- PORTLAND - In a ninety minute
stand off, Oregon activist Lon Mabon and his wife Bonnie confronted
Multnomah
County "judge" RONALD CINNIGER about the fact that Cinniger has
not sworn the same oath as mandated in the Oregon Constitution in order
to be a lawful judge or to proceed against Mabons.
-
- An overflow crowd of supporters were kept in the hallway,
as a packed courtroom watched Cinniger and Mabons discuss the challenges
before the court. The following is from personal notes taken at the trial
today.
-
- The thirteen or more media representatives were seated
in the jury box in the crowded courtroom. In the crowd were Lons father
Myron Mabon, supporters Lou Beres, with the Oregon Christian Coalition;
Bob Eckstrom, director of the Constitution Party of Oregon; Paul DeParrie,
long time advocate and Right to Life spokesman; Milt Mitcheck,
Constitutional
Researcher and Court Advocate; William Mayhar, Constitutional Scholar and
advocate; Roger Weidner, Republican Governor candidate, Republican Party;
Jesse Lott, political advocate and courtwatcher; Michael Marsh, Salem TV
producer; Yvonne Heinrichs, peoples rights advocate, and many more.
-
- Upon entering the courtroom, Cinniger ordered that all
beepers be shut down and that if anyone spoke in the courtroom besides
the parties they would be removed. Cinniger announced the case,
"Stauffer
v OCA, Scott Lively, OCA Educational Foundation, and OCA, Inc. Plaintiff
CATHERINE STAUFFER and representative BRENT FOSTER were present at the
table, and Cinniger acknowledged that Lon and Bonnie Mabon were present
for the Record.
-
- Mabons stayed behind the bar in the court, appearing
by "special appearance" Sui Juris, retaining their own Rights
and without representation and told the court on the Record that they were
challenging the jurisdiction of the court, and did not want to enter into
a false or fictitious jurisdiction. Lon tried to speak but Cinninger talked
over him. Lon stated that he expected the judge to uphold his rights in
the courtroom, and Cinniger told Mabons that they would not be recognized
unless they came into the bar.
-
- Bonnie Mabon stated that they were insisting on a court
that "guarantees my rights", and was ignored by Cinniger.
-
- Attorney Foster stated that they had been trying to
collect
a judgement for nine years, that on November 14 there had been a judgement
debtor hearing, and again on November 26, and that Mabons did not appear
in either of those hearings. The attorney described how a judge Ellis
had ordered a December hearing for contempt for the failure to appear
at the previous hearing.
-
- Foster stated that on the December 12 court date the
case had been moved to federal court ( and was remanded the same day !).
The attorney stated that the hearing was rescheduled for February 7, 2002,
that there had been an error in time and then was rescheduled for
today.
-
- Cinniger asked Lon and Bonnie repeatedly to cross the
bar to "respond" to the court, which Mabons refused to do.
Cinniger
had Governor candidate Roger Weidner removed when Weidner tried to suggest
to Mabon to cross the bar and make the Record against the judge for
violating
Mabons rights.
-
- Lon Mabon again told the court that he would be glad
to participate if Cinniger would sign a simple contract that stated that
Mabons rights would be upheld in the courtroom and that Cinniger in fact
was a lawful judge. Cinniger replied "I TAKE IT YOU WILL NOT
PARTICIPATE",
ignoring Mabons responses.
-
- Cinniger turned to attorney Foster, and stated "they
have challenged the jurisdiction of the court. What is your response to
this?" The attorney stated "we think they are frivolous, this
has been ruled on by you...."; Cinniger interrupted the attorney and
said " NO I HAVE NOT RULED ON THIS OATH CHALLENGE. I ASKED YOU TO
RESPOND WHY THE NAMED DEFENDANTS SHOULD BE HELD IN CONTEMPT - THEY HAVE
CHALLENGED THE JURISDICTION".
-
- Attorney Foster stated "that the court has ample
jurisdiction under Oregon Revised Statutes 33.015, 33.025, to issue
contempt
is clear". The attorney stated "the challenge to the oath is
not an issue that has merit".
-
- Mabon stated "your intent to uphold my rights
faithfully
and impartially". Mabon asked again "did you take an oath?"
Cinniger kept ignoring Mabon.
-
- Cinniger asked the bar representative "are you aware
that the oath is missing some words?" The attorney said "the
court feels the oath is appropriate. Cinniger said "it is appropriate
for a litigant to challenge the jurisdiction or authority of an individual
acting as a judge.... I think it is NOT frivolous.... it IS an issue.
Comparing the oaths, I found another way to look at it."
-
- Mabon kept trying to say CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CINNIGER,
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW !!!, but Cinniger kept ignoring Mabons accurate
responses.
-
- Cinniger said "if it even applies".
-
- Mabon said "Taswell v Smith states ALL circuit
judges
MUST take the original Constitutional oath. Cinniger stated that he had
decided that the false oath was OK, and told the bar representative "I
believe Ms Stauffer that the challenge is to be denied", and continued
to proceed against Mabons, refusing to allow any redress on the merits
or the lawfulness of his acts.
-
- Lon Mabon said "twelve different times we have
challenged
this jurisdiction. As you even stated, a legitimate challenge. Mabon said
"the court has to appreciate our reluctance to proceed without a
contract.
I want you to sign my contract before these people and the
press".
-
- Again Cinniger said "I take that to be you refuse
to cooperate". Cinniger said "the law provides for a way for
disputes to be resolved" ..... "when a decision is made"
......(Lon said "IF THEY ARE A QUALIFIED JUDGE" WITH A
CONSTITUTIONAL
OATH") Cinniger continued "requires the representatives to come
to court (Lon stated "WHEN YOU ARE UNDER OATH I WILL")...
-
- Cinniger said that the court has the power of contempt
to force people to "remedy the situation" (even though civil
judgements are not jailable offenses and jail cannot be a penalty in a
civil case !)
-
- Cinniger stated "in this case the Plaintiff is
asking
the court to hold two citizens in contempt as directors of the corporation
to apear at a judgement debtor hearing. The Corporation could have
appeared
by other persons. Plaintiff has made a showing that the corporate
entitities
and two individuals did not appear. A remedy includes confinement. Before
we get to that, this hearing is to show why they should not be held in
contempt. Plaintiff's attorneys have asked for jail as punishment or to
induce payment to comply - until Mabons agree to participate or up to 6
months."
-
- Cinnniger then told Mabons about their right to an
attorney
since they were "unrepresented". Mabons are Sui Juris before
the court and do not waiver their rights over to any bar member
"representative",
but claim their Inherent rights, demanding a constitutional court.
-
- Lon stated "MY RIGHTS ARE NOT GUARANTEED IN THIS
COURT".
-
- Cinniger asked attorney Foster "what remedy is the
Plaintiff seeking? Foster replied "all is designed to encourage and
require Mabons to pay the judgement. We are seeking confinement until
they submit to a judgement debtor hearing. $500.00 $$ a day sanctions
against
each of them, as well in the courts power. Lon as director, Bonnie as
Secretary/Treasurer, control both of the (corporate) entities. They are
high managerial agents. ORS 33.025 (3), 33.025 (d). They have failed
to recognize the jurisdiction of the court. Hold them jointly and
severally
liable for attorney fees and time specific order to pay - we have no belief
they intend to pay. Original judgement 30,000, now with interest and
attorneys
fees federal and state, more than $40,000.00."
-
- Attorney Foster continued "We want a $500.00
sanction
on every pleading or motion filed by Mabons and found to be frivolous.
We want the court to strike all future motions and to strike all answers
filed and that are frivolous in this case".
-
- Lon spoke "you are acting under an amended Article
VII, NOT the lawful constitutional Article VII, original, the lawful
jurisdiction
I have claimed".
-
- Cinniger stated "there are two kinds of persons.
Here today we have a Plaintiff, two citizens, corporate entity, and the
citizens not created by law, but as individuals. It is appropriate for
the court to consider when the corporate citizen is created, the offices
have responsibility to the corporation. Like you can't create children
without responsibility to them. A fiduciary interest. Corporate interest
is inconsistent to individual interest. A citizen who represents a
corporate
body has a responsbility."
-
- Bonnie Mabon stated "How can you say the issues
are an issue but not in this court' .... but I ruled against it' ...I don't
think the issues are frivolous." Mabon stated "if they have
merit don't you have to abide by your oath?"
-
- An unidentified attorney appeared before the court Amicus
Curiae, and asked for time to brief the case. Cinniger denied the attorney
request, saying it was "untimely".
-
- Cinniger proceeded to state that he found Mabons to be
in contempt "beyond a reasonable doubt", that they had not
appeared
nor had the corporate entities appeared. Attorney Foster reminded Cinniger
that the Mabons "willfully" refused to comply, and Cinniger used
the word "willfully" in his finding.
-
- Cinniger stated that he did not believe that Mabons would
comply with a disposition (compelled contract and admission of guilt),
and so ordered Mabons to jail, Lon immediately from the courtroom, Bonnie
ten days from now (March 1, 2002). Cinniger ordered the sanctions of
$500.00
a day each, on one corporate name until the amount of the original debt
is paid. Then Cinniger stated that on the second corporate name the
sanctions
would be in place until double the original amount was paid. Mabon told
Cinniger that that particular corporate entity had been closed for ten
years. It was unclear to observers exactly whether Cinniger changed that
order or not. Cinniger told attorney Foster that "all other sanctions
I am denying," except attorney fees.
-
- Cinniger stated "I find no alternative Mrs Mabon,
also in contempt, and impose six month sentence in jail, suspended for
ten days.
-
- The front row of the courtroom was cleared and Lon Mabon
was led from the courtroom in handcuffs before a crowded roomfull of angry
courtwatchers.
-
- As Cinniger was moving to arrest Lon in the courtroom,
courtwatcher William Mayhar rose and left the room, stating loudly on the
Record to the court "I am not going to sit here and watch any more
of this treason" and left the room.
-
- As Mayhar left, the judge ordered the sheriffs to remove
Milt Mitcheck, researcher and advocate, who affirmed that the judge had
no oath to proceed, and had stated so.
-
- After Mitcheck was "escorted" out, Wilbur
Gaston,
founder of A Voice For Children, rose and on the Record to the judge stated
"I charge YOU with treason and misprison of felony" for your
acts.* Gaston was assaulted in the hallway by Sheriffs McHenny and
Greathouse,
as he was leaving, who told Gaston he had to leave the building and was
being "evicted". The sheriffs attempted to force Gaston to allow
his picture to be taken, yet said he was "not" arrested. Gaston
told the sheriffs in no uncertain terms that if they were going to take
his picture they were going to arrest him or he was leaving now. And
Gaston
left without the Sheriffs following on their threats.
-
- Courtwatchers reported that the sheriffs were confronted
after Gaston charged the judge, to arrest Cinniger. The courtwatchers
asked the Sheriffs how they were protecting a man who refused to take his
lawful oath, and that the sheriffs had just seen this confirmed for
themselves.
The Sheriffs told the courtwatchers that they were unsure what to do
and said possibly after the hearing they would be arresting Cinniger.
(The paperwork to arrest Cinniger had been served on Sheriff Dan Noelle
by process server yesterday to arrest Cinniger for treason; additional
paperwork moving for prosecution and sanctions is being filed at this
time.)
-
- In the courtroom, after Mabon was led away, courtwatchers
told the press DID YOU SEE THAT THE JUDGE REFUSED TO TAKE HIS OATH? YOU
SAW IT FOR YOURSELF NOW - THIS IS TREASON AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS AT
ALL."
-
- The sheriff directing the courtroom security said
"pretty
soon what you are doing will be criminal" When asked who was
"we"
and what he meant, he replied "your common law courts". The
courtwatchers assured him that when he is on trial for committing unlawfull
acts against the citizens, and that it is NOT "just doing my
job",
and accountability is reached, and SOMEONE HAS TO ANSWER, then he will
enjoy the same kind of court, a rendering, where he will have no rights
and no lawful judge and no court will go to the lawfulness of the court,
the bar member judges and attorneys or the violations of lawful
process.
-
- The courtwatchers assured the sheriffs that their
families
are as vulnerable as the rest of the "people" to these rights
violations, fraud, extortion and racketeering being openly operated now
in Oregon.
-
- The STATE OF OREGON corporate entity, bar representative
had no defense today in court on the Record that the judges in Oregon have
NO OATH - NO BOND - NO CONTRACT with the constitutionally sovereign
Oregonians.
NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER.
-
- When Cinnigar told Attorney Foster "I want you to
respond to this" in court that means RESPONSE ..... as in - GIVE ME
THE SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS FOR THIS NOW TO DEFEND MYSELF WHILE I AM HANGING
OUT HERE AND EVERYONE KNOWS THE OATH I AM UNDER IS NOT
CONSTITUTIONAL.
-
- AND, JUST AS IN THE SENATE HEARINGS LAST YEAR ON THE
FRAUD OF THE AMENDED VII COURTS, THE COURT/BAR/STATE HAD NO DEFENSE. The
attorney and Cinniger discussed that this issue DOES have merit, IS
important,
is NOT FRIVOLOUS, and did not allow the "vexatious litigant"
filing against Mabons to stop them from ever defending themselves again
in any court in America, federally and state.
-
- The false oath issue has been openly reported and
admitted
by Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Carson, new information at
this time revealing more knowlege of the false oaths and that the courts
have known for twenty years that they were taking color of law
"oaths",
not binding to the constitutional rights of the sovereign people. That
is how they violate every Inherent Right provided in the Bill of Rights,
and as in todays hearing, the attorney said they were "upholding the
law" and making the Mabons "follow the law".
-
- The truth is, as is so clearly revealed in this case
and in our own, that the legislature are the perpetrators of the extreme
process violations in the non constitutional courts. This is the justice
2020, the new rules where the bar members are ALLOWED to conduct malicious
prosecutions and lie, cheat and steal (just passed last month !) But you
go to jail. Like Lon and Bonnie. And Will and I next week, next Thursday,
if the STATE has its way with us again (sixth sham jury trial in more than
five years now !!!)
-
- So everyone sees the REAL PICTURE is they willl NOT go
to the lawfulness of what they are doing.... it is always "that has
been heard before, we are not going to talk about what happened before,
and deny all evidence of injury or state liability. They are creating
a class immune from prosecution, are doing this NOW, where these pervert
profiteers are exploiting the people and our children by force, and NO
ONE WILL ANSWER. The governor has been subpoaened to our trial, and once
again will not appear, even though he IS the "STATE" of Oregon
face.
-
- There is no human so far who is accountable. The feds
are moving in Oregon now and no one is stopping them. The prostitutes
to the corporate state act in the interest of the corporate state.
-
- You heard it yourself in this article Cinniger trying
to compare a corporation to having a child, and fiduciary interest. They
are NOT acting in your "interest" and "interest" only
means how much money they make. Enron is a "department" of this
fraud, the whole government is the "criminal enterprise for
profit",
the banks, title companies insurance, etc are all the same money going
aroung and around (or illusion of money !) OPERATING THROUGH THE COURTS
WHO ARE PROTECTING THE FRAUD......
-
- SYSTEMIC colluding and conducting FRAUD against the
people no level of law or court at any level .... the federal takeover
and global agenda ..... in Oregon the Pioneer police State...... Enron
broke open in Oregon after being exposed in the Western Electric grab,
stealing the Klamath property, among other exploitations..... watch Capitol
Investments in Oregon next and in Washington and New York.... they are
liquidating all their assets now, our children, our homes, our lives.....
we are slaves in their new non constitutional world ..... only
"sustainable"
according to what we "contribute" to the "system",
in the "interest"/money for the corporate socialist state.
-
- PANDORAS BOX HAS BEEN OPENED and the corruption is
systemic.
Mabons are standing firm in the TRUTH, have never committed any crime
against anyone, and are even "charged" and in jail for an
"unarrestable"
offence. We PRAY that people see how YOU ARE NEXT as this
"outreach"
claw grasps our freedom - it already proceeds as though it owns our
children
and property, and as Mabons are so clearly exemplifying, we have at this
time only TYRANNY and NO REDRESS at any level of court, and in fact NO
lawful court, outside of the sovereign court we held in Marion County on
June 20, 2001, a court of Law and credible evidence.
-
- THIS IS SERIOUS FOLKS ..... EVERYONE BETTER PAY ATTENTION
AND TELL EACH OTHER WHAT IS GOING ON AND DO IT FAST ...... THE FEDS ARE
MOVING AT THIS TIME IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS AS WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THEM,
THE COLLUSION LIKE RABID DOGS, MULTI JUDICIAL SCHEMES AT EVERY LEVEL, COVER
UP AND FRAUD.
-
- IT WILL ALL END WHEN WE CAN GET ONE ANSWER, PROSECUTION
AND ACCOUNTABILITY, AND COURTS WITH LAWFUL OATHS TO PROTECT US.
-
- THESE SAME UNLAWFUL OATHS APPLY TO LEGISLATORS, WHOSE
OATHS ARE NOTARIZED BY OTHER FALSE OATH JUDGES, AND GOVERNOR KITZHABER
SIGNED HIS FALSE OATH ON THE TALMUD, THE ANCIENT BABYLONIAN SLAVE CHATTEL
CODE, NOW CALLED THE U.C.C., THE "BIBLE" OF THE CULT OF THE
NEW CORPORATE SOCIALIST STATE, WITH WHOM WE HAVE SLAVE STATUS AS "US
CITIZENS" WHICH WE ARE NOT. WE ARE SOVEREIGN STATE CITIZENS IN A
REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY. GUARANTEED THESE RIGHTS UN A LIEN ABLE.
-
- Mabons excercised their birthright, Inherent
Constitutionally
protected Rights today in the courtroom. Tonight it is seen widely on
the news that the court did NOT ANSWER THE PEOPLE.
-
- WE ASK - WOULD NOT A JUDGE OF INTEGRITY BE PROUD TO STAND
AND SAY YES - OF COURSE I HAVE TAKEN MY CONSTITUTIONAL OATH, AS I AM BONDED
AND SWORN", but in fact, they have been playing another game in there
for a long time. Chief Justice Wallace Carson told a group of courtwatchers
in private one day "yes - I am a public servant and proud of it",
yet, the courts recently taken "new" oaths are as big a fraud
as before.....still not the right words, not to say of all the VOID
decisions
that have to be dealt with, and the people injured and in jail who have
committed no crime ..... like Mabons and ourselves and you next........
NO judge is yet under the lawful oath in Oregon.
-
- TIME FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN OREGON TODAY.
-
- Pamela Gaston, A Voice For Children, Fifth Amendment
Coalition
-
- *(Gaston and the Citizens in Marion County arrested
"judge"
Fred Avera on September 30, l999, for Treason and Misprison of Felony for
the criminal acts comitted by Avera and others against Gastons minor child.
She has been severally abused by the state and being held now more than
six years as a political prisoner while the courts protect each other in
blatant collusion. This ongoing retaliation is continuing next Thursday,
attack after attack for Gastons whistleblowing on black market child and
pornography being operated and protected in the Oregon child services,
as well as systemic fraud and racketeering. The articles on this and the
text are on our website www.avoiceforchildren.com)
|
