- The global propoganda arm of the New World Order is doing
its job as expected. Osama bin Ladin has already been tried and convicted
as the mastermind of the September 11 attacks. America will now become
embroiled in a religious war that could engulf the entire Middle East.
Who will gain from this war? What are some of the possible results?
- Osama bin-Ladin has now become the greatest Muslim hero. Don't believe
the lies that the Western press is spreading that he is looked upon as
a deviant and as an outcast by most Muslims. He embodies the fullest ideals
of the concept of Jihad. It does not matter if he is responsible for the
attacks or if he is not. He now stands in battle against what Muslims refer
to as The Great Satan, and 90% of Muslims can do nothing but admire him.
- The House of Saud is now in a Catch-22 situation. Do they support the
American war and risk their kingdom being toppled, or do they try to keep
their distance and acknowledge how illegitimate and shaky their government
is? A very possible result of this war could be the fall of the House of
Saud. They have been corrupted by American luxuries and true Muslims see
the royal family as traitors to Islam. Standard Oil of California (now
Chevron) bought the rights to prospect for oil in Arabia from the House
of Saud for a mere $250,000 in 1933. America has viewed Saudi oil as our
oil since that time, and we have always counted on our Saudi lackeys to
always push for lower prices and higher production during every OPEC meeting.
The House of Saud is an American asset and real Muslims view it as a terrible
shame that their holiest land is controlled and supported by, and even
occupied with troops from, a "Christian" nation.
- The physical British Empire declined in the years after World War II,
but the global elites, since the time of Cecil Rhodes, have understood
this inevitable decline and have turned their attention to creating a brand
new global empire. The Federal Reserve, the Council On Foreign Relations,
the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the Trilateral Commission,
the World Trade Organization etc, etc, are all a continuing part of this
march towards a global government.
- Islamic Fundamentalism was supported by the British and American governments
during the Cold War. Bin Ladin was a CIA and British asset. He personally
fought against the Russians in Afghanistan and he was almost killed several
times by Russian shelling. After the Cold War America slowly backed off
of its support for Muslim fundamentalists, but certain members of the British
elite have continued to support, and perhaps even direct it.
- Bin Ladin's direct financial assets and strategic capabilities have been
hugely exaggerated. The entity known as Al-Qaeda is simply the guestbook
for Muslims who entered Peshawar to join the jihad against Russia in Afghanistan.
There is no such thing as a global terrorist organization known as Al-Qaeda!
Bin-Laden is probably not directly, or even secondarily, responsible, but
of course the media is able to trot out "links" that "prove"
Bin-Ladin was involved. These "links" may be real, but Afghanistan
was a haven for many dedicated Muslims who wanted to participate in a jihad,
and many of these rich and powerful fanatics crossed paths in that country
over the past twenty years. These links are far from "proof"
or even "evidence" that Bin-Ladin was responsible for orchestrating
and funding the September 11 attacks.
- The Taliban regime became the focus of the Global Elites anger for doing
at least two things: 1) Destroying the ancient carved stone buddhist statues,
which represented an attack on religious pluralism and tolerance. 2) Prohibiting
the growing of poppies for heroin. This was perhaps one of the few admirable
actions of the Taliban regime, but it deprived the merchant banks of a
very important and massive supply of liquid capital. Drug money is used
to prop up the bankrupt global financial system and the loss of the Afghani
raw material represented a major loss of income. When Afghanistan is liberated
will poppy production continue again under the UN? Of course it will.
- Osama Bin-Ladin is a perfact scapegoat because he is already a well-known
and admitted terrorist, he is connected with the House of Saud, he is associated
with the Taliban and he is capable of starting a jihad among the majority
of Muslims not corrupted and bought by the West.
- A religious war in the Middle East is a goal of the global elites for
several purposes: 1) War is always a quick road to peace. Want a League
of Nations? Start World War I. Want a United Nations? Start World War II.
Want a New World Order? Start a religious war in the Middle East. 2) Jerusalem
must become an international city, controlled by the UN, as a symbol of
tolerance and as a holy place for the three monotheistic faiths. 3) The
Arabs must be kicked off the Temple Mount and a new Jewish Temple must
be built, to be taken over for occult purposes. 4) America's status as
the only super-power must be dissolved. America's strong grip on OPEC,
through the Saudis, must be diminished. Europe has already made agreements
for Russian oil, and so the fall of the House of Saud serves the NWO at
the expense of America.
- Britain pledges to be our friend, and Tony Blair makes heartfelt speeches,
but all of the alleged terrorists entered the United States via London,
Saudi Arabian dissidents are given shelter in Britain, and the British-dominated
New World Order can only gain from what will soon happen. In the meantime,
the British press continues to be the most aggresive antagonists of Israeli
self-preservation, and British elites have proven ties to Muslim terrorism.
By the way, is there a CNN reporter that does not have a British accent?
I thought CNN was an American network.
These are merely the thoughts I have gathered after pondering this subject.
Below are some links to articles that offer important data that has been
ignored or glossed over by the major media:
Dr. Saad Al-Fagih: A dissident Saudi now living in London. He lived in
Afghanistan, understands Saudi politics, and is quite frank in relating
the Muslim view of Bin-Ladin. Here is an interview, and here is the website
of his organization that seeks freedom and democracy in Saudi Arabia. Read
especially the two main articles on the front page. Have you heard these
views in our media? Don't you think that people like Dr. Al-Fagih should
be heard?
Here is his statement of what Al Qaida really is: "Al Qaeda is just
a record for the people who came to Peshawar and moved from there back
and forth to the guest house. And moved back to their country. And if they
want to follow the number, they must be talking about 20, 30 thousand people.
Which is impossible to trace... That record, that documentation was called
the record of Al Qaeda. So that was Al Qaeda. There's nothing sinister
about Al Qaeda. It's not like an organization--like any other terrorist
organization or any other underground group... Al Qaeda is just a record
for the people who came to Peshawar and moved from there back and forth
to the guest house. And moved back to their country. And if they want to
follow the number, they must be talking about 20, 30 thousand people. Which
is impossible to trace. And I think most of those records are in the hands
of the Saudi government anyway, because people used the Saudi airlines,
[at] a very much reduced fare."
"Al Qaida" simply means "The Base." It was the base
for Arabs who would sign up before entering Afghanistan. Please read Dr.
Al Fagih's interview above. It was the base where Arabs would sign up so
they could be tracked down if something happened to them in Afghanistan.
There are twenty to thirty thousand names on the "roster" of
Al Qaida, many of then are probably very prominant names of Saudi Arabians,
and very few would even think of associating themselves with a terrorist
organization. The Bush administration was frantic in their search for a
label for Bin Ladin's group and the best they could do was "The Base."
Pathetic. Here are some names for some very real terrorist organizations,
and what they mean in English:
Al-Gama`a al-Islamiyyah: The Islamic Group
Hamas: An acronym for "Harakat -Al-Islamia" or "Islamic
Resistance Movement." Hamas also means courage and bravery in Arabic.
Islamic Jihad: Muslim holy war
Hizballah: The party of God
And we are told that the most insidious, most well-funded and most fanatical
of them all is "The Base."
In a Wall Street Journal article entitled "<http://www.geocities.com/freedomofpress/wsj2.htmlSaudi
Arabian Royal Family Finds Itself Caught in the Middle of Two Alliances,"
Dr. Al Fagih is quoted as saying, "If the regime goes ahead and helps
the Americans, it will abandon the last stroke linking it to Islam. People
believe once there is Saudi help [to the U.S.], and the attack starts,
it is totally justified to hit the regime itself."
The real action that could take place in the coming months might not be
in the mountains of Afghanistan, but in countries like Saudi Arabia, Jordan
and Egypt, where the disenfranchised populations could very well revolt
against their leaders who have been submitting to Western domination for
decades. Democracy in the Middle East would be a disaster for the West,
despite the fantasy that is disseminated by the mass media that America
is the great defender of freedom. We have been propping up dictators in
the Middle East since the 1930s and we fear what might happen were the
Muslim masses able to exercise freedom and democracy. Perhaps this has
been a strategy in the best interest of the West, and of the American people,
but we should acknowledge what we are doing and dispense with the self-righteous
hypocritical lies.
Website: Americans Against the Sauduction of Washington
Said K. Aburish: A Palestinian author and journalist also living in London.
Here is an interview. His many books document the West's manipulation of
the Middle East, and they offer a perspective that must be heard if the
present situation is to be properly understood. And Americans stupidly
wonder in horror and amazement, "How can they hate us so much?! What
have we done to deserve this?!" Well, put down the clicker and read
a book! Our foreign policy has been hijacked since Woodrow Wilson and we
have been steadily aiming for our present destination for quite a long
time. This should not be a surprise.
Executive Intelligence Review: An organization led by the sometimes brilliant,
sometimes ignorant, and sometimes comical, Lyndon LaRouche. One article
on Osama Bin-London's globalist British backers, and another article on
the globalist British control of international terror.
On January 11, 2000, EIR submitted a memorandum to Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright requesting an official investigation into Great Britain's support
of terrorism. This document puts forth the clear evidence that Great Britain
has been a safe haven for known terrorists for many years. To this day
groups like the Islamic Group (Egypt), Al-Jihad (Egypt), Hamas (Israel,
Palestinian Authority), Armed Islamic Group (Algeria, France), Kurdish
Workers Party (Turkey), and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (Sri Lanka)
all continue to maintain official headquarters within Britain, and Britain
has often bent over backwards diplomatically to protect known terrorists
from the justice that was sought by countries such as Egypt, India and
Yemen. According to EIR, the United States has every right, indeed the
moral obligation to its citizens, to place Great Britain on the list of
nations who we officially sanction as sponsors of terrorism. According
to EIR:
ALL ROADS LEAD TO LONDON
- London's Bridge is Falling Down, a webpage that uncovers
London's links with Islamic Jihad, Hamas and other terrorist organizations,
while exploring reasons for the TWA flight 800 disaster.
-
- Consider the article from a CBS news website entitled
"Report: L.A. Target For Terror." Ahmed Ressam was a terrorist
arrested in December of 1999 for plotting to bomb the LAX airport. Ressam
admitted during his trial that he has close ties with a London resident,
who is known to have close ties to Osama Bin Ladin.
-
- A BBC article, "Algerian suspect 'trained hijackers'"
records the arrest of an Algerian suspect named Lotfi Raissi. This man
was a pilot and was allegedly involved in training at least four of the
terrorists who struck on September 11. Raissi was re-arrested on an international
warrant, along with three other suspects in the UK. Raissi was living in
London near Heathrow International Airport at the time of his arrest.
A Guardian Observer article, "London-based terror chief plotted mayhem
in Europe" speaks of how Djamel Beghal, the leader of a terror group
that even Bin-Ladin admired, was based in London until September of last
year. The article says, "US investigators now believe that the attacks
on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon were planned in Germany using
up to 30 people, with individuals who lived or once lived in Britain playing
a crucial role."
The Guardian Observer also published an article on its website that documented
links between two London-based banks and a Sudanese bank, that were involved
in funding Bin-Ladin, but this article has disappeared.
Another article also documents Bin-Ladin's money supply, allegedly funneled
through the Capital Trust Bank that is based in New York and London, a
bank owned by Mohammad Hussein Al-Amoudi, whose lawyer is Vernon Jordan.
Esquire magazine published an exposé of Bin-Ladin in 1999, and they
have re-posted it on their website. On the first page of this article it
documents how Bin-Ladin was approached by the journalists interested in
getting the interview,
"That was the very reason I wanted to interview him, and the reason
getting such an interview would not be a simple process. His public-relations
apparatus is a sophisticated and complex network of agents and intermediaries.
The first discussions took place in the old, ornate Jefferson Hotel in
Washington. A couple of ABC News producers, Chris Isham and Len Tepper,
brought me to meet with a trusted contact who had good connections among
Islamic fundamentalists. Soon he sent word back: We would have to travel
to London and meet with some of bin Laden's people. Bin Laden, it seems,
has people all over. Two meetings, both in Tudor-style homes a half hour's
drive from central London. We removed our shoes, drank cider and water,
and made our intentions toward bin Laden known. We told his people we would
raise the issues that concerned him, and "tell his side" and
enough about his background so people would get a broader understanding
of him."
A CNN article mentions a London associate of Bin-Ladin, who purchased and
shipped to him a state of the art satellite telephone. His associate, Khaled
al-Fawwaz, who was the recipient of the majority of calls from Bin-Ladin
in Aghanistan, is now in custody in England.
The Christian Science Monitor published an article, available here, on
the intrigues surrounding England's Finsbury Park Mosque. Abu Hamza is
the senior cleric of this north London mosque, and it held an "Islamic
camp" during Christmas to train young British Muslims in "military
training for brothers, self-development skills, martial arts, map reading,
etc." Soon after, the Yemeni government arrested five Muslim youths
who were in Yemen on British passports, on suspicion of plotting to commit
terrorism. One of these youths was a step-son of Abu Hamza. Here is an
article on Abu Hamza, his mosque and his group, and here is another article
by the ADL. The latter article mentions that, "In addition to his
sermons, Abu Hamza is believed to run weekend military training camps for
Islamic youth in Britain that are staffed by former British army officers."
Apparently, in a rather startling sequence of events, the President of
Yemen asked the government of Britain to hand over Abu Hamza so that he
could be tried as a terrorist in Yemen, but Britain refused. So who's fighting
terrorism here!? Another article documents Abu Hamza's long-overdue arrest
by Britain's crack "anti-terror squad" (no doubt!), but he was
detained only for a few days and later released.
Osama Bin Ladin is a tool of the global elites who is being used to establish
the New World Order. These global elites, also known affectionately as
the Illuminati, are the rulers of the shadow governments of the United
States and Britain. They are a collection of close-knit royal families,
banking families and political dynasties, with a major base of power being
the city of London financial district, from where the major commodities
of oil, gold, diamonds, weapons and drugs are controlled and dispensed
throughout the world.
These global elites have a vast intelligence network that operates through,
over and above the American CIA, the British MI6 and the Israeli Mossad.
They have been the major supporters of violent Islamic Fundamentalism from
the very beginning, and they continue to manipulate these violent religious
fanatics for their own ends.
The events of September 11 were engineered by these global elites, and
to cover their rear ends they have betrayed their expendable asset, Osama
Bin Ladin. They know everything about him, and all of the connections that
he has all over the world, and they are very easily able to frame him for
the terrible crimes they have orchestrated. Consider now the way in which
our British "friends" are helping us to solve this crime:
(Does Britain have a history of betraying expendable agents? Here is one
man's recent story.)
On Thursday, October 4, Tony Blair, in an address to Members of the British
Parliament stated, "We have absolutely no doubt that Bin Laden and
his network were responsible for the attacks." The British PM said
that the evidence that had been collected was "overwhelming,"
but that a great deal of it could not be released because it might compromise
the security of the agents who had gathered it ( Yeah, it wouldn't be prudent).
The major media trotted right out with this shameless drivel through the
BBC, The Washington Post and CNN, among others.
On October 5, Time.com published a short report on Mohammed Atta, the alleged
ringleader of the hijackers. Here is an excerpt,
"Britain on Thursday released a document setting out the basis for
a case against Al Qaida for the September 11 attack, which indicates, among
other things, that some of the hijackers had met with Al Qaida officials,
and that Bin Laden had warned in the days before the attack that he was
about to launch a major attack on America. The British document, based
on telephone intercepts and information gleaned from interrogations in
Europe since the attacks in New York and Washington, also reveals that
orders were sent to a number of the network's key operatives to return
to Afghanistan by September 10.
"Al Qaida's often diffuse structures are designed specifically to
avoid leaving behind trails of command responsibility detectable to investigators
probing specific attacks. Proving that Atta and others had spent time at
Al Qaida camps in Afghanistan and had met with al-Zawahiri would therefore
constitute a major breakthrough in the investigation."
So on the one hand we are told that Al Qaida is a shadowy paranoid group
dedicated to preserving its anonymity, but on the other hand we now have
a "major breakthrough" by being able to link Atta with Al Qaida.
Of course all hard-core proof cannot be offered to the press because it
would compromise the safety of agents.
Here is an article that critically analyzes the 70-point "evidence
document" that has been released by the British government indicting
Bin Ladin and Al Qaida. The writer shows that only nine of these seventy
points relate directly to the events of September 11, and that all of the
evidence is weak and circumstancial. The document itself even begins with
the disclaimer that "This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable
case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law. Intelligence often cannot
be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and
the need to protect the safety of sources. But on the basis of all the
information available Her Majesty's Government is confident of its conclusions
as expressed in this document."
Not enough to convict in a court of law, but enough to render judgment
and go to war?!
And why is the British government taking the lead in investigating an attack
that occurred on American soil? Why do they suddenly appear to have all
the evidence and all the answers, with a tear-jerking, supportive and noble
speech of solidarity and brotherhood from Tony Blair to boot?
<http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2838bin-london.htmlBin Ladin
has always been an agent of British Intelligence. After America retaliated
for the bombing of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania by launching
cruise missiles at Bin Ladin's bases in Afghanistan he reassured Britain,
through the London-based Al Quds Al Arabi daily newpaper, that he was "only
interested in hitting the U.S. and Israel." Afterwards, Bin Ladin's
London-based spokesman, Omar Bakri, re-emphasized to the London-based Arabic
daily Al Sharq Al Awsat, that "we have a covenant of peace with the
British government." Well, for their betrayal the British must realize
that Bin Ladin's covenant of peace with them has expired.
Yes, Bin Ladin was a British/NWO pawn, and his usefulness will be complete
when he is punished for the September 11 atrocities.
And the true masterminds run free...
--
October 8,
In a Newsmax.com article it was shown that a prominant Russian economic
expert predicted that a major disaster would soon strike the United States.
Dr. Tatyana Koryagina, a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic
Researches subordinated to the Russian Ministry of Economic Development,
and reportedly close to President Putins inner circle, stated in a July
12 interview in Pravda:
"The U.S. has been chosen as the object of financial attack because
the financial center of the planet is located there. The effect will be
maximal. The strike waves of economic crisis will spread over the planet
instantly, and will remind us of the blast of a huge nuclear bomb."
Dr. Koryagina was reached after the September 11 disasters and she commented:
"As a result [of the attacks] a significant part of the world financial
network was paralyzed. This strike was aimed at destabilization and destruction
of America and [in domino fashion] all the countries making countless billions
of dollars."
The article continues and states:
"Who is behind these strikes? Koryagina claims the U.S. is painting
a false picture. She said the operation was not the work of 19 terrorists
but a larger group seeking to reshape the world. She claimed a group of
extremely powerful private persons, with total assets of about $300 trillion,
intends to legalize its power and to become the new world government. The
Sept. 11 strikes showed that this group is afraid of nothing -- human lives
have zero value for them."
Two additional questions regarding the September 11 attacks:
1. The media has created an uproar about the supposed huge failure of American
intelligence agencies in preventing the attacks. But who should be the
nation held responsible here? Bin Ladin's Western base of operations was
in Great Britain, and as related above, he had many contacts and operatives
living in the city of London itself. Where was British Intelligence during
the months and years of planning for these attacks? Where the hell was
James Bond? If the attacks were done without British knowledge, then their
failure is inexcusable, because the planning was done in their very living
room. The only other option is that British Intelligence did not fail,
and that MI-6 is another weapon in the elites war for world domination.
2. In the days after the attacks the media was able to incite Americans
even further, and to fan the flames of anti-Muslim hatred by pointing out
the fact that a number of transactions such as puts and short selling was
done in the financial markets, by a number of shadowy investors, with the
goal of benefitting from a major financial markets crash, especially in
airline stocks. Many people were getting rich and benefitting from the
American suffering. However, in the weeks since, this subject seems to
have disappeared from the list of "talking points" that are covered
each evening in the network news. My hunch is that it was not a bunch of
shadowy fugitives from justice that benefitted from the disaster, but rather
the group mentioned by Dr. Koryagina above, the "extremely private
persons," who already have assets over and above $300 trillion. Will
the media ever provide the public with a list of the transactions and the
persons involved in them, who benefitted from the disasters? Well, it should
be obvious that they know better than to do that.
|
