Rense.com



Navy Wants To Proceed With
Use Of Deadly Whale Sonar

By Laura Linden
Staff Writer
Oakland Tribune Online
4-11-2

In the space of just two days, 16 whales mysteriously beached themselves in the Bahamas. Six of the creatures died, their ears and brains bleeding and crushed from a mysterious source of pressure.
 
That was in March 2000.
 
Four months ago the U.S. Navy admitted that the pressure came from huge blasts of underwater sound it had deployed during surveillance exercises.
 
Now the Navy wants to launch a five-year program using similar but less powerful equipment -- so-called low frequency active sonar -- possibly off the California coast. The Navy sonar ships would operate throughout 80 percent of the world's oceans, according to the proposal.
 
The unprecedented admission of the Navy's role in the death of the whales has lent validity to environmentalists' longstanding concerns about sonar's threat to marine mammals.
 
"The entire Bahamas incident raises a red flag about the operation of active sonar and other intense sound sources," said Michael Jasny, senior policy analyst with the National Resources Defense Council.
 
The Navy has been using this controversial brand of antisubmarine warfare for years, mostly in secret. Its proposal for the new program marks the first time it is seeking permission from another government agency -- a permit from the National Marine Fisheries Service. A decision is expected soon, possibly later this month.
 
The Navy insists the sonar deployments are crucial to the defense of the country.
 
"The low frequency active sonar system is much more able to listen to quiet submarines (owned) by nations not friendly to us," said Lt. Commander Pauline Storum, a Navy spokeswoman.
 
The Navy's Web site says there are 21 nations that operate potentially hostile submarines, but Storum declined to name any nations.
 
Navy ships would tow a string of 18 bathtub-sized speakers, called hydrophones, that emit great bursts of sound at 215 decibels. Above ground, the level of sound is equivalent to standing close to an exploding rocket, according to environmentalists.
 
Those intense pulses travel vast distances and bounce off vessels and other objects, returning a signal read by a couple of hundred underwater microphones trailing from the ship's stern.
 
The Navy also has a permit application pending before the California Coastal Commission, which has expressed concern about the sonar's threat to marine life in the three-mile state coastal zone, said Mark Delaplaine, federal consistency supervisor for the Coastal Commission.
 
"It's a fuzzy area, but we think (the Commission) has jurisdiction even farther out" into the ocean, Delaplaine said.
 
Besides whales, environmentalists say the massive sounds can harm and even kill seals, sea lions, sea turtles, dolphins and fish.
 
It is "a killer technology that has the potential of deafening every marine mammal in the ocean," according to Earth Island Institute.
 
For several years, whale strandings corresponded with nearby sonar testing in spots around the globe, including a few suspicious incidents off the Bay Area coast.
 
But the Navy -- and other countries that have used the active sonar technology -- denied any connection. Until last year, that is.
 
In December the Navy released a report admitting that sonar blasts in the Bahamas in March 2000 led 16 whales to beach themselves.
 
Six whales -- five Cuvier's beaked whales and one Blainville's beaked whale -- died. Scientists from the Navy and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration concluded the pressure from the sonar blasts pierced the mammal's ears and caused them to hemorrhage.
 
The whales suffered other internal injuries as well.
 
In a report to the California Coastal Commission, the Navy said the technology may lead to the deaths of a small amount of marine mammals, but overall the impacts would be negligible.
 
The Navy's proposal says it will respect a 12-mile coastal buffer zone and will avoid other sensitive areas.
 
The Navy has promised it will not operate off the California coast unless it has a permit, Delaplaine said.
 
Palmer said the environmental community expects the NMFS to grant the Navy a permit. The question, Palmer explained, is how much freedom or restrictions will the agency give the Navy.
 
Palmer and Delaplaine are concerned about a loophole allowing the Navy to breach the coastal safety zone during times of war or heightened national security. That arguably could apply now, they said.
 
If NMFS approves the program, Palmer said, environmental organizations are ready to sue under the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act and National Environmental Policy Act.
 
The Navy says its sonar ships will try to avoid whales to make sure they aren't exposed to dangerous sound levels. But it admits there is some potential for "harassment" and death.
 
Critics of the Navy sonar counter that the Navy can just as easily ferret out hostile subs with its passive sonar technology, which basically consists of powerful microphones that record far-off sounds in the ocean.
 
They stress that just as the Navy uses sound to navigate the ocean and learn more about it, so do sea creatures. In fact, hearing is their keenest and most vital sense. As such, environmentalists say the sonar could be as debilitating to sea creatures as blinding a human being.
 
"Imagine being told to drive down to the soccer field and pick up your kid, and to stop at the grocery store on your way back, all the while blinded by a brilliant strobe light," the Earth Island Journal wrote in its newsletter.
 
But others in the scientific community are not so damning of the sonar.
 
Doreen Moser, assistant director of education at the Marine Mammal Center in Sausalito, said while there is reason for concern, the effects of sound on marine mammals and fish are not clear, and more research is necessary.
 
"You have animals that live in a completely different environment than us. We have difficulty measuring sound in the ocean," Moser said. "One person likes loud, head-banging music, and another person hates it."
 
"The low frequency sonar signal is one of the loudest sounds produced by humans under water," Palmer said.
 
*********
 
Our thanks to the California Coastal Commission, the NRDC and Earth Island Institute for presenting this information so articulately to the press. Also, thanks to Mark Palmer of EII for providing a copy of the text. His contact information is contained below.
 
Best regards,
Cheryl A. Magill
Stop LFAS Worldwide!
http://www.stoplfas.net
 
Mark J. Palmer
Assistant Director
International Marine Mammal Project
Director
Wildlife Alive
Earth Island Institute
300 Broadway, Suite 28
San Francisco, CA 94133
 
(415) 788-3666 x139
(415) 788-7324 (fax)
 
mpalmer@mother.com
 
www.earthisland.org


Email This Article





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros