- Propaganda on biological weapons including anthrax originates
in the dark cellars of government for the purpose of swaying the public
for increased police powers. A terrorist threat is hyped or contrived,
while military research on contagious diseases is concealed.
-
-
- Disinformation in Media
-
- An example of the disinformation is an article in a news
weekly which listed each of the supposed terrorist weapons and the cost
of producing them. For $10-20,000, terrorists could supposedly kill hundreds
of thousands of persons with botulism toxin, anthrax, nerve gas, etc. "60
Minutes" had an expert who said biological weapons could be produced
in someone's back yard in a five gallon bucket. They said anthrax spores
released from a boat on the Hudson River could kill four hundred thousand
persons in New York City.
-
- Anthrax is Trivial
-
- Here's the truth of the matter. Anthrax will never be
used successfully as a terrorist weapon, and probably never as a military
weapon. It has to be converted to spores suspended in the air, which is
technically very difficult; and the lethality is nowheres near the terror
that it is made out to be. It is not 100% lethal as often claimed. Wool
sorters inhale anthrax spores in small quantities continually http://www.emergency.com/anthrax.htm
(150-700 per hour), and only if they get a large dose does an infection
get started.
-
- Only US and Russia can Weaponize it
-
- To use anthrax as a weapon, it must be converted to a
powder which can be inhaled. Only the US and Russian militaries have succeeded
in doing that. Even Iraq uses anthrax in liquid form, which is totally
ineffective.
-
- Humans are Seldom Affected
-
- Anthrax is a livestock pathogen. There are anthrax spores
in the ground in rural areas, because they survive for about twenty years.
They normally have no effect upon humans, because a few anthrax spores
cannot create an infection, and they do not come up from the ground in
large quantities.
-
- Cellular Limitations
-
- Anthrax is what's called a "gram positive"
bacterium. This means it has the type of cell walls which are harmless,
unlike the cell walls of "gram negative" bacteria, which attack
tissue. Therefore, anthrax can only attack tissue by producing a special
toxin which it excretes. One cell or spore does not produce enough toxin
to start an infection.
-
- Studies have apparently determined that, typically, ten
thousand anthrax spores must be inhaled to start an infection. That number
might be someone's guess, but it is in line with the biology of the disease.
It is the number which the military uses, and only the military has significantly
researched such questions. It uses gas chambers for animal tests.
-
- Anthrax normally attacks the lungs, because it must lodge
in vulnerable tissue. It can invade through other routes such as cuts or
undercooked meat, but it only does so under third world conditions, and
those routes are not relevant to biowarfare.
-
- Livestock eat from the ground, so they have their faces
in the ground where the spores are, and they can inhale ten thousand spores.
How does anyone get ten thousand spores into the lungs of humans?
-
- Technical Obstacles to Weaponizing
-
- The first requirement would be to aerosolize the spores.
The spores would have to be converted to a dry powder, because a liquid
would create globs which would fall to the ground rather than staying suspended
in the air.
-
- To create a powder, the spores would first have to be
washed several times in an array of very large and expensive centrifuges.
Then a drying apparatus would have to be used; and it would require spraying
a mist into a vacuum, which is how powders are created from liquids. Otherwise,
everything globs up into hard rocks.
-
- How do workers clean the equipment without getting spores
everywhere? A likely procedure would be to enclose the equipment in a
pressure chamber and steam sterilize it for several days. Such an operation
costs hundreds of millions of dollars, considering related facilities and
development. Only countries do that, not radical groups, and not in five
gallon buckets.
-
- It won't stay in the Air
-
- Even in powder form, the spores would fall to the ground
rapidly in the absence of wind. Anthrax is not adapted for airborne dissemination.
It needs to stay on the ground until inhaled by livestock. So it would
not stay in the air like mold spores but would fall out easily, about like
flour. In the presence of wind, the spores would be carried away rapidly
and would not stay in one place long enough for anyone to get more than
a few inhaled.
-
- Once the spores were on the ground, they would not affect
humans significantly, because they would not come up from the ground in
large enough quantities.
-
- Foggers are Propaganda
-
- There is some talk about using liquids with fogging devices
for dispersion of biological agents such as anthrax. It's not realistic.
First, there is no mention of the purity that would be required to prevent
globbing and plugging of nozzles. At least, a lot of expensive centrifuging
would be required to remove debris.
-
- Then agricultural spraying demonstrates that a mist drops
rapidly to the ground. It does that because air can only hold a small amount
of water, which causes sprays to precipitate.
-
- Another problem is that spores would rapidly settle to
the bottom of a liquid and form a gum due to sticky cell debris and their
tendency to clump.
-
- A chemical mist is different, because chemicals vaporize,
while cells do not. Cells in a mist would clump together as the liquid
vaporizes. To create free spores would require very clean material, high
dilution, ultra fine mist and a vacuum for rapid evaporation. Foggers can't
do the same thing.
-
- For these reasons, anthrax would be difficult to use;
and it could hardly kill more than a few hundred persons under the most
ideal conditions, not the hundreds of thousands which are claimed. On top
of that, antibiotics are effective for it during the early stage of the
illness. It is not contagious for humans.
-
- Glib Journalism is Unrealistic
-
- Innumerable journalists have been insisting that anthrax
can be produced in a simple laboratory with little expertise. To the contrary,
no countries but the U.S. and Russia can convert anthrax to a usable weapon.
Iraq cannot.
-
- Consider what the journalists fail to recognize. Growing
a large quantity of anthrax would result in a fermenter full of slop which
is extremely slimy and viscous with large amounts of debris and metabolic
products mixed with the nutrient medium. That slop has to be washed and
converted to a medium which will induce spores to form. Much research and
knowledge would be required to get a reasonable yield of spores. Then the
cells would have to be fragmented with something like a blender to get
the spores out of the cells. Then much differential centrifugation would
be required to separate the spores from the debris. Then spray drying of
spores in a vacuum would be required.
-
- Accomplishing all of that would require several Ph.Ds.
and much developmental type research in addition to expensive equipment
and a very large building. It isn't a matter of growing something in a
kettle and pouring it into a rocket, as journalists and weapons inspectors
seem to be assuming.
-
- Grinding is Another Absurdity
-
- The latest contrivance is that terrorists might weaponize
anthrax by drying a slurry and grinding it to particles 1-5 microns in
size. (The bacteria are 1 by 3 microns.)
-
- The first problem is that the gunk would dry like glue;
and after grinding, it would still be glue. Even if it were washed first,
the bacteria would be sticky and would dry like glue.
-
- The second problem is that bacteria do not tolerate grinding.
They are as fragile as egg shells. Grinding is how they are broken apart
for biochemical tests. Even if only 1% were broken, the result would be
a sticky gum, not a powder; and more like 99% would be broken before getting
5 micron particles.
-
- Journalists keep mentioning how many anthrax spores can
be gotten onto the head of a pin. It's not a question of how many can be
gotten onto the head of a pin but how many can be gotten into someone's
lungs.
-
- Planes cannot Dust a City
-
- A scenario which is often mentioned is that someone might
use a plane to dust a large city with anthrax during the night. It's unrealistic.
First, no one in buildings would be harmed by anthrax. The few spores that
entered buildings would settle on surfaces, and few would enter the air,
and even fewer would be inhaled. At most, someone might inhale a few dozen
spores per hour. That's not the ten thousand that are needed.
-
- Secondly, anthrax spores would not diffuse uniformly
through the air like a gas. They will either drop too fast or blow away.
A few dozen persons might be killed, but that's not the terror that is
being hyped in the media. And more than anything, nobody is producing the
spores in powder form but the U.S. and Russia.
-
- Journalists seem to assume that an anthrax cell anywhere
will kill someone someplace. Putting words alongside each other on a page
is not the same thing as getting cells into humans on the ground. There
are millions of square miles of space on the ground which do not show up
with the words.
-
- Iraq did not Weaponize Anthrax
-
- Saddam Hussein is said to have produced anthrax. If
so, the reason is because it is stable and easy to handle, not because
it is effective when used. Iraq is unsophisticated to a point of ineptness
in its approach to biological weapons.
-
- It is said that Iraq uses anthrax in liquid form and
puts it in missiles in liquid form. In liquid form, anthrax is almost as
safe as cotton candy. Therefore, Iraq poses no anthrax threat.
-
- In fact, military and UN inspectors only found two Iraqi
warheads with anthrax in them (in liquid form). If Iraq had anthrax in
an effective form, it would have had it in hundreds of warheads, as they
did with nerve gas. So Iraq knew its anthrax was useless.
-
- For about a billion dollars, Iraq could probably get
enough experts together to develop anthrax as a weapon. But the reason
why it doesn't is that researchers already know that anthrax would be next
to worthless after it was developed.
-
- The Whole Concept is Flawed
-
- Biological warfare is a flawed concept. The only route
usually considered is airborne, because bombs and missiles create the delivery
system. There is no disease in existence which is propagated in that manner.
Even the airborne diseases require close contact with the source. The reason
is because wind disperses the agents too thinly, and gravity brings them
down too rapidly. Increasing the quantities massively will get a few persons,
but only a few.
-
- And then, very few of the diseases which are mentioned
as biowarfare agents are suitable for airborne dissemination. Brucellosis
is not. It is disseminated through body fluids. Plague is not. It is carried
by insects from the blood of one animal to another. The insects do not
pick it up from the ground.
-
- Motives Taylor the Truth at every Level
-
- Biowarfare is promoted through a combination of ignorance
and propaganda. The researchers, who should know better and often do, are
getting paid to produce the agents, so they do not want to admit the futility
of it. The nonresearchers cannot realistically evaluate the claims, and
they have propaganda motives. They want to militarize society, and scare
tactics go a long ways in that direction.
-
- The point here is not that large countries cannot make
a lot of persons miserable with biological weapons. It's that the small
countries and terrorists cannot do so on their own; and it cannot be done
on a large scale and in some magical way as described in the media.
-
- Recent Events
-
- Numerous persons have asked me how I interpret recent
events. I think recent events substantiate my statements to the nth degree.
Only half a dozen persons have been stricken by anthrax instead of the
millions which authorities were predicting upon a terrorist attack. It
shows that anthrax is almost impossible to use effectively.
-
- The terrorists may have succeeded in creating a lot of
fear, but for casualties, guns would have been more effective
-
- The field tests of white powders are not credible. Anthrax
powder is gray or brown, not white.
-
- Some persons are claiming that maybe the terrorists have
limited motives at this time, such as scaring people or testing their wares.
Not hardly. They threw everything they could at the World Trade Center
and went for body count. Why didn't they just fly by and scare people first?
The CIA is behind the anthrax incidents.
-
- There is no source for powdered anthrax besides the US
and Russia, and the incidents follow the CIA style.
-
-
- http://www.all-natural.com/gwi-1.html Web Link to McAlvany
Intelligence Advisor
-
- http://www.gulfwarvets.com/anthrax.htm Web Link to Vaccines
and the Military
|