Rense.com



One Angry Spy
The Guardian - UK
1-13-2


The CIA has been widely feared and despised - even since it supposedly cleaned up its act. But from the point of view of one insider who joined in the agency's old, free-booting days, it is not interventionist enough. Robert Baer, who recently left, disillusioned, argues that if the CIA had more on-the- ground agents and information, the disaster of September 11 might have been averted...
 
 
As a teenager in Aspen, Colorado, Robert Baer wanted to be a professional ski racer. His mother, dismayed at his low academic grades, packed him off to military school. Eight years later, in 1976, after graduating from Georgetown University School of Foreign Services in Washington DC, he decided to join the CIA, which in those days was much in the news as scandal followed scandal. For Baer, the CIA "seemed for a moment like romance itself". The agency is divided into two houses, a Directorate of Intelligence (DI) and a Directorate of Operations (DO), the latter made up of information collectors, "case officers". Baer was accepted into the DO and began a year-long training cycle, including a four-month paramilitary course.
 
The purehearts in Washington blanch at the description, but case officers are in fact second-storey men, thieves who steal other countries' secrets. The DO is the only arm of the federal government dedicated to breaking the law - foreign law, but still the law. The last thing the DO wants is for its officers to run around setting off explosions and shooting it out with the bad guys in some eastern European capital. Even back then, before political correctness had taken deep root at Langley and all around Washington, management was painfully aware that, whenever the guns came out, the CIA got itself into trouble: Iran, Chile and the Congo, countries where the CIA was accused of overthrowing governments. Better to operate in the shadows and leave the bang-bang to others.
 
Another thing I learned about the DO was that, like any other professional criminal organisation, it lived according to a strict code of secrecy. Every document generated in the DO was classified, from a requisition order for toilet paper to invitations to office parties. All communications were encrypted and super-encrypted. Case officers used pseudonyms in place of their true names. Cryptonyms replaced the names of agents. Even geographical places were renamed. Most case officers spent their careers in perpetual fear that their cover wouldn't hold up at a crucial moment.
 
After training, Baer's first posting was to India, where he began the business of of recruiting agents, a bit shakily at first. Next, he was offered a two-year Arabic course by the CIA's Near East Division. He accepted without a second thought. It was during this time, on April 18, 1983, that a pick-up truck was driven into the lobby of the US embassy in Beirut and exploded.
 
At ground zero, the centre of the seven-storey embassy lifted up hundreds of feet into the air, remained suspended for what seemed an eternity, and then collapsed in a cloud of dust, people, splintered furniture and paper. Sixty-three people, including 17 Americans, were killed in what was then the deadliest terrorist attack against the US ever, but the CIA was hardest hit. Six officers died, including the chief, his deputy and the deputy's wife. Bob Ames, the CIA's national intelligence officer for the Near East, was killed, too. Bob had stopped by the embassy on a visit to Beirut. His hand was found floating a mile offshore, the wedding ring still on his finger. It was a tragedy from which the agency would never recover.
 
I was in Tunis studying Arabic when the news of the bombing hit like a sonic boom. All of us, the students and the instructors, knew someone working in the embassy in Beirut.
 
I figured that some radical Palestinian group was behind the explosion, that it would be only a matter of weeks before someone was caught and the plot exposed. I turned out to be wrong. I had no idea the bombing would never be officially solved or that it would become for me a lifelong obsession.
 
The following year, in March 1984, Bill Buckley, the CIA chief in Beirut, was kidnapped. The Islamic Jihad Organisation (IJO), one of the groups that had claimed responsibility for the embassy bombing, said it had seized him, but in seven months no leads to his whereabouts were uncovered. Baer, by now stationed in a secret Middle East outpost, decided, unbeknownst to his station chief, to visit Lebanon. He thought Baalbek, in the Bekaa valley, was a good place to start looking.
 
Baalbek had become the Sodom and Gomorrah of terrorism. Every terrorist, radical and lunatic who thought he could drive the Israelis out of Lebanon had set up shop there. The real turning point had arrived on November 21, 1982, when Hussein Al-Musawi, the head of a radical Islamic group, seized the Sheikh Abdallah barracks from the Lebanese gendarmerie. Clearly acting on Tehran's orders, Musawi immediately turned the barracks over to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or the Pasdaran, as the Iranians themselves call it. Without any opposition from the Lebanese or the Syrians, Iran now had a sovereign piece of Lebanese soil, and every source we had indicated that the Pasdaran was about to go to war against the west.
 
Thanks to a chain of contacts with well-placed friends, including a Lebanese army captain, Baer made his way to Baalbek and actually found himself having lunch at the house of one of Hussein Al-Musawi's cousins.
 
Things were going fine until one of the guests took a particular interest in me. With his long, ungroomed beard and armband that read "We Crave Martyrdom", he made me nervous. After staring at me a few seconds, he asked, "What brings you to Baalbek?"
 
Rather than drag out the classicist spiel I'd used before, I went for the big lie. "I'm Belgian. I work for an aid organisation," I said. I kept my fingers crossed that no one spoke French or, worse, Flemish. I didn't speak a word of Flemish, and my French was definitely rusty.
 
"Sir, may I ask your name?" the ungroomed beard persisted.
 
"Er, RÈmy."
 
"That's your family name?"
 
"No, it's Martin," I said before I could stop myself. It wasn't as if RÈmy Martin cognac wasn't sold in Lebanon. Fortunately, he went back to eating.
 
Afterwards, the captain took me to the Temple of the Sun, the Roman section of Baalbek. When we were driving out of town, I casually asked him about the compound on the hill, which I knew was the Sheikh Abdallah barracks. He stopped the car by the outside perimeter wall, and I had a chance to take in all of the buildings. It was remarkable how different they looked from the ground than they did from satellite photography. One building in particular caught my attention. Two Pasdaran soldiers were guarding the front door, and either cardboard or blankets covered the inside of the windows. A wooden sign on the wall identified it as the married officers' quarters.
 
It wasn't until years later that I would learn Bill Buckley was inside, blindfolded and chained to a radiator, along with five other western hostages. Nor would I know for years that this same building was a key link in my search for the embassy bombers. But, in truth, I wasn't really surprised by either revelation. Everything in the Middle East is interconnected.
 
 
Shortly afterwards, Baer was transferred to Khartoum, Sudan, and then, after only four months, recalled to CIA headquarters in the US because Libya was apparently targeting him for assassination. Back home, he was enrolled by Duane "Dewey" Clarridge in Counterterrorism Centre (CTC).
 
Dewey had all the money he wanted. The CIA director, Bill Casey, promised him carte blanche; he could cannibalise the DO and the DI to stock CTC. He even recruited a handful of Los Angeles cops. He was planning to deploy them around the world and start hauling in terrorists in handcuffs.
 
Expectations were high, but it wasn't long before the politics of intelligence undermined everything Dewey tried to do. He couldn't even recruit the staff that he had been promised. After six months, he could put his hands on only two Arabic speakers, one of whom was me, although about 80% of CTC's targets spoke Arabic. There were no Persian, Pashtun or Turkish speakers at all.
 
About a month after I joined, CIA in Bonn cabled that a leader of Syria's Muslim Brotherhood who was living in Germany wanted a meeting with the CIA. Bonn, of course, refused to meet him for fear of irritating the Germans, but it grudgingly agreed to let someone from CTC fly out to see what he wanted. I took the cable to Dewey. "What's in it for us?" he asked.
 
Good question. The Muslim Brotherhood was an amorphous, dangerous, unpredictable movement that shook every government in the Middle East to its bones. Founded by an Egyptian, Hasan Al-Banna, in 1929, it was dedicated to bringing the Kingdom of God to earth. The Egyptian Muslim Brothers had unsuccessfully tried to kill Egyptian president Abdul Nasser. The Syrian branch had tried to kill Syrian President Hafiz Assad a couple of times. The Muslim Brothers are also distant cousins of the Wahabis of Saudi Arabia, the most puritanical sect of Islam. Underwritten by the Saudi royal family, the Wahabis spawned Osama bin Laden. They also served as the inspiration for the Taliban in Afghanistan and other radical Sunni movements.
 
I knew, in short, that dealing with the Muslim Brotherhood was playing with fire. These guys were programmed for trouble. But if the Reagan administration really was determined to fight it out with our enemies in Syria and Lebanon, we couldn't have found better surrogates. The only question was what they were prepared to do for us, and to find that out, we had to talk to them.
 
Dewey agreed that I should meet with them, and I was on an airplane to Frankfurt the next day.
 
Not bothering to check in with Bonn, I took the train directly to Dortmund. The plan was for me to wait by a designated kiosk at Dortmund railway station until I was signalled by a Brotherhood cutout. At the stroke of two, a dark, bearded man with a paunch, about 45 years old, walked up to me and, without saying a word, motioned me to follow him. [A fast drive in a Mercedes ensued along the autobahn and into a "modest, scrubbed German suburb".] Almost no one was on the street when the driver turned into the driveway of a house identical to all the rest. I never would have been able to find the place again.
 
Waiting in a small office was a frail, elegant man with a neatly trimmed beard. He was in his late 50s, I guessed, wearing a soft, grey flannel suit. For the next hour, the Muslim Brotherhood leader vilified the regime in Damascus. He described Hafiz Assad as a heathen, the incarnation of evil, and in other terms you didn't hear even in Washington, where Assad was never particularly popular.
 
Finally, I interrupted to ask what could be done.
 
The man smiled. "We are ready to go hand in hand with the United States and remove this cancerous sore from God's sight."
 
"How?" I asked, suspecting the worst.
 
"We have buried in Ghuta, near the Damascus airport, an SA-7 missile," he said matter-of-factly, as if telling me he'd planted a bed of petunias in his garden back home. "What we need is for you to inform us when Assad's airplane is ready to take off and he is on it."
 
My first thought, as a case officer, was, 'Damn, this is hot information'. The sourcing couldn't be better - this man was a boss in the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, and he was talking about capping Hafiz Assad, the biggest hurdle to a Middle East peace. Since our new friend was proposing an assassination, in violation of Executive Order 12333, I'd have to report it to Dewey, but I still hoped that we could keep meeting this man and maybe redirect his energies to a common goal. Even if we couldn't, I didn't see any harm in keeping our lines of communication open. Who could tell when we might need the Muslim Brotherhood?
 
Back in Washington, Dewey listened carefully as I told him about the meeting, from the moment I was picked up at the Dortmund rail station until I had told the Muslim Brotherhood leader I'd have to consult with my bosses.
 
"Go write it up," Dewey said.
 
"Wait," he added as I was heading out the door. "Nothing on a computer. Use a typewriter instead. Destroy the ribbon afterward. And don't make a copy. I want to keep this between Ollie [Oliver North], you and me." As instructed, I gave Dewey the only copy of my contact report - the last I was ever to hear about it.
 
Bonn was unimpressed with the cable I sent about the meeting (minus the part about the SA-7). Bonn was sticking to its original position: it did not want to meet anyone from the Muslim Brotherhood. I didn't have the time to go back, and the CIA wouldn't meet the Syrian Muslim Brothers again. But the Muslim Brother I met in that innocuous suburban house in Dortmund would pop into my life again, in the days after September 11, 2001, when the FBI came calling to tell me that one of the Syrian's associates was a suspect in the global network that had supported the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.
 
The really bad guys - the ones capable of doing great harm for or against our side, depending on which way God is talking to them that day - don't just go away. It was better, I always figured, to have a line into them, even if it meant keeping our hands a little dirty in the process. There is, of course, no guarantee even if we had kept communications open that the Syrian I met in 1986 would have led us to Mohamed Atta or any of the German cells of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network that may have played a role in the September 11 attacks. But closing down the channel assured that the Syrian wouldn't lead us to anyone. For Bonn and the CIA, it remains an unforgivable error.
 
Meanwhile, the White House was still on Dewey's back to do something about the hostages. He hailed me into his office one morning. "You have good instincts," he began. "What's the craziest idea you can come up with to free the hostages?"
 
For a year after Buckley's kidnapping, the CIA had no idea who had taken either him or the other IJO hostages. A break wouldn't come until Algeria stepped forward to inform us that a young Shi'a Muslim from southern Lebanon named Imad Fayez Mughniyah had kidnapped Buckley, as well as CNN's Jeremy Levin and the clerics Benjamin Weir and Laurence Martin Jenco. Before 1982, Mughniyah worked for PLO chairman Yasser Arafat, the Algerians told us; now, he operated on his own. A well-placed agent identified Mughniyah, too, as the mastermind of the hijacking of the TWA Flight 847 out of Athens on June 14, 1985. All this was on my mind as I stood in Dewey's door.
 
"No limits?" I finally asked.
 
"Yeah, anything," Dewey said.
 
"We hit Mughniyah where it hurts: his family," I said.
 
Dewey didn't see what I was getting at.
 
"Look, Dewey," I said. "Let's assume three things are true: Mughniyah really controls the hostages, Mughniyah is devoted to his family, as most people in the Middle East are, and, finally, this administration would consider anything to get the hostages back. If all of these are, in fact, true, then we might consider grabbing some of Mughniyah's family to trade for the hostages."
 
The idea, of course, was over the top, but back then the CIA was expected to operate on the edge, to do things no other government agency would consider. One of the instructors at the Farm [the CIA's main training base] had told us a story of how, after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the agency's skunk works had come up with the idea of filling a captured Soviet transport plane - Soviet markings and all - with live pigs and dropping them over Mecca, Islam's most holy city. The idea was to light the Middle East's fuse and direct the blast toward the Soviet Union, whose influence had been growing in the area. Compared with that, what I was suggesting to Dewey sounded almost sane.
 
"Fine, go find me Imad's family," he told me.
 
I knew better than actually to get started; Dewey would still have to run it by Ollie North or someone else at the National Security Council (NSC). When I never heard anything back, I forgot about it. Only when the Iran-contra story broke did I learn that North had circulated my idea around the White House via one of his infamous messages on PROF, an internal White House email system.
 
April 1986, Washington, DC. Before I was sent to my next posting, in Beirut, I had time to give myself a crash course in terrorism. There wasn't a better place to do that than in the CTC. I had complete access to all of the CIA's files and databases on terrorism. I was like a kid in a candy store. The first thing I turned to - inevitably, I suppose - was the embassy bombing. Imad Mughniyah was as good a place as any to start.
 
He was an enigma. According to his passport application, he had been born in 1962. We knew he had grown up in a makeshift cinder-block house with no running water in 'Ayn Al-Dilbah, one of the poorest parts of Beirut's southern suburbs. Mughniyah, we had confirmed, joined Yasser Arafat's Force 17 (Arafat's elite personal security organisation) at an early age, maybe 14 or 15, but was always a low-level bang man, one of dozens who spent their days and nights sniping at Christians across the Green Line. It didn't add up. How did a poor boy from 'Ayn Al- Dilbah rise out of the ashes of the 1982 Israeli invasion and in less than a year put together the most lethal and well- funded terrorist organisation in the world? Was this the man who kidnapped and held dozens of foreign hostages? Was this the man who, as I had come to believe, blew up the American embassy in April 1983 and covered his tracks so well that there wasn't a single lead tying him to it? The more I got into the files, the more convinced I was that the Algerians were wrong about Mughniyah operating independently.
 
Maybe it sounds wacky, but I loved working in Beirut. However, picking up the trail of the embassy bombing was like putting together a Roman mosaic scattered in an earthquake and scorched by fire. Sitting in Christian East Beirut meant we were working in the dark. We couldn't cross into West Beirut, where most of our best remaining agents were. That left us making do with what the CIA calls access agents - those who don't know secrets themselves but can access people who do.
 
One of my best access agents was a freelance journalist I'll call Farid. Although he was a Christian, Farid's job allowed him to travel back and forth across the Green Line. A slight, balding man with a winning smile, Farid could pass unnoticed almost anywhere in the world. He had friends and contacts all over Lebanon, and could talk to pretty much whomever he liked, with the exception of Mughniyah or Hizbullah.
 
Where Farid left off, telephone taps picked up. In Beirut, everyone's phone was tapped. You could walk down almost any street and see jerry-rigged telephone wires draped across the street. Part of it was a practicality. If you were to move into an apartment in, say, Hamra - Beirut's old business district - and find that there was no telephone line, you couldn't ask the telephone company to install a new line. The telephone company no longer existed. What you did was find a working line and tie into it, legally or illegally.
 
I had five other agents like Farid. Piece by piece, I put together a picture of Mughniyah's group. Everyone was either related by blood, had fought together in Fatah, or hailed from 'Ayn Al-Dilbah neighbourhood.
 
One name that kept popping up alongside Mughniyah's was Hussein Khalil, who was the Lebanese man in charge of the married quarters at the Sheikh Abdallah barracks in early 1985 - at the same time the IJO hostages were held there.
 
The only conclusion a reasonable person could make was that a Fatah cell, with or without Arafat's knowledge, blew up the American embassy in Beirut on April 18, 1983. Mughniyah and Khalil were almost definitely involved. There was only one significant question: who gave the orders?
 
To get to the next step, a lot of details needed filling in, such as who actually drove the truck through the front door. If we could find that out, it might well lead us to the bombers. The break came in October 1987. I was at my desk late in the afternoon when the embassy security officer came to say that a Mr Walker wanted to see me. Mr Walker was the code for a walk- in who wanted to see a CIA officer. The man waiting for me was probably about 35, although he could have passed for much older, and scarred all over. His sandals flagged him as a Muslim. (Lebanese Christians usually opted for stylish European shoes).
 
After he passed through the metal detector, I led him along the embassy's metal labyrinthine sandbagged trenches, down a hill, and out a back exit, where I had prepositioned a car.
 
As soon as we turned on to the coastal highway, I asked Mr Walker for his national identity card. When he pulled it from his shirt pocket and showed it to me, I almost drove off the road. He had the same family name as a member of Mughniyah's group. I held my breath when I asked Mr Walker - I'll call him Hasan - if he was related to the terrorist of the same name. "He's a first cousin," he told me.
 
My objective became putting our relationship on a clandestine footing as quickly as possible. As the first cousin of a notorious IJO terrorist, Hasan had a half-life in Christian East Beirut of about five seconds. I needed to find a secure place to let him off and another secure spot to pick him up for the next meeting. I headed to Sinn Al-Fill, the same neighbourhood where I met Farid. As I was about to drop Hasan off, I asked him why he had decided to meet with the CIA. "I can't stand the murder of innocent people," he said. "What Hizbullah does is wrong."
 
"But it's risky," I said. "You have children. If you're caught, you'll be tortured to death."
 
"I know. But God protects me." I waited for him to explain. I thought I knew where the conversation was going. I was wrong. "I play Russian roulette," Hasan said sheepishly.
 
I'd heard the rumour that fanatic Muslims had taken up the sport to test divine determination. A round in the chamber was God's way of letting you know your time was up. But I never took the rumour seriously, at least until now. Before I let Hasan out, I made him promise to stop playing Russian roulette. Just meeting me, I told him, was all the fate he wanted to tempt.
 
Hasan joined Hizbullah, found a job in one of its offices, and turned into a fantastic agent, the CIA's first in the group.
 
The analysts back home sent me reams of questions about what sheikh so-and-so thought about sheikh so-and-so, how much Hizbullah was spending on its social welfare programmes, or when it was going to enter mainstream Lebanese politics. But what interested me was Imad Mughniyah and the IJO.
 
Since you had to be recruited to the IJO, I asked Hasan to work the problem on the edges. He started praying at a mosque whose imam was close to Mughniyah. Hasan went every Friday and soon joined a religious study group. Because the imam knew Hasan was related to an IJO terrorist, he accepted him as one of the faithful.
 
One day when Hasan was alone with the imam, he decided the time was right to bring up the bombing. As we'd agreed, Hasan started with a ploy. Instead of charging ahead and asking who the suicide bomber was, he mentioned the name of a young man who had been in the imam's congregation for many years but had disappeared. Lowering his voice conspiratorially, Hasan said he'd heard the young man was the suicide driver who blew up the US embassy in April 1983.
 
"Where did you hear that?" the imam asked.
 
Hasan responded vaguely that he'd heard it from his IJO cousin. He knew the imam would never check back with his cousin.
 
"No," the imam answered. "No, he was not the blessed martyr who destroyed the American spy nest."
 
Hasan insisted he was right.
 
"No, you're wrong." The imam didn't appreciate having his authority challenged. "It was Brother Hassuna. I know very well."
 
"Who?"
 
"Mohamed Hassuna."
 
Hassuna was not a common name in Lebanon. That helped. I had all of my agents look into the Hassuna family. One of them, Samir, knew a Major Hassuna, and promised to check with him to see if any members of the family were missing. A week later he dropped the bombshell on me - one of Major Hassuna's brothers, Mohamed, had died on the Iraq front in Iran.
 
"Iran?" I asked incredulously. "How's that possible? Lebanese don't simply pull up stakes and fight for Iran."
 
Samir shrugged. "I'll find out."
 
At the next meeting, Samir said that Major Hassuna had told him that his family were non-practising Muslims, but that Mohamed was different. In his search for a deeper faith, he had embraced Shi'a Islam, and in early 1983 he had unexpectedly informed his family that he was going to Iran to fight in the war with Iraq. That was the last they heard of him until they received a letter from the Iranian embassy that Mohamed had died in a battle on the front.
 
I had Farid dig up the official records on Mohamed Hassuna. Although Hassuna had a passport, there was no record that he had ever travelled out of the country. I wrote up what I knew about Hassuna in a long, detailed intelligence report - the first in a series I would do on the bombing.
 
A few days later, headquarters advised that the report would not be disseminated: "While the information is compelling, it is only of historical interest." In plain English, the national security community no longer gave a damn who had bombed our embassy in Beirut.
 
In a way, I could almost understand Washington's not caring. The CIA was falling into the hands of people who had never put their lives on the line to learn about terrorism in places such as Beirut. The embassy bombing for them wasn't just ancient history; it was a distraction from their career ambitions. Why mess up a spotless record by bearing news of one of the agency's darkest hours? I saw my job differently. If we didn't know who we were up against, we wouldn't know what they were capable of, and might not learn until they showed up on our shores, armed to the teeth.
 
Besides, there was still an outstanding arrest warrant for Mughniyah. All I needed was someone with the balls to exercise it.
 
I'll call the man I found Jean, who in turn put me in touch with with a man I'll call Isam. I told Isam straight off that I wanted to grab someone who lived in 'Ayn Al-Dilbah.
 
"Do you know anything about 'Ayn Al-Dilbah?" Isam asked. I don't think he was daunted by the prospect; he was just taking my measure.
 
I ignored him. "It's Imad Mughniyah I want."
 
He turned to Jean: "Is he serious?" Jean nodded.
 
Isam turned back to me and said: "I'll kill him for two thousand dollars. A thousand in advance."
 
"I want him alive."
 
"Then find someone else."
 
"How do I know you can do anything in 'Ayn Al-Dilbah, anyhow?" I asked.
 
Isam laughed. "Mr Jean didn't tell you who I am? I've killed more people than your marines and the New Jersey put together."
 
The next week, Isam arrived carrying a sheaf of notes and an envelope of pictures. It was obvious he was well plugged into the 'Ayn Al-Dilbah gang. He had it all - cars, addresses, telephone numbers.
 
At our third meeting, Isam had a plan: "This week, Mughniyah is going to be back at the school. He has to be. Someone from Tehran is coming to see him there. We may never have another chance...." Isam said. "In front of the school there is a parking lot, and in the back an alley. What I propose is to put a car on each side and detonate them simultaneously. I figure a thousand kilos of Semtex will tidy up your little problem."
 
It was what we call a muffler charge, and Isam was right. Two car bombs on either side of a two-story building would definitely bring it down and kill everyone inside.
 
"Can you be sure Mughniyah will be there?" I asked.
 
"My cousin will tell me."
 
"What do you need to start?"
 
"Two thousand up front and ten thousand afterward - after Mughniyah is dead."
 
It didn't take me long to decide. I'd joined the CIA as a prank. And, yeah, somewhere along the line I was converted and became an information junkie. I was obsessed with finding out who bombed the embassy. But none of it meant I'd been handed the moral authority to decide who needed to be killed. I'd leave that up to the politicians in Washington.
 
I told Isam to go back and collect more information. I never reported the incident to headquarters, and I would never see Isam again. Do I regret it now? Sure. Whether Imad Mughniyah is in league with Osama bin Laden, I really don't know, but I am certain there's not a dime's worth of real difference between the two of them. If we had accepted back then that we were at war with terrorists, Washington might have been more inclined to approve the operation Isam proposed, and I would have been more inclined to force the issue with my superiors in Langley. But we didn't, and like so many other problems, we let this one fester in place.
 
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,630664,00.html
 
One angry spy (Part 2)
 
Robert Baer Saturday January 12, 2002 The Guardian
 
Baer's next posting was to Paris. He was not impressed with the CIA operation there. To be sure, Paris went through the motions of spying, but it was only for appearances' sake. And then there was the language problem [for CIA operatives]. The older officers spoke good French; the younger ones didn't. French agents, like their countrymen, hate slowing down for someone who can't bother to learn the language properly. French snobbery was another barrier: Hush Puppies, Brooks Brothers trench coats, and neon fanny packs offended the host sensibilities. Paris's case officers were frozen out of French society. All they could do at night was watch videos.
 
Something else I noticed: as the DO went into decline, satellites, not agents, became the touchstone of truth in Washington. Few things are more satisfying for a policymaker than to hold in his hand a clean, glossy black-and-white satellite photo, examine it with his very own 3D viewer, and decide for himself what it means. Not only could he do without analysts, he could do without agents, too. And thank goodness. Agents were messy. They sometimes got things wrong, even occasionally lied. And they definitely had the potential to cause ugly diplomatic incidents.
 
As a fatal malaise settled over the CIA, case officers began resigning in droves, and some of the best left first. In Paris - beautiful, bewitching Paris - the attrition rate was running at about 30%. Convinced by all the outward signs that spying was no longer a serious profession for serious people, they went home to find a job in investment banking or any other profession that America took seriously.
 
America is at war as I write, and the enemy's recruits are like water. Arrest or kill hundreds of them, and hundreds of others will flow into their places. We can't kill them all, but we can figure out what their plans and intentions are by talking with them. We can figure out the direction of their war by infiltrating people in the mosques who might tell us how bad things are and how many young men are devoted to taking their own lives. That's what we didn't have. That's what we were forfeiting all over the CIA and the intelligence community generally, in the pursuit of goals I still can't fully understand.
 
Baer returned to head office, to a desk job.
 
It wasn't long before I began to realise just how lost I was in the current culture of Washington and the CIA. For decades, I had unpacked my bags in places such as Tajikistan and the Sudan and begun learning the ins and outs of the local culture, and that's what I did now. I started talking with all sorts of people, anyone who could teach me how Washington works. I would eventually learn far more than I had bargained for.
 
I would see how committee hearings and press leaks can be almost as effective as suicide bombers in promoting narrow, parochial causes. I would find that the tentacles of big oil stretch from the Caspian Sea to the White House. I'd also see how money, not lives or national security, skews so much of what takes place in the very places most charged with protecting us all.
 
I was called down to the NSC in December 1995 for an unscheduled emergency meeting on Georgia. When I walked into the NSC's stately conference room, I found the usual downtown nomenklatura: Rand Beers, head of intelligence programmes for the NSC, Jennifer Sims, from the State Department, and a few others from Defence and State, there for decoration.
 
Sims didn't waste any time making her pitch: we absolutely had to give Georgia's president Eduard Shevardnadze a Matador air- defence system to protect his planes and helicopters. (The Matador detects things such as radar lock-ons and approaching missiles.) Shevardnadze was the only Caucusus leader who had committed to the main oil-export pipeline, connecting the Caspian to the Mediterranean; America could not afford to lose him.
 
I vaguely wondered why, if he was so important, the oil companies didn't pay to protect his life. Then Sims dropped her bomb: the money for the Matador would come from the CIA. At first I thought I'd fallen asleep and was dreaming.
 
The State Department couldn't have forgotten already that after Fred Woodruff [the CIA man in Tbilisi] had been murdered just outside the Georgian capital, Shevardnadze had stonewalled the investigation at every turn. Now the CIA was being asked to reward Shevardnadze by ponying up $2 million-plus to protect his life - all so that Amoco, Exxon, and Mobil could have some extra reserves for their yearly financial statement. Had the inmates finally taken complete control of the asylum?
 
At least I knew exactly how to drive a stake in this deal.
 
"Can't be done," I said, interrupting.
 
Everyone in the room stopped talking, surprised I'd said anything.
 
"Bob, what seems to be the problem?" Beers said, bracing himself for the worst.
 
"The man Ms Sims proposes turning the Matador system over to is a murderer."
 
"Sorry, Bob, I'm not sure we all understand what you're getting at," Beers said.
 
I explained. The relevant KGB man - the one who would operate the Matador system - was a murderer. "We have a video of him shooting six handcuffed prisoners in the back of the head. It's rather gruesome, but I'd be happy to go back to Langley and bring you back a copy. In any case, he's violated human rights. As much as we'd like to, there's nothing the CIA can do for you."
 
Side stories such as this stoked my curiosity about the oil lobby and, particularly, an NSC staffer I'd had dealings with, Sheila Heslin, so I began calling around Washington to see what the deal was. Heslin's sole job, it seemed, was to carry water for an exclusive club known as the Foreign Oil Companies Group, a cover for a cartel of major petroleum companies doing business in the Caspian. The deeper I got, the more Caspian oil money I found sloshing all around Washington. If it had been just a matter of money or even political corruption, I might have been able to walk away from all I had learned about big oil, the White House and the NSC. Elective politics always breed a certain amount of nastiness. What I couldn't get around, though, was this: every time I turned over a new rock, there was something even nastier underneath.
 
After Iran released the last of the American hostages in 1991, the White House kept its fingers crossed that Iran was finally out of the terrorism business. By December, however, it was becoming apparent that Iran had simply switched battlefields. The Iranian Pasdaran opened a training base in the Bekaa for Saudi Hizbullah terrorist cadres. In July 1995, the Iranian- trained networks started to watch American facilities in Saudi Arabia. The first attack came against the Saudi National Guard facility in Riyadh in November 1995, killing five Americans. The Khobar barracks were hit on June 25, 1996, killing 19 Americans.
 
Just as ominously, the CIA was learning about the first tentative contacts between Bin Laden and Iran - he desperately needed the terrorist expertise Iran possessed. Our fears were confirmed when bin Laden met an Iranian intelligence officer in Afghanistan in July 1996 to hammer out a strategic relationship. The possibility of a grand terrorist alliance against the US was staggering. It wasn't something we could just ignore.
 
By then, I was a group chief and could instruct my stations to do essentially what I wanted, so I leaned on our offices in the Caspian and Central Asia to concentrate on the Iranian target. Early in 1996, one place came up with a plan to bug a clandestine Pasdaran facility. At that point, we had no idea what the Pasdaran was doing in the Caspian, but the possibility always existed that it intended to open a third front, in addition to Saudi Arabia. Any information would have been helpful.
 
I knew the routine and called Heslin for her permission to go ahead. I described what we intended to do, what we expected the take to be, and what the benefit would be to US interests in the region. I could feel a frigid Arctic air coming over the telephone line.
 
Less than 20 minutes later, my green phone rang - the super- encrypted communications line used for discussing sensitive information. Rand Beers was on the other end. "What's this about the Iranian Pasdaran and some audio operation?" he asked.
 
"Yeah, what's the problem?"
 
"Well, Heslin's worried about the blowback."
 
"The blowback?"
 
"She's afraid the Iranians will take revenge on Amoco's people in Azerbaijan."
 
I was furious. "Do you mean to tell me we have to stop an operation against a terrorist group - one perhaps responsible for killing five Americans in Saudi Arabia - to protect Amoco's balance sheets?"
 
"Well, I wouldn't put it that way," Beers said.
 
"Fine, I'll call Congress and tell them that Sheila Heslin, Amoco's ambassador to the NSC, no longer wants us to target the Iranian Pasdaran because we're worried about Amoco's profits."
 
Like a good bureaucrat, I fired off what is called a spot report to the deputy director of operations, Dave Cohen, about my conversation with Beers. I got no response, but Beers called back that same day to tell me the NSC had had a change of mind and decided not to object to South Group's targeting the Pasdaran. Congress and Iran had a certain resonance in the White House.
 
I remember thinking that it should have been a big moment. After all the bureaucratic infighting within the intelligence community, I had finally won one. For a moment, at least, the battle against terrorism had trumped the battle for oil money. But I was just so tired of it all. We were talking about lives, for God's sake. The fight shouldn't have been so difficult.
 
How do you call an end to a career that has taken you so far into the heart of darkness and shown you so many of the secrets that lie there? I didn't want to go out bitter, but I didn't want just to slink away, either. I'd spent a quarter-century building up a body of knowledge and a set of instincts about some of the worst people and most dangerous organisations on the planet. I decided to find out, really find out, to the best of my knowledge, the truth behind Iranian-sponsored terrorism.
 
Maybe, I thought, the search would lead me to what I considered the biggest secret of all, the one that had been gnawing at me for more than 13 years: who bombed the US embassy in Beirut, and why had they never been brought to justice? If we couldn't identify who had done it, if we couldn't even learn what kind of explosives had been used, chances are it would all happen again, maybe at a far greater magnitude. It had become obvious to me that the new, politically correct CIA was neither up to nor interested in the challenge.
 
I started out by running a computer search for intelligence we knew to be factual on the hostages in Lebanon. The phantom I kept running up against in my investigation was the IJO. It seemed to pop into existence whenever some new horror was inflicted in the Middle East and elsewhere, and then it seemed to slip completely back into the shadows again.
 
And then it occurred to me: the IJO had never existed. It was only a name the Pasdaran used for communiquÈs to claim terrorist operations. What's more, the CIA knew the IJO was merely a front for the Iranians. It was clear from the documents I dredged up that, by at least 1997, the CIA knew the Pasdaran's command structure inside and out, just as it knew that Ayatollah Ali Khameini and President Rafsanjani approved every terrorist operation to come out of Iran. As I looked at the evidence in front of me, the conclusion was unavoidable: the Islamic Republic of Iran had declared a secret war against the US, and the US had chosen to ignore it.
 
When the world as most of us knew it began to fall apart on the morning of September 11, 2001, I was at my home in Washington DC. If United Airlines Flight 93 had been allowed by its passengers to fly on to its intended destination, I would have heard it crash into the White House. If the target had been the Capitol, and it might have been, I would have felt the crash as well.
 
For me, the irony of the situation was hard to miss. After two decades in some of earth's true hellholes, I had returned to the heart of the most powerful nation on earth, protected by a military force such as the world has never known, watched over by domestic and foreign security services that number in the hundreds of thousands. And what had saved the city I was living in? Not the CIA. Not the FBI. Not the air force or navy or marines or army. But the raw courage and determination of a fistful of average Americans. The lapse made me furious to think about.
 
Were the attacks of September 11 conceived in the fertile imagination of Osama bin Laden? I don't know for certain, and I'm not sure anyone ever will. But I am absolutely sure that it's in Bin Laden's best interests for us to believe that is so. Terrorist campaigns aren't directed just against the enemy. They are campaigns of recruitment as well, and by demonising Bin Laden, by holding him up as the mastermind of the attacks and as the arch enemy, we have ensured that the disillusioned, the angry, the desperate young men of the Muslim world will flock to his cause, whether he's dead or alive to lead it. And, yes, there are more men like that than we could ever count.
 
Did bin Laden act alone, through his own al-Qaida network, in launching the attacks? About that I'm far more certain and emphatic: no.
 
Even before I left the CIA in late 1997, we had learned that Bin Laden had suggested to the Iranians that they drop their efforts to undermine central Asian governments and instead join him in a campaign against the United States. We knew, too, that in July 1996 Bin Laden's allies, the Egyptian Gama'at, had been in touch with Imad Mughniyah, whom my own research had shown to be behind the 1983 bombing of the American embassy in Beirut. Throw in Bin Laden's connections to the Egyptian fundamentalists, and what we have is the most formidable terrorist coalition in history.
 
Once he set up shop in Afghanistan, opened his training camps there, and sent out word that he was ready to take violence across the ocean, it was only a matter of time until he and his colleagues struck. The questions were always how and how big, what and where, and when, not if.
 
© Robert Baer, 2002.
 
This is an edited extract from See No Evil: The True Story Of A Ground Soldier In The CIA's War Against Terrorism, by Robert Baer, published next month by Random House International, priced £12.99. To order a copy for the special price of £10.99 (plus p&p), call the Guardian Book Service on 0870 066 7979.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,630422,00.html



Email This Article





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros