- From Bill
11-8-1
-
- Jeff,
-
- I wrote the editor at the Boston Globe about this story
(couldn't find Globe correspondent Bender's email) and this was his reply:
-
- "this is either a misprint, or a misquote: The last
sentence of that story published on newsprint reads: 'Since Sept. 11 the
Pentagon has undertaken several other measures to enhance domestic security,
including certifying National Guard weapons of mass destruction civil support
teams.'"
-
-
- Dear Mr. Rense,
-
- From reading your columns, I think you maybe a good person
to contact about an item that I have run across and have not been able
to get an anwer to.
-
- I read an article on the Internet entitled 'Pentagon
ee shuffles command'.
-
- This article is on the Boston Globe website at the url...
http://boston.com/dailyglobe2/300/nation/Pentagon_shuffles_command+.shtml
-
- I understood what it was talking about for the most part
but the very last sentence said...
-
- "Since Sept. 11 the Pentagon has undertaken several
other measures to enhance domestic security, including certifying National
Guard weapons of mass destruction."
-
- My question is what in the world does that mean: "...certifying
National Guard weapons of mass destruction."?
-
- I know the National Guard is the part of the military
responsible for defending American soil. And I know that weapons of mass
destruction means Nuclear, Chemical and Biological weapons. Now why would
our National Guard have Nuclear, Chemical or Biological weapons?
-
- I have contacted my congressman, the National Guard (through
their website) and the Boston Globe to get some understanding about is
being referred to in this article - but have not heard back from anyone.
I want to know what is going on here. Any light you can shine on this would
help. I think someone with some connections needs to check this out.
-
-
-
- Comment
-
- From Gary Schooley
11-6-1
-
- Jeff - OK, I think I have some answers (clues) to why
the National Guard would have such weapons. See the below article and the
attached article. Sorry if they don't wrap right, but it is worth your
time to read them.
-
- Furthermore (in addition to the enclosed and attached),
the NWO has a new set of what appears to be "ten commandments".
It is carved in stone somewhere. I can't find the text of it but I do have
the picture of it.
-
- Here is what it says:
-
- *Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance
with nature.
-
- *Guide reproduction wisely improving fitness and diversity.
-
- *Unite humanity with a living new language.
-
- *Rule passion - faith - tradition and all things with
tempered reason.
-
- *Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
-
- *Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes
in a World court.
-
- *Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
-
- *Balance personal rights with social duties.
-
- *Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the
infinite.
-
- *Be not a cancer on the Earth - leave room for nature
- ......... (the photo is cut off; the "-" gives indication that
there is more to that last verse).
-
- Note the first one, and ask yourself "HOW?".
I will try to find more on these "commandments", and/or the place
where I found the actual photo ("importD13.jpg").
-
- Gary Schooley
-
- Attached Article -
-
-
- Population Reduction And The New World Order - Eliminate
The Useless Eaters
-
- By Paula Demers
-
- "The individual is handicapped by coming face to
face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists".
-- J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI
-
- Every time I turn around I will hear over the news, or
read in the paper of the tremendous over population of our planet. This
is very interesting, because, from what I understand, if you took the entire
population of the world, stood them side by side in the state of Texas,
each person would have 1000 square feet. We are also told through various
media sources, that we are using up the earths precious resources.
-
- Yet we have the technology to find a license plate on
a car by use of a satellite. We have the technology for our government
to listen to every phone call going on in the United States by use of a
computer. This computer has about 400 key words, that if it picks up on
any of these words, will record the phone call. We have the technology
to put a computer chip contain all information on a person in the back
of their hand the size of a grain of rice . We have the technology to put
all information on a person on a strip in the back of their license, that
can be run though a little machine and call up all info on that person.
Is the media trying to tell us that we don't have the ability to use the
earths precious resources wisely to feed and cloth everyone on the planet?
I mean, our government pays farmers not to grow food. Food in third world
countries is stored in buildings and left to rot. What is going on here?
-
- What would be the purpose of stressing a fact that isn't
even true? For those of you folks who have read the Iron Mountain Report,
you will notice that they stress that the population would have to be at
a controllable level. They give many examples on how the population could
be brought down to a level that would be controllable. The simple fact
is that there are simply too many people on the earth to be controlled
at this point.
-
- The following information is taken from the report written
by Dr. J Coleman, (copyright 1992: 2533 North Carson Street, Carson City,
NV 89706) "Global 2000: A Blueprint For Global Genocide". I will
be using quotes out of the report that should get every reader thinking.
-
- In the first paragraph of the report Dr. Coleman wrote,
he stated, "In 1979 I received a copy of a massive document commissioned
by the Club of Rome and written by Cyrus Vance, three days after President
James Earl Carter accepted it as official U.S. Policy....Global 2000 was
unknown outside the Committee of 300 and carefully chosen officials inside
U.S. Government circles...." Keep in mind that many of the ideas for
"Goals 2000" came from 19th century thinkers and writers such
as Jeremy Bentham, William Petty-the Earl of Shelburne, H.G. Wells and
Lord Bertrand Russell. (page one, paragraph three)
-
- In his book The Impact of Science on Society Russell
expounded his views on how the world's population ought to be controlled,
so as not to become a threat to the privileged rulers...." (page three,
paragraph five)
-
- "We are also witnessing the Great Plagues of 1987-2000
in the form of AIDS, herpes, cholera, smallpox, tuberculosis....Aids, as
we know, is an artificially induced virus which in effect is a cancer of
the blood.The first experiments were conducted in Africa on the border
of Sierra Leone and Nigeria..." (page four and five paragraph's five
and one)
-
- "...namely that the world is populated with too
many redundant people who must not be allowed to procreate and consume
scarce natural resources..." (page five paragraph five)
-
- "..jobless people be confined in concentration camps,
run by a joint stock company for profit....Once committed to concentration
camps, inmates would never leave there alive." (Page six, paragraph
two)
-
- "Bentham, Shelburne, Wells and Russell hated the
idea of education for the masses....systems in operation that would allow
people to have a vocabulary of no more than 500 words....might help to
explain why Alexander King of the Club of Rome was commissioned to destroy
education in America.....A destructed education system qualifying millions
who can barely read and write....will ensure a society in which the majority
can and will be easily manipulated by men like President Bush, Cyrus Vance,
Lord Carrington and James Baker III." (page six, paragraph five)
-
- "The First and Second World Wars were wars designed
to kill millions....were not successful enough hence the new methods outlined
in the Global 2000 Report." (page seven, paragraph two)
-
- "the mechanism of agriculture and the industrialization
of the world was a terrible mistake....it has led to, and presently supports,
a mass of people who perform no indispensable service....consuming the
limited resources and destroying the environment of the globe....which
they...the Committee of 300 representing the "preordained leaders"
of the world, say is theirs.....the remedy...lies in destroying an economy
based upon agricultural and industrial expansion, because these support
larger and larger populations of unwanted "useless eaters"."
(page seven, paragraph seven)
-
- "The "surplus population" thus created
is targeted for death as "useless eaters" in terms so clearly
expressed in the Global 2000 Report." (page eight, paragraph four)
-
- "By the year 2000 the world SHALL have rid itself
of at least 100 million "useless eaters" and by the year 2050,
the number culled SHALL amount to not less then 400 million." (Page
nine, paragraph four)
-
- "By the year 2000...cases of AIDS in America will
have reached 10 million, with millions more dying of AIDS-related diseases
like tuberculosis, meningitis, cholera and more than likely, from bubonic
plague. These events were planned and they are ongoing." (Page nine
paragraph five)
-
- The quotes I have given from Dr. Coleman's report sound
pretty unbelievable. Or do they? Let's take a look at what is happening
in our country. In the report, Dr. Coleman mentioned abortion and the gay
life style. Abortion has killed about 36 million babies. Many in America
have been conditioned to believe this is not murder, but it has reduce
America's population by 36 million. The gay life style was encouraged,
because with same sex partners, there is no procreation.
-
- The education system in America as "dumb downed"
our children so much that people are going to and graduating from college
who can't read. Outcomebased Education does not teach the basics of reading,
writing and arithmetic. It is training our children to become "global
citizens".
-
- The environmental movement is bringing man down to a
level lower than the animals. In public schools, children are being taught
to worship "Mother Earth". People can no longer do with their
property what they want, but are accountable to the government if they
want to add a room to their house, put a side walk up, cut a tree down.
-
- Our weather is being controlled. Droughts, earthquakes,
floods, hurricanes are rampant. People are starving to death because of
droughts in their countries and the food being shipped to them is being
left to rot in storage houses.
-
- Aids is rampant. The behaviors that cause the spread
of Aids is being encouraged by our government.
-
- Civilian labor camps are being put up on military installations.
Saw an interesting article in the Daily News, January 8, 1995. It was called
"Doing Time On The Outside". It talks about using prisoners to
do work, like construction or road work, while they are in prison to save
the taxpayers money. A sign on outside the Department of Corrections said,
"Inmate Work Crews, Reducing Costs to Taxpayers". As I was reading
the article, the thought kept going through my mind, "Is this how
they are going to get people use to seeing prisoner slave labor?"
-
- Global 2000 doesn't seem to have a list of people who
they want to get. It seems that they consider most of the population "useless
eaters". I do imagine they will go after people fighting this first.
There was no evidence that folks who keep quite and don't try to get the
word out would be safe. No one will be safe. The Committee of 300 believe
that the world is theirs to do with as they want. The rest of us are excess
baggage.
-
- This report reminds me of a scripture verse. Matthew
24:21-22, "For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since
the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be and except
those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for
the elect's sake those days shall be shortened."
-
- Go to "INITIATIVE FOR ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER".
This will curl your teeth!
-
-
-
- Comment
-
- From Greg Spencer
11-6-1
-
- Dear Jeff,
-
- After reading the Boston Globe's article, I tend to think
that a misprint is the likely cause of the ominous sounding final paragraph.
My right brain reads it and wants to see the following:
-
- " . . . certifying National Guard training in response
to weapons of mass destruction."
-
- I'd certainly sleep better knowing this is what it meant.
The thought of these poorly-trained weekend warriors toting loaded Beretta's
is bad enough, let alone the thought of having them run around with WMDs.
-
-
-
-
- Comment
-
- From Paul Pearce
11-6-1
-
- Dear Jeff,
-
- Until the early 1990's (before undergoing the first of
what will be 4 back operations) I was a Corporal in the USAR. My primary
MOS was 13B (Field Artillery). In my reserve capacity I was assigned to
a Special Weapons unit. Special Weapons is a polite name for nukes. My
unit was composed of self-propelled howitzers with a 203 gun. We trained
at the old Fort Sheridan base in a huge vault putting together and taking
apart practice nuke rounds. Should the deployment ever come and our troops
to be placed into harms way, we trained to set up and fire our nuclear
artillery rounds with deadly precision. We would joke that by the time
one of us pulled the lanyard the rest of us would already be in the truck
doing a 180 as fast as possible. And while the range of our weapons are
classified, a max trajectory round would destroy our own Howitzer and that's
the one we always hoped for. I would not like to find out in the field
that they had more than one nuke for us.
-
- And given that we were reservists, the Guard always had
a like contingent with more modern weapons. So it's no surprise to me to
hear that the National Guard has nuke capability. And the aspect of certification
includes the units showing that they have the requisite training to store,
transport, set-up, arm and employ a weapon according to mil specs. That
is not an easy task and takes some intelligent and dedicated folks. No
one gets paid extra for being in Special Weapons although we always seemed
to eat better and everyone left us alone. And no, neither I nor any of
my kids glow in the dark.
-
- Sincerely,
-
- Paul
-
- Corporal - United States Army Reserve (Retired; I did
my time and got the hell out)
-
- PS -
-
- If we were to fire at our maximum range, it would require
a full charge of powder that would render the tube (Gun) useless. I don't
believe that the tube would blow out but it is possible. And, based on
firing at our max range using the most number of rings in our nukes (we
used rings made of ###### in order to set a charge on the round. If we
added all the rings to the round then we would have the most violent of
explosions. If they wanted a less damaging burst, we could add fewer rings
which would yield a smaller nuke.) We were afraid that we could not put
enough distance between us and the impact site. Once we pulled the lanyard
to fire the round we would jump in the trucks and drive 180 deg. from the
impact site. We would have less than two minutes to add real estate between
us and ground zero. We never really trusted the manuals and what a safe
distance or cover was. We didn't trust our suits (NBC or MOPP Suits). The
worst fear was being given more than one round and having to stick around
and fire a second time. We all said that one would be enough and then it's
time to retire. We had a conscience and none of us really knew how we would
react to setting off a nuclear round under orders. However, I have no doubt
in my mind that at that time I would have obeyed the orders of my superiors
and done my duty. They did interview us on this point and I lost my best
girl because she couldn't understand why I would volunteer for such a unit.
Better me than some unstable sort I always thought because even back then
I toed the line and wouldn't do or carry out an illegal order. I am thankful
that I never was tested in this regard. ___
|
