- WASHINGTON - U.S. intelligence
overheard al-Qaeda operatives discussing a major pending terrorist attack
in the weeks prior to Sept. 11 and had agents inside the terror group,
but the intercepts and field reports didn't specify where or when a strike
might occur, according to U.S. officials.
-
- The disclosures add to a growing body of evidence to
be examined in congressional hearings that open today into how the CIA,
FBI and other agencies failed to seize on intelligence pointing to the
deadliest terror attack in U.S. history.
-
- Some of the clues lie buried in 350,000 pages of documents
turned over by the CIA for the hearings:
-
- * Reports discussing the possibility of suicide bombings,
plots to fly planes into buildings and strikes against the Pentagon, World
Trade Center and other high-profile targets.
-
- * Electronic intercepts as late as Sept. 10 of al-Qaeda
members speaking cryptically of a major attack. Two U.S. intelligence officials,
paraphrasing highly classified intercepts, say they include such remarks
as, "Good things are coming," "Watch the news" and
"Tomorrow will be a great day for us."
-
- * Dispatches from agents who infiltrated al-Qaeda and
its Taliban allies. The operatives could not crack the tightly held secret
of the Sept. 11 plot but helped underscore the lengths al-Qaeda was willing
to go to inflict pain on the United States.
-
- After two weeks of pummeling the FBI for its failures,
lawmakers are shifting their focus to the CIA. "The enemy is overseas.
The first place to stop the enemy is overseas," House Intelligence
Chairman Porter Goss said in an interview.
-
- President Bush has avoided criticizing the CIA and FBI.
But on Monday, he suggested that they need to improve. "In this new
war, against this shadowy enemy, it's very important that we gather as
much intelligence as we can," Bush said.
-
- One U.S. intelligence official describes the clues collected
before the attacks as needles in a haystack. Others say the unheeded warnings
add up to a fundamental failure by intelligence agencies to alert the nation
to approaching danger from abroad.
-
- The prevailing view on Capitol Hill is that U.S. intelligence
had the goods and blew it by failing to recognize and connect warning signs.
"If they had acted on the information they had and followed through,
maybe things would be different," says Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala.,
ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
-
- The other, perhaps more worrisome, conclusion is that
despite all their resources, key agencies had no clear warning of what
was to come.
-
- The hearings begin behind closed doors, as the House
and Senate Intelligence panels jointly discuss what information can be
aired. CIA director George Tenet and FBI Director Robert Mueller are sure
to face grillings later this month. Other witnesses will include CIA and
FBI field operatives and analysts who handled some of the information on
the al-Qaeda threat.
-
- The intercepts of conversations are in 13,000 pages of
material from the National Security Agency, the nation's eavesdropping
service, U.S. officials say. Two U.S. intelligence officials said some
were translated and analyzed before Sept. 11. Others went unread until
later because of a shortage of translators.
-
- Contributing: Toni Locy, Kevin Johnson, Barbara Slavin
and Joan Biskupic
-
- http://www.usatoday.com/news/attack/2002/06/03/cia-attacks.htm
|
