the smaller Ramapithecus and medium sized Sivapithecus had migrated from Himalayas to Turkey, Hungary, Greece and Spain some 17 million years ago.
 
However, this American scientific team is silent about Gigantopethicus, whose fossilized remains were also found in Western Sibalic Hills during 1970-79 excavations. It is as yet to be established, but highly probable that the Gigentopithecus (or Yetis?) were on the move from Himalayas towards South-Eastern China (Yunnan-Kwangsii). It is noteworthy that the tallest peaks of Himalayas like Mt. Everest and Mt. Jhi-jha-Pangma (Goshiansthan) were barely less than 1000 m high and Chure Hills were no-hills at all during the times of Gigantopithecus and Ramapithecus. Some 10-15 million years ago there were very flat tropical forests with grasslands, in those areas (where Chure Hills and inner valleys of Mahabharat Ranges stand now).
 
These grasslands and dense tropical forests could very easily support giant creatures like Gigantopithecus - the probable forefather of Yetis. As a Chinese study on Himalayas shows (Tibet Symposium, 1980 #48) Mt. Everest and Mt. Zhi-jha-Pangma were found to be rising by 0.84 and 0.60 mm annually respectively (even now) and as such, probably the Gigantopithecus were forced to survive and evolve on the land, which were rising higher and higher over millions of years. These great 'Men like Apes' stronger than 10 men put together, must have evolved into present day Yetis and survived in a most hostile environment. But unlike their small sized cousins, the Ramapithecus, it seems that the Gigantopithecus could not evolve with speed. In fact, it is quite possible that in the extreme hostile environment, the process of their evolution had stopped all together. No-body knows for sure.
 
Have the Yetis still survived in the 21st century? Are the Yetis, whose footprints have been sighted upto mid-eighties in Nepal Himalayas in plenty on the verge of extinction? or are they dwelling in some isolated stretch of lofty mountain ranges? Is there a link between the Himalayan Yeti, the Chinese snowman and Caucasus Region Almos? Many such questions have been baffling the scientists - write Madan Mohan Gupta and Tribhuvan Nath (On the Yeti Trails, UPB Publication, New Delhi-London, 1994). Scientists want hard and concrete proofs. But the elusive, nocturnal and very smart Yetis do not seem to oblige and this most inaccessible, cold, windy and extremely dangerous 'Third Pole' called the Himalaya, is bent on hiding them. But the scientists also with night vision gadgets and satellite tracking systems will not giveup.
 
 
Linking Learning to Life
 
The primary stakeholders in education such as the teachers and yes the students must be involved in the planning and evaluation of their system if it is to progress. The traditional buraucracy well known in so many of Nepal's social institutions must be driven out and these people that matter given more power in decision making, writes Harry Anscombe
 
With the grave and hopeless issue of the Maoist violence presently at the forefront of Nepal's mind it is easy to forget the wider issues such as the future of its children. At a workshop organised by the Democratic Youth Organization last week the topic of education was gruelled. It is the horrid truth that 15% of Nepal is unemployed and every year 250,000 school and university leavers are added to the unemployment list. The workshop aimed to tackle these issues and come up with a solution.
 
So who is to blame for Nepal's medieval education system? The teachers, the students or indeed the government? It seems that it is INGO's like Students Partnership Worldwide (SPW), based in Kathmandu that have the answer. SPW understand that unemployment is a huge issue but without adequate and sustainable education at the core, jobs can't be created or fullfilled. Supported by the government yet self funded, it sends groups of overseas (mainly English) and Nepali students out into the most rural areas of the Country to implement 'Practical Education'. This concept is presently unknown in Nepali schools and so many children are sufferring from the worst cases of 'bad education'.
 
Think back to your school days and you will remember sitting with your peers in a strict and stuffy classroom with only the sounds of the teachers monotone reading from the text book and the squeaking of the chalk on the board- and this is education! Gaurab Rana, the extension coordinator from SPW believes that this has to change and that there is a tradition in schools where "the teachers don't have ears and the students dont have mouths". The volunteers of SPW seek to crush this naive and lazy form of so called learning and their constant mission is towards empowering the students and teachers collectively.
 
So how is it implemented and what do the students think of this up to date form of learning? The crazy thing about practical education is that it takes little funds and just a bit of intuition. 'Green Clubs' are set up which "aim to link text book information with practical learning" and "encourage teamwork, cooperation and communication both between students and with teachers." (Gaurab Rana.) This is done through drama, quiz's, songs and field work which can be as simple as going to a tree to explain how it functions as opposed to reciting facts from the text book.
 
Sarah Hiddleston from England, who volunteered for SPW in Budhimorang, Dankhuta this year for the six month programme believes the combination has a huge range of benefits for the school and the community. "When we first arrived, the girls in the class room were afraid even to talk but by the end they were implementing plays and so much more confident". This shows how gender issues can be addressed and that by empowering and respecting the students, as individuals, their personalities can flourish and their talents can shine through.
 
This does, however raise concerns about discipline as the students gain power in the classroom and their confidence with the teacher strengthens. Sarah believes that this isn't an issue; "the whole idea is about mutual respect and although the students started having a voice in the classroom they were shouting "another game please" which showed they were enthusiastic about learning, not causing trouble". Furthermore, before practical education was introduced to the school the students had a bitterness towards learning and became bored. "They would go to the local tongba hut to get drunk just to quench their boredom". However, since the SPW volunteers arrived, there were less cases of drugs and drunkeness as the students had become stimulated at school.
 
When asked if they would change one thing in the education system today, students from Kalinchwok Secondary School in Charikot said "we would balance the extra curricular activities with the books and introduce technical and vocational education." This is easy to say from their perspective but what do those having to change their career perspective (the teachers) think? Suman Khadka, a teacher in Baglung said "one area I think is a key in all of this is the need to make our education system sustainable and encouraging us to be critically thoughtful in teaching appears to be the only way". She added that students are only educated when they are taught the reality of their subjects and when they are put in the context of what is explained in the textbooks.
 
There is a saying in Nepal that goes 'if you can't get a job, teach' and if this holds true then fighting the battle of lazy, unmotivated teachers is a hard one. It is clear that the students crave a change towards practical education and they clearly benefit from such methods but without a motivated teacher the task becomes impossible. The Extension coordinator of SPW strongly supports this fact and has a solution. He, as do his organisation based in over six countries, believes that empowerment is the key. "The teachers get bored too and need academic stimulation just like the students". Practical education gives the teachers the opportunity to use their skills (although often limited) in a real and active way which in turn creates a more communicative, confident and pleasent environment to work in.
 
Although poverty is one of the main issues needing to be tackled before change for the better is possible, it is the attitudes of the whole education system that must, and can be reformed. The primary stakeholders in education such as the teachers and yes the students must be involved in the planning and evaluation of their system if it is to progress. The traditional buraucracy well known in so many of Nepal's social institutions must be driven out and these people that matter given more power in decision making.
 
It is organisations like Students Partnership Worldwide that hold the key ideas in their underfunded hands. Nepali at every level from management to teaching, these are not just another bunch of middle class Western do-gooders. These are Nepali and overseas pioneers, not blinded by politics but working with the relevant local populations to empower them and enforce what is the key for the future of Nepals most important social institution, 'Practical Education'.
 
 
Send your comments and letters to the editor at <mailto:kanti@kpost.mos.com.np,npfeed@mos.com.np>kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2002 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566 (6 lines). Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on Sunday Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to <mailto:npnews@mos.com.np>US. Send us your feedback: <http://www.nepalnews.com.np/cgi-bin/feed1.cgi>CONTACT
 
 
http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishweekly/sundaypost/2002/jul/jul28/head.htm#1





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros