- In case you haven't noticed, the mainstream media got
their marching orders from their government handlers early on November
12. The fire from the crash of AA flight 587 was barely extinguished before
they started touting the official government position that this was
probably
just an accident - not an act of terrorism. By the time the 10pm news came
on that verdict was all but official.
-
- It always gives me such a feeling of confidence in my
government when they assure me of what has happened without having to
conduct
one of those pesky "investigations". Don't you agree? After all,
we all saw what happened on 9-11, the first time we ever had an Islamic
terrorist attack on American soil that the government couldn't cover up.
The economy went into recession, the unemployment rate took its biggest
jump in 21 years, and consumer confidence went straight into the toilet.
We don't want any more of that now do we? Of course not!
-
- After all, if you allowed an investigation to prove that
our own government is allowing Islamic terrorists to work as mechanics
or in other service capacities at major airlines, thereby putting them
in exactly the right position to sabotage our planes, how long do you think
it would take for the flying public to ground every plane in this country
by simply refusing to fly?
-
- You'll notice I didn't call 9-11 the "first Islamic
terrorist attack on American soil". Just the first one that the
government
couldn't cover up. I'm sure you all remember the first one - the now
infamous
TWA 800, back on July 17, 1996. Remember how that one turned out? Even
after dozens of witnesses came forward to testify that they saw a missile
rise from the surface of the Atlantic and intercept flight 800 in mid air
government investigators were still able to fabricate a conclusion
completely
at odds with the evidence. But to do that, they had to get Boeing to take
the fall.
-
- I can just see the CEO of Boeing sitting in his office
when Bill Clinton's task force of federal "investigators" came
to see him. "We all know" they explained, "what would happen
if we let the public know that one of our planes was shot down by a
terrorist.
Clinton would lose re-election, the economy would be ruined, airline
traffic
would drop, new plane orders would dry up, and Boeing would lose billions
in new sales. Obviously, its in everyone's best interest that we come up
with an alternate explanation. Don't you agree, Mr. CEO?"
-
- Put yourself in Boeing's place. Would you have acted
any differently? Of course, not. So, you play ball, and you concoct some
cockamamie story about a rare design defect that blew up the plane.
-
- Meanwhile, Osama is sitting over in Afghanistan
scratching
his head, trying to figure out why the Americans are trying so hard to
keep from admitting what they surely must know is the truth about what
his boys just did. Are they such cowards that they would lie to their own
people just to avoid a fight with a rag-tag group of camel jockeys? Or
is there something more to this?
-
- Then one of Osama's Harvard educated lieutenants points
out what's obvious to everyone but Osama - the fragility of the US economy
- and the light bulbs start go on. What the terrorists need is to attack
the US economy, and to do that they need to launch an attack that cannot
be covered up by the US government. And so the 9-11 plot is born.
-
- So, now our government, in an effort to protect our
precious
economy, assures us that the crash of AA 587 was just a "catastrophic
mechanical failure", a once in a lifetime fluke that caused the plane
to come apart in mid-air. But is "protecting the economy" their
only motivation? Or, are there other, more sinister, motives at work here?
Maybe we should take a closer look.
-
- But before we can grasp the truth about what's going
on, there's one basic fact we need to understand about the US government.
It is not monolithic. It does not speak with one voice. It's actions do
not reflect a unified intention. It is riddled with factions - but those
factions coalesce into two primary camps that make up the power elites.
For ease of discussion, we can call them the conservatives and the
liberals.
They may differ about the means but their goals are essentially the same,
and after years of competition they have learned to govern together, by
way of a corrupt power sharing arrangement, much as Mafia families
do.
-
- Relative to the event we now call "AA 587"
the conservatives seem to be primarily concerned with sustaining the
economy,
while the liberals are most concerned about protecting the terrorists in
our midst. Different motives to be sure, but both are served just as well
by the same cover-up. Now, I know what all you bleeding heart, altruistic
types out there are saying: How could it be possible that even the most
leftist elements in our government could possibly want to protect
terrorists
in our midst?
-
- Then ask yourself this. Why did Ted Kennedy sponsor an
immigration bill some years ago that made it illegal to prevent the
immigration
of individuals to this country simply because they had been a member of
a terrorist group in their homeland? As you know liberals love to tell
us that: "One man's terrorist, is just another man's freedom
fighter".
Right?
-
- Or, why has congress done virtually nothing to stop the
issuing of countless new visas to people from Islamic countries? Why do
the US and Canada allow anyone from an Islamic country automatic free entry
by simply asking for political asylum? Remember the Millennium Bomber from
Algeria? That's how he got in. And even his felony convictions for crimes
he committed after he got into Canada provided no grounds for expulsion
or even denial of permanent residency under Canadian law. Are the people
running our governments really that stupid, or do these policies serve
some grand design?
-
- Why have the liberal police chiefs of California decided
to accept as valid an ID issued by Mexican Consulates to illegals after
they arrive in the US? Maybe they just want to spare themselves all that
tedious paperwork that goes with deportation proceedings? You think? Of
course. one thing we won't have to worry about is those Mexican consuls
issuing phony IDs to people who only look Mexican. After all, there's no
graft and corruption in the Mexican system of government anymore, is there?
Right, it all disappeared the day Vicente Fox got elected president.
-
- Ever notice that it's always the liberals who are the
first to scream whenever a serial killer's civil rights have been violated,
or the first to complain about law abiding citizens exercising their Second
Amendment right to own a gun for their own protection? Who's side do you
really think these folks are on, anyway?
-
- One thing I learned a long time ago: when actions form
a pattern they reveal a purpose. So, what purpose do you suppose could
possibly be served by disarming the American public, or turning violent
criminals back out on to our streets, or allowing terrorists free reign
inside our borders?
-
- It's really very simple. If you want to create a police
state capable of exercising total control of an entire population, you
first have to setup a pretext - a threat so horrendous that even a
population
accustomed to "democracy" will be willing to surrender its
liberties
in the interest of security.
-
- Ben Franklin warned us about this when he wrote:
"Any
people willing to surrender basic liberty for security, deserve
neither."
But who's even going to get to read those words nowadays? While you
and I were busy living our pathetic lives, the liberals were busy taking
over our schools and universities and re-writing all of our school text
books, with hardly a mention of any of the founding fathers or the values
they stood for. The NRA is so upset about this that they have created a
new web site dedicated to John Madison as an alternate source of
information
about America's heritage and principles.
-
- So, if the liberals have a future of slavery in mind
for us, where do the so-called conservatives fit into this picture, and
how do you tell them apart? Well that's pretty tough, because politicians
change labels like you and I change underwear. Remember Mr. Bloomberg,
the new billionaire Mayor-elect of NYC? He just got elected as a
Republican.
Isn't that just great? Up until a year ago he described himself as a card
carrying "liberal Democrat". And if you ask him his views on
abortion or gun control you'll realize he still is one. No wonder he had
no difficulty getting elected in a city where registered democrats out
number republicans 5 to 1.
-
- Like I suggested before, the power elite, liberals and
conservatives alike, share a common goal. They call it "The New World
Order". Only their styles, as reflected in the means they choose
to employ, or the roles they choose to play, are different. Remember how
the Nazis ruled the Jewish ghettos in Poland during world war II? They
ruled by proxy through the local polish, and even Jewish, police. It
was the Poles and Jews themselves they used to convince the people to get
into those box cars that would take them to their deaths.
-
- So, next time you find yourself wondering where Mr. Bush
and his friends are taking us, remember the Jews, and the "Judas
Goats"
who kept trying to reassure them that everything was going to be
alright..
-
- MainPage
http://www.rense.com
-
-
-
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|