- "This is the world that has been pulled over your
eyes to blind you to the truth." - Morpheus The Matrix
-
-
- In this chapter:
-
- Anthrax as an issue Anthrax as a disease Anthrax as a
weapon, developed in the 1950s by US scientists Antibiotics: Cipro, penicillin,
and doxycycline Side effects of Cipro Superbugs and Alexander Fleming Anthrax
vaccine - after 50 years, still unproven and untested The politics of anthrax
vaccine Anthrax vaccine - what do the real experts say? Bioport - the Saudi
connection to American military politics, The Golden Goose Bioterrorism:
threat vs. reality Oil - the true value of the Afghanistan invasion Congressional
hearings - Feb 1998 Smallpox: the next chimera Bill of Rights US military
against Americans No more media
-
-
- True to the principles set forth in the chapter Doors
of Perception: Why Americans Will Believe Almost Anything, I try to avoid
newspapers and TV as much as possible, mainly because it's obvious that
that is NOT what is going on in the world. Global affairs are certainly
much more complicated, multilayered, with a thousand more points of view
than the ridiculous Media stories that focus on one or two extremely basic
"facts," eschewing subtlety in favor of black and white.
-
- Even so, I could not avoid watching CNN for a couple
of hours on a recent Sunday. It was an interminable documentary supposedly
to show what was going on in Afghanistan. But all we saw were a few shoeless
Afghanis riding their mules in the mountain wastelands of Afghanistan,
armed with what had to be the oldest rifles known to man. And it went
on and on and I'm thinking OK we have all these thousands of UN troops
and all those ships and the most sophisticated war gear in history assembled
somewhere in the vicinity of Afghanistan, for the invasion, right? So,
like where is the army? Where is the enemy? Why are we watching this
endless footage about these ragged nomads, like they had something to do
with blowing up the WTC or something. Or like they're our target, and killing
them is going to solve everything.
-
- So I guess we're supposed to believe what, that our real
enemy the Taliban terrorists who set up 9/11 are hiding out in caves somewhere
making calls on their cell phones to their colleagues on the east coast,
directing the anthrax mailings. And bin Laden is like the fox of the hunt
and just as soon as we find him, America will be vindicated. And that's
why we need all these troops, and it's going to take months to check out
all the mountains, etc., right? It's getting vaguer by the day, but I guess
that's pretty much the morning line.
-
- And then it occurred to me to simply apply the principles
from the Doors of Perception to this situation, and it came a little clearer
into focus. OK so if this is the smokescreen, then what is it that's being
covered up?
-
- How are we being distracted? We're being distracted
by what we see most of in the news. Just like always. Like Sherman McCoy
in Bonfire of the Vanities, it's not about portraying the factual truth.
It's about dinner. And these days dinner is served, and we're having war
and anthrax.
-
- And smallpox for dessert.
-
- In the creation of public opinion on most subjects, there
is always the underlying financial upside. Propaganda - Edward L. Bernays
- spin control (Doors of Perception - thedoctorwithin.com - a prerequisite
to this chapter). There's big money in the hysteria surrounding anthrax
- big money for Bayer, producer of the dangerous antibiotic Cipro, and
big money for Bioport the Saudi-owned holder of the exclusive contract
to produce anthrax vaccine in the United States. Big money for new vaccines.
-
- And bigger money in war.
-
- EVERYBODY'S AN AUTHORITY
-
- The subject of anthrax has brought all sorts of experts
with columns and websites out of the woodwork, lords of hearsay and unsubstantiated
conspiracy and hallucination, many working for syndicated news services,
exhibiting the full spectrum of wacky contentions:
-
- - George W engineered WTC so that a war could boost the
economy - the drug companies are sending anthrax spores to mailrooms and
Congress in order to create a demand for anthrax vaccine and antibiotics
- bin Laden indirectly owns the anthrax vaccine company - the FBI knew
about 9/11 beforehand but let it happen anyway
-
- as well as some likely ones:
-
- - a few people have died from inhaling anthrax spores
- someone is trying to terrorize the American people - no one really knows
what is going on
-
- These days anyone can claim anything. Actually anyone
can prove anything now - all they have to say is that their source is speaking
"on condition of anonymity." What a ridiculous new device.
Or else that they have such a great journalistic reputation that readers
will believe them without references. When did all these tenured journalists
become such primadonnas that they think people actually take their uncited,
unsourced ruminations seriously? Fortunately, most people buy newspapers
for the sports and movie sections, being as sensitized to the daily war
scores as they are to advertising.
-
- THE OLDEST PROFESSION
-
- Crowd control. Media is the only business in the world
that gets to pretend it isn't a business. They maintain this supercilious
air of selfless dedication - of uncompromising responsibility for 'reporting
the truth.' Please! Like there are no depths to which they wouldn't stoop
to jangle just one more nerve ending from a story. To serve their advertisers,
media has one focus only: to keep readers in a perpetual state of fear
and uncertainty so that they will be sure to tune in tomorrow or to buy
tomorrow's paper to see if things got worse. And what kind of news sells
most? Right - bad news. If it's bad today, it's gotta be worse tomorrow.
So if nothing bad enough really happened today, then the main story will
seek to foster some unformed fear about what very likely might be happening
soon that will be even worse than the actual bad stuff going on now. Generally
they'll wreak the worst possible scenario from any given situation.
-
- Leo Tolstoy nailed it over a century ago:
-
- "All newspaper and journalistic activity is an intellectual
brothel from which there is no retreat." - Letter to Prince V.
1871
-
- But we digress. For now let's consider the two new issues
separately: anthrax and war.
-
- With anthrax, what is the popular perception that has
been crafted since October 2001? Well, let's see - some white powder has
been mailed to a bunch of offices and some people have died from anthrax.
Because they didn't get ahold of Cipro soon enough. And now we're all at
risk because terrorists want to kill all Americans. And more outbreaks
are likely soon. And that to be on the safe side, we should take Cipro
'just in case.' And maybe the vaccine, if we can find any.
-
- In this chapter we will hold a little different standard
from the popular press by asking, what can really be verified about what
is going on lately with anthrax? We will leave paranoic theorizing to
the journalists - servants to the commandment that the primary goal of
media is to perpetuate fear and uncertainty from one day to the next.
-
-
- ANTHRAX THE DISEASE
-
- Let's start from the beginning. What is anthrax? According
the most recent Merck Manual, a standard medical text, anthrax is a
-
- "highly infectious disease of animals, especially
ruminants, transmitted to humans by contact with animals or their products."
- Merck p 1157
-
-
- It is infectious, but not contagious. Causative agent:
Bacillus anthracis - a gram positive anaerobic bacterium. Standard medical
knowledge of the disease is sketchy. That's probably because anthrax is
so rare. Until lately, there have only been 18 cases in the past century.
(Associated Press, 8 Oct 01)
-
- Although rare as a naturally occurring disease, anthrax
has been intensely studied as a bioweapon since the 1940s. FDR set up
a center for developing bioweapons at Camp Detrick, Maryland. The program
was headed up by none other than George Merck, drug czar. After years
of experimentation with anthrax, a method for inducing spore encapsulation
was invented. In this way anthrax the disease was crafted into anthrax
the weapon. (Broad) And not by Islamic terrorists. We created anthrax
the bioweapon. In Maryland.
-
- In the 1950s, our scientists produced thousands of gallons
of 'weaponized' anthrax. Operating out of Fort Detrick Maryland for two
decades, a group of scientists led by Bill Patrick succeeded in:
-
- testing experimental anthrax on hundreds of soldiers
and prisoners, with or without their consent
-
- killing some of their own workers in testing unknown
germs
-
- spraying American cities like San Francisco, St Louis,
and New York with experimental germs to monitor how they would spread
(Cole, also Christopher)
-
- forcing the anthrax bacillus and smallpox virus to convert
into spores, thus creating weapons that can be stored for decades
-
- aerosolizing germs so they could be sprayed
-
- developing an arsenal of germ agents, including anthrax
and smallpox
-
- These facts are referenced in Miller's new book Germs,
and in several more legitimate sources. Although this book is generally
a confused, overblown narrative of drug industry propaganda, written in
that style of feigned omniscience that is customary with journalists writing
about scientific issues they don't understand very well, it does point
to some valuable sources.
-
- The above listed facts did take place, and can be verified
by collateral references. It is true that in 1969, for political reasons,
Nixon officially brought the US bioweapons research program to a close.
Although biological research went out of favor as far as lavish funding
was concerned, up until the present time, we find out that stockpiles of
anthrax that were supposed to be destroyed were not. And also that the
research went on, disguised as "defensive" in nature. What a
big surprise. Gee, you mean the army and the CIA weren't up front with
the public?
-
- Even after the Biological Weapons Treaty was signed in
1972 by more than 100 nations, the US and Russia continued to develop and
stockpile anthrax, and still do. (Germs p 63)
-
- When engineered into a weapon, the anthrax bacillus is
protected by spores which can exist in the soil or in animal products for
decades.
-
- According to the recent Merck Manual, there are 3 ways
humans can get the disease
-
- skin
-
- eating infected meat
-
- inhaling spores (Woolsorter's Disease)
-
- Funny thing is, in this medical text (Merck) the same
paragraph says that inhaled anthrax is "often fatal" and "almost
always fatal." Recent events have proven both wrong.
-
- This is typical of medicine's approach to anthrax.
Despite boatloads of ink used up on the topic of anthrax, 99% of it is
from the popular press. Very little legitimate scientific research has
been done about the cause and cure of anthrax, especially the biowarfare
version. Even from our "experts," estimates of how many spores
are necessary to cause the disease vary so widely that it's obviously guesswork.
Dr. Meryl Nass states that the infective dose for inhaled anthrax is "a
million spores." Yet in the Journal of the American Medical Association,
the estimate is between 8,000 and 50, 000. (Franz) Conclusion: we really
have no idea.
-
- Let's talk about the two supposed treatments for anthrax:
antibiotics and the vaccine.
-
-
- ANTHRAX ANTIBIOTICS
-
- According to Merck, the following antibiotics have traditionally
been the treatment of choice:
-
- skin anthrax pulmonary anthrax
-
- penicillin streptomycin tetracycline penicillin
erythromycin cipro chloramphenical
-
-
-
- These are listed in order of preference, with the most
harmful choices listed last. Now there are a couple of odd things here.
First of all, notice that as of 1999, Cipro is not even on Merck's list
for the inhaled version. It was a only fourth choice for the skin version.
Reason: the prodigious amount of side effects listed on p 850 of the
2001 Physicians Desk Reference for Cipro:
-
-
- NVD phobia hearing loss rash intestinal perforation
hemolytic anemia palpitations GI bleeding high triglycerides
-
- fainting jaundice high cholesterol
-
- hypertension damage to wt. bearing jts. seizures
heart attack nephritis tendon rupture thrombosis urethral bleeding
exfoliative dermatitis hallucinations nosebleeds manic rx dizziness
pulmonary embolism blurred vision
-
-
-
- Some of these can be fatal. Probably the only antibiotic
more dangerous than Cipro is chloramphenicol, as any drug rep will tell
you.
-
- Therefore it seems odd that suddenly in September 2001
the media just upgraded Cipro to the #1 choice for anthrax. Why did they
do that? Because Bayer, Cipro's manufacturer is a huge patron of media
advertising? Not that the media would be swayed by financial concerns,
of course not... Cipro sales are up 1000% since 9/11. (New York Times 21
Oct 01)
-
- Remember Baycol, the killer cholesterol drug that was
pulled off the market earlier this year after at least 32 people had died
from it? (The Baycol Recall) That was Bayer. Remember IG Farben - the
German drug giant under Hitler? ( Horowitz) That's also Bayer. A very
classy company, always with the interests of human health first and foremost.
-
- The other odd thing is that in the same PDR where the
above side effects are catalogued, there's a whole list of bacteria that
Cipro is supposed to be used for. But anthrax bacillus isn't one of them.
And in fact all the ones listed are aerobic bacteria. Anthrax is anaerobic.
Isn't that odd?
-
- Now, Cipro was only recently put on the list for inhalation
anthrax by the FDA, in Aug 2000. (Enserink)
-
- Going back to the 1991 Gulf War, each soldier was given
a 5 day supply of Cipro -- like that would do something. (Miller p 119)
Since then, Cipro has stayed in the driver's seat with respect to military
opinions on anthrax antibiotics. In typical military tunnel vision, the
terrible side effects of Cipro are not even considered. Nor the fact that
efficacy has never been determined for humans younger than 18. (PDR)
-
- But it's only in the military that Cipro has been the
preferred antibiotic for anthrax. Elsewhere it's always been penicillin
and doxycycline. So why the fanfare over Cipro?
-
- Many scientists are wondering the same thing lately.
In the 26 Oct 01 edition of the journal Science, there's an article titled
"Researchers question obsession with Cipro." The article calls
Cipro a "drug manufacturer's heaven." Fort Detrick official
CJ Peters remembers right before the Gulf War when he was deciding which
antibiotic to give to soldiers for anthrax, the decision went to Cipro
because of its limited success with test monkeys, and because Cipro was
the newest antibiotic. The reasoning there was that the Iraqis might have
created a new strain of anthrax that was resistant to older antibiotics
like penicillin. Just a hunch - no real evidence. But today, 10 years
down the road, Peters says that newness has worn off and Cipro is no better
than the other less harmful, less expensive antibiotics.
-
- But whether it's Cipro or penicillin or doxycycline,
the biggest deception by the unlettered press is that people are safe taking
any antibiotics just on the suspicion that they might possibly have been
exposed to anthrax. This is the conventional wisdom that has been created
by a hundred media pieces per day. Such a perception is erroneous, unscientific,
and extremely dangerous.
-
- Antibiotic resistance is always the Demon to be feared
in any mass campaign of preventive antibiotic administration. In The Post
Antibiotic Age (thedoctorwithin.com) we learned that the discoverer of
penicillin himself Alexander Fleming, warned against the creation of superbugs
from the very beginning. That chapter should be reviewed to understand
the issues of natural selection of superbugs.
-
- Superbugs don't just happen naturally. Superbugs are
created by indiscriminate use of antibiotics. Anthrax presents two particular
dangers in this respect:
-
- 1. it's almost a brand new disease among humans and therefore
at first will be very susceptible to standard old-fashioned antibiotics,
like penicillin and doxycycline. This initial effectiveness may cause
undue expectations of lasting success.
-
- 2. since the anthrax bacillus is encapsulated in a spore,
it can remain in the lungs for weeks after being inhaled, without escaping
that protective covering. During this time the subject would not react
- no immune response, no inflammatory response. Now if a patient were
known to be exposed to anthrax and prophylactic antibiotics were begun
and continued for several weeks, see the danger? As the millions of inhaled
spores gradually come open a few thousand at a time, like time-release
capsules, the same strain of anthrax would be exposed to the same antibiotic
over a period of time. This is a perfect textbook scenario to encourage
slight mutation of the microbe in order to survive the everpresent never-changing
antibiotic. The patient becomes a walking Petri dish, and this month's
lab assignment is to evolve a superbug. Ideal set-up.
-
-
- The current recommended duration of antibiotic therapy
for inhalational or cutaneous anthrax is 60 days. (Lane -- JAMA) The reason
the course is so long is that spores may remain in the lungs for weeks
before opening up. Actually the 60 days is just an estimate - we really
don't know how long the spores can remain in the lungs.
-
- This recommended dosage does seem to have been effective,
however, because there have been no cases of anthrax among those who have
taken the preventive doses of antibiotics in the offices in which anthrax
exposure may have taken place. But the question remains regarding the
advisability of creating unnecessary antibiotic resistance. Would a life-threatening
infection have taken hold in the absence of these antibiotics? In how
many cases? With a 40% fatality rate, what is the wisdom of waiting till
the disease manifests, weighed against creating antibiotic resistance?
Nobody knows.
-
- Remember - anthrax is a new disease. Antibiotics have
their greatest effect when diseases first appear.
-
- Many postal and government workers today are clamoring
for 'protective' antibiotics. In all, over 30,000 people have taken prophylactic
doses of antibiotics since 9/11, because of "possible" exposure
to anthrax! (Lane) And because of the robotic media, there is an outcry
for more millions of doses to be manufactured in case of outbreak of an
bioterrorist attack. Yak yak yak.
-
- There's a little problem with all these individuals taking
antibiotics at this time. Most of them have not even been exposed to anthrax.
So if they continue to take unnecessary antibiotics, what will happen
to their immune systems? Several things:
-
- 1. they will destroy all their body's natural flora,
primarily in the colon
-
- 2. by starting with the most dangerous antibiotics, the
risk of side effects is much higher
-
- 3. in the unlikely even that they do inhale some anthrax
spores, the above mentioned resistant mutations may be created by the constant
antibiotics
-
- In a few years or less, individual resistance to antibiotics
will become species resistance. That's why so many people are resistant
to penicillin today. The infectious agents have evolved; only the mutants
survive. For some of these modern germs, penicillin is like a trip to
Baskin-Robbins.
-
- A University of Flagstaff study has already been looking
for Cipro-resistant strains of anthrax. The chief researcher, Dr Paul
Keim, says he has a paper "ready to go" at present but that he's
holding onto it for now. Such altruism - actually puts national security
before his own career. (Science, 26 Oct 01)
-
- No matter what you read in the illiterate, pandering
media, remember this fact: antibiotics have always had, and still have,
only one proper application: the life-threatening infection. Not colds,
not sniffles, not just-in-case anything. A life-threatening situation.
Period.
-
- Cipro is not the solution to disaster; it's the marketing
of disaster.
-
- WHAT WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT ANTHRAX
-
- At present 10 people have contracted inhalation anthrax
and 4 have died. (Lane - JAMA) All were treated with antibiotics - a
40% mortality rate - making new inroads in our very sketchy knowledge of
this disease:
-
- "The fact that 6 of these patients have survived
provides hope that the published mortality rates of 86% to 97% for inhalational
anthrax may not be accurate in the year 2001.." -- J Toxicol Clin
Toxicol. 2001;39:85-100
-
- With this relatively rare new disease, real life is ahead
of research here. So just our current experience brings the mortality rate
down to 40%. Now of course this wasn't a real clinical study and 10 people
aren't a very large sample. But this is a vivid demonstration of the difference
between scientific theory and reality.
-
- ANTHRAX VACCINE
-
- Anthrax vaccine was first developed by the US government
at the Fort Detrick facility in the 1950s. (Miller, p 86) The US bioweapons
program was at its peak at that time. At a facility in Lansing Michigan,
millions of doses of anthrax vaccine were produced and stockpiled. The
original vaccine testing at that time was done on monkeys. Results were
inconclusive (Germs, p99)
-
- Very quietly, anthrax vaccine was first licensed by the
FDA in 1970 (Nass, Saga) even though it still was extremely "reactogenic."
To apply for license approval, the Michigan company used the same untested
vaccine developed by Merck in the 1950s.
-
- Then in 1969, Nixon sought political currency by proposing
a treaty to ban bioweapons research worldwide. The US stated by this treaty
that it would never use biological weapons under any circumstances whatsoever.
(Christopher in JAMA) Looked great in the papers for a few months but
the bottom line was that everybody signed the treaty and then continued
to store the old stockpiles of deadly germ weapons, and to quietly research
new ones. That's when George Bush ran the CIA, remember?
-
- Before the Gulf War, anthrax vaccine held little interest.
A 1985 review by the FDA concluded that:
-
- ""Immunization with this vaccine is indicated
only for certain occupational groups with risk of uncontrollable or unavoidable
exposure to the organism ... Inhalation anthrax occurred too infrequently
to assess the protective effect of vaccine against this form of the disease."
- Nass, Saga
-
- Then suddenly in 1988, the army wanted enough vaccine
to inoculate all military personnel. The only licensed manufacturer of
anthrax vaccine was still that state-owned facility in Lansing Michigan.
The company promised it could produce enough vaccine in 5 years in cover
all US military.
-
- SELLING ANTHRAX TO IRAQ
-
- Iraq began its buildup of anthrax in the 1980s. They
bought their starter germs from a company in Manassas, Virginia called
American Type Culture Collection, continuing to do so as late as 1988.
(Gulflink.org, 28 June 88; Germs, p 88) This company had obtained the
anthrax samples as a result of original research done just up the road
at Fort Detrick in the 1950s. American Type Culture (phone number 703
365-2700) specialized in variants of the original diseases - stronger versions.
-
- Now why would we sell a lethal biological agent to Iraq,
you might wonder. Because up till the late 1980s we considered Iraq an
"ally" more or less - a buffer power between us and Iran. In
CIA-speak, Iraq was an 'asset.' And their money was as green as anyone
else's.
-
- Surrealistically, it wasn't until 1989 that the US decided
to stop biological weapons to foreign countries, including Iraq. (Miller
p 89)
-
- But they could still sell to any red-blooded American.
In 1995 an Ohio civilian bought 3 vials of plague bacteria for $300 from
this same company. (Danzig - JAMA) Get the picture? Economics rules,
as always.
-
- Getting back to Iraq here, in 1991 during the Gulf War,
the CIA and the army began to freak out because they thought that Iraq
had at least 3 biological agents ready to go as weapons. (Sanctity, p
125) And where did Iraq get these bugs from? From us, of course. Yes,
Iraq had the agents, but turning biological pathogens into weapons is something
very sophisticated -- something only an advanced nation like the US could
figure out. At that time, there was no evidence that Iraq had learned
how to turn these agents it had purchased from us into mass weapons. (Germs,
p105)
-
- Nevertheless, DoD (Dept of Defense) paranoia fueled the
panic to force vaccines on soldiers, even though Iraqis never used germ
weapons. A lot of anxiety was created and the issue of vaccines became
a political issue between the generals and the FDA. There was an absurd
amount of disagreement between the top brass: Schwarzkopf, Griffith, Cheney,
Powell, etc. After the usual blustering, politicking, and measuring of
external genitalia, the FDA finally gave DoD the OK to use the unproven,
untested vaccine for anthrax, even though it was still in the experimental
stage after 30 years, and even though it was known to be useless against
the type of anthrax agents the Iraqis supposedly had. (Rockefeller) Moreover,
the vaccine was never licensed for aerosol exposure, which is the way that
bioweapons are deployed. (p190 Miller)
-
- Result of this collective idiocy with no one driving
the bus: 80,000 cases of Gulf War Syndrome. (Rockefeller)
-
- This is the exact type of reasoning and the exact same
people that are bringing anthrax vaccine back today.
-
- After the vaccine was approved, the original dosage recommendation
was 6 shots over 18 months, which remains today. Why? Nobody knows. It
was complete guesswork. ( p 190, Miller)
-
- THE SCIENCE OF ANTHRAX VACCINE
-
- One expert on anthrax vaccine is certainly Meryl Nass,
MD. Dr. Nass is an internationally acknowledged authority on biological
warfare, and for the past 15 years has been extensively quoted and published
in the top medical journals all over the world. From her very thoroughly
documented website http://www.anthraxvaccine.org/ we find out the scientific
and economic aspects of anthrax that we're not seeing in the daily Matrix
media. Anyone who expects salvation from anthrax vaccine is directed to
that site for a reality check. A few of the highlights from Dr. Nass:
-
- Before the Gulf War, the FDA permitted manufacturers
to keep rotating old vaccine stocks from 1970. This includes anthrax vaccine.
-
- Anthrax vaccine is an "investigational" vaccine.
By FDA regulations, doses of investigational vaccines never expire!
-
- The lots of vaccine produced by the Michigan facility
are inconsistently powerful - some lots may be as much as 40x stronger
than other lots!
-
- The FDA did not require efficacy in humans in order to
license anthrax vaccine.
-
- The Department of Defense has spent $150 million studying
Gulf War Syndrome. None of those studies even looked at the possibility
of a connection between anthrax vaccine and Gulf War Syndrome even though
that was one of the 3 vaccines given to Gulf War personnel.
-
- The DoD said that it was impossible to do a study like
that because "all records have been lost."
-
- Dr Philip Pittman of Fort Detrick found that 44% of personnel
who received anthrax and botulism vaccines had systemic reactions.
-
- Kathlerine Zoon, the Director of the FDA's CBER, and
the one who has final say in approving military anthrax vaccine recently
stated:
-
- "After these vaccines are licensed and administered,
the safety and adverse reactions should be assessed."
-
- Appalled by this cavalier, irresponsible attitude of
an FDA director, Dr. Nass states:
-
- "Ignoring Federal law, Dr. Zoon is suggesting that
biowarfare vaccines be licensed and used on humans and only afterwards
should their safety profile be ascertained. Should the military be given
carte blanche to field biowarfare vaccines and then determine whether they
cause adverse reactions...?
-
- "Dr. Katherine Zoon, Director of the Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research at FDA, who is in charge of assuring
that federal laws are followed and that public health is protected with
respect to vaccines, has forgotten where her primary responsibilities lie.
For advocating that vaccines be administered before their safety and adverse
reactions are known she should immediately lose her job. " - The
Anthrax Vaccine Saga
|