Rense.com



Information Battle Flares
In War On Terrorism
By Randall Mikkelsen
10-11-1

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A new front is quickly emerging in the conflict between the West and Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network -- the battle to define information and propaganda.
 
The United States, stung by widespread publicity given to broadcasts of bin Laden and his spokesman following the launch on Sunday of U.S.-led attacks on Afghanistan, is fighting back with an information assault of its own.
 
But some are concerned the West is behind in that battle. "One thing becoming increasingly clear to me is the need to upgrade our media and public opinion operations in the Arab and Muslim world," British Prime Minister Tony Blair told reporters on Thursday while traveling in the Middle East.
 
President George W. Bush was to take to the airwaves Thursday night, with the first prime-time news conference of his presidency. It is also his first in the formal, attention-getting, setting of the White House East room.
 
Bush has unveiled posters calling bin Laden and 21 others "most wanted terrorists," and the White House is working with Fox television network on a special terrorism episode of of its "America's Most Wanted" television show.
 
In the meantime, the White House has sought -- and won -- cooperation from U.S. television networks in limiting broadcasts of prerecorded statements by bin Laden, an Islamic militant who is based in Afghanistan and accused of masterminding the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.
 
It is also asking newspapers to avoid printing full transcripts of bin Laden's statements, which White House spokesman Ari Fleischer denounced as "propaganda of a most insidious nature" with possible coded incitements to violence.
 
In a videotaped message shown on Sunday after the U.S. military strikes began in Afghanistan, bin Laden said God had blessed a group of vanguard Muslims to "destroy America."
 
The White House is reviewing a request from the al Jazeera Arabic-language satellite television network to interview Bush. The network, which earlier interviewed Blair, is owned by the government of Qatar and has come under U.S. criticism for its exclusive broadcasts of bin Laden statements, which have been picked up by Western media.
 
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell has already complained to the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, and was told that the Qatari government wanted media freedom in preparation for parliamentary life.
 
Al Jazeera's Washington bureau chief, Hafiz al Mirazi, said in an interview with Reuters television that the network was striving for balance in its coverage and he accused the U.S. government of using national security concerns as an excuse to stop broadcasts seen as unfavorable.
 
A "PROPAGANDA WAR"
 
Such incidents are probably only the opening skirmishes in a long information battle, said propaganda expert Randall Bytwerk of Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
 
"We have no choice to wage a propaganda war as well as the military war, and those who oppose us are going to be doing the same," Bytwerk said.
 
"It's proceeding with fits and starts ... but more and more of it will happen, and ultimately I think the propaganda war may be almost as important as military activity," he said.
 
"In a cast of standard war you've got large armies ... in this case you've got a much more scattered enemy. The enemy can be reached by different methods," he said.
 
Democratic Rep. Tom Lantos of California, speaking at a congressional hearing on Wednesday, called for expanding U.S. overseas broadcasting such as Voice of America to Afghanistan and other Arab and Muslim countries.
 
"In many respects, the United States and our allies are losing the battle of the airwaves. We are literally being out-gunned, out-manned and out-maneuvered on the public information battlefield," he said.
 
As it tries to get out its own message, the White House has also clamped down on unauthorized releases of classified information and kept evidence about bin Laden's involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks close to its vest. Bush scolded Congress this week for leaking material from classified briefings.
 
Also, after complaints that the United States was providing insufficient evidence of bin Laden's complicity in the Sept. 11 attacks, Washington left it to Blair to publish a document outlining the case against the Saudi-born militant.
 
"The goal was always to get information out in a way that was useful to the campaign," U.S. national security adviser Condoleezza Rice said of Washington's view on the release.
 
Charlotte Beers, who heads the State Department's "public diplomacy" efforts, told the congressional hearing on Wednesday the United States was seeking to convey four main messages.
 
They are: that the Sept. 11 attacks were an attack on the whole world, that the battle against terrorism was not a war against Islam, that America supports the Afghan people and that nations must "band together" against terrorism.
 
Carrol Doherty, editor at the Pew Research Center for the People and The Press, said the American public is likely to support the government's interest in restraining press coverage of bin Laden. "The public is very willing to place restrictions on the press," he said.
 
But Bob Giles, head of Neiman Fellowship program at Harvard University, said the government should not seek self-censorship. "Information," he said, "is what this country needs."

 
 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros